.NET on Windows 98

It will run, but Windows 98 is known for some very minor issues with .net framework. So couple things dont work excatly right.
 
.NET executables are not native code, theyre mostly IL (Intermediate Language). You make use of the enormous .NET framework from your application to get things done, youre going to have to package it too.

You can still windows apps in plain C that dont require any dependancies (except windows itself).
 
so does any application written using any of the languages provided in Visual Studio.net require the .NET framework? is there one language in VS.net i can use to compile an exe that does not require the framework to execute? or should i go back to using VB 6.0 or Visual C++ instead?
 
If you look at it different way, 20 mb of executables which will be pretty much required for most of the new programs is not so bad :)
You can use the Win32 project type of C++ to create stand aloneapps.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
0
Views
57
sva0008
S
E
Replies
0
Views
241
EN59CVH
E
Back
Top