Should we be suspicious?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~BD~
  • Start date Start date
B

~BD~

Guest
"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> has recently said..

"You should see my W2K3 Enterprise Sever boot. From cold boot to fully
loaded Desktop 46 seconds including LAN connection"

(his mis-spelling of 'Server')

Wikipedia tells me ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_Server )

"An enterprise server is a computer system which performs an essential
service for a large organization. Examples include corporate web servers,
print servers, and databases. A key feature distinguishing an enterprise
server is that even a short-term failure can cost more than purchasing and
installing the system. For example, it may take only a few minutes' down
time at a national stock exchange to justify the expense of entirely
replacing the system with something more reliable."

Perhaps that isn't true.


Mr Foldes has also previously advised that he has a T3 Connection.

Detailed/Technical DS3-T3 Definition
http://www.realtimet1search.com/news/article_282.php which mentions:
"Who uses DS-3s? Companies who host high traffic web sites, support web
hosting, and need high capacity bandwidth on an as-needed basis. Also
universities/colleges, government offices, and high volume call centers. A
full DS3 can accommodate many simultaneous users depending on the
requirements of the business. Generally a DS3 line is installed as a major
networking channel for large corporations or universities with high volume
network traffic. This is an always-on, high-speed connection that provides a
dedicated, stable and reliable link to the Internet, and can support up to
500 or more computer users."

I still can't help wondering who he *really* is ............ and what he
*actually* does.

Does anyone reading here know - or care?

Surely *someone* 'out there' must be curious too!

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

LOL David. Does my posting properties suggests otherwise ? Or is it faked according to you.

I will ask you very nicely and politely David. Can you stop with your childish and unintelligent postings. Be a man and not a 8 yr old running to mommy and daddy.

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:uSamAynNJHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> has recently said..
>
> "You should see my W2K3 Enterprise Sever boot. From cold boot to fully
> loaded Desktop 46 seconds including LAN connection"
>
> (his mis-spelling of 'Server')
>
> Wikipedia tells me ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_Server )
>
> "An enterprise server is a computer system which performs an essential
> service for a large organization. Examples include corporate web servers,
> print servers, and databases. A key feature distinguishing an enterprise
> server is that even a short-term failure can cost more than purchasing and
> installing the system. For example, it may take only a few minutes' down
> time at a national stock exchange to justify the expense of entirely
> replacing the system with something more reliable."
>
> Perhaps that isn't true.
>
>
> Mr Foldes has also previously advised that he has a T3 Connection.
>
> Detailed/Technical DS3-T3 Definition
> http://www.realtimet1search.com/news/article_282.php which mentions:
> "Who uses DS-3s? Companies who host high traffic web sites, support web
> hosting, and need high capacity bandwidth on an as-needed basis. Also
> universities/colleges, government offices, and high volume call centers. A
> full DS3 can accommodate many simultaneous users depending on the
> requirements of the business. Generally a DS3 line is installed as a major
> networking channel for large corporations or universities with high volume
> network traffic. This is an always-on, high-speed connection that provides a
> dedicated, stable and reliable link to the Internet, and can support up to
> 500 or more computer users."
>
> I still can't help wondering who he *really* is ............ and what he
> *actually* does.
>
> Does anyone reading here know - or care?
>
> Surely *someone* 'out there' must be curious too!
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?


"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eXm3xKpNJHA.3640@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
LOL David. Does my posting properties suggests otherwise ? Or is it faked
according to you.

--
Peter
>


Thank you for responding, Peter Foldes (aka Derek Feldman? - hence
registration at Annexcafe as 'Derek'?)

I have not suggested the faking of anything. I do not have the skill to know
(as you have told me many times!). However, there may be others here who
*may* be able to determine if all is not exactly as it should be. You have
made mistakes before!

So - here are the full Headers of your two recent messages for others to
look at - and maybe comment upon thereafter: There *will* be some here who
remember 9/11 ......... and that maybe folk should have asked more questions
beforehand. I seek only the truth. A private email to explain who you are
and what you do, had you sent same nearly three years ago, would have made
posts such as this one, in the public domain, totally unnecessary. It has
been your choice (and right) to remain silent, but this is no game.


Subject: Re: XP versus Vista?
From: "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:37:53 -0400
Message-ID: <1224769069_32811@pegasus.annex.net>
References: <1224589399_22182@pegasus.annex.net>
<1224736399_31974@pegasus.annex.net>
Bytes: 4105
Lines: 105
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.70.248.208
Path: pegasus.annex.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: annexcafe.uk.general.user2user
X-Authenticated-User: Derek
X-Trace: pegasus.annex.net 1224769069 69.70.248.208 (23 Oct 2008
08:37:49 -0500)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.3959
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
Xref: pegasus.annex.net annexcafe.uk.general.user2user:6949

Andrew and Peter

You should see my W2K3 Enterprise Sever boot. From cold boot to fully =
loaded Desktop 46 seconds including LAN connection

*********************************************************

Reply-To: "Peter Foldes" <bounce@bounce>
From: "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
References:
<70a49c31-6e12-4994-8511-8de78c062ded@v22g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
<OgZ#cnkNJHA.4088@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>

<uSamAynNJHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>
Subject: Re: Should we be suspicious?
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:13:36 -0400
Lines: 77
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.3959
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
Message-ID: <eXm3xKpNJHA.3640@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus,microsoft.public.security
NNTP-Posting-Host: modemcable208.248-70-69.mc.videotron.ca 69.70.248.208
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.security:104406
microsoft.public.security.virus:83360

LOL David. Does my posting properties suggests otherwise ? Or is it
faked according to you.
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

Lots of people have servers.

People need to be suspicious of only you!

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:uSamAynNJHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> has recently said..

"You should see my W2K3 Enterprise Sever boot. From cold boot to fully
loaded Desktop 46 seconds including LAN connection"
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

David

First of all do not use these forums are not for your personal vendetta arising from dementia. My email is listed as per the Properties and you can send these concerns there not posting it here

I as I said it is unfortunate that your son passed away and unfortunately life goes on.

Secondly when you reported me to the Police in England that I am a International Terrorist it was not appreciated by me and especially by my family for what we were put through.
They (from England) advised me that I can take you to court for causing my family and myself grief and besides that they also found that you were a very sick individual and the best compromise that they came up with is to ignore you and they also did the same if you have not already noticed.
You have been doing this since you started to post on the newsgroup going back a few years and I have been ignoring you and even being nice when answering you since the inception of this regrettable sickness of yourself
There is more people than me using this computer (Server) . So I ask you again very nicely to stop your witch hunt and get a life.
You are a sick individual and periodically you go off the deep end with this good guy\bad guy personality which I see is starting again.
Yes I am using a Server and Yes I have a T3 connection along with a LAN when not using it also for which my business pays an incredible amount per month for rental of that service.
I hope that answers your curiosity
Dave
Put an end to your witch-hunt about everybody and go and enjoy your life on your Longboat with your Family



--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:u2cXwzpNJHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eXm3xKpNJHA.3640@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> LOL David. Does my posting properties suggests otherwise ? Or is it faked
> according to you.
>
> --
> Peter
>>

>
> Thank you for responding, Peter Foldes (aka Derek Feldman? - hence
> registration at Annexcafe as 'Derek'?)
>
> I have not suggested the faking of anything. I do not have the skill to know
> (as you have told me many times!). However, there may be others here who
> *may* be able to determine if all is not exactly as it should be. You have
> made mistakes before!
>
> So - here are the full Headers of your two recent messages for others to
> look at - and maybe comment upon thereafter: There *will* be some here who
> remember 9/11 ......... and that maybe folk should have asked more questions
> beforehand. I seek only the truth. A private email to explain who you are
> and what you do, had you sent same nearly three years ago, would have made
> posts such as this one, in the public domain, totally unnecessary. It has
> been your choice (and right) to remain silent, but this is no game.
>
>
> Subject: Re: XP versus Vista?
> From: "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:37:53 -0400
> Message-ID: <1224769069_32811@pegasus.annex.net>
> References: <1224589399_22182@pegasus.annex.net>
> <1224736399_31974@pegasus.annex.net>
> Bytes: 4105
> Lines: 105
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.70.248.208
> Path: pegasus.annex.net!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: annexcafe.uk.general.user2user
> X-Authenticated-User: Derek
> X-Trace: pegasus.annex.net 1224769069 69.70.248.208 (23 Oct 2008
> 08:37:49 -0500)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="Windows-1252"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.3959
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
> Xref: pegasus.annex.net annexcafe.uk.general.user2user:6949
>
> Andrew and Peter
>
> You should see my W2K3 Enterprise Sever boot. From cold boot to fully =
> loaded Desktop 46 seconds including LAN connection
>
> *********************************************************
>
> Reply-To: "Peter Foldes" <bounce@bounce>
> From: "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
> References:
> <70a49c31-6e12-4994-8511-8de78c062ded@v22g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
> <OgZ#cnkNJHA.4088@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>
>
> <uSamAynNJHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>
> Subject: Re: Should we be suspicious?
> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:13:36 -0400
> Lines: 77
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="Windows-1252"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.3959
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
> Message-ID: <eXm3xKpNJHA.3640@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus,microsoft.public.security
> NNTP-Posting-Host: modemcable208.248-70-69.mc.videotron.ca 69.70.248.208
> Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
> Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.security:104406
> microsoft.public.security.virus:83360
>
> LOL David. Does my posting properties suggests otherwise ? Or is it
> faked according to you.
>
>
>
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

I don't care one whit. Lots of us run servers for fun or business.

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:uSamAynNJHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> has recently said..

"You should see my W2K3 Enterprise Sever boot. From cold boot to fully
loaded Desktop 46 seconds including LAN connection"

(his mis-spelling of 'Server')

Wikipedia tells me ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_Server )

"An enterprise server is a computer system which performs an essential
service for a large organization. Examples include corporate web servers,
print servers, and databases. A key feature distinguishing an enterprise
server is that even a short-term failure can cost more than purchasing and
installing the system. For example, it may take only a few minutes' down
time at a national stock exchange to justify the expense of entirely
replacing the system with something more reliable."

Perhaps that isn't true.


Mr Foldes has also previously advised that he has a T3 Connection.

Detailed/Technical DS3-T3 Definition
http://www.realtimet1search.com/news/article_282.php which mentions:
"Who uses DS-3s? Companies who host high traffic web sites, support web
hosting, and need high capacity bandwidth on an as-needed basis. Also
universities/colleges, government offices, and high volume call centers. A
full DS3 can accommodate many simultaneous users depending on the
requirements of the business. Generally a DS3 line is installed as a major
networking channel for large corporations or universities with high volume
network traffic. This is an always-on, high-speed connection that provides a
dedicated, stable and reliable link to the Internet, and can support up to
500 or more computer users."

I still can't help wondering who he *really* is ............ and what he
*actually* does.

Does anyone reading here know - or care?

Surely *someone* 'out there' must be curious too!

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?


"Jonas" <jonas@noemail.nit> wrote in message
news:eUQfnXsNJHA.4116@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
I don't care one whit. Lots of us run servers for fun or business.

Hello Jonas :)

I apologise if I have mis-understood matters. Here at Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_(computing) you will note this:-

This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced
material may be challenged and removed. (July 2008)

*************************************************

With your expertise in these matters, perhaps *you* can help improve the
article - try, at the very least. <s>

AFAIK an *Enterprise* Server is rather different, as described in my
original post, thus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_server

Thanks for responding!

Dave

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:OkMxRlsNJHA.3804@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> With your expertise in these matters, perhaps *you* can help improve the
> article - try, at the very least. <s>


Lots of us would rather spend our time helping in other areas than updating
Wikipedia. Whatever floats your boat, of course, but don't view Wikipedia as
either a definitive source of complete and accurate information, or a
mandatory social welfare project that we should all be engaging in.

> AFAIK an *Enterprise* Server is rather different, as described in my
> original post, thus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_server


While it pains me to point you to Wikipedia just after I've finished telling
you that you shouldn't rely on it being accurate, might I point this out to
you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2003#Enterprise_Edition

This is most likely what was being referred to as "Windows 2003 Enterprise
Server". As has been pointed out, there are many of us who have computer and
network setups that are non-traditional. I have a domain of ten computers
used by three people, for instance. Some of those are Enterprise Servers in
the sense that they run serious enterprise-level code, rather than
small-business quality code. (The difference comes when you ask "how well
does it perform with umpty thousand
users/systems/locations/applications/etc?") Small software vendors selling
into large institutions frequently have to mimic Enterprise-like scenarios
in their small environments.

Finally, I know a lot of the people in this group have said this to you far
more rudely than I will, but here's my advice: you are clearly a beginner in
this field. You are asking so many questions, and getting so many things
wrong in your assumptions, that it's very clear that you are a beginner.

As such, use a little humility, and make your postings more inquisitive than
accusative. Ask questions - don't assert that others are wrong just because
they disagree with you. Ask _why_ they disagree with you or with your
understanding of the world. You don't know enough to be quoting Wikipedia
back at people trying to prove that they're lying. All you do is make people
irritated with you.

And that's not helpful when you come to ask for help.

Alun.
~~~~
--
Texas Imperial Software | Web: http://www.wftpd.com/
23921 57th Ave SE | Blog: http://msmvps.com/alunj/
Woodinville WA 98072-8661 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
Fax/Voice +1(425)807-1787 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

~BD~ wrote:

> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> has recently said..
>
> "You should see my W2K3 Enterprise Sever boot. From cold boot to fully
> loaded Desktop 46 seconds including LAN connection"
> (his mis-spelling of 'Server')


Without knowing what hardware he uses (which could be a hell of lot
faster than yours) and without knowing what he loads on Windows startup
(which could be a hell of lot less than you), that is not an
unreasonable boot time. Hell, maybe he isn't even loading the desktop
GUI and prefers a command-line interface.

> Wikipedia tells me ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_Server )
>
> "An enterprise server is a computer system which performs an essential
> service for a large organization. Examples include corporate web servers,
> print servers, and databases.


None of which must be running or even installed. "Server" is part of
the product name, not necessarily how it is used. Hell, even developers
will run server versions of an OS to test their code but that doesn't
mean they are using the server OS as a server to anyone else.

> Mr Foldes has also previously advised that he has a T3 Connection.


Often users will wrongly equate their company's property as their own
property.

T3 (DS-3): 44.736 million bits per second

Well, that depends entirely on what service level you pay for. Just
because YOU choose to pay for lower bandwidth doesn't mean something
richer than you must also be just as slow.

> I still can't help wondering who he *really* is ............ and what he
> *actually* does.
> Does anyone reading here know - or care?
> Surely *someone* 'out there' must be curious too!


So now you're targeting yet another regular netizen. What's the point?
Why do you even care about what someone claims they do or don't have?

So who's your next target of your ennui?
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?


"Alun Jones" <alun@texis.invalid> wrote in message
news:D6A4A2D9-D7ED-42F5-B3F6-80DABDDC7C2D@microsoft.com...
> "~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:OkMxRlsNJHA.3804@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> With your expertise in these matters, perhaps *you* can help improve the
>> article - try, at the very least. <s>

>
> Lots of us would rather spend our time helping in other areas than
> updating Wikipedia. Whatever floats your boat, of course, but don't view
> Wikipedia as either a definitive source of complete and accurate
> information, or a mandatory social welfare project that we should all be
> engaging in.
>
>> AFAIK an *Enterprise* Server is rather different, as described in my
>> original post, thus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_server

>
> While it pains me to point you to Wikipedia just after I've finished
> telling you that you shouldn't rely on it being accurate, might I point
> this out to you:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2003#Enterprise_Edition
>
> This is most likely what was being referred to as "Windows 2003 Enterprise
> Server". As has been pointed out, there are many of us who have computer
> and network setups that are non-traditional. I have a domain of ten
> computers used by three people, for instance. Some of those are Enterprise
> Servers in the sense that they run serious enterprise-level code, rather
> than small-business quality code. (The difference comes when you ask "how
> well does it perform with umpty thousand
> users/systems/locations/applications/etc?") Small software vendors selling
> into large institutions frequently have to mimic Enterprise-like scenarios
> in their small environments.
>
> Finally, I know a lot of the people in this group have said this to you
> far more rudely than I will, but here's my advice: you are clearly a
> beginner in this field. You are asking so many questions, and getting so
> many things wrong in your assumptions, that it's very clear that you are a
> beginner.
>
> As such, use a little humility, and make your postings more inquisitive
> than accusative. Ask questions - don't assert that others are wrong just
> because they disagree with you. Ask _why_ they disagree with you or with
> your understanding of the world. You don't know enough to be quoting
> Wikipedia back at people trying to prove that they're lying. All you do is
> make people irritated with you.
>
> And that's not helpful when you come to ask for help.
>
> Alun.
> ~~~~
> --
> Texas Imperial Software | Web: http://www.wftpd.com/
> 23921 57th Ave SE | Blog: http://msmvps.com/alunj/
> Woodinville WA 98072-8661 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
> Fax/Voice +1(425)807-1787 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.
>
>


Alun - many thanks for taking the time and so much trouble to respond here.
I really appreciate you input.

Your web site says:-
"Alun Jones, the author of WFTPD Server and WFTPD Pro Server, has been
programming and developing software since his early teens. He now has over
20 years experience in the IT industry, 13 years as a TCP/IP Winsock
developer. Alun is a Microsoft Certified Professional (MCP) and has helped
to review and author a number of RFCs. Alun was recognized by Microsoft in
April of 2003 as a "Most Valuable Professional", for his repeated volunteer
assistance in Usenet newsgroups devoted to Windows developers, mostly in
TCP/IP development using Winsock. Alun's MVP award is in the dual areas of
Windows SDK and Security, as a result of his SSL / TLS knowledge and his
overall advocacy of good development security principles. Since then, Alun
has twice been re-awarded as a Microsoft MVP in the Windows Security area,
and is currently a Microsoft MVP."

I have absolutely no reason whatsoever to doubt that is true.

Perhaps you can point me in the right direction to ascertain the true
credentials of Mr Foldes?

TIA

Dave

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

He has been vetted many times and is who he says he is. Move on.

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:eHICs$tNJHA.1744@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

"Alun Jones" <alun@texis.invalid> wrote in message
news:D6A4A2D9-D7ED-42F5-B3F6-80DABDDC7C2D@microsoft.com...
> "~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message
> news:OkMxRlsNJHA.3804@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> With your expertise in these matters, perhaps *you* can help improve the
>> article - try, at the very least. <s>

>
> Lots of us would rather spend our time helping in other areas than
> updating Wikipedia. Whatever floats your boat, of course, but don't view
> Wikipedia as either a definitive source of complete and accurate
> information, or a mandatory social welfare project that we should all be
> engaging in.
>
>> AFAIK an *Enterprise* Server is rather different, as described in my
>> original post, thus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_server

>
> While it pains me to point you to Wikipedia just after I've finished
> telling you that you shouldn't rely on it being accurate, might I point
> this out to you:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2003#Enterprise_Edition
>
> This is most likely what was being referred to as "Windows 2003 Enterprise
> Server". As has been pointed out, there are many of us who have computer
> and network setups that are non-traditional. I have a domain of ten
> computers used by three people, for instance. Some of those are Enterprise
> Servers in the sense that they run serious enterprise-level code, rather
> than small-business quality code. (The difference comes when you ask "how
> well does it perform with umpty thousand
> users/systems/locations/applications/etc?") Small software vendors selling
> into large institutions frequently have to mimic Enterprise-like scenarios
> in their small environments.
>
> Finally, I know a lot of the people in this group have said this to you
> far more rudely than I will, but here's my advice: you are clearly a
> beginner in this field. You are asking so many questions, and getting so
> many things wrong in your assumptions, that it's very clear that you are a
> beginner.
>
> As such, use a little humility, and make your postings more inquisitive
> than accusative. Ask questions - don't assert that others are wrong just
> because they disagree with you. Ask _why_ they disagree with you or with
> your understanding of the world. You don't know enough to be quoting
> Wikipedia back at people trying to prove that they're lying. All you do is
> make people irritated with you.
>
> And that's not helpful when you come to ask for help.
>
> Alun.
> ~~~~
> --
> Texas Imperial Software | Web: http://www.wftpd.com/
> 23921 57th Ave SE | Blog: http://msmvps.com/alunj/
> Woodinville WA 98072-8661 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
> Fax/Voice +1(425)807-1787 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.
>
>


Alun - many thanks for taking the time and so much trouble to respond here.
I really appreciate you input.

Your web site says:-
"Alun Jones, the author of WFTPD Server and WFTPD Pro Server, has been
programming and developing software since his early teens. He now has over
20 years experience in the IT industry, 13 years as a TCP/IP Winsock
developer. Alun is a Microsoft Certified Professional (MCP) and has helped
to review and author a number of RFCs. Alun was recognized by Microsoft in
April of 2003 as a "Most Valuable Professional", for his repeated volunteer
assistance in Usenet newsgroups devoted to Windows developers, mostly in
TCP/IP development using Winsock. Alun's MVP award is in the dual areas of
Windows SDK and Security, as a result of his SSL / TLS knowledge and his
overall advocacy of good development security principles. Since then, Alun
has twice been re-awarded as a Microsoft MVP in the Windows Security area,
and is currently a Microsoft MVP."

I have absolutely no reason whatsoever to doubt that is true.

Perhaps you can point me in the right direction to ascertain the true
credentials of Mr Foldes?

TIA

Dave

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

Better yet give us your credentials.

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:eHICs$tNJHA.1744@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...



Perhaps you can point me in the right direction to ascertain the true
credentials of Mr Foldes?

TIA

Dave

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?


"VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH> wrote in message
news:gdvugc$dsg$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> ~BD~ wrote:
> So now you're targeting yet another regular netizen. What's the point?
> Why do you even care about what someone claims they do or don't have?
>
> So who's your next target of your ennui?




Not bored - concerned. I'm very disappointed with your response, VanguardLH.

I haven't told you the full background, nor will I here. I *can* tell you
that this 'regular netizen', as you call him, has consistently lied when
posting on these Microsoft groups and, indeed, on the Annexcafe newsgroups
too. I fully appreciate that only *I* can be sure of that - others will have
to make up their own minds.

Two things are of concern to me.

1. Cybercrime

2. Terrorism

One, of course, can feed the other. Mr Foldes, by his own admission, is a
foreign national now living in Canada. 'He' and/or his companions answer
every computing query under-the-sun at just about any time of the day or
night. He appears to use highly sophisticated equipment too, yet no-one
knows anything about him or his business - there's not even a web site to
enlighten us. Strange, I think, in 2008.

Perhaps the explanation/statement he has made 'here' in these groups today
(much of it untrue, BTW) will put your mind at ease. There is obviously no
need to worry about the safety of your friends and family ........ is there?

Dave

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?


"Larry Thomas" <l_thom@nomail.ney.niy> wrote in message
news:%23TJc4GuNJHA.4832@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
He has been vetted many times and is who he says he is. Move on.

I didn't know that!

WHY has Mr Foldes been vetted many times - and by whom?

Just *how* do you know that, Larry?

TIA

Dave

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

Seems you to have been vetted, so to speak.

http://www.interpol.int/


"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message
news:u8NF0WuNJHA.1668@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

"Larry Thomas" <l_thom@nomail.ney.niy> wrote in message
news:%23TJc4GuNJHA.4832@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
He has been vetted many times and is who he says he is. Move on.

I didn't know that!

WHY has Mr Foldes been vetted many times - and by whom?

Just *how* do you know that, Larry?

TIA

Dave

--
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:13:36 -0400, Peter Foldes wrote:

<snip>

And why on earth you (and anybody else for this matter) keep continuing
responding to this screwball? There is absolutely no reason to do so! Is it
so difficult for you to ignore posts originating from this idiot-person?
Whatever you want to achieve...you won't!
(No response required!)
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?

You friggin idiot. I was 4 yrs old when my family was liberated and was brought to the USA from Dachau by the liberating forces in 1946.
It was enough Dave that what you did by reporting me as a terrorist to the Police in the UK. My home and my family was invaded by Canadian and US security forces on account of that and made it very uncomfortable for 3 hrs before it was realized that you made a false claim.
I have no idea what others would have done to you but I think I was and still is civilized enough that I still hold my patience and my tongue with you.
You caught me on a bad weekend and as it now winds down so will I

Again. Go on your boat and get a life you sick demented person

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"~BD~" <~BD~@no.mail.afraid.com> wrote in message news:%23j1Z%23SuNJHA.1484@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> "VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH> wrote in message
> news:gdvugc$dsg$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>> So now you're targeting yet another regular netizen. What's the point?
>> Why do you even care about what someone claims they do or don't have?
>>
>> So who's your next target of your ennui?

>
>
>
> Not bored - concerned. I'm very disappointed with your response, VanguardLH.
>
> I haven't told you the full background, nor will I here. I *can* tell you
> that this 'regular netizen', as you call him, has consistently lied when
> posting on these Microsoft groups and, indeed, on the Annexcafe newsgroups
> too. I fully appreciate that only *I* can be sure of that - others will have
> to make up their own minds.
>
> Two things are of concern to me.
>
> 1. Cybercrime
>
> 2. Terrorism
>
> One, of course, can feed the other. Mr Foldes, by his own admission, is a
> foreign national now living in Canada. 'He' and/or his companions answer
> every computing query under-the-sun at just about any time of the day or
> night. He appears to use highly sophisticated equipment too, yet no-one
> knows anything about him or his business - there's not even a web site to
> enlighten us. Strange, I think, in 2008.
>
> Perhaps the explanation/statement he has made 'here' in these groups today
> (much of it untrue, BTW) will put your mind at ease. There is obviously no
> need to worry about the safety of your friends and family ........ is there?
>
> Dave
>
> --
>
>
 
Re: Should we be suspicious?


"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uSVGYUwNJHA.1668@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> I was 4 yrs old when my family was liberated and was brought to the USA
> from Dachau by the liberating forces in 1946.


Are you refering to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dachau_concentration_camp which starts off:-

"Dachau was a Nazi German concentration camp, and the first one opened in
Germany,......" or were you simply refering to the nearby town of that
name?


>It was enough Dave that what you did by reporting me as a terrorist to the
>Police in the UK. My home and my family was invaded by Canadian and US
> >security forces on account of that and made it very uncomfortable for 3

>hrs


I'm both pleased and amazed that I had so much influence. Maybe. though,
this is another of your fairy stories, Peter!
..
>You caught me on a bad weekend ....


As I've mentioned before, bad guys *always* make mistakes.

The truth *will* out!

Dave

--
 
Back
Top