Reply to thread

Re: Microsoft extends XP downgrade rights date by six months




nemo wrote:


> On Oct 8, 11:05 am, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

>>Frank wrote:

>>

>>>Plato wrote:

>>

>>>>the granter of sina wrote:

>>

>>>>>Microsoft is sending some very confusing signals about Windows Vista

>>>>>- the

>>>>>latest of which it issued via a statement on October 3.

>>

>>>>>The Register reported on October 2 that Microsoft was going to extend

>>>>>again

>>>>>the date until which PC makers would be allowed to continue to offer

>>>>>Windows

>>>>>users "downgrade rights," enabling them to switch from Vista to XP on

>>>>>new

>>

>>>>I'm also a bit confused. The other Sunday I was watching NASCAR with a

>>>>neighbor and was considering bringing my laptop over after signing up

>>>>with their special service, which required a high end pc/laptop, so I

>>>>went to Dell and looked for laptops as it was about time for me to get

>>>>in shape, and they all seemed to come with Vista, but for $100 _more_

>>>>you could get a _downgrade_ to XP.

>>

>>>>Too weird for me. I closed the page.

>>

>>>"Downgrade" is the operative word.

>>>But why would anyone pay $100 to "downgrade" anything?

>>>Are there that many stupid people out there?

>>

>>You don't have to pay to downgrade, it's part of the Vista business

>>license as it was part of the XP Professional license as it was part of

>>the Windows 2000 Professional license as it is and was part of different

>>Server versions.  

> So if the laptop I bought came with a Home version, what are my

> options?  Unfortunately most PCs sold in the US, and certainly nearly

> *ALL* laptops, come with a choice of exactly one version of the OS.

> Is there a path to put XP on my machine?  I am using it for design

> work and a fair percentage of the software I run is very cranky under

> Vista or some of it won't even install.  So I may have to shell out

> thousands of dollars more to get new versions of applications... if

> they are even available for Vista.


The only issue I see is that Microsoft didn't replace XP soon enough. Up

  until Vista, they were releasing operating systems every 2-3 years. XP

just has a lot more history behind it, and people tend to have very

short memories.


Back
Top