Server 2008 File and Print server 32bit or 64bit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MT
  • Start date Start date
M

MT

Guest
My company is going to star tthe process of buidling a new File and Print
server for our domain. I wanted to get opinions on using Server 2008 for this
job. Right the a 2003 server is performing this duty.

I need this to be a clean and painless operation. I've been thinking I
should just go with 2008 32bit, to avoid any driver issues in the migration.
What is the general consesus on this? If there are other caveats with this
migration we could deploy a new 2003 server for this job.

We have a lot of Shares,printers and files on the old server and I need a
seamless move. Also any tools to help aid in the process, and perhaps a
checklist of best practices for this job would be help. Thanks in advance!
 
Re: Server 2008 File and Print server 32bit or 64bit?

If it's new server, go for 64 bit. I didn't have any issues with drivers.


"MT" <MT@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:34B8C17A-4B5D-4225-99F6-BA95FA75D5D5@microsoft.com...
> My company is going to star tthe process of buidling a new File and Print
> server for our domain. I wanted to get opinions on using Server 2008 for
> this
> job. Right the a 2003 server is performing this duty.
>
> I need this to be a clean and painless operation. I've been thinking I
> should just go with 2008 32bit, to avoid any driver issues in the
> migration.
> What is the general consesus on this? If there are other caveats with this
> migration we could deploy a new 2003 server for this job.
>
> We have a lot of Shares,printers and files on the old server and I need a
> seamless move. Also any tools to help aid in the process, and perhaps a
> checklist of best practices for this job would be help. Thanks in advance!
>
>
 
Re: Server 2008 File and Print server 32bit or 64bit?

Verify that the manufacture of the printers shared by the server has 64 bit
and 32 bit print drivers for the devices.

Most vendors have 64 bit drivers for new devices but nothing for most
devices older that five years. HP and Xerox have a "universal" and "global"
driver that will work with most models in 64 and 32 bit.

The 64 bit server must have 64 bit print drivers to install the printers and
32 bit print drivers installed so the 32 bit clients can get the print
driver from the server rather than searching for the driver from the
manufacture's web site.

If you only have 32 bit clients, the a 32 bit server is fine but if you have
32 and 64 bit clients and all the printers you use have 64 bit drivers
available go 64 bit on the server.

tools to migrate:

Vista clients include printbrm.exe and printbrmui.exe to remotely backup the
Server 2003 printer data. Once you install the Print Role on Server 2008,
you can use the same tools to restore the backed up data to the new server.


The hard part is remapping the shared printers to the existing clients. I
typically setup the new machine using NEWNAME. Then I restore the printers,
verify all the printers are online and working, then rename the CURRENT
server to OLD, then rename the NEWNAME to CURRENT. All the clients
reconnect to the new server and can continue printing. I normally perform
the rename operation during off hours since DNS replication of the new
machine name can take a while.

No clue on file services.


--
Alan Morris
Windows Printing Team
Search the Microsoft Knowledge Base here:
http://support.microsoft.com/search/?adv=1

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Dusko Savatovic" <nospamplease.savatovic@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ucZ9AjMHJHA.4080@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> If it's new server, go for 64 bit. I didn't have any issues with drivers.
>
>
> "MT" <MT@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:34B8C17A-4B5D-4225-99F6-BA95FA75D5D5@microsoft.com...
>> My company is going to star tthe process of buidling a new File and Print
>> server for our domain. I wanted to get opinions on using Server 2008 for
>> this
>> job. Right the a 2003 server is performing this duty.
>>
>> I need this to be a clean and painless operation. I've been thinking I
>> should just go with 2008 32bit, to avoid any driver issues in the
>> migration.
>> What is the general consesus on this? If there are other caveats with
>> this
>> migration we could deploy a new 2003 server for this job.
>>
>> We have a lot of Shares,printers and files on the old server and I need a
>> seamless move. Also any tools to help aid in the process, and perhaps a
>> checklist of best practices for this job would be help. Thanks in
>> advance!
>>
>>

>
 

Similar threads

M
Replies
0
Views
596
Microsoft Windows Server Team
M
M
Replies
0
Views
470
Microsoft Windows Server Team
M
M
Replies
0
Views
547
Microsoft Windows Server Team
M
M
Replies
0
Views
633
Microsoft Windows Server Team
M
M
Replies
0
Views
694
Microsoft Windows Server Team
M
Back
Top