Vista Service Pack 1 for 64-Bit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clayton
  • Start date Start date
C

Clayton

Guest
All in all, it has not fixed much, it has incorporated all 60 updates since
RTM
I'm using it now and it still hasn't fixed a few issues I am having, SP-1
dated August 2007, 1.08GB in size
And yes, I know it is still a beta version SP-1 v.249 Expires 8/4/2008

Don't shoot the messenger!!
 
Re: Vista Service Pack 1 for 64-Bit

"Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:

> All in all, it has not fixed much, it has incorporated all 60
> updates since RTM

I think by now we all know (or should know) that service packs are not
intended to fix anything, they combine previous updates and add
drivers. Some service packs such as SP2 for XP do add/change some
functionality but that's not usual.



--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
 
Re: Vista Service Pack 1 for 64-Bit

LOL, ofcourse they are intended to fix things

"XS11E" <xs11e@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99A9781AFC062xs11eyahoocom@127.0.0.1...
> "Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> All in all, it has not fixed much, it has incorporated all 60
>> updates since RTM
>
> I think by now we all know (or should know) that service packs are not
> intended to fix anything, they combine previous updates and add
> drivers. Some service packs such as SP2 for XP do add/change some
> functionality but that's not usual.
>
>
>
> --
> XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
 
Re: Vista Service Pack 1 for 64-Bit

"Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:

> "XS11E" <xs11e@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns99A9781AFC062xs11eyahoocom@127.0.0.1...
>> "Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>>> All in all, it has not fixed much, it has incorporated all 60
>>> updates since RTM
>>
>> I think by now we all know (or should know) that service packs
>> are not intended to fix anything, they combine previous updates
>> and add drivers. Some service packs such as SP2 for XP do
>> add/change some functionality but that's not usual.

> LOL, ofcourse they are intended to fix things

No, they are NOT intended as fixes and people who install service packs
thinking they will fix a problem are almost always disappointed and
sometimes find the problem is worse after the service pack.



--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
 
Re: Vista Service Pack 1 for 64-Bit

I agree with you. Fixes that are important or critical are issued thru
updates that are later incorporated into the SP. For the most part, unless
an extraordinary delay is expected before the next os release (as in the
case of 5 yrs for Vista), any 'fixes' are saved for it.

"XS11E" <xs11e@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99AF52BA4D22Bxs11eyahoocom@127.0.0.1...
> "Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> "XS11E" <xs11e@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns99A9781AFC062xs11eyahoocom@127.0.0.1...
>>> "Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All in all, it has not fixed much, it has incorporated all 60
>>>> updates since RTM
>>>
>>> I think by now we all know (or should know) that service packs
>>> are not intended to fix anything, they combine previous updates
>>> and add drivers. Some service packs such as SP2 for XP do
>>> add/change some functionality but that's not usual.
>
>> LOL, ofcourse they are intended to fix things
>
> No, they are NOT intended as fixes and people who install service packs
> thinking they will fix a problem are almost always disappointed and
> sometimes find the problem is worse after the service pack.
>
>
>
> --
> XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
 
Re: Vista Service Pack 1 for 64-Bit

Also, Microsoft has announced that they are no longer going to add drivers
to the service packs as they are available thru Windows update and are a
waste to load so many irrelevant drivers on everyone's machine.

"John Barnes" <jbarnes@email.net> wrote in message
news:e4pahmg%23HHA.4612@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>I agree with you. Fixes that are important or critical are issued thru
>updates that are later incorporated into the SP. For the most part, unless
>an extraordinary delay is expected before the next os release (as in the
>case of 5 yrs for Vista), any 'fixes' are saved for it.
>
> "XS11E" <xs11e@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns99AF52BA4D22Bxs11eyahoocom@127.0.0.1...
>> "Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>>> "XS11E" <xs11e@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns99A9781AFC062xs11eyahoocom@127.0.0.1...
>>>> "Clayton" <claytonbNOSPAM@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All in all, it has not fixed much, it has incorporated all 60
>>>>> updates since RTM
>>>>
>>>> I think by now we all know (or should know) that service packs
>>>> are not intended to fix anything, they combine previous updates
>>>> and add drivers. Some service packs such as SP2 for XP do
>>>> add/change some functionality but that's not usual.
>>
>>> LOL, ofcourse they are intended to fix things
>>
>> No, they are NOT intended as fixes and people who install service packs
>> thinking they will fix a problem are almost always disappointed and
>> sometimes find the problem is worse after the service pack.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
>> The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
>
 
Re: Vista Service Pack 1 for 64-Bit

Another detail to remember here is that a Service Pack has to support all
languages for the OS. If they've made any changes to localized resources,
then that has to be reflected in something like 99 different languages.

--
Chuck Walbourn
SDE, XNA Developer Connection

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
 
Back
Top