Re: VISTA, XP and Virtual Machines??
"Mick Murphy" <MickMurphy@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:712C9956-03BE-49F9-99B8-33106C4C0803@microsoft.com...
> One licence, one install.
> If you have the OS installed on your computer, you need another licence to
> install that same OS on a VM on that computer, or another computer.
Actually the Vista licence agreement says One Licence - One Device.
Though it does expresly forbid using the licence in a virtualised
environment (at lease Vista Home Premium which is my licence)
Given this exclusion if you were to buy a second licence would you actually
be able to install it?
(I wanted to install it today and found this little clause)
Through a set of twisted arguments you could argue that a VPC is different
to the real PC which is what MS does to justify ripping you off for a second
licence.
However if you have a second HD installed on your PC you could install it on
a partition there as well as the core install on the other desk - Then use
the PCs BIOS to go into a boot menu and choose which one you want.
There is no virtualisation involved and it is still the One PC Device.
>
> --
> Mad Mike
>
>
> "Al Dykes" wrote:
>
>> What is the deal with running XP under VM legally. If I buy a copy of
>> XP/Pro (EOM) as part of a complete system, can I run it under VM if I
>> install Linux or Vista as a host OS?
>>
>> Would getting a legal XP/Pro Retail make any difference?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Al Dykes
>> News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is
>> advertising.
>> - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
>>
>>