Windows Vista Windows 7 must appeal to geeks--or else

  • Thread starter Thread starter gerooky
  • Start date Start date
G

gerooky

Guest
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10047704-17.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20

Windows Vista has been a tragedy on many levels for Microsoft. First, it was
marked with compatibility issues and annoyances with its User Access Control
feature that started a firestorm of epic proportions. But once those issues
improved, Microsoft ran into an even bigger issue: it wasn't able to satisfy
vendors, nor was it able to satisfy the geeks.

And that's where the biggest issue with Vista really is. The technology
space is looked at by many in the mainstream as a higher-level industry that
simply can't be understood by the average person. Software? Hardware? Huh?

Because of that, it's the geek that filters opinions and creates a
trickle-down effect in the space. Let's face it--if you don't know what
you're talking about and you know that your friend does, wouldn't you take
their word for it at the least or verify what they're saying at the very
most?

And when you verify what they're saying, you'll probably end up researching
the topic by going to the countless blog posts and articles by experts in
the field to decide if your friend is correct, right?

And what do you find there? A slew of stories written by geeks, for geeks.
And throughout the past year, those stories written by geeks for geeks were
littered with criticisms of Vista and countless reasons why the company made
mistakes. Sure, there were some sites that came to its defense, but the vast
majority of journalists took the opportunity to beat up on the OS.

So how did it get to the point where the Mojave Experiment became necessary?
How did it get to the point where Microsoft was forced to concede that it
was losing the PR game and it needed to tell the world about it?

You can blame it on the geeks and the trickle-down effect that makes the
technology industry such a unique space.

Technology's trickle-down effect is simple: a tech company screws up a
product in ways that the tech-savvy crowd will notice, but the mainstream
crowd won't. Once that happens, geeks start railing on the product and
discuss why it's so bad. Eventually, they start complaining to their family
and friends, who don't know much about it and the distaste for products
starts entering the mainstream. Once that happens, those people will start
talking to others and soon it becomes viral.

And that's exactly why Microsoft can't make the same mistake it made with
Vista. That operating system didn't appeal to the geeks and they spent the
past year telling the world about it. Once that happened, the world started
believing it (regardless of whether or not it was true) and Microsoft has
paid the price.

So what does it need to do with Windows 7? Make sure the geeks love it.

But making sure the geeks love it will be difficult. Microsoft isn't one of
the most well-liked companies in the space and any chance to beat up on the
company will make even the most objective geek happy.

Realizing that, Microsoft can't expect to quiet every critic, but it needs
to be more proactive in ensuring that more geeks will be happy. First off,
it needs to ensure that the geeks' desires are met as effectively as
possible: the geeks want better security, more customization, and full
compatibility. Secondly, it has to play the right PR game: make Windows 7
about the desires of the tech-savvy crowd and stop pretending like that
crowd doesn't matter.

The one thing I don't understand about Microsoft and countless other
companies in the technology industry is why they don't realize that the
influential people are not the average John and Jane Doe. Instead, the
technology industry is dominated by a select few who tell their friends and
family why a certain product or service is useless.

And that's exactly why I don't like what I'm hearing already about Windows
7. Microsoft isn't doing enough to appeal to the geeks and it's instead
tying its success to the mainstream. From a business standpoint that may
make sense--the majority of people are in the mainstream--but from a
strategical perspective, the company has it all wrong.

Microsoft needs to start leaking information that discusses some of the
features that would make the tech-savvy crowd go wild. It doesn't have to be
anything special, just enough to start building some hype. After that, it
needs to give the niche press unprecedented access to Windows 7 and create a
product that appeals to them. And simply by embracing the niche press,
Microsoft can start rebuilding its image in that space.

The technology industry is unique because it's segmented by a perceived
knowledge barrier. Because of that, a select few are looked at as the source
for knowledge and thus, provide the general public with the opinions they
should be formulating. Apple has realized that--just look at the press
coverage--but Microsoft failed to do so with Vista and now needs to repair
its image before Windows 7 throws the company into disaster mode.

Playing nicely with the mainstream means nothing in this industry unless the
niche is happy. And if Microsoft wants Windows 7 to be a success, it better
create a product that appeals to that niche and start playing nice with it.
If it doesn't, look for Microsoft's PR troubles to continue indefinitely.
 
Re: Windows 7 must appeal to geeks--or else


"gerooky" <g@ish.com> wrote in message
news:48d81260$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10047704-17.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
>
> Windows Vista has been a tragedy on many levels for Microsoft. First, it
> was marked with compatibility issues and annoyances with its User Access
> Control feature that started a firestorm of epic proportions. But once
> those issues improved, Microsoft ran into an even bigger issue: it wasn't
> able to satisfy vendors, nor was it able to satisfy the geeks.


You just don't know how to use Vista. See Ringmaster. He has major trouble
with Vista also.


>
> And that's where the biggest issue with Vista really is. The technology
> space is looked at by many in the mainstream as a higher-level industry
> that simply can't be understood by the average person. Software? Hardware?
> Huh?
>


You could strive to become average but it would take years. Give it up.



> Because of that, it's the geek that filters opinions and creates a
> trickle-down effect in the space. Let's face it--if you don't know what
> you're talking about and you know that your friend does, wouldn't you take
> their word for it at the least or verify what they're saying at the very
> most?


Make sure to wear rubber pants so you aren't caught up in the trickle-down
problem


>
> And when you verify what they're saying, you'll probably end up
> researching the topic by going to the countless blog posts and articles by
> experts in the field to decide if your friend is correct, right?
>
> And what do you find there? A slew of stories written by geeks, for geeks.
> And throughout the past year, those stories written by geeks for geeks
> were littered with criticisms of Vista and countless reasons why the
> company made mistakes. Sure, there were some sites that came to its
> defense, but the vast majority of journalists took the opportunity to beat
> up on the OS.


You should migrate to Ubuntu. An OS for geeks by geeks.
 
Re: Windows 7 must appeal to geeks--or else


"gerooky" <g@ish.com> wrote in message
news:48d81260$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10047704-17.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
>snip< The technology industry is unique because it's segmented by a
>perceived knowledge barrier. Because of that, a select few are looked at as
>the source for knowledge and thus, provide the general public with the
>opinions they should be formulating. Apple has realized that--just look at
>the press coverage--but Microsoft failed to do so with Vista and now needs
>to repair its image before Windows 7 throws the company into disaster mode.
>
> Playing nicely with the mainstream means nothing in this industry unless
> the niche is happy. And if Microsoft wants Windows 7 to be a success, it
> better create a product that appeals to that niche and start playing nice
> with it. If it doesn't, look for Microsoft's PR troubles to continue
> indefinitely.


The hype on Vista created an expectation that it would actually be better
than XP.
I don't see or feel any improvement. In fact, quite the opposite.
My Vista runs as designed, I don't have driver issues or many of the
problems I see posted.
The problem is the design sucks.
I told MS throughout BETA what I found distasteful/poorly designed/and just
plain stupid. They chose to ignore tester's input and released something I
(and many other geeks) just plain don't like.
They knew what they wanted, decided it wasn't possible, and cobbled together
a server based POS to foist on an unsuspecting public as the next big thing.
 
Re: Windows 7 must appeal to geeks--or else

"NotEvenMe" <cargod01@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:#FdNg5QHJHA.1304@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>


> The hype on Vista created an expectation that it would actually be better
> than XP.
> I don't see or feel any improvement. In fact, quite the opposite.
> My Vista runs as designed, I don't have driver issues or many of the
> problems I see posted.
> The problem is the design sucks.
> I told MS throughout BETA what I found distasteful/poorly designed/and
> just plain stupid. They chose to ignore tester's input and released
> something I (and many other geeks) just plain don't like.
> They knew what they wanted, decided it wasn't possible, and cobbled
> together a server based POS to foist on an unsuspecting public as the next
> big thing.
>


that's exactly what happened.
 
Re: Windows 7 must appeal to geeks--or else

"gerooky" <g@ish.com> wrote in message
news:48d83201$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> "NotEvenMe" <cargod01@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:#FdNg5QHJHA.1304@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>

>
>> The hype on Vista created an expectation that it would actually be better
>> than XP.
>> I don't see or feel any improvement. In fact, quite the opposite.
>> My Vista runs as designed, I don't have driver issues or many of the
>> problems I see posted.
>> The problem is the design sucks.
>> I told MS throughout BETA what I found distasteful/poorly designed/and
>> just plain stupid. They chose to ignore tester's input and released
>> something I (and many other geeks) just plain don't like.
>> They knew what they wanted, decided it wasn't possible, and cobbled
>> together a server based POS to foist on an unsuspecting public as the
>> next big thing.
>>

>
> that's exactly what happened.



That's why consumers like me avoid PC shops, geeks in general.
You people are wacked.

I think this week I will walk into PC shops ... bring them $6000 cash to
build me a gaming PC...then ask them about Vista.

I will write down what they say ... then tell them nevermind the 6
grand....My 8 year old can snap a PC together, and report the actual replies
of the nerds.

Be interesting to see "real world" results.

Anyway to tell a true nerd PC shop ?

Is Mr. Spock in the window a good clue ?



--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis
 
Re: Windows 7 must appeal to geeks--or else

"D. Eth" <death@thedoor.nxt> wrote in message news:gb9c6c$fpv$1@aioe.org...
> Anyway to tell a true nerd PC shop ?
>
> Is Mr. Spock in the window a good clue ?


If the guy tells you...just a minute, I'm in a deathmatch...then he quotes
you a dual 1TB SATA2/RAID0 system with 2 1GB Pcie/SLI cards and XP64 w/8GB
RAM... you know you've found the right place.
I repair PCs under warranty for several Major OEMs, as well as build my own;
but I don't run a PC Shop.
I've only been using computers for 40 years. The changes I have seen are
nearly unbelievable.
I don't mind change as long as it brings improvement.
That is the problem with Vista, I can't see where it actually improved
anything.
People can rant and rave about all the improved security and new toys, but
what can Vista actually do that XP couldn't?
I didn't have security issues with XP after SP2 (really I didn't have many
before SP2), but I only manage a couple hundred machines... Maybe I am
missing something.
 
Back
Top