Is 100k Handles too Much?

[Computer Guru]

My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,
PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set
at 2492408.

I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -
but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.

It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).


Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

 

[Computer Guru]

Re: Is 100k Handles too Much?

On Jul 4, 8:17 am, Computer Guru <mqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,
> PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set
> at 2492408.
>
> I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -
> but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.
>
> It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).
>
> Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

Please ignore that sentence about the limit. I was looking in the
wrong place - that's for the "commit charge"

 

[Theo Verweij]

Re: Is 100k Handles too Much?

Why making a problem, when it is fast and stable?

Computer Guru wrote:
> My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,
> PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set
> at 2492408.
>
> I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -
> but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.
>
> It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).
>
>
> Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?
>