S
Skybuck Flying
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Woopsie
XP newsgroup removed.
Vista newsgroup added
Bye,
Skybuck =D
Woopsie
XP newsgroup removed.
Vista newsgroup added
Bye,
Skybuck =D
S
Skybuck Flying
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
I forgot one:
Military:
DEAD
Bye,
Skybuck.
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
I forgot one:
Military:
DEAD
Bye,
Skybuck.
R
R. C. White
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Hi, Skybuck.
And we here in the Vista.general NG have NO idea what you're talking about!
And I think that's wonderful! ;<)
RC
--
R. C. White, CPA
San Marcos, TX
rc@grandecom.net
Microsoft Windows MVP
(Running Windows Live Mail beta 2 in Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 beta v.275)
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo683$khp$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Woopsie
>
> XP newsgroup removed.
>
> Vista newsgroup added
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck =D
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Hi, Skybuck.
And we here in the Vista.general NG have NO idea what you're talking about!
And I think that's wonderful! ;<)
RC
--
R. C. White, CPA
San Marcos, TX
rc@grandecom.net
Microsoft Windows MVP
(Running Windows Live Mail beta 2 in Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 beta v.275)
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo683$khp$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Woopsie
>
> XP newsgroup removed.
>
> Vista newsgroup added
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck =D
S
Skybuck Flying
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Admit it dude,
VISTA IS SELLING BAD.
Even idiots don't want to be terrorized.
That leaves the clueless people like you waiting to be terrorized LOL.
ONCE YOU HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED LOL We will "communicate" again LOL.
Bye,
Skybuck.
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Admit it dude,
VISTA IS SELLING BAD.
Even idiots don't want to be terrorized.
That leaves the clueless people like you waiting to be terrorized LOL.
ONCE YOU HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED LOL We will "communicate" again LOL.
Bye,
Skybuck.
D
Dave
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
You betcha, bye!
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo9b9$29t$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Admit it dude,
>
> VISTA IS SELLING BAD.
>
> Even idiots don't want to be terrorized.
>
> That leaves the clueless people like you waiting to be terrorized LOL.
>
> ONCE YOU HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED LOL We will "communicate" again LOL.
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck.
>
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
You betcha, bye!
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo9b9$29t$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Admit it dude,
>
> VISTA IS SELLING BAD.
>
> Even idiots don't want to be terrorized.
>
> That leaves the clueless people like you waiting to be terrorized LOL.
>
> ONCE YOU HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED LOL We will "communicate" again LOL.
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck.
>
P
Pac Man ©
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
"Dave" <dave@beepbeep.com> schreef in bericht
news:e3JmhNPDIHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> You betcha, bye!
>
> "Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:feo9b9$29t$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>> Admit it dude,
>>
>> VISTA IS SELLING BAD.
>>
>> Even idiots don't want to be terrorized.
>>
>> That leaves the clueless people like you waiting to be terrorized LOL.
>>
>> ONCE YOU HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED LOL We will "communicate" again LOL.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Skybuck.
Mán am i glad i didn't buy windows vista.
I will get the free linux instead
Greetz
Wim
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
"Dave" <dave@beepbeep.com> schreef in bericht
news:e3JmhNPDIHA.3400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> You betcha, bye!
>
> "Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:feo9b9$29t$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>> Admit it dude,
>>
>> VISTA IS SELLING BAD.
>>
>> Even idiots don't want to be terrorized.
>>
>> That leaves the clueless people like you waiting to be terrorized LOL.
>>
>> ONCE YOU HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED LOL We will "communicate" again LOL.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Skybuck.
Mán am i glad i didn't buy windows vista.
I will get the free linux instead
Greetz
Wim
J
Jerry Atricks
Guest
Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
You need to increase your medication.
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo683$khp$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Woopsie
>
> XP newsgroup removed.
>
> Vista newsgroup added
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck =D
>
Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
You need to increase your medication.
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo683$khp$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Woopsie
>
> XP newsgroup removed.
>
> Vista newsgroup added
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck =D
>
S
Skybuck Flying
Guest
Re: Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
Re: Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
Bill called:
"Posting off-topic messages is not allowed"
Your computer will go offline in exactly 20 hours LOL.
Bye,
Skybuck.
Re: Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
Bill called:
"Posting off-topic messages is not allowed"
Your computer will go offline in exactly 20 hours LOL.
Bye,
Skybuck.
S
Skybuck Flying
Guest
Re: Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
Re: Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
It's not to late yet for ya.
Call up Bill Gates and tell him you'll pay a 100 dollar fine and you be ok !
Bye,
Skybuck.
Re: Dr. Called - Says to increase your medication
It's not to late yet for ya.
Call up Bill Gates and tell him you'll pay a 100 dollar fine and you be ok !
Bye,
Skybuck.
C
Charlie Russel - MVP
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Skybuck -
We'd appreciate it if you didn't cross post to the 64bit newgroup. We
try to stick to subjects exclusively 64bit, and leave vista.general for
those things that affect all versions. Thank you for your understanding and
patience - we do appreciate it.
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo683$khp$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Woopsie
>
> XP newsgroup removed.
>
> Vista newsgroup added
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck =D
>
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Skybuck -
We'd appreciate it if you didn't cross post to the 64bit newgroup. We
try to stick to subjects exclusively 64bit, and leave vista.general for
those things that affect all versions. Thank you for your understanding and
patience - we do appreciate it.
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:feo683$khp$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> Woopsie
>
> XP newsgroup removed.
>
> Vista newsgroup added
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck =D
>
S
Skybuck Flying
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
You have things reversed.
64 bit is now, and the future.
32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
Bye,
Skybuck.
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
You have things reversed.
64 bit is now, and the future.
32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
Bye,
Skybuck.
C
Charlie Russel - MVP
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Oh, I agree - I've been running almost exclusively 64-bit for 2 1/2 years
now, after all. But 32-bit isn't quite extinct, yet. Just having a bit of a
low birth rate problem.
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fepg8m$eqv$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> You have things reversed.
>
> 64 bit is now, and the future.
>
> 32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck.
>
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Oh, I agree - I've been running almost exclusively 64-bit for 2 1/2 years
now, after all. But 32-bit isn't quite extinct, yet. Just having a bit of a
low birth rate problem.
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
"Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fepg8m$eqv$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> You have things reversed.
>
> 64 bit is now, and the future.
>
> 32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck.
>
J
John Barnes
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
I assume you mean that 64-bit has the low birth rate problem. What ever
happened to the requirement you once mentioned that Microsoft was going to
require that products be both 32 and 64-bit compatible before they received
the Vista blessing. I see lots of hardware and some software with the Vista
symbol with only 32-bit compatibility. Obviously there is now no 64-bit
requirement. It is annoying to have to drill down to some obscure page on a
product and find an * with small print that says it won't work on 64-bit or
has no 64-bit drivers.
"Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
news:29067514-D342-4078-A260-45A364BC6FAC@microsoft.com...
> Oh, I agree - I've been running almost exclusively 64-bit for 2 1/2 years
> now, after all. But 32-bit isn't quite extinct, yet. Just having a bit of
> a low birth rate problem.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
>
> "Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fepg8m$eqv$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>> You have things reversed.
>>
>> 64 bit is now, and the future.
>>
>> 32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Skybuck.
>>
>
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
I assume you mean that 64-bit has the low birth rate problem. What ever
happened to the requirement you once mentioned that Microsoft was going to
require that products be both 32 and 64-bit compatible before they received
the Vista blessing. I see lots of hardware and some software with the Vista
symbol with only 32-bit compatibility. Obviously there is now no 64-bit
requirement. It is annoying to have to drill down to some obscure page on a
product and find an * with small print that says it won't work on 64-bit or
has no 64-bit drivers.
"Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
news:29067514-D342-4078-A260-45A364BC6FAC@microsoft.com...
> Oh, I agree - I've been running almost exclusively 64-bit for 2 1/2 years
> now, after all. But 32-bit isn't quite extinct, yet. Just having a bit of
> a low birth rate problem.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
>
> "Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fepg8m$eqv$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>> You have things reversed.
>>
>> 64 bit is now, and the future.
>>
>> 32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Skybuck.
>>
>
C
Charlie Russel - MVP
Guest
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
No, actually I meant that new "32-bit only" machines are getting harder and
harder to find. That is, 32-bit only hardware. Machines with 32-bit OS's on
64-bit capable hardware are still the norm. But I don't think that will
last. This release coming early next year of Windows Server 2008 will be the
last Server version that is available in 32-bit. (And very few folks in the
server world will be running 32-bit Server 2k8, I strongly suspect, for
reasons of RAM support if nothing else.)
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
"John Barnes" <jbarnes@email.net> wrote in message
news:%23Xl4WyYDIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I assume you mean that 64-bit has the low birth rate problem. What ever
>happened to the requirement you once mentioned that Microsoft was going to
>require that products be both 32 and 64-bit compatible before they received
>the Vista blessing. I see lots of hardware and some software with the
>Vista symbol with only 32-bit compatibility. Obviously there is now no
>64-bit requirement. It is annoying to have to drill down to some obscure
>page on a product and find an * with small print that says it won't work on
>64-bit or has no 64-bit drivers.
>
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
> news:29067514-D342-4078-A260-45A364BC6FAC@microsoft.com...
>> Oh, I agree - I've been running almost exclusively 64-bit for 2 1/2 years
>> now, after all. But 32-bit isn't quite extinct, yet. Just having a bit of
>> a low birth rate problem.
>>
>> --
>> Charlie.
>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>
>>
>> "Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fepg8m$eqv$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>>> You have things reversed.
>>>
>>> 64 bit is now, and the future.
>>>
>>> 32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Skybuck.
>>>
>>
>
Re: Vista's De-Activation = CYBERTERRORISM ?!
No, actually I meant that new "32-bit only" machines are getting harder and
harder to find. That is, 32-bit only hardware. Machines with 32-bit OS's on
64-bit capable hardware are still the norm. But I don't think that will
last. This release coming early next year of Windows Server 2008 will be the
last Server version that is available in 32-bit. (And very few folks in the
server world will be running 32-bit Server 2k8, I strongly suspect, for
reasons of RAM support if nothing else.)
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
"John Barnes" <jbarnes@email.net> wrote in message
news:%23Xl4WyYDIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I assume you mean that 64-bit has the low birth rate problem. What ever
>happened to the requirement you once mentioned that Microsoft was going to
>require that products be both 32 and 64-bit compatible before they received
>the Vista blessing. I see lots of hardware and some software with the
>Vista symbol with only 32-bit compatibility. Obviously there is now no
>64-bit requirement. It is annoying to have to drill down to some obscure
>page on a product and find an * with small print that says it won't work on
>64-bit or has no 64-bit drivers.
>
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
> news:29067514-D342-4078-A260-45A364BC6FAC@microsoft.com...
>> Oh, I agree - I've been running almost exclusively 64-bit for 2 1/2 years
>> now, after all. But 32-bit isn't quite extinct, yet. Just having a bit of
>> a low birth rate problem.
>>
>> --
>> Charlie.
>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>
>>
>> "Skybuck Flying" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fepg8m$eqv$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
>>> You have things reversed.
>>>
>>> 64 bit is now, and the future.
>>>
>>> 32 bit was the past and is near extinction.
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Skybuck.
>>>
>>
>