Help on figuring out what workload for what server.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy
  • Start date Start date
A

Andy

Guest
Ok, this may be long but bear with me. I am at a smallish
manufacturing company with about 55-60 users. I am going to tell you
my current server configuration first.

Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
GB SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs

Runs: Windows 2000 Server. It is the Domain Controller/GCS.
Exchange 2000. File server. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition/
Symantec System Center.

Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics

Runs: Windows 2003 Server. WSUS. Various Server based licensing
managers (Autocad, for example), File Server. Print Server. Fax
Server.

Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
RAM. 6 72 GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics

Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise Edition.
Visual Manufacturing (Our ERP type system). This server typically has
half a gig of RAM unused and 2 GB of Page File use.

Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.

Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Terminal Server

Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ.

Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Veritas backup software.


We are looking at implementing a Sharepoint Server and a product
called Knowledge Lake which would allow us to scan in and auto file a
bunch of documents. It would be using SQL Server pretty heavily.

I was thinking about buying....

HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146 GB
SCSI Drives

With Windows SBS 2003 (I'm aware of user limitation and all the other
stuff already. Just stick with me on this one even if you don't agree
with SBS 2003 necessarily.)

Now I would have.....

New Server Running: Domain Controller/CGS, Exchange 2003, SQL Server,
Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake, File Server

Server 1 (Old Domain Controller) running: Windows Server 2003.
Terminal Server. Outlook Web Access

Server 2 running Windows Server 2003, Symantec AV Server. Print
Server, Backup Server, Licensing Server. Backup Catalog Server

Server 3 Running Windows Server 2003, SQL Server, the Visual
Manufacturing system, and being a Backup Catalog Server

Does this seem like a legitimate configuration or would a Sharepoint/
KNowledge Lake type database lumped on to the Exchange Server cause a
major problem with performance?

The other option may be to upgrade the Server running our ERP system
to 2003 Enterprise Server, bring it up to 8 GB of RAM, and use that
for both the Visual Manufacturing server and the Sharepoint/Knowledge
Lake Server.

Another option has been to stand pat with what the current servers
have and just buy another seperate server to run the Sharepoint/
Knowledge Lake software. This would leave us at Windows 2000 Active
Directory and Exchange 2000.

Any comments on what you would do would be much appreciated. Price is
very much a limiting factor, but if performance would be terrible on
any one of the setups I want to avoid it.

Thanks,

Andy
 
Re: Help on figuring out what workload for what server.....

Hello,

SBS taken apart, never install Exchange on a DC...

60 users is close to 75, which is the SBS limit.

Let me propose the target. You need:
-2 DC
-1 exchange
-1SQL
-1Sharepoint
-1 Symantec
-1 WSUS
-some license manager
-1 file server / printer /fax
-1 ERP
-1 TS
-1 backup

You have:
Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18 GB SCSI
Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB SCSI
Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of RAM. 6 72
GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ
Server6*:HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146
GB SCSI Drives

My proposal:
upgrade Server1 (and server2 if possible) to 4G of ram (except if you move
on exchange 2003 to server6)
Make server 2 DC+GC + DNS
Make server 6 "2003 standard" + sharepoint + lake knowledge.
move WSUS to server 6
move Veritas to server 6
remove server 5 (not a real server ;)

You may concentrate services on server 3 and server 6*. But SQL would love
to stay alone for performance.
You will have to replace server 1 & 2 soon. Adding them memory is just to
stay alive
Remove these "Business desktop" which don't have raid i guess as soon as you
can








--
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com


"Andy" <andy.lisowski@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1190739973.894572.126690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Ok, this may be long but bear with me. I am at a smallish
> manufacturing company with about 55-60 users. I am going to tell you
> my current server configuration first.
>
> Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
> GB SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
>
> Runs: Windows 2000 Server. It is the Domain Controller/GCS.
> Exchange 2000. File server. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition/
> Symantec System Center.
>
> Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
> SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
>
> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. WSUS. Various Server based licensing
> managers (Autocad, for example), File Server. Print Server. Fax
> Server.
>
> Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
> RAM. 6 72 GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
>
> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise Edition.
> Visual Manufacturing (Our ERP type system). This server typically has
> half a gig of RAM unused and 2 GB of Page File use.
>
> Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
>
> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Terminal Server
>
> Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ.
>
> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Veritas backup software.
>
>
> We are looking at implementing a Sharepoint Server and a product
> called Knowledge Lake which would allow us to scan in and auto file a
> bunch of documents. It would be using SQL Server pretty heavily.
>
> I was thinking about buying....
>
> HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146 GB
> SCSI Drives
>
> With Windows SBS 2003 (I'm aware of user limitation and all the other
> stuff already. Just stick with me on this one even if you don't agree
> with SBS 2003 necessarily.)
>
> Now I would have.....
>
> New Server Running: Domain Controller/CGS, Exchange 2003, SQL Server,
> Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake, File Server
>
> Server 1 (Old Domain Controller) running: Windows Server 2003.
> Terminal Server. Outlook Web Access
>
> Server 2 running Windows Server 2003, Symantec AV Server. Print
> Server, Backup Server, Licensing Server. Backup Catalog Server
>
> Server 3 Running Windows Server 2003, SQL Server, the Visual
> Manufacturing system, and being a Backup Catalog Server
>
> Does this seem like a legitimate configuration or would a Sharepoint/
> KNowledge Lake type database lumped on to the Exchange Server cause a
> major problem with performance?
>
> The other option may be to upgrade the Server running our ERP system
> to 2003 Enterprise Server, bring it up to 8 GB of RAM, and use that
> for both the Visual Manufacturing server and the Sharepoint/Knowledge
> Lake Server.
>
> Another option has been to stand pat with what the current servers
> have and just buy another seperate server to run the Sharepoint/
> Knowledge Lake software. This would leave us at Windows 2000 Active
> Directory and Exchange 2000.
>
> Any comments on what you would do would be much appreciated. Price is
> very much a limiting factor, but if performance would be terrible on
> any one of the setups I want to avoid it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
 
Re: Help on figuring out what workload for what server.....

On Sep 25, 4:46 pm, "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> SBS taken apart, never install Exchange on a DC...
>
> 60 users is close to 75, which is the SBS limit.
>
> Let me propose the target. You need:
> -2 DC
> -1 exchange
> -1SQL
> -1Sharepoint
> -1 Symantec
> -1 WSUS
> -some license manager
> -1 file server / printer /fax
> -1 ERP
> -1 TS
> -1 backup
>
> You have:
> Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18 GB SCSI
> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
> Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB SCSI
> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
> Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of RAM. 6 72
> GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
> Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
> Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ
> Server6*:HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146
> GB SCSI Drives
>
> My proposal:
> upgrade Server1 (and server2 if possible) to 4G of ram (except if you move
> on exchange 2003 to server6)
> Make server 2 DC+GC + DNS
> Make server 6 "2003 standard" + sharepoint + lake knowledge.
> move WSUS to server 6
> move Veritas to server 6
> remove server 5 (not a real server ;)
>
> You may concentrate services on server 3 and server 6*. But SQL would love
> to stay alone for performance.
> You will have to replace server 1 & 2 soon. Adding them memory is just to
> stay alive
> Remove these "Business desktop" which don't have raid i guess as soon as you
> can
>
> --
> Cordialement,
> Mathieu CHATEAUhttp://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
>
> "Andy" <andy.lisow...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1190739973.894572.126690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Ok, this may be long but bear with me. I am at a smallish
> > manufacturing company with about 55-60 users. I am going to tell you
> > my current server configuration first.

>
> > Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
> > GB SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs

>
> > Runs: Windows 2000 Server. It is the Domain Controller/GCS.
> > Exchange 2000. File server. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition/
> > Symantec System Center.

>
> > Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
> > SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics

>
> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. WSUS. Various Server based licensing
> > managers (Autocad, for example), File Server. Print Server. Fax
> > Server.

>
> > Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
> > RAM. 6 72 GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics

>
> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise Edition.
> > Visual Manufacturing (Our ERP type system). This server typically has
> > half a gig of RAM unused and 2 GB of Page File use.

>
> > Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.

>
> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Terminal Server

>
> > Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ.

>
> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Veritas backup software.

>
> > We are looking at implementing a Sharepoint Server and a product
> > called Knowledge Lake which would allow us to scan in and auto file a
> > bunch of documents. It would be using SQL Server pretty heavily.

>
> > I was thinking about buying....

>
> > HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146 GB
> > SCSI Drives

>
> > With Windows SBS 2003 (I'm aware of user limitation and all the other
> > stuff already. Just stick with me on this one even if you don't agree
> > with SBS 2003 necessarily.)

>
> > Now I would have.....

>
> > New Server Running: Domain Controller/CGS, Exchange 2003, SQL Server,
> > Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake, File Server

>
> > Server 1 (Old Domain Controller) running: Windows Server 2003.
> > Terminal Server. Outlook Web Access

>
> > Server 2 running Windows Server 2003, Symantec AV Server. Print
> > Server, Backup Server, Licensing Server. Backup Catalog Server

>
> > Server 3 Running Windows Server 2003, SQL Server, the Visual
> > Manufacturing system, and being a Backup Catalog Server

>
> > Does this seem like a legitimate configuration or would a Sharepoint/
> > KNowledge Lake type database lumped on to the Exchange Server cause a
> > major problem with performance?

>
> > The other option may be to upgrade the Server running our ERP system
> > to 2003 Enterprise Server, bring it up to 8 GB of RAM, and use that
> > for both the Visual Manufacturing server and the Sharepoint/Knowledge
> > Lake Server.

>
> > Another option has been to stand pat with what the current servers
> > have and just buy another seperate server to run the Sharepoint/
> > Knowledge Lake software. This would leave us at Windows 2000 Active
> > Directory and Exchange 2000.

>
> > Any comments on what you would do would be much appreciated. Price is
> > very much a limiting factor, but if performance would be terrible on
> > any one of the setups I want to avoid it.

>
> > Thanks,

>
> > Andy


Wait a minute, you don't have to have Exchange on the Small Business
Server?
 
Re: Help on figuring out what workload for what server.....

Hello Andy,

Mathieu has taken out the SBS at the beginning. (SBS taken apart) His proposal
doesn't include the SBS. Because you are near on 75 users i think and if
you will grow up his proposal give you the option for that.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.

> On Sep 25, 4:46 pm, "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum...@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> SBS taken apart, never install Exchange on a DC...
>>
>> 60 users is close to 75, which is the SBS limit.
>>
>> Let me propose the target. You need:
>> -2 DC
>> -1 exchange
>> -1SQL
>> -1Sharepoint
>> -1 Symantec
>> -1 WSUS
>> -some license manager
>> -1 file server / printer /fax
>> -1 ERP
>> -1 TS
>> -1 backup
>> You have:
>> Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
>> GB SCSI
>> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
>> Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
>> SCSI
>> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
>> Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
>> RAM. 6 72
>> GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
>> Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
>> Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ
>> Server6*:HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons,
>> 6 146
>> GB SCSI Drives
>> My proposal:
>> upgrade Server1 (and server2 if possible) to 4G of ram (except if you
>> move
>> on exchange 2003 to server6)
>> Make server 2 DC+GC + DNS
>> Make server 6 "2003 standard" + sharepoint + lake knowledge.
>> move WSUS to server 6
>> move Veritas to server 6
>> remove server 5 (not a real server ;)
>> You may concentrate services on server 3 and server 6*. But SQL would
>> love
>> to stay alone for performance.
>> You will have to replace server 1 & 2 soon. Adding them memory is
>> just to
>> stay alive
>> Remove these "Business desktop" which don't have raid i guess as soon
>> as you
>> can
>> --
>> Cordialement,
>> Mathieu CHATEAUhttp://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
>> "Andy" <andy.lisow...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1190739973.894572.126690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> Ok, this may be long but bear with me. I am at a smallish
>>> manufacturing company with about 55-60 users. I am going to tell
>>> you my current server configuration first.
>>>
>>> Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
>>> GB SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
>>>
>>> Runs: Windows 2000 Server. It is the Domain Controller/GCS.
>>> Exchange 2000. File server. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition/
>>> Symantec System Center.
>>>
>>> Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
>>> SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
>>>
>>> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. WSUS. Various Server based licensing
>>> managers (Autocad, for example), File Server. Print Server. Fax
>>> Server.
>>>
>>> Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
>>> RAM. 6 72 GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
>>>
>>> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise
>>> Edition. Visual Manufacturing (Our ERP type system). This server
>>> typically has half a gig of RAM unused and 2 GB of Page File use.
>>>
>>> Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
>>>
>>> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Terminal Server
>>>
>>> Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ.
>>>
>>> Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Veritas backup software.
>>>
>>> We are looking at implementing a Sharepoint Server and a product
>>> called Knowledge Lake which would allow us to scan in and auto file
>>> a bunch of documents. It would be using SQL Server pretty heavily.
>>>
>>> I was thinking about buying....
>>>
>>> HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146
>>> GB SCSI Drives
>>>
>>> With Windows SBS 2003 (I'm aware of user limitation and all the
>>> other stuff already. Just stick with me on this one even if you
>>> don't agree with SBS 2003 necessarily.)
>>>
>>> Now I would have.....
>>>
>>> New Server Running: Domain Controller/CGS, Exchange 2003, SQL
>>> Server, Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake, File Server
>>>
>>> Server 1 (Old Domain Controller) running: Windows Server 2003.
>>> Terminal Server. Outlook Web Access
>>>
>>> Server 2 running Windows Server 2003, Symantec AV Server. Print
>>> Server, Backup Server, Licensing Server. Backup Catalog Server
>>>
>>> Server 3 Running Windows Server 2003, SQL Server, the Visual
>>> Manufacturing system, and being a Backup Catalog Server
>>>
>>> Does this seem like a legitimate configuration or would a
>>> Sharepoint/ KNowledge Lake type database lumped on to the Exchange
>>> Server cause a major problem with performance?
>>>
>>> The other option may be to upgrade the Server running our ERP system
>>> to 2003 Enterprise Server, bring it up to 8 GB of RAM, and use that
>>> for both the Visual Manufacturing server and the
>>> Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake Server.
>>>
>>> Another option has been to stand pat with what the current servers
>>> have and just buy another seperate server to run the Sharepoint/
>>> Knowledge Lake software. This would leave us at Windows 2000 Active
>>> Directory and Exchange 2000.
>>>
>>> Any comments on what you would do would be much appreciated. Price
>>> is very much a limiting factor, but if performance would be terrible
>>> on any one of the setups I want to avoid it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>

> Wait a minute, you don't have to have Exchange on the Small Business
> Server?
>
 
Re: Help on figuring out what workload for what server.....

I don't propose you to install a SBS...I recommend keeping standard Windows
2003.


--
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com


"Andy" <andy.lisowski@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1190772559.197118.154450@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 25, 4:46 pm, "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum...@free.fr> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> SBS taken apart, never install Exchange on a DC...
>>
>> 60 users is close to 75, which is the SBS limit.
>>
>> Let me propose the target. You need:
>> -2 DC
>> -1 exchange
>> -1SQL
>> -1Sharepoint
>> -1 Symantec
>> -1 WSUS
>> -some license manager
>> -1 file server / printer /fax
>> -1 ERP
>> -1 TS
>> -1 backup
>>
>> You have:
>> Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18 GB
>> SCSI
>> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
>> Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB SCSI
>> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
>> Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of RAM. 6
>> 72
>> GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
>> Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
>> Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ
>> Server6*:HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6
>> 146
>> GB SCSI Drives
>>
>> My proposal:
>> upgrade Server1 (and server2 if possible) to 4G of ram (except if you
>> move
>> on exchange 2003 to server6)
>> Make server 2 DC+GC + DNS
>> Make server 6 "2003 standard" + sharepoint + lake knowledge.
>> move WSUS to server 6
>> move Veritas to server 6
>> remove server 5 (not a real server ;)
>>
>> You may concentrate services on server 3 and server 6*. But SQL would
>> love
>> to stay alone for performance.
>> You will have to replace server 1 & 2 soon. Adding them memory is just to
>> stay alive
>> Remove these "Business desktop" which don't have raid i guess as soon as
>> you
>> can
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement,
>> Mathieu CHATEAUhttp://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
>>
>> "Andy" <andy.lisow...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1190739973.894572.126690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Ok, this may be long but bear with me. I am at a smallish
>> > manufacturing company with about 55-60 users. I am going to tell you
>> > my current server configuration first.

>>
>> > Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
>> > GB SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs

>>
>> > Runs: Windows 2000 Server. It is the Domain Controller/GCS.
>> > Exchange 2000. File server. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition/
>> > Symantec System Center.

>>
>> > Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
>> > SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics

>>
>> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. WSUS. Various Server based licensing
>> > managers (Autocad, for example), File Server. Print Server. Fax
>> > Server.

>>
>> > Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
>> > RAM. 6 72 GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics

>>
>> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise Edition.
>> > Visual Manufacturing (Our ERP type system). This server typically has
>> > half a gig of RAM unused and 2 GB of Page File use.

>>
>> > Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.

>>
>> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Terminal Server

>>
>> > Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ.

>>
>> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Veritas backup software.

>>
>> > We are looking at implementing a Sharepoint Server and a product
>> > called Knowledge Lake which would allow us to scan in and auto file a
>> > bunch of documents. It would be using SQL Server pretty heavily.

>>
>> > I was thinking about buying....

>>
>> > HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146 GB
>> > SCSI Drives

>>
>> > With Windows SBS 2003 (I'm aware of user limitation and all the other
>> > stuff already. Just stick with me on this one even if you don't agree
>> > with SBS 2003 necessarily.)

>>
>> > Now I would have.....

>>
>> > New Server Running: Domain Controller/CGS, Exchange 2003, SQL Server,
>> > Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake, File Server

>>
>> > Server 1 (Old Domain Controller) running: Windows Server 2003.
>> > Terminal Server. Outlook Web Access

>>
>> > Server 2 running Windows Server 2003, Symantec AV Server. Print
>> > Server, Backup Server, Licensing Server. Backup Catalog Server

>>
>> > Server 3 Running Windows Server 2003, SQL Server, the Visual
>> > Manufacturing system, and being a Backup Catalog Server

>>
>> > Does this seem like a legitimate configuration or would a Sharepoint/
>> > KNowledge Lake type database lumped on to the Exchange Server cause a
>> > major problem with performance?

>>
>> > The other option may be to upgrade the Server running our ERP system
>> > to 2003 Enterprise Server, bring it up to 8 GB of RAM, and use that
>> > for both the Visual Manufacturing server and the Sharepoint/Knowledge
>> > Lake Server.

>>
>> > Another option has been to stand pat with what the current servers
>> > have and just buy another seperate server to run the Sharepoint/
>> > Knowledge Lake software. This would leave us at Windows 2000 Active
>> > Directory and Exchange 2000.

>>
>> > Any comments on what you would do would be much appreciated. Price is
>> > very much a limiting factor, but if performance would be terrible on
>> > any one of the setups I want to avoid it.

>>
>> > Thanks,

>>
>> > Andy

>
> Wait a minute, you don't have to have Exchange on the Small Business
> Server?
>
 
Re: Help on figuring out what workload for what server.....

On Sep 26, 1:09 am, "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum...@free.fr> wrote:
> I don't propose you to install a SBS...I recommend keeping standard Windows
> 2003.
>
> --
> Cordialement,
> Mathieu CHATEAUhttp://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
>
> "Andy" <andy.lisow...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1190772559.197118.154450@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Sep 25, 4:46 pm, "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum...@free.fr> wrote:
> >> Hello,

>
> >> SBS taken apart, never install Exchange on a DC...

>
> >> 60 users is close to 75, which is the SBS limit.

>
> >> Let me propose the target. You need:
> >> -2 DC
> >> -1 exchange
> >> -1SQL
> >> -1Sharepoint
> >> -1 Symantec
> >> -1 WSUS
> >> -some license manager
> >> -1 file server / printer /fax
> >> -1 ERP
> >> -1 TS
> >> -1 backup

>
> >> You have:
> >> Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18 GB
> >> SCSI
> >> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
> >> Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB SCSI
> >> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
> >> Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of RAM. 6
> >> 72
> >> GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
> >> Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
> >> Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ
> >> Server6*:HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6
> >> 146
> >> GB SCSI Drives

>
> >> My proposal:
> >> upgrade Server1 (and server2 if possible) to 4G of ram (except if you
> >> move
> >> on exchange 2003 to server6)
> >> Make server 2 DC+GC + DNS
> >> Make server 6 "2003 standard" + sharepoint + lake knowledge.
> >> move WSUS to server 6
> >> move Veritas to server 6
> >> remove server 5 (not a real server ;)

>
> >> You may concentrate services on server 3 and server 6*. But SQL would
> >> love
> >> to stay alone for performance.
> >> You will have to replace server 1 & 2 soon. Adding them memory is just to
> >> stay alive
> >> Remove these "Business desktop" which don't have raid i guess as soon as
> >> you
> >> can

>
> >> --
> >> Cordialement,
> >> Mathieu CHATEAUhttp://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>
> >> "Andy" <andy.lisow...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> >>news:1190739973.894572.126690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

>
> >> > Ok, this may be long but bear with me. I am at a smallish
> >> > manufacturing company with about 55-60 users. I am going to tell you
> >> > my current server configuration first.

>
> >> > Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
> >> > GB SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs

>
> >> > Runs: Windows 2000 Server. It is the Domain Controller/GCS.
> >> > Exchange 2000. File server. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition/
> >> > Symantec System Center.

>
> >> > Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
> >> > SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics

>
> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. WSUS. Various Server based licensing
> >> > managers (Autocad, for example), File Server. Print Server. Fax
> >> > Server.

>
> >> > Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
> >> > RAM. 6 72 GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics

>
> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise Edition.
> >> > Visual Manufacturing (Our ERP type system). This server typically has
> >> > half a gig of RAM unused and 2 GB of Page File use.

>
> >> > Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.

>
> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Terminal Server

>
> >> > Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ.

>
> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Veritas backup software.

>
> >> > We are looking at implementing a Sharepoint Server and a product
> >> > called Knowledge Lake which would allow us to scan in and auto file a
> >> > bunch of documents. It would be using SQL Server pretty heavily.

>
> >> > I was thinking about buying....

>
> >> > HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146 GB
> >> > SCSI Drives

>
> >> > With Windows SBS 2003 (I'm aware of user limitation and all the other
> >> > stuff already. Just stick with me on this one even if you don't agree
> >> > with SBS 2003 necessarily.)

>
> >> > Now I would have.....

>
> >> > New Server Running: Domain Controller/CGS, Exchange 2003, SQL Server,
> >> > Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake, File Server

>
> >> > Server 1 (Old Domain Controller) running: Windows Server 2003.
> >> > Terminal Server. Outlook Web Access

>
> >> > Server 2 running Windows Server 2003, Symantec AV Server. Print
> >> > Server, Backup Server, Licensing Server. Backup Catalog Server

>
> >> > Server 3 Running Windows Server 2003, SQL Server, the Visual
> >> > Manufacturing system, and being a Backup Catalog Server

>
> >> > Does this seem like a legitimate configuration or would a Sharepoint/
> >> > KNowledge Lake type database lumped on to the Exchange Server cause a
> >> > major problem with performance?

>
> >> > The other option may be to upgrade the Server running our ERP system
> >> > to 2003 Enterprise Server, bring it up to 8 GB of RAM, and use that
> >> > for both the Visual Manufacturing server and the Sharepoint/Knowledge
> >> > Lake Server.

>
> >> > Another option has been to stand pat with what the current servers
> >> > have and just buy another seperate server to run the Sharepoint/
> >> > Knowledge Lake software. This would leave us at Windows 2000 Active
> >> > Directory and Exchange 2000.

>
> >> > Any comments on what you would do would be much appreciated. Price is
> >> > very much a limiting factor, but if performance would be terrible on
> >> > any one of the setups I want to avoid it.

>
> >> > Thanks,

>
> >> > Andy

>
> > Wait a minute, you don't have to have Exchange on the Small Business
> > Server?


Gotcha. I'm taking the guys with the money with me on Friday to a
Exchange 2007 Unified Messaging demonstration. I can get them to
spend the extra money IF I can find something that they really like in
Exchange 2007. I'm riding a thin budget and a few days ago they
decided that while my upgrading to newer server software sounded like
a good idea, they were thinking about just buying a cheaper server,
Another Server 2003 License, and installing Our Document management on
that...leaving the current Active directory and Exchange environments
at AD 2000/Exchange 2000.

Thanks,

Andy
 
Re: Help on figuring out what workload for what server.....

Hello,

Do not forget Outlook 2007 in the Demo...
You may also mention Outlook Anywhere...
OWA 2007 sound great too

--
Cordialement,
Mathieu CHATEAU
http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com


"Andy" <andy.lisowski@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1190822207.777603.163100@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 26, 1:09 am, "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum...@free.fr> wrote:
>> I don't propose you to install a SBS...I recommend keeping standard
>> Windows
>> 2003.
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement,
>> Mathieu CHATEAUhttp://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
>>
>> "Andy" <andy.lisow...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1190772559.197118.154450@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Sep 25, 4:46 pm, "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum...@free.fr> wrote:
>> >> Hello,

>>
>> >> SBS taken apart, never install Exchange on a DC...

>>
>> >> 60 users is close to 75, which is the SBS limit.

>>
>> >> Let me propose the target. You need:
>> >> -2 DC
>> >> -1 exchange
>> >> -1SQL
>> >> -1Sharepoint
>> >> -1 Symantec
>> >> -1 WSUS
>> >> -some license manager
>> >> -1 file server / printer /fax
>> >> -1 ERP
>> >> -1 TS
>> >> -1 backup

>>
>> >> You have:
>> >> Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
>> >> GB
>> >> SCSI
>> >> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs
>> >> Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
>> >> SCSI
>> >> Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics
>> >> Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of RAM.
>> >> 6
>> >> 72
>> >> GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics
>> >> Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.
>> >> Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ
>> >> Server6*:HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons,
>> >> 6
>> >> 146
>> >> GB SCSI Drives

>>
>> >> My proposal:
>> >> upgrade Server1 (and server2 if possible) to 4G of ram (except if you
>> >> move
>> >> on exchange 2003 to server6)
>> >> Make server 2 DC+GC + DNS
>> >> Make server 6 "2003 standard" + sharepoint + lake knowledge.
>> >> move WSUS to server 6
>> >> move Veritas to server 6
>> >> remove server 5 (not a real server ;)

>>
>> >> You may concentrate services on server 3 and server 6*. But SQL would
>> >> love
>> >> to stay alone for performance.
>> >> You will have to replace server 1 & 2 soon. Adding them memory is just
>> >> to
>> >> stay alive
>> >> Remove these "Business desktop" which don't have raid i guess as soon
>> >> as
>> >> you
>> >> can

>>
>> >> --
>> >> Cordialement,
>> >> Mathieu CHATEAUhttp://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>>
>> >> "Andy" <andy.lisow...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>
>> >>news:1190739973.894572.126690@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

>>
>> >> > Ok, this may be long but bear with me. I am at a smallish
>> >> > manufacturing company with about 55-60 users. I am going to tell
>> >> > you
>> >> > my current server configuration first.

>>
>> >> > Server 1: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 1.13 GHZ, 1.5 GB RAM, 6 18
>> >> > GB SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit NICs

>>
>> >> > Runs: Windows 2000 Server. It is the Domain Controller/GCS.
>> >> > Exchange 2000. File server. Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition/
>> >> > Symantec System Center.

>>
>> >> > Server 2: Compaq Proliant ML370 G2 (PIII 700 MHZ, 1 GB RAM, 6 9 GB
>> >> > SCSI Hard drives, 2 Gigabit Nics

>>
>> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. WSUS. Various Server based licensing
>> >> > managers (Autocad, for example), File Server. Print Server. Fax
>> >> > Server.

>>
>> >> > Server 3: HP Proliant DL 380. Dual Intel Xeon 3.4 GHZ. 3 GB of
>> >> > RAM. 6 72 GB SCSI Drives. 2 Gigabit Nics

>>
>> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise
>> >> > Edition.
>> >> > Visual Manufacturing (Our ERP type system). This server typically
>> >> > has
>> >> > half a gig of RAM unused and 2 GB of Page File use.

>>
>> >> > Server 4: HP Business Desktop. 2 GB of Ram 1 Pentium 4 3.0 GHZ.

>>
>> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Terminal Server

>>
>> >> > Server 5: Hp Business Desktop. 650 MB of RAM. 1 P4 2.8 GHZ.

>>
>> >> > Runs: Windows 2003 Server. Veritas backup software.

>>
>> >> > We are looking at implementing a Sharepoint Server and a product
>> >> > called Knowledge Lake which would allow us to scan in and auto file
>> >> > a
>> >> > bunch of documents. It would be using SQL Server pretty heavily.

>>
>> >> > I was thinking about buying....

>>
>> >> > HP ProLiant DL 360. 4 GB of RAM, 2 1.8 GHZ Quad Core Xeons, 6 146
>> >> > GB
>> >> > SCSI Drives

>>
>> >> > With Windows SBS 2003 (I'm aware of user limitation and all the
>> >> > other
>> >> > stuff already. Just stick with me on this one even if you don't
>> >> > agree
>> >> > with SBS 2003 necessarily.)

>>
>> >> > Now I would have.....

>>
>> >> > New Server Running: Domain Controller/CGS, Exchange 2003, SQL
>> >> > Server,
>> >> > Sharepoint/Knowledge Lake, File Server

>>
>> >> > Server 1 (Old Domain Controller) running: Windows Server 2003.
>> >> > Terminal Server. Outlook Web Access

>>
>> >> > Server 2 running Windows Server 2003, Symantec AV Server. Print
>> >> > Server, Backup Server, Licensing Server. Backup Catalog Server

>>
>> >> > Server 3 Running Windows Server 2003, SQL Server, the Visual
>> >> > Manufacturing system, and being a Backup Catalog Server

>>
>> >> > Does this seem like a legitimate configuration or would a
>> >> > Sharepoint/
>> >> > KNowledge Lake type database lumped on to the Exchange Server cause
>> >> > a
>> >> > major problem with performance?

>>
>> >> > The other option may be to upgrade the Server running our ERP system
>> >> > to 2003 Enterprise Server, bring it up to 8 GB of RAM, and use that
>> >> > for both the Visual Manufacturing server and the
>> >> > Sharepoint/Knowledge
>> >> > Lake Server.

>>
>> >> > Another option has been to stand pat with what the current servers
>> >> > have and just buy another seperate server to run the Sharepoint/
>> >> > Knowledge Lake software. This would leave us at Windows 2000 Active
>> >> > Directory and Exchange 2000.

>>
>> >> > Any comments on what you would do would be much appreciated. Price
>> >> > is
>> >> > very much a limiting factor, but if performance would be terrible on
>> >> > any one of the setups I want to avoid it.

>>
>> >> > Thanks,

>>
>> >> > Andy

>>
>> > Wait a minute, you don't have to have Exchange on the Small Business
>> > Server?

>
> Gotcha. I'm taking the guys with the money with me on Friday to a
> Exchange 2007 Unified Messaging demonstration. I can get them to
> spend the extra money IF I can find something that they really like in
> Exchange 2007. I'm riding a thin budget and a few days ago they
> decided that while my upgrading to newer server software sounded like
> a good idea, they were thinking about just buying a cheaper server,
> Another Server 2003 License, and installing Our Document management on
> that...leaving the current Active directory and Exchange environments
> at AD 2000/Exchange 2000.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
 
Back
Top