Windows Vista Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

  • Thread starter Thread starter Free Phones
  • Start date Start date
F

Free Phones

Guest
See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05

Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant Texas
Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1, V10, V11).
These organizations are evaluating their options, but overseas it's turning
into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software (V15).

School districts in the U.S. are starting to move entirely to Linux rather
suffer the cost of upgrading Windows. Examples are the Windsor Unified
School District in Northern California and the Bexley, Ohio high school
district. Schools making this move have been surprised how easy it is and
how much money is saved. (V6, V8)

Leading computer maker HP is reporting "massive deals for Linux desktops"
with corporate clients (V4). Runner-up computer maker and long time faithful
Microsoft ally Dell has been overwhelmed by demand and has started
developing Linux desktop preloads for their notebook and desktop computers
(V9).

Even that great bastion of the status quo, the Wall Street Journal, has
published an article under the title Linux Starts to Find Home on Desktops
(Business Technology, 13 Mar 2007).

Small business and consumer demand for computers with Windows XP is very
high, but Microsoft has moved swiftly to make sure they can't get it. No
sane person wants Vista, so Microsoft is making sure they have no choice.

It's becoming clear people are going to be holding on to their XP machines
as long as they can. Chip manufacturers in particular face a damaging glut
of memory and CPU chips because the anticipated Vista upgrade demand isn't
materializing. One gigabyte of RAM memory is the practical minimum for Vista
(except Home Basic which will run in 500 megabytes).

What went wrong? Basically, Vista was designed with almost no consideration
for the needs of Microsoft's customers. James Allchin, co-president of
Microsoft's Platform Products and Services Group wrote an internal memo
saying that Microsoft had lost touch with customer needs and if he didn't
work there he'd buy an Apple Macintosh (V12). Allchin retired the day Vista
shipped.

Vista and its companion programs, Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7, offer
precious little Windows users want beyond what's in Windows XP, but plenty
they don't want.

* A confusing new user interface. Vista actually reduces user
productivity according to a consulting firm's study (V7).

* Blamed for so many security problems, Microsoft has placed security
responsibility right where it doesn't belong, squarely on the shoulders of
the average user. Confusing security pop-up dialogs are so common users get
used to just hitting "Yes" automatically to everything, including malware.

* Most existing software is not compatible with Vista. You will have to
purchase upgrades to almost all the software you run and many programs will
never be upgraded to Vista.

* It's an exercise in frustration to try to upgrade an XP computer to
Vista. Few Vista drivers are available except for new devices designed for
Vista, and manufacturers don't plan any.

* Even many current printers don't have Vista drivers, and many never
will. Developing Vista drivers and getting them approved by Microsoft is
just too expensive.

* Vista is effectively a Windows price increase. Vista Home Basic,
shipped with lower cost consumer market computers, is rather minimal, This
often forces a $79 upgrade to Home Premium (equivalent to Windows XP Media
Center) or Ultimate for $139. Vista's built-in Anytime Upgrade handles
that - have your credit card ready. Actually all versions are on the machine
but must be "activated".

* Vista Activation is a hassle and failure prone, but Microsoft says
they'll be turning the screws down even tighter due to rampant piracy
already taking place. This does little harm to the pirates, just to
legitimate users (V5).

* Vista Activation, should it fail or be aborted, phones home to
Microsoft with enough details to identify your computer and possibly your
location (V3).

* Vista's much ballyhooed security has already been shattered in various
ways, and Microsoft's One Care, intended to protect Vista from malware, has
scored at the very bottom in independent tests of anti-malware programs
(V2).

* Microsoft's draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management) features not
only interfere with your enjoyment of entertainment media you have
purchased, but force you to have a much more powerful and expensive machine
just to achieve XP level performance (V14).

* Windows Update is now mandatory. What's wrong with that? You have no
defense against patches that break other stuff. Worse, Microsoft has
promised the media moguls they will cripple your computer if any DRM
problems are found with your computer's hardware or drivers - this by
Windows Update, of course (V14).

* Microsoft president Steve Ballmer said Vista was so good a service
pack would not be needed. Service Pack 1 went into "critical" development
even before Vista's public release at the end of January. There are flaws
aplenty.

Why did they do this? Most new features originally planned for Vista were
dropped in favor of one: a draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management) scheme.
See my editorial Vista - Broken by Design for the details. All other
features were of lower priority and the needs of customers were disregarded
if they conflicted with DRM.

Microsoft hopes to parlay secure DRM into a monopoly on distribution of so
called "premium content". Once they have lured the studios into the deal and
established the monopoly they can dictate terms to the studios the way Apple
dictated terms to the record companies based on the iPod success, but on a
much larger scale.

Microsoft is depending on the unbounded greed of the media moguls to pull
this off, but word is the moguls are starting to wonder if DRM is a good
idea after all. It is causing them a lot of trouble, has done nothing to
stop piracy, and has caused tremendous ill will and bad publicity.

Clearly ill will is of no concern to Microsoft. A recent patent filing
reveals they have a whole lot more pain and expense planned for you in the
future (V13).

What should Microsoft do? Their most basic mistake is "one size fits all",
holding that an entertainment device is equally suited for business. This is
now obviously and painfully false. Microsoft should immediately develop a
version of Vista for business with DRM completely stripped out. Perhaps they
could disable playing of "premium content" entirely if they could do it
cleanly - "premium content" has no place on business computers anyway.

Will Microsoft do this? No. Instead they will "stay the course", increasing
PR expenditures, working on ways to kill Windows XP to force Vista adoption,
and ramping up their misinformation and FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt)
attacks on Linux to "full rabid" shrillness.

What should you do? Every business should be taking a long hard look at
moving to Linux. Yes, there will be costs involved, and employees will gripe
initially, but those who have done this find an overall cost savings.

eComStation (formerly IBM's OS/2) is another good alternative for general
business, but lacking specialty applications. I find it hard to recommend
Apple - applications are limited and it's a closed proprietary environment
run by a person of proven greed. It seems like jumping from the frying pan
into the fire.

I understand that many small businesses are dependent on specialty software
the publishers of which support only Windows - even if it'll actually run on
Linux. It's time to start pressuring them for Linux versions and/or support.
Remember, there's worse to come (V13).

If you happen to be such a software publisher, it's time for you to take a
good hard look at producing Linux versions yourself. Microsoft has already
killed a huge segment of the commercial software industry and you are on
their list. Sooner or later it's your turn.

- Andrew Grygus
Additional Reading

* V1 - Information Week - Microsoft Suffers Latest Blow As NIST Bans
Windows Vista
* V2 - CNet News - Microsoft's OneCare antivirus fails another test.
* V3 - Inquirer - Windows piracy hunt tool phones home if aborted.
* V4 - CRN ChannelWeb - HP Sees Huge Linux Desktop Deals.
* V5 - Inquirer - OEM Vista crack gets round 'phone home' activation.
* V6 - SearchOpenSource.com - Microsoft Windows ousted at California
school district.
* V7 - The Register - Vista makes people less efficient than XP did.
* V8 - DesktopLinux.com - Ohio school district upgrades to Linux, saves
$412K.
* V9 - Direct2Dell - Dell to Expand Linux Options.
* V10 - Information Week - FAA May Ditch Microsoft's Windows Vista And
Office For Google And Linux Combo.
* V11 - Information Week - Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows
Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007.
* V12 - Seattle Post-Intelligencer - Jim Allchin's Mac message: The full
text.
* V13 - ars technica - Microsoft files for patent on "modular operating
system".
* V14 - Andrew Grygus - Vista - Broken by Design.
* V15 - silicon.com - French MPs pick Ubuntu for Linux switch.
* V16 - Microsoft - Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup.
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

I am no MVP, but I agree with most of your points.
I haven't liked the look & feel of Vista since I installed the very first
Beta build.
I don't like the implementation of what they trumpet as security
improvements.
Putting the ignition switch in the trunk may make it harder to steal, but it
also makes it harder to drive!

"Free Phones" <floyd@mostlyfreephones.com> wrote in message
news:uQCUTcv4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05
>
> Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
> Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
> (NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant Texas
> Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1, V10, V11).
> These organizations are evaluating their options, but overseas it's
> turning into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software (V15).
>
> School districts in the U.S. are starting to move entirely to Linux rather
> suffer the cost of upgrading Windows. Examples are the Windsor Unified
> School District in Northern California and the Bexley, Ohio high school
> district. Schools making this move have been surprised how easy it is and
> how much money is saved. (V6, V8)
>
> Leading computer maker HP is reporting "massive deals for Linux desktops"
> with corporate clients (V4). Runner-up computer maker and long time
> faithful Microsoft ally Dell has been overwhelmed by demand and has
> started developing Linux desktop preloads for their notebook and desktop
> computers (V9).
>
> Even that great bastion of the status quo, the Wall Street Journal, has
> published an article under the title Linux Starts to Find Home on Desktops
> (Business Technology, 13 Mar 2007).
>
> Small business and consumer demand for computers with Windows XP is very
> high, but Microsoft has moved swiftly to make sure they can't get it. No
> sane person wants Vista, so Microsoft is making sure they have no choice.
>
> It's becoming clear people are going to be holding on to their XP machines
> as long as they can. Chip manufacturers in particular face a damaging glut
> of memory and CPU chips because the anticipated Vista upgrade demand isn't
> materializing. One gigabyte of RAM memory is the practical minimum for
> Vista (except Home Basic which will run in 500 megabytes).
>
> What went wrong? Basically, Vista was designed with almost no
> consideration for the needs of Microsoft's customers. James Allchin,
> co-president of Microsoft's Platform Products and Services Group wrote an
> internal memo saying that Microsoft had lost touch with customer needs and
> if he didn't work there he'd buy an Apple Macintosh (V12). Allchin retired
> the day Vista shipped.
>
> Vista and its companion programs, Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7,
> offer precious little Windows users want beyond what's in Windows XP, but
> plenty they don't want.
>
> * A confusing new user interface. Vista actually reduces user
> productivity according to a consulting firm's study (V7).
>
> * Blamed for so many security problems, Microsoft has placed security
> responsibility right where it doesn't belong, squarely on the shoulders of
> the average user. Confusing security pop-up dialogs are so common users
> get used to just hitting "Yes" automatically to everything, including
> malware.
>
> * Most existing software is not compatible with Vista. You will have to
> purchase upgrades to almost all the software you run and many programs
> will never be upgraded to Vista.
>
> * It's an exercise in frustration to try to upgrade an XP computer to
> Vista. Few Vista drivers are available except for new devices designed for
> Vista, and manufacturers don't plan any.
>
> * Even many current printers don't have Vista drivers, and many never
> will. Developing Vista drivers and getting them approved by Microsoft is
> just too expensive.
>
> * Vista is effectively a Windows price increase. Vista Home Basic,
> shipped with lower cost consumer market computers, is rather minimal, This
> often forces a $79 upgrade to Home Premium (equivalent to Windows XP Media
> Center) or Ultimate for $139. Vista's built-in Anytime Upgrade handles
> that - have your credit card ready. Actually all versions are on the
> machine but must be "activated".
>
> * Vista Activation is a hassle and failure prone, but Microsoft says
> they'll be turning the screws down even tighter due to rampant piracy
> already taking place. This does little harm to the pirates, just to
> legitimate users (V5).
>
> * Vista Activation, should it fail or be aborted, phones home to
> Microsoft with enough details to identify your computer and possibly your
> location (V3).
>
> * Vista's much ballyhooed security has already been shattered in
> various ways, and Microsoft's One Care, intended to protect Vista from
> malware, has scored at the very bottom in independent tests of
> anti-malware programs (V2).
>
> * Microsoft's draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management) features not
> only interfere with your enjoyment of entertainment media you have
> purchased, but force you to have a much more powerful and expensive
> machine just to achieve XP level performance (V14).
>
> * Windows Update is now mandatory. What's wrong with that? You have no
> defense against patches that break other stuff. Worse, Microsoft has
> promised the media moguls they will cripple your computer if any DRM
> problems are found with your computer's hardware or drivers - this by
> Windows Update, of course (V14).
>
> * Microsoft president Steve Ballmer said Vista was so good a service
> pack would not be needed. Service Pack 1 went into "critical" development
> even before Vista's public release at the end of January. There are flaws
> aplenty.
>
> Why did they do this? Most new features originally planned for Vista were
> dropped in favor of one: a draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management)
> scheme. See my editorial Vista - Broken by Design for the details. All
> other features were of lower priority and the needs of customers were
> disregarded if they conflicted with DRM.
>
> Microsoft hopes to parlay secure DRM into a monopoly on distribution of so
> called "premium content". Once they have lured the studios into the deal
> and established the monopoly they can dictate terms to the studios the way
> Apple dictated terms to the record companies based on the iPod success,
> but on a much larger scale.
>
> Microsoft is depending on the unbounded greed of the media moguls to pull
> this off, but word is the moguls are starting to wonder if DRM is a good
> idea after all. It is causing them a lot of trouble, has done nothing to
> stop piracy, and has caused tremendous ill will and bad publicity.
>
> Clearly ill will is of no concern to Microsoft. A recent patent filing
> reveals they have a whole lot more pain and expense planned for you in the
> future (V13).
>
> What should Microsoft do? Their most basic mistake is "one size fits all",
> holding that an entertainment device is equally suited for business. This
> is now obviously and painfully false. Microsoft should immediately develop
> a version of Vista for business with DRM completely stripped out. Perhaps
> they could disable playing of "premium content" entirely if they could do
> it cleanly - "premium content" has no place on business computers anyway.
>
> Will Microsoft do this? No. Instead they will "stay the course",
> increasing PR expenditures, working on ways to kill Windows XP to force
> Vista adoption, and ramping up their misinformation and FUD (Fear,
> Uncertainty and Doubt) attacks on Linux to "full rabid" shrillness.
>
> What should you do? Every business should be taking a long hard look at
> moving to Linux. Yes, there will be costs involved, and employees will
> gripe initially, but those who have done this find an overall cost
> savings.
>
> eComStation (formerly IBM's OS/2) is another good alternative for general
> business, but lacking specialty applications. I find it hard to recommend
> Apple - applications are limited and it's a closed proprietary environment
> run by a person of proven greed. It seems like jumping from the frying pan
> into the fire.
>
> I understand that many small businesses are dependent on specialty
> software the publishers of which support only Windows - even if it'll
> actually run on Linux. It's time to start pressuring them for Linux
> versions and/or support. Remember, there's worse to come (V13).
>
> If you happen to be such a software publisher, it's time for you to take a
> good hard look at producing Linux versions yourself. Microsoft has already
> killed a huge segment of the commercial software industry and you are on
> their list. Sooner or later it's your turn.
>
> - Andrew Grygus
> Additional Reading
>
> * V1 - Information Week - Microsoft Suffers Latest Blow As NIST Bans
> Windows Vista
> * V2 - CNet News - Microsoft's OneCare antivirus fails another test.
> * V3 - Inquirer - Windows piracy hunt tool phones home if aborted.
> * V4 - CRN ChannelWeb - HP Sees Huge Linux Desktop Deals.
> * V5 - Inquirer - OEM Vista crack gets round 'phone home' activation.
> * V6 - SearchOpenSource.com - Microsoft Windows ousted at California
> school district.
> * V7 - The Register - Vista makes people less efficient than XP did.
> * V8 - DesktopLinux.com - Ohio school district upgrades to Linux, saves
> $412K.
> * V9 - Direct2Dell - Dell to Expand Linux Options.
> * V10 - Information Week - FAA May Ditch Microsoft's Windows Vista And
> Office For Google And Linux Combo.
> * V11 - Information Week - Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows
> Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007.
> * V12 - Seattle Post-Intelligencer - Jim Allchin's Mac message: The
> full text.
> * V13 - ars technica - Microsoft files for patent on "modular operating
> system".
> * V14 - Andrew Grygus - Vista - Broken by Design.
> * V15 - silicon.com - French MPs pick Ubuntu for Linux switch.
> * V16 - Microsoft - Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup.
>
>
>
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one


"Not Me" <cargod01@bresnan.net> wrote in message
news:OMzQFsv4HHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I am no MVP, but I agree with most of your points.
> I haven't liked the look & feel of Vista since I installed the very first
> Beta build.
> I don't like the implementation of what they trumpet as security
> improvements.
> Putting the ignition switch in the trunk may make it harder to steal, but
> it also makes it harder to drive!
>


Giving out more of your dime a dozen opinions?

No one asked for your worthless dozen, but you got to put it out anyway.
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

You sure must have a pathetic life if you can't find anything better to do
with your time than read this group and whine. Does it make you feel
important to be on so many kill lists?


"Not Me" <cargod01@bresnan.net> wrote in message
news:OMzQFsv4HHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I am no MVP, but I agree with most of your points.
> I haven't liked the look & feel of Vista since I installed the very first
> Beta build.
> I don't like the implementation of what they trumpet as security
> improvements.
> Putting the ignition switch in the trunk may make it harder to steal, but
> it also makes it harder to drive!
>
> "Free Phones" <floyd@mostlyfreephones.com> wrote in message
> news:uQCUTcv4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05
>>
>> Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
>> Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
>> (NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant Texas
>> Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1, V10,
>> V11). These organizations are evaluating their options, but overseas it's
>> turning into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software (V15).
>>
>> School districts in the U.S. are starting to move entirely to Linux
>> rather suffer the cost of upgrading Windows. Examples are the Windsor
>> Unified School District in Northern California and the Bexley, Ohio high
>> school district. Schools making this move have been surprised how easy it
>> is and how much money is saved. (V6, V8)
>>
>> Leading computer maker HP is reporting "massive deals for Linux desktops"
>> with corporate clients (V4). Runner-up computer maker and long time
>> faithful Microsoft ally Dell has been overwhelmed by demand and has
>> started developing Linux desktop preloads for their notebook and desktop
>> computers (V9).
>>
>> Even that great bastion of the status quo, the Wall Street Journal, has
>> published an article under the title Linux Starts to Find Home on
>> Desktops (Business Technology, 13 Mar 2007).
>>
>> Small business and consumer demand for computers with Windows XP is very
>> high, but Microsoft has moved swiftly to make sure they can't get it. No
>> sane person wants Vista, so Microsoft is making sure they have no choice.
>>
>> It's becoming clear people are going to be holding on to their XP
>> machines as long as they can. Chip manufacturers in particular face a
>> damaging glut of memory and CPU chips because the anticipated Vista
>> upgrade demand isn't materializing. One gigabyte of RAM memory is the
>> practical minimum for Vista (except Home Basic which will run in 500
>> megabytes).
>>
>> What went wrong? Basically, Vista was designed with almost no
>> consideration for the needs of Microsoft's customers. James Allchin,
>> co-president of Microsoft's Platform Products and Services Group wrote an
>> internal memo saying that Microsoft had lost touch with customer needs
>> and if he didn't work there he'd buy an Apple Macintosh (V12). Allchin
>> retired the day Vista shipped.
>>
>> Vista and its companion programs, Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7,
>> offer precious little Windows users want beyond what's in Windows XP, but
>> plenty they don't want.
>>
>> * A confusing new user interface. Vista actually reduces user
>> productivity according to a consulting firm's study (V7).
>>
>> * Blamed for so many security problems, Microsoft has placed security
>> responsibility right where it doesn't belong, squarely on the shoulders
>> of the average user. Confusing security pop-up dialogs are so common
>> users get used to just hitting "Yes" automatically to everything,
>> including malware.
>>
>> * Most existing software is not compatible with Vista. You will have
>> to purchase upgrades to almost all the software you run and many programs
>> will never be upgraded to Vista.
>>
>> * It's an exercise in frustration to try to upgrade an XP computer to
>> Vista. Few Vista drivers are available except for new devices designed
>> for Vista, and manufacturers don't plan any.
>>
>> * Even many current printers don't have Vista drivers, and many never
>> will. Developing Vista drivers and getting them approved by Microsoft is
>> just too expensive.
>>
>> * Vista is effectively a Windows price increase. Vista Home Basic,
>> shipped with lower cost consumer market computers, is rather minimal,
>> This often forces a $79 upgrade to Home Premium (equivalent to Windows XP
>> Media Center) or Ultimate for $139. Vista's built-in Anytime Upgrade
>> handles that - have your credit card ready. Actually all versions are on
>> the machine but must be "activated".
>>
>> * Vista Activation is a hassle and failure prone, but Microsoft says
>> they'll be turning the screws down even tighter due to rampant piracy
>> already taking place. This does little harm to the pirates, just to
>> legitimate users (V5).
>>
>> * Vista Activation, should it fail or be aborted, phones home to
>> Microsoft with enough details to identify your computer and possibly your
>> location (V3).
>>
>> * Vista's much ballyhooed security has already been shattered in
>> various ways, and Microsoft's One Care, intended to protect Vista from
>> malware, has scored at the very bottom in independent tests of
>> anti-malware programs (V2).
>>
>> * Microsoft's draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management) features not
>> only interfere with your enjoyment of entertainment media you have
>> purchased, but force you to have a much more powerful and expensive
>> machine just to achieve XP level performance (V14).
>>
>> * Windows Update is now mandatory. What's wrong with that? You have no
>> defense against patches that break other stuff. Worse, Microsoft has
>> promised the media moguls they will cripple your computer if any DRM
>> problems are found with your computer's hardware or drivers - this by
>> Windows Update, of course (V14).
>>
>> * Microsoft president Steve Ballmer said Vista was so good a service
>> pack would not be needed. Service Pack 1 went into "critical" development
>> even before Vista's public release at the end of January. There are flaws
>> aplenty.
>>
>> Why did they do this? Most new features originally planned for Vista were
>> dropped in favor of one: a draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management)
>> scheme. See my editorial Vista - Broken by Design for the details. All
>> other features were of lower priority and the needs of customers were
>> disregarded if they conflicted with DRM.
>>
>> Microsoft hopes to parlay secure DRM into a monopoly on distribution of
>> so called "premium content". Once they have lured the studios into the
>> deal and established the monopoly they can dictate terms to the studios
>> the way Apple dictated terms to the record companies based on the iPod
>> success, but on a much larger scale.
>>
>> Microsoft is depending on the unbounded greed of the media moguls to pull
>> this off, but word is the moguls are starting to wonder if DRM is a good
>> idea after all. It is causing them a lot of trouble, has done nothing to
>> stop piracy, and has caused tremendous ill will and bad publicity.
>>
>> Clearly ill will is of no concern to Microsoft. A recent patent filing
>> reveals they have a whole lot more pain and expense planned for you in
>> the future (V13).
>>
>> What should Microsoft do? Their most basic mistake is "one size fits
>> all", holding that an entertainment device is equally suited for
>> business. This is now obviously and painfully false. Microsoft should
>> immediately develop a version of Vista for business with DRM completely
>> stripped out. Perhaps they could disable playing of "premium content"
>> entirely if they could do it cleanly - "premium content" has no place on
>> business computers anyway.
>>
>> Will Microsoft do this? No. Instead they will "stay the course",
>> increasing PR expenditures, working on ways to kill Windows XP to force
>> Vista adoption, and ramping up their misinformation and FUD (Fear,
>> Uncertainty and Doubt) attacks on Linux to "full rabid" shrillness.
>>
>> What should you do? Every business should be taking a long hard look at
>> moving to Linux. Yes, there will be costs involved, and employees will
>> gripe initially, but those who have done this find an overall cost
>> savings.
>>
>> eComStation (formerly IBM's OS/2) is another good alternative for general
>> business, but lacking specialty applications. I find it hard to recommend
>> Apple - applications are limited and it's a closed proprietary
>> environment run by a person of proven greed. It seems like jumping from
>> the frying pan into the fire.
>>
>> I understand that many small businesses are dependent on specialty
>> software the publishers of which support only Windows - even if it'll
>> actually run on Linux. It's time to start pressuring them for Linux
>> versions and/or support. Remember, there's worse to come (V13).
>>
>> If you happen to be such a software publisher, it's time for you to take
>> a good hard look at producing Linux versions yourself. Microsoft has
>> already killed a huge segment of the commercial software industry and you
>> are on their list. Sooner or later it's your turn.
>>
>> - Andrew Grygus
>> Additional Reading
>>
>> * V1 - Information Week - Microsoft Suffers Latest Blow As NIST Bans
>> Windows Vista
>> * V2 - CNet News - Microsoft's OneCare antivirus fails another test.
>> * V3 - Inquirer - Windows piracy hunt tool phones home if aborted.
>> * V4 - CRN ChannelWeb - HP Sees Huge Linux Desktop Deals.
>> * V5 - Inquirer - OEM Vista crack gets round 'phone home' activation.
>> * V6 - SearchOpenSource.com - Microsoft Windows ousted at California
>> school district.
>> * V7 - The Register - Vista makes people less efficient than XP did.
>> * V8 - DesktopLinux.com - Ohio school district upgrades to Linux,
>> saves $412K.
>> * V9 - Direct2Dell - Dell to Expand Linux Options.
>> * V10 - Information Week - FAA May Ditch Microsoft's Windows Vista And
>> Office For Google And Linux Combo.
>> * V11 - Information Week - Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows
>> Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007.
>> * V12 - Seattle Post-Intelligencer - Jim Allchin's Mac message: The
>> full text.
>> * V13 - ars technica - Microsoft files for patent on "modular
>> operating system".
>> * V14 - Andrew Grygus - Vista - Broken by Design.
>> * V15 - silicon.com - French MPs pick Ubuntu for Linux switch.
>> * V16 - Microsoft - Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup.
>>
>>
>>

>
>
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

"Free Phones" quoted some guy's blog...
> See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05
>
> Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
> Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
> (NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant Texas
> Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1, V10, V11).
> These organizations are evaluating their options, but overseas it's
> turning into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software (V15).
>

Funny how most of the links are to other blogs, written by other guys, with
no real references to anything other than opinion. Blogs and Wikis, written
by users, for users, with no required credentials whatsoever. Gotta love the
'net! ;-)

Just Me, here@home.again
Founder, Pres., CEO, Editor, www.home.again.inc
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

Not Me wrote:
> I am no MVP, but I agree with most of your points.
> I haven't liked the look & feel of Vista since I installed the very first
> Beta build.
> I don't like the implementation of what they trumpet as security
> improvements.
> Putting the ignition switch in the trunk may make it harder to steal, but it
> also makes it harder to drive!


I agree with much of this too. What bothers me the most is how MS is
using Vista to bend our privacy and non-commercial fair use over the
table at will and rape and abuse it endlessly! Worse yet, doing this to
paying customers!

>
> "Free Phones" <floyd@mostlyfreephones.com> wrote in message
> news:uQCUTcv4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05
>>
>> Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
>> Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
>> (NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant Texas
>> Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1, V10, V11).
>> These organizations are evaluating their options, but overseas it's
>> turning into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software (V15).
>>
>> School districts in the U.S. are starting to move entirely to Linux rather
>> suffer the cost of upgrading Windows. Examples are the Windsor Unified
>> School District in Northern California and the Bexley, Ohio high school
>> district. Schools making this move have been surprised how easy it is and
>> how much money is saved. (V6, V8)
>>
>> Leading computer maker HP is reporting "massive deals for Linux desktops"
>> with corporate clients (V4). Runner-up computer maker and long time
>> faithful Microsoft ally Dell has been overwhelmed by demand and has
>> started developing Linux desktop preloads for their notebook and desktop
>> computers (V9).
>>
>> Even that great bastion of the status quo, the Wall Street Journal, has
>> published an article under the title Linux Starts to Find Home on Desktops
>> (Business Technology, 13 Mar 2007).
>>
>> Small business and consumer demand for computers with Windows XP is very
>> high, but Microsoft has moved swiftly to make sure they can't get it. No
>> sane person wants Vista, so Microsoft is making sure they have no choice.
>>
>> It's becoming clear people are going to be holding on to their XP machines
>> as long as they can. Chip manufacturers in particular face a damaging glut
>> of memory and CPU chips because the anticipated Vista upgrade demand isn't
>> materializing. One gigabyte of RAM memory is the practical minimum for
>> Vista (except Home Basic which will run in 500 megabytes).
>>
>> What went wrong? Basically, Vista was designed with almost no
>> consideration for the needs of Microsoft's customers. James Allchin,
>> co-president of Microsoft's Platform Products and Services Group wrote an
>> internal memo saying that Microsoft had lost touch with customer needs and
>> if he didn't work there he'd buy an Apple Macintosh (V12). Allchin retired
>> the day Vista shipped.
>>
>> Vista and its companion programs, Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7,
>> offer precious little Windows users want beyond what's in Windows XP, but
>> plenty they don't want.
>>
>> * A confusing new user interface. Vista actually reduces user
>> productivity according to a consulting firm's study (V7).
>>
>> * Blamed for so many security problems, Microsoft has placed security
>> responsibility right where it doesn't belong, squarely on the shoulders of
>> the average user. Confusing security pop-up dialogs are so common users
>> get used to just hitting "Yes" automatically to everything, including
>> malware.
>>
>> * Most existing software is not compatible with Vista. You will have to
>> purchase upgrades to almost all the software you run and many programs
>> will never be upgraded to Vista.
>>
>> * It's an exercise in frustration to try to upgrade an XP computer to
>> Vista. Few Vista drivers are available except for new devices designed for
>> Vista, and manufacturers don't plan any.
>>
>> * Even many current printers don't have Vista drivers, and many never
>> will. Developing Vista drivers and getting them approved by Microsoft is
>> just too expensive.
>>
>> * Vista is effectively a Windows price increase. Vista Home Basic,
>> shipped with lower cost consumer market computers, is rather minimal, This
>> often forces a $79 upgrade to Home Premium (equivalent to Windows XP Media
>> Center) or Ultimate for $139. Vista's built-in Anytime Upgrade handles
>> that - have your credit card ready. Actually all versions are on the
>> machine but must be "activated".
>>
>> * Vista Activation is a hassle and failure prone, but Microsoft says
>> they'll be turning the screws down even tighter due to rampant piracy
>> already taking place. This does little harm to the pirates, just to
>> legitimate users (V5).
>>
>> * Vista Activation, should it fail or be aborted, phones home to
>> Microsoft with enough details to identify your computer and possibly your
>> location (V3).
>>
>> * Vista's much ballyhooed security has already been shattered in
>> various ways, and Microsoft's One Care, intended to protect Vista from
>> malware, has scored at the very bottom in independent tests of
>> anti-malware programs (V2).
>>
>> * Microsoft's draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management) features not
>> only interfere with your enjoyment of entertainment media you have
>> purchased, but force you to have a much more powerful and expensive
>> machine just to achieve XP level performance (V14).
>>
>> * Windows Update is now mandatory. What's wrong with that? You have no
>> defense against patches that break other stuff. Worse, Microsoft has
>> promised the media moguls they will cripple your computer if any DRM
>> problems are found with your computer's hardware or drivers - this by
>> Windows Update, of course (V14).
>>
>> * Microsoft president Steve Ballmer said Vista was so good a service
>> pack would not be needed. Service Pack 1 went into "critical" development
>> even before Vista's public release at the end of January. There are flaws
>> aplenty.
>>
>> Why did they do this? Most new features originally planned for Vista were
>> dropped in favor of one: a draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management)
>> scheme. See my editorial Vista - Broken by Design for the details. All
>> other features were of lower priority and the needs of customers were
>> disregarded if they conflicted with DRM.
>>
>> Microsoft hopes to parlay secure DRM into a monopoly on distribution of so
>> called "premium content". Once they have lured the studios into the deal
>> and established the monopoly they can dictate terms to the studios the way
>> Apple dictated terms to the record companies based on the iPod success,
>> but on a much larger scale.
>>
>> Microsoft is depending on the unbounded greed of the media moguls to pull
>> this off, but word is the moguls are starting to wonder if DRM is a good
>> idea after all. It is causing them a lot of trouble, has done nothing to
>> stop piracy, and has caused tremendous ill will and bad publicity.
>>
>> Clearly ill will is of no concern to Microsoft. A recent patent filing
>> reveals they have a whole lot more pain and expense planned for you in the
>> future (V13).
>>
>> What should Microsoft do? Their most basic mistake is "one size fits all",
>> holding that an entertainment device is equally suited for business. This
>> is now obviously and painfully false. Microsoft should immediately develop
>> a version of Vista for business with DRM completely stripped out. Perhaps
>> they could disable playing of "premium content" entirely if they could do
>> it cleanly - "premium content" has no place on business computers anyway.
>>
>> Will Microsoft do this? No. Instead they will "stay the course",
>> increasing PR expenditures, working on ways to kill Windows XP to force
>> Vista adoption, and ramping up their misinformation and FUD (Fear,
>> Uncertainty and Doubt) attacks on Linux to "full rabid" shrillness.
>>
>> What should you do? Every business should be taking a long hard look at
>> moving to Linux. Yes, there will be costs involved, and employees will
>> gripe initially, but those who have done this find an overall cost
>> savings.
>>
>> eComStation (formerly IBM's OS/2) is another good alternative for general
>> business, but lacking specialty applications. I find it hard to recommend
>> Apple - applications are limited and it's a closed proprietary environment
>> run by a person of proven greed. It seems like jumping from the frying pan
>> into the fire.
>>
>> I understand that many small businesses are dependent on specialty
>> software the publishers of which support only Windows - even if it'll
>> actually run on Linux. It's time to start pressuring them for Linux
>> versions and/or support. Remember, there's worse to come (V13).
>>
>> If you happen to be such a software publisher, it's time for you to take a
>> good hard look at producing Linux versions yourself. Microsoft has already
>> killed a huge segment of the commercial software industry and you are on
>> their list. Sooner or later it's your turn.
>>
>> - Andrew Grygus
>> Additional Reading
>>
>> * V1 - Information Week - Microsoft Suffers Latest Blow As NIST Bans
>> Windows Vista
>> * V2 - CNet News - Microsoft's OneCare antivirus fails another test.
>> * V3 - Inquirer - Windows piracy hunt tool phones home if aborted.
>> * V4 - CRN ChannelWeb - HP Sees Huge Linux Desktop Deals.
>> * V5 - Inquirer - OEM Vista crack gets round 'phone home' activation.
>> * V6 - SearchOpenSource.com - Microsoft Windows ousted at California
>> school district.
>> * V7 - The Register - Vista makes people less efficient than XP did.
>> * V8 - DesktopLinux.com - Ohio school district upgrades to Linux, saves
>> $412K.
>> * V9 - Direct2Dell - Dell to Expand Linux Options.
>> * V10 - Information Week - FAA May Ditch Microsoft's Windows Vista And
>> Office For Google And Linux Combo.
>> * V11 - Information Week - Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows
>> Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007.
>> * V12 - Seattle Post-Intelligencer - Jim Allchin's Mac message: The
>> full text.
>> * V13 - ars technica - Microsoft files for patent on "modular operating
>> system".
>> * V14 - Andrew Grygus - Vista - Broken by Design.
>> * V15 - silicon.com - French MPs pick Ubuntu for Linux switch.
>> * V16 - Microsoft - Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup.
>>


--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

"Only religious fanatics and totalitarian states equate morality with
legality."
- Linus Torvalds
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

Go peddle some Free Phones

"Free Phones" <floyd@mostlyfreephones.com> wrote in message
news:uQCUTcv4HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05
>
> Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
> Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
> (NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant Texas
> Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1, V10, V11).
> These organizations are evaluating their options, but overseas it's
> turning into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software (V15).
>
> School districts in the U.S. are starting to move entirely to Linux rather
> suffer the cost of upgrading Windows. Examples are the Windsor Unified
> School District in Northern California and the Bexley, Ohio high school
> district. Schools making this move have been surprised how easy it is and
> how much money is saved. (V6, V8)
>
> Leading computer maker HP is reporting "massive deals for Linux desktops"
> with corporate clients (V4). Runner-up computer maker and long time
> faithful Microsoft ally Dell has been overwhelmed by demand and has
> started developing Linux desktop preloads for their notebook and desktop
> computers (V9).
>
> Even that great bastion of the status quo, the Wall Street Journal, has
> published an article under the title Linux Starts to Find Home on Desktops
> (Business Technology, 13 Mar 2007).
>
> Small business and consumer demand for computers with Windows XP is very
> high, but Microsoft has moved swiftly to make sure they can't get it. No
> sane person wants Vista, so Microsoft is making sure they have no choice.
>
> It's becoming clear people are going to be holding on to their XP machines
> as long as they can. Chip manufacturers in particular face a damaging glut
> of memory and CPU chips because the anticipated Vista upgrade demand isn't
> materializing. One gigabyte of RAM memory is the practical minimum for
> Vista (except Home Basic which will run in 500 megabytes).
>
> What went wrong? Basically, Vista was designed with almost no
> consideration for the needs of Microsoft's customers. James Allchin,
> co-president of Microsoft's Platform Products and Services Group wrote an
> internal memo saying that Microsoft had lost touch with customer needs and
> if he didn't work there he'd buy an Apple Macintosh (V12). Allchin retired
> the day Vista shipped.
>
> Vista and its companion programs, Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7,
> offer precious little Windows users want beyond what's in Windows XP, but
> plenty they don't want.
>
> * A confusing new user interface. Vista actually reduces user
> productivity according to a consulting firm's study (V7).
>
> * Blamed for so many security problems, Microsoft has placed security
> responsibility right where it doesn't belong, squarely on the shoulders of
> the average user. Confusing security pop-up dialogs are so common users
> get used to just hitting "Yes" automatically to everything, including
> malware.
>
> * Most existing software is not compatible with Vista. You will have to
> purchase upgrades to almost all the software you run and many programs
> will never be upgraded to Vista.
>
> * It's an exercise in frustration to try to upgrade an XP computer to
> Vista. Few Vista drivers are available except for new devices designed for
> Vista, and manufacturers don't plan any.
>
> * Even many current printers don't have Vista drivers, and many never
> will. Developing Vista drivers and getting them approved by Microsoft is
> just too expensive.
>
> * Vista is effectively a Windows price increase. Vista Home Basic,
> shipped with lower cost consumer market computers, is rather minimal, This
> often forces a $79 upgrade to Home Premium (equivalent to Windows XP Media
> Center) or Ultimate for $139. Vista's built-in Anytime Upgrade handles
> that - have your credit card ready. Actually all versions are on the
> machine but must be "activated".
>
> * Vista Activation is a hassle and failure prone, but Microsoft says
> they'll be turning the screws down even tighter due to rampant piracy
> already taking place. This does little harm to the pirates, just to
> legitimate users (V5).
>
> * Vista Activation, should it fail or be aborted, phones home to
> Microsoft with enough details to identify your computer and possibly your
> location (V3).
>
> * Vista's much ballyhooed security has already been shattered in
> various ways, and Microsoft's One Care, intended to protect Vista from
> malware, has scored at the very bottom in independent tests of
> anti-malware programs (V2).
>
> * Microsoft's draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management) features not
> only interfere with your enjoyment of entertainment media you have
> purchased, but force you to have a much more powerful and expensive
> machine just to achieve XP level performance (V14).
>
> * Windows Update is now mandatory. What's wrong with that? You have no
> defense against patches that break other stuff. Worse, Microsoft has
> promised the media moguls they will cripple your computer if any DRM
> problems are found with your computer's hardware or drivers - this by
> Windows Update, of course (V14).
>
> * Microsoft president Steve Ballmer said Vista was so good a service
> pack would not be needed. Service Pack 1 went into "critical" development
> even before Vista's public release at the end of January. There are flaws
> aplenty.
>
> Why did they do this? Most new features originally planned for Vista were
> dropped in favor of one: a draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management)
> scheme. See my editorial Vista - Broken by Design for the details. All
> other features were of lower priority and the needs of customers were
> disregarded if they conflicted with DRM.
>
> Microsoft hopes to parlay secure DRM into a monopoly on distribution of so
> called "premium content". Once they have lured the studios into the deal
> and established the monopoly they can dictate terms to the studios the way
> Apple dictated terms to the record companies based on the iPod success,
> but on a much larger scale.
>
> Microsoft is depending on the unbounded greed of the media moguls to pull
> this off, but word is the moguls are starting to wonder if DRM is a good
> idea after all. It is causing them a lot of trouble, has done nothing to
> stop piracy, and has caused tremendous ill will and bad publicity.
>
> Clearly ill will is of no concern to Microsoft. A recent patent filing
> reveals they have a whole lot more pain and expense planned for you in the
> future (V13).
>
> What should Microsoft do? Their most basic mistake is "one size fits all",
> holding that an entertainment device is equally suited for business. This
> is now obviously and painfully false. Microsoft should immediately develop
> a version of Vista for business with DRM completely stripped out. Perhaps
> they could disable playing of "premium content" entirely if they could do
> it cleanly - "premium content" has no place on business computers anyway.
>
> Will Microsoft do this? No. Instead they will "stay the course",
> increasing PR expenditures, working on ways to kill Windows XP to force
> Vista adoption, and ramping up their misinformation and FUD (Fear,
> Uncertainty and Doubt) attacks on Linux to "full rabid" shrillness.
>
> What should you do? Every business should be taking a long hard look at
> moving to Linux. Yes, there will be costs involved, and employees will
> gripe initially, but those who have done this find an overall cost
> savings.
>
> eComStation (formerly IBM's OS/2) is another good alternative for general
> business, but lacking specialty applications. I find it hard to recommend
> Apple - applications are limited and it's a closed proprietary environment
> run by a person of proven greed. It seems like jumping from the frying pan
> into the fire.
>
> I understand that many small businesses are dependent on specialty
> software the publishers of which support only Windows - even if it'll
> actually run on Linux. It's time to start pressuring them for Linux
> versions and/or support. Remember, there's worse to come (V13).
>
> If you happen to be such a software publisher, it's time for you to take a
> good hard look at producing Linux versions yourself. Microsoft has already
> killed a huge segment of the commercial software industry and you are on
> their list. Sooner or later it's your turn.
>
> - Andrew Grygus
> Additional Reading
>
> * V1 - Information Week - Microsoft Suffers Latest Blow As NIST Bans
> Windows Vista
> * V2 - CNet News - Microsoft's OneCare antivirus fails another test.
> * V3 - Inquirer - Windows piracy hunt tool phones home if aborted.
> * V4 - CRN ChannelWeb - HP Sees Huge Linux Desktop Deals.
> * V5 - Inquirer - OEM Vista crack gets round 'phone home' activation.
> * V6 - SearchOpenSource.com - Microsoft Windows ousted at California
> school district.
> * V7 - The Register - Vista makes people less efficient than XP did.
> * V8 - DesktopLinux.com - Ohio school district upgrades to Linux, saves
> $412K.
> * V9 - Direct2Dell - Dell to Expand Linux Options.
> * V10 - Information Week - FAA May Ditch Microsoft's Windows Vista And
> Office For Google And Linux Combo.
> * V11 - Information Week - Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows
> Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007.
> * V12 - Seattle Post-Intelligencer - Jim Allchin's Mac message: The
> full text.
> * V13 - ars technica - Microsoft files for patent on "modular operating
> system".
> * V14 - Andrew Grygus - Vista - Broken by Design.
> * V15 - silicon.com - French MPs pick Ubuntu for Linux switch.
> * V16 - Microsoft - Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup.
>
>
>
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:53:03 -0400, here wrote:

> "Free Phones" quoted some guy's blog...
>> See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05
>>
>> Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
>> Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
>> (NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant Texas
>> Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1, V10, V11).
>> These organizations are evaluating their options, but overseas it's
>> turning into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software (V15).
>>

> Funny how most of the links are to other blogs, written by other guys, with
> no real references to anything other than opinion. Blogs and Wikis, written
> by users, for users, with no required credentials whatsoever. Gotta love the
> 'net! ;-)


Conclusion: there must be lots of users upset with vista.


>
> Just Me, here@home.again
> Founder, Pres., CEO, Editor, www.home.again.inc
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

In article <pan.2007.08.20.20.28.53.100779@zianet.com>,
ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:

> > Funny how most of the links are to other blogs, written by other guys, with
> > no real references to anything other than opinion. Blogs and Wikis, written
> > by users, for users, with no required credentials whatsoever. Gotta love
> > the
> > 'net! ;-)

>
> Conclusion: there must be lots of users upset with vista.


Funny how Vista is selling around 13 million copies per month. There
are a few (dozen? hundred? whatever) blogs about "how bad Vista is!"

Conclusion: there must be lots and lots and lots of users happy with
Vista.

Mike
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

Free Phones wrote:
> See article in context at: http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html#v05
>
> Upgrading to Windows Vista has been banned by the U.S. Department of
> Transportation (DOT), the National Institute of Standards and Technology
> (NIST), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), technology giant
> Texas Instruments and other corporations and government agencies (V1,
> V10, V11). These organizations are evaluating their options, but
> overseas it's turning into a stampede to get out of Microsoft software
> (V15).
>
> School districts in the U.S. are starting to move entirely to Linux
> rather suffer the cost of upgrading Windows. Examples are the Windsor
> Unified School District in Northern California and the Bexley, Ohio high
> school district. Schools making this move have been surprised how easy
> it is and how much money is saved. (V6, V8)
>
> Leading computer maker HP is reporting "massive deals for Linux
> desktops" with corporate clients (V4). Runner-up computer maker and long
> time faithful Microsoft ally Dell has been overwhelmed by demand and has
> started developing Linux desktop preloads for their notebook and desktop
> computers (V9).
>
> Even that great bastion of the status quo, the Wall Street Journal, has
> published an article under the title Linux Starts to Find Home on
> Desktops (Business Technology, 13 Mar 2007).
>
> Small business and consumer demand for computers with Windows XP is very
> high, but Microsoft has moved swiftly to make sure they can't get it. No
> sane person wants Vista, so Microsoft is making sure they have no choice.
>
> It's becoming clear people are going to be holding on to their XP
> machines as long as they can. Chip manufacturers in particular face a
> damaging glut of memory and CPU chips because the anticipated Vista
> upgrade demand isn't materializing. One gigabyte of RAM memory is the
> practical minimum for Vista (except Home Basic which will run in 500
> megabytes).
>
> What went wrong? Basically, Vista was designed with almost no
> consideration for the needs of Microsoft's customers. James Allchin,
> co-president of Microsoft's Platform Products and Services Group wrote
> an internal memo saying that Microsoft had lost touch with customer
> needs and if he didn't work there he'd buy an Apple Macintosh (V12).
> Allchin retired the day Vista shipped.
>
> Vista and its companion programs, Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7,
> offer precious little Windows users want beyond what's in Windows XP,
> but plenty they don't want.
>
> * A confusing new user interface. Vista actually reduces user
> productivity according to a consulting firm's study (V7).
>
> * Blamed for so many security problems, Microsoft has placed security
> responsibility right where it doesn't belong, squarely on the shoulders
> of the average user. Confusing security pop-up dialogs are so common
> users get used to just hitting "Yes" automatically to everything,
> including malware.
>
> * Most existing software is not compatible with Vista. You will have
> to purchase upgrades to almost all the software you run and many
> programs will never be upgraded to Vista.
>
> * It's an exercise in frustration to try to upgrade an XP computer to
> Vista. Few Vista drivers are available except for new devices designed
> for Vista, and manufacturers don't plan any.
>
> * Even many current printers don't have Vista drivers, and many never
> will. Developing Vista drivers and getting them approved by Microsoft is
> just too expensive.
>
> * Vista is effectively a Windows price increase. Vista Home Basic,
> shipped with lower cost consumer market computers, is rather minimal,
> This often forces a $79 upgrade to Home Premium (equivalent to Windows
> XP Media Center) or Ultimate for $139. Vista's built-in Anytime Upgrade
> handles that - have your credit card ready. Actually all versions are on
> the machine but must be "activated".
>
> * Vista Activation is a hassle and failure prone, but Microsoft says
> they'll be turning the screws down even tighter due to rampant piracy
> already taking place. This does little harm to the pirates, just to
> legitimate users (V5).
>
> * Vista Activation, should it fail or be aborted, phones home to
> Microsoft with enough details to identify your computer and possibly
> your location (V3).
>
> * Vista's much ballyhooed security has already been shattered in
> various ways, and Microsoft's One Care, intended to protect Vista from
> malware, has scored at the very bottom in independent tests of
> anti-malware programs (V2).
>
> * Microsoft's draconian DRM (Digital Rights Management) features not
> only interfere with your enjoyment of entertainment media you have
> purchased, but force you to have a much more powerful and expensive
> machine just to achieve XP level performance (V14).
>
> * Windows Update is now mandatory. What's wrong with that? You have
> no defense against patches that break other stuff. Worse, Microsoft has
> promised the media moguls they will cripple your computer if any DRM
> problems are found with your computer's hardware or drivers - this by
> Windows Update, of course (V14).
>
> * Microsoft president Steve Ballmer said Vista was so good a service
> pack would not be needed. Service Pack 1 went into "critical"
> development even before Vista's public release at the end of January.
> There are flaws aplenty.
>
> Why did they do this? Most new features originally planned for Vista
> were dropped in favor of one: a draconian DRM (Digital Rights
> Management) scheme. See my editorial Vista - Broken by Design for the
> details. All other features were of lower priority and the needs of
> customers were disregarded if they conflicted with DRM.
>
> Microsoft hopes to parlay secure DRM into a monopoly on distribution of
> so called "premium content". Once they have lured the studios into the
> deal and established the monopoly they can dictate terms to the studios
> the way Apple dictated terms to the record companies based on the iPod
> success, but on a much larger scale.
>
> Microsoft is depending on the unbounded greed of the media moguls to
> pull this off, but word is the moguls are starting to wonder if DRM is a
> good idea after all. It is causing them a lot of trouble, has done
> nothing to stop piracy, and has caused tremendous ill will and bad
> publicity.
>
> Clearly ill will is of no concern to Microsoft. A recent patent filing
> reveals they have a whole lot more pain and expense planned for you in
> the future (V13).
>
> What should Microsoft do? Their most basic mistake is "one size fits
> all", holding that an entertainment device is equally suited for
> business. This is now obviously and painfully false. Microsoft should
> immediately develop a version of Vista for business with DRM completely
> stripped out. Perhaps they could disable playing of "premium content"
> entirely if they could do it cleanly - "premium content" has no place on
> business computers anyway.
>
> Will Microsoft do this? No. Instead they will "stay the course",
> increasing PR expenditures, working on ways to kill Windows XP to force
> Vista adoption, and ramping up their misinformation and FUD (Fear,
> Uncertainty and Doubt) attacks on Linux to "full rabid" shrillness.
>
> What should you do? Every business should be taking a long hard look at
> moving to Linux. Yes, there will be costs involved, and employees will
> gripe initially, but those who have done this find an overall cost savings.
>
> eComStation (formerly IBM's OS/2) is another good alternative for
> general business, but lacking specialty applications. I find it hard to
> recommend Apple - applications are limited and it's a closed proprietary
> environment run by a person of proven greed. It seems like jumping from
> the frying pan into the fire.
>
> I understand that many small businesses are dependent on specialty
> software the publishers of which support only Windows - even if it'll
> actually run on Linux. It's time to start pressuring them for Linux
> versions and/or support. Remember, there's worse to come (V13).
>
> If you happen to be such a software publisher, it's time for you to take
> a good hard look at producing Linux versions yourself. Microsoft has
> already killed a huge segment of the commercial software industry and
> you are on their list. Sooner or later it's your turn.
>
> - Andrew Grygus
> Additional Reading
>
> * V1 - Information Week - Microsoft Suffers Latest Blow As NIST Bans
> Windows Vista
> * V2 - CNet News - Microsoft's OneCare antivirus fails another test.
> * V3 - Inquirer - Windows piracy hunt tool phones home if aborted.
> * V4 - CRN ChannelWeb - HP Sees Huge Linux Desktop Deals.
> * V5 - Inquirer - OEM Vista crack gets round 'phone home' activation.
> * V6 - SearchOpenSource.com - Microsoft Windows ousted at California
> school district.
> * V7 - The Register - Vista makes people less efficient than XP did.
> * V8 - DesktopLinux.com - Ohio school district upgrades to Linux,
> saves $412K.
> * V9 - Direct2Dell - Dell to Expand Linux Options.
> * V10 - Information Week - FAA May Ditch Microsoft's Windows Vista
> And Office For Google And Linux Combo.
> * V11 - Information Week - Microsoft Hit By U.S. DOT Ban On Windows
> Vista, Explorer 7, and Office 2007.
> * V12 - Seattle Post-Intelligencer - Jim Allchin's Mac message: The
> full text.
> * V13 - ars technica - Microsoft files for patent on "modular
> operating system".
> * V14 - Andrew Grygus - Vista - Broken by Design.
> * V15 - silicon.com - French MPs pick Ubuntu for Linux switch.
> * V16 - Microsoft - Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup.
>
>
>



Truth? I don't even see the relevance. Did you have a problem you
need help with? (Other than the inability to post in the pertinent
newsgroups, that is?)

--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell
 
Re: Even MVP's must admit truth to this one

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:15:45 -0400, Mike wrote:

> In article <pan.2007.08.20.20.28.53.100779@zianet.com>,
> ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:
>
>> > Funny how most of the links are to other blogs, written by other guys, with
>> > no real references to anything other than opinion. Blogs and Wikis, written
>> > by users, for users, with no required credentials whatsoever. Gotta love
>> > the
>> > 'net! ;-)

>>
>> Conclusion: there must be lots of users upset with vista.

>
> Funny how Vista is selling around 13 million copies per month. There
> are a few (dozen? hundred? whatever) blogs about "how bad Vista is!"
>
> Conclusion: there must be lots and lots and lots of users happy with
> Vista.
>
> Mike


Selling and using may be quite different. Selling and happy are not
necessarily congruent. BTW after looking at the list I see several
articles from 'Information Week' - hardly some dissatisfied user's blog!!
 
Back
Top