Web Hosting Question

irasmith

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
209
Location
Nashville
I have started looking at web hosting for .net, just the initial stages to see what is out there and what type of pricing there is.

I came across something that Im a little puzzled about and maybe some of you who are more experienced than I can enlighten me.

One place I came across made special note that their hosting service allowed you to handle VS.NET projects.

I thought that whatever you did in VS.NET became compiled to whatever type you opted be it a class library or whatever, and that it would work accordingly in a .NET environment.

So I am a bit confused by the special billing the hosting provider was providing VS.NET.

Just seeking knowledge and understanding at this point and hopefully some of you can help out.
 
I think they are just saying that they have development servers with the VS.NET debug components, so that you can develop on their servers. I just hope they have production servers too...
 
I have been using discountAsp.net as a host and have found them to be very helpful. Technical support is pretty prompt and accurate.
 
What Sam said about developing on their server is true, however most times you cannot Step-Through whilst on a remote server.

iebidan, I was with InterLand for about two years and I wasnt very happy with their service.

I am curently with CrystalTech and this is some of the best service you can get. Ill get a reply to a ticket within minutes (at night or on the weekend). Their control panel gives you most any config capablity so you rarely need to request any help.
 
50 bucks everymonth for
300 Mb storage
.NET support (ASPX, webservices, etc)
email accounts
Administrative panel
Old ASP support
50 or 75 (cant remember) Mb on a SQL Server database
SSL
ODBC connections
------and much more
 
I have Brinkster:

15.95 a month
200mb webspace
10gb datatransfer
25 pop3 email accounts (web based AND computer based)
SQL Server (15 megs) is 15 bucks a month more
FTP
ASP 3.0
25+ ASP Componants
ASP.Net
.Net Mobile Toolkit
WAP Enabled
Flash Enabled
SSI
ADO 2.6
MS Access

Its the best Ive seen if you dont want to use SQL Server 2000 for its price. Awesome support.

This is their bottom teir, right above free hosting with no ads, which also supports ASP.Net!!

If youre using SQL Server, it might make more sense to get a higher tier.

This is more than Ill be using for quite a while until I get into SQL Server a bit more.
 
ok ok, here is the complete information on what I get for what I pay, and the exact price will be $ 39.95, not 50 as I said in the previous post

350 MB Hard Disk Storage
Unlimited Monthly Transfer
50 POP E-Mail Accounts
500 (10 per account) E-mail Aliases
50 E-mail Autoresponders
Virus & Spam Protection - CatchGuard
 
Thank you all so much for your posts. I will check out the resoures you listed as I work toward selecting a .NET hosting provider.

I also thank you for the explanation of the VS.NET hosting question. I really did not know what that meant and am glad to know that some providers provide that ability. I do not need to make use of it as I have my own copy of VS.NET Professional that I will be using to program with.

With the suggestions you have provided though it does look like I will be busy researching the options :)
 
If uptime and reliability is a consideration, I wouldnt go with Brinkster.
 
Yes, uptime is of importance to me. I realize everyone will have hardware/network issues at some point in time, its just the nature of the beast so that part wont upset me. My present PHP/MySQL provider has had a couple of those times but as it should be service was promptly restored and Im no worse for the wear.

I will keep looking into this as I continue my steps forward to open up a .NET based site as well.
 
Originally posted by divil
If uptime and reliability is a consideration, I wouldnt go with Brinkster.

Has there been a problem with them?

Featureprice (the old plan I had) was rated like 99.9% up, but they kept screwing with things and knocking my site down for hours to days without any clue or warning. Then they wouldnt fix anything until you complained about it.

Brinkster has been down twice for me in the last 2 months. Both times I got an email a few days in advance giving me a window of time the site might be down for X amount of minutes/hours and if I had a real problem with that time, to email them back and set up another maintanance time.

I think thats rather professional.

Considering my only other comparison, Brinksters A-OK by me so far. Do they have a rep for reliability or being down that I havnt heard about?
 
I speak only from experience. I have a site hosted on there that has very odd behaviour, they overload their servers. Sessions are spontaneously lost, things like that.
 
Back
Top