Re: DISK BURN vs DISK COPY?
"DDW" <dd.wright@KILLSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in message
news:q0ikf4t2v5e6609l0ugkk43c1iue9fv1n4@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:24:55 -0400, "its_my_dime"
> <its_my_dime@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"DDW" <dd.wright@KILLSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:tqgkf4995rne6d1e4mbare7u51tbh4nvq3@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:58:12 -0400, "its_my_dime"
>>> <its_my_dime@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can someone kindly explain the difference between copying a disk (using
>>>>disk
>>>>copy) and burning a disk image to a second disk. When would you use
>>>>one
>>>>in
>>>>preference to the other?
>>>
>>> First: there is a difference between the terms "copy" and "burn",
>>> unless you're talking about copying/burning to optical media. Are you?
>>>
>>> Your turn.
>>>
>>> DDW
>>> --
>>> Reply via this group
>>> No email please
>>
>>Just a standard CD-DVD player/burner. And I'm talking about CD's, not
>>DVD's.
>
> "Copying" burns the files to the media in uncompressed form that you
> can access with Explorer.
>
> "Burning an image" burns everything into a single compressed file
> that would probably require a proprietary browser (related to the
> software you use to do the imaging) to access.
>
Crap.
Burning an image is the same as copying the entire disk. It doesn't put
everything into a single compressed file, and it does not have anything to
do with browsers (proprietary or otherwise).
> DDW
> --
> Reply via this group
> No email please