can't get trusted sites to work properly!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lee.james@spartan.ab.ca
  • Start date Start date
L

lee.james@spartan.ab.ca

Guest
We have added a list of trusted sites in Group Policy set at the
domain level. This works fine for users logging into their computer.

However when they connect to our Citrix server (Metaframe XP) they
don't get the trusted sites (published app is IE based) being
applied.


I tried adding the same list of trusted sites in the Citrix server's
local policy but that didn't work either.


A few posts have mentioned having to enable loopback processing - but
I don't care, all users are going to get the same trusted sites
anyways - because they're already specified at the domain level!


Also, the citrix servers are in their own OU, don't have any Group
Policies applied against it, and there is no Group Policy blocking
either.


Any help or insight would be appreciated.


J.
 
Re: can't get trusted sites to work properly!

Is Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration enabled
for regular user groups on your TS? You can check this
through Add/Remove Windows Components, select IEES
and click Details.

Security zone information is stored separately for IEES
versus non-IEES enabled. The GPO site list applies to
non-IEES enabled only.

-TP

lee.james@spartan.ab.ca wrote:
> We have added a list of trusted sites in Group Policy set at the
> domain level. This works fine for users logging into their computer.
>
> However when they connect to our Citrix server (Metaframe XP) they
> don't get the trusted sites (published app is IE based) being
> applied.
>
>
> I tried adding the same list of trusted sites in the Citrix server's
> local policy but that didn't work either.
>
>
> A few posts have mentioned having to enable loopback processing - but
> I don't care, all users are going to get the same trusted sites
> anyways - because they're already specified at the domain level!
>
>
> Also, the citrix servers are in their own OU, don't have any Group
> Policies applied against it, and there is no Group Policy blocking
> either.
>
>
> Any help or insight would be appreciated.
>
>
> J.
 
Back
Top