Bucky
Well-known member
Having seen multiple questions regarding showing forms and
passing variable, I thought itd be necesarry to explain the
differences of using Forms in VB6 and VB.NET. Thisll also take a
little work off people having to explain this idea more than once.
Please feel free to leave any comments and suggestions. Id
like to know if the tutorial is too wordy, and if I should
shorten it.
-------
Forms in VB.NET
This short and simple tutorial is long overdue, and hopefully it will clear up confusion regarding the use of forms in VB.NET, compared to their use in VB6. This tutorial assumes the readers knowledge of basic VB.NET syntax and the basics of object-oriented programming.
This tutorial is intended to answer such questions as:
The coder transferring from VB6 to VB.NET must think of forms in an entirely new way. A Form in VB.NET (and indeed, the entire .NET Framework) is now a standard class module. A Form acts as any other class does: a new instance of the Form class is initialized, the instance is manipulated and used, and then it is disposed of. This is very important to understanding that everything you know about forms in VB6 is wrong.
Working With Forms
That being said, here is a short example of a Form (Form1) opening another Form (Form2) upon the click of a button (Button1).
Heres where the difference of showing forms comes into play. In the General Declarations area of Form1, I declared a new instance of the Form2 class. The local variable otherForm is accessible to any subroutines inside the Form1 class. The Text property of the form was changed to show how other members of otherForm can be accessed.
Passing Values Between Forms
If forms are so disconnected, how are values passed between them? You cant just get the value of Form1.VariableName from Form2, because thats how VB6 did it, and thus VB.NET does it differently. If you can get into this state of mind, then you will pick up the changes in VB.NET quickly.
Now, I bet youre wondering, why not just create some public variables in a module and call it a day? Like what was just mentioned, this is how VB6 does things, and thus it is wrong. Modules should be considered obsolete, because they go against the OOP paradigm. If you want to create members accessible to your entire project, create them as static (Shared in VB.NET) members of a class. Here, however, it makes more sense to pass the values to the Forms constructor.
Because Forms are classes, you are free, as an inheritor of the class, to override or overload its constructor. Using this technique, you can overload the constructor of a Form to accept variables being passed to it.
Take the Form1/Form2 example again. Here, the code for both Form1 and Form2 is shown.
The only change in Form1 is that the declaration of Form2 passes the string "Foo" to its constructor. In Form2s code, the constructor has been overloaded (the original Sub New is inside the Windows Forms Designer code region) to accept a string and set it to a local variable. Then, when Button1 is clicked on Form2, the variable is displayed to the user. Any type and number of variables can be passed to constructors, including other Form instances (if, for example, you wanted to refer back to Form1 from Form2).
Its important to note that the first two lines of the overloaded constructor are required in any constructor, for they make sure that the form and all its control initialize properly. The InitializeComponent sub is, not surprisingly, also in the code region.
Lets say that you wanted to be able to access all the members of Form1 from Form2. Instead of passing a string the constructor, like in the example, you would pass a parameter of the Form (or Form1) type instead.
Heres the revised code. Form2 now shows the contents of TextBox1 on Form1 to the user when the button is clicked. Note how Form1 passes itself (Me) to the constructor of Form2, and that Form2s constructor now accepts a variable of type Form1.
Summary
When working with forms, remember that:
Feel free to PM me with any questions or comments.
Happy coding!
passing variable, I thought itd be necesarry to explain the
differences of using Forms in VB6 and VB.NET. Thisll also take a
little work off people having to explain this idea more than once.
Please feel free to leave any comments and suggestions. Id
like to know if the tutorial is too wordy, and if I should
shorten it.
-------
Forms in VB.NET
This short and simple tutorial is long overdue, and hopefully it will clear up confusion regarding the use of forms in VB.NET, compared to their use in VB6. This tutorial assumes the readers knowledge of basic VB.NET syntax and the basics of object-oriented programming.
This tutorial is intended to answer such questions as:
- Why cant I show (name of form) just by using (name of form).Show()?
- How can my form access variables that are in other places?
- What is the answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything?
The coder transferring from VB6 to VB.NET must think of forms in an entirely new way. A Form in VB.NET (and indeed, the entire .NET Framework) is now a standard class module. A Form acts as any other class does: a new instance of the Form class is initialized, the instance is manipulated and used, and then it is disposed of. This is very important to understanding that everything you know about forms in VB6 is wrong.
Working With Forms
That being said, here is a short example of a Form (Form1) opening another Form (Form2) upon the click of a button (Button1).
Code:
Public Class Form1
Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form
Windows Forms Designer generated code region
Private otherForm As New Form2()
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, _
ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
otherForm.Text = "Foo"
otherForm.Show()
End Sub
End Class
Heres where the difference of showing forms comes into play. In the General Declarations area of Form1, I declared a new instance of the Form2 class. The local variable otherForm is accessible to any subroutines inside the Form1 class. The Text property of the form was changed to show how other members of otherForm can be accessed.
Passing Values Between Forms
If forms are so disconnected, how are values passed between them? You cant just get the value of Form1.VariableName from Form2, because thats how VB6 did it, and thus VB.NET does it differently. If you can get into this state of mind, then you will pick up the changes in VB.NET quickly.
Now, I bet youre wondering, why not just create some public variables in a module and call it a day? Like what was just mentioned, this is how VB6 does things, and thus it is wrong. Modules should be considered obsolete, because they go against the OOP paradigm. If you want to create members accessible to your entire project, create them as static (Shared in VB.NET) members of a class. Here, however, it makes more sense to pass the values to the Forms constructor.
Because Forms are classes, you are free, as an inheritor of the class, to override or overload its constructor. Using this technique, you can overload the constructor of a Form to accept variables being passed to it.
Take the Form1/Form2 example again. Here, the code for both Form1 and Form2 is shown.
Code:
Public Class Form1
Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form
Windows Forms Designer generated code region
Private otherForm As New Form2("Foo")
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, _
ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
otherForm.Show()
End Sub
End Class
----------------------
Public Class Form2
Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form
Windows Forms Designer generated code region
Private param As String
Public Sub New(ByVal newParameter As String)
MyBase.New()
InitializeComponent()
param = newParameter
End Sub
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, _
ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
MessageBox.Show(param)
End Sub
End Class
The only change in Form1 is that the declaration of Form2 passes the string "Foo" to its constructor. In Form2s code, the constructor has been overloaded (the original Sub New is inside the Windows Forms Designer code region) to accept a string and set it to a local variable. Then, when Button1 is clicked on Form2, the variable is displayed to the user. Any type and number of variables can be passed to constructors, including other Form instances (if, for example, you wanted to refer back to Form1 from Form2).
Its important to note that the first two lines of the overloaded constructor are required in any constructor, for they make sure that the form and all its control initialize properly. The InitializeComponent sub is, not surprisingly, also in the code region.
Lets say that you wanted to be able to access all the members of Form1 from Form2. Instead of passing a string the constructor, like in the example, you would pass a parameter of the Form (or Form1) type instead.
Heres the revised code. Form2 now shows the contents of TextBox1 on Form1 to the user when the button is clicked. Note how Form1 passes itself (Me) to the constructor of Form2, and that Form2s constructor now accepts a variable of type Form1.
Code:
Public Class Form1
Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form
Windows Forms Designer generated code region
Private otherForm As New Form2(Me)
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, _
ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
otherForm.Show()
End Sub
End Class
----------------------
Public Class Form2
Inherits System.Windows.Forms.Form
Windows Forms Designer generated code region
Private callingForm As Form1
Public Sub New(ByVal newCallingForm As Form1)
MyBase.New()
InitializeComponent()
callingForm = newCallingForm
End Sub
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, _
ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
MessageBox.Show(callingForm.TextBox1.Text)
End Sub
End Class
Summary
When working with forms, remember that:
- Forms are merely classes that can be manipulated in any way a class can.
- To pass values to a Form (including another Form), overload the constructor of the Form to accept these values.
- If you try to do something in VB.NET using a VB6 technique, chances are it wont work and/or its bad coding practice. Find a new way.
- The answer is 42.
Feel free to PM me with any questions or comments.
Happy coding!
Last edited by a moderator: