NTDLL.DLL v. 5.0.2195.7006

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom
  • Start date Start date
T

Tom

Guest
Can anyone tell me how and why NTDLL.DLL version 5.0.2195.7006 got installed
on my Win2000 AS server?

I have searched the DLL Help database at:
http://support.microsoft.com/dllhelp/?dlltype=file&l=55&pid=3075&vid=36832&alpha=&S=0
with no luck.

I have searched the Microsoft sites with the query:
"5.0.2195.7006 AND ntdll.dll", also no luck.

I grepped through the .log files in my WINNT directory and discovered that
an NTDLL.DLL was installed as part of the "Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000
SP4", but it doesn't say what version was installed.

I walked through the entire list of rollup 1 fixes given in the table at:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=891861
and only found 1 fix that contained NTDLL.DLL, Security Bulletin MS04-011
at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-011.mspx
but it lists version 5.0.2196.6899

So where does this version 5.0.2195.7006 come from? What was changed?

I have an in-house application here that is behaving differently with this
DLL, and I'm trying to find out why.

Thanks
 
Re: NTDLL.DLL v. 5.0.2195.7006

If memory serves correctly there was an issue with the first issued
rollup and a replacement was issued shortly afterwards. Perhaps the "bad
one" is still installed?

Tom wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how and why NTDLL.DLL version 5.0.2195.7006 got installed
> on my Win2000 AS server?
>
> I have searched the DLL Help database at:
> http://support.microsoft.com/dllhelp/?dlltype=file&l=55&pid=3075&vid=36832&alpha=&S=0
> with no luck.
>
> I have searched the Microsoft sites with the query:
> "5.0.2195.7006 AND ntdll.dll", also no luck.
>
> I grepped through the .log files in my WINNT directory and discovered that
> an NTDLL.DLL was installed as part of the "Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000
> SP4", but it doesn't say what version was installed.
>
> I walked through the entire list of rollup 1 fixes given in the table at:
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=891861
> and only found 1 fix that contained NTDLL.DLL, Security Bulletin MS04-011
> at:
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-011.mspx
> but it lists version 5.0.2196.6899
>
> So where does this version 5.0.2195.7006 come from? What was changed?
>
> I have an in-house application here that is behaving differently with this
> DLL, and I'm trying to find out why.
>
> Thanks
>
>
 
Re: NTDLL.DLL v. 5.0.2195.7006

Well, the build number is higher and the date is more recent than what is
listed for the rollup. If the rollup was updated, why doesn't Microsoft list
the newer files? At least it should be listed in the DLL Help database.


"Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uuK5gyt9HHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> If memory serves correctly there was an issue with the first issued rollup
> and a replacement was issued shortly afterwards. Perhaps the "bad one" is
> still installed?
>
 
Re: NTDLL.DLL v. 5.0.2195.7006

Nobody has an answer?

"Tom" <Tom@bogus.com> wrote in message
news:OGtH3tn9HHA.396@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Can anyone tell me how and why NTDLL.DLL version 5.0.2195.7006 got
> installed on my Win2000 AS server?
>
> I have searched the DLL Help database at:
> http://support.microsoft.com/dllhelp/?dlltype=file&l=55&pid=3075&vid=36832&alpha=&S=0
> with no luck.
>
> I have searched the Microsoft sites with the query:
> "5.0.2195.7006 AND ntdll.dll", also no luck.
>
> I grepped through the .log files in my WINNT directory and discovered that
> an NTDLL.DLL was installed as part of the "Update Rollup 1 for Windows
> 2000 SP4", but it doesn't say what version was installed.
>
> I walked through the entire list of rollup 1 fixes given in the table at:
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=891861
> and only found 1 fix that contained NTDLL.DLL, Security Bulletin MS04-011
> at:
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-011.mspx
> but it lists version 5.0.2196.6899
>
> So where does this version 5.0.2195.7006 come from? What was changed?
>
> I have an in-house application here that is behaving differently with this
> DLL, and I'm trying to find out why.
>
> Thanks
>
 
Back
Top