A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamie Plenderleith
  • Start date Start date
J

Jamie Plenderleith

Guest
Hi Guys,

Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
Recently put together a machine;
E6700 Quad Core CPU
Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
2GB of PC8500 RAM
ATI Radeon X1800 XL
etc.

I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs and
reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
allocated time interval'
Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
So, for example;

0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
or
0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....

I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest graphics
drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs. The
machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in Safe
Mode.
Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently any
other game will not cause the machine to crash.

Any thoughts?

Regards,
Jamie
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

Giving this a quick search, I found someone who solved (for the moment?)
this exact issue by re-installing.

My own contribution - if you upgraded the BIOS, did you look for upgraded
system drivers as well?

Try disconnecting everything you don't need for booting - especially USB
stuff.


Tony. . .


"Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:4B09A34E-1B5D-4989-A4FD-A63B4E46CF6D@microsoft.com...
> Hi Guys,
>
> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> Recently put together a machine;
> E6700 Quad Core CPU
> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> etc.
>
> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs
> and
> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> allocated time interval'
> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> So, for example;
>
> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> or
> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>
> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
> graphics
> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs.
> The
> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in
> Safe
> Mode.
> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently
> any
> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Jamie
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Hi Tony,

Thanks for responding.
I had to upgrade the BIOS to get windows to even install on the machine.
Windows itself had picked up all the drivers automatically after it was
installed.

I suppose I could reinstall... I've got nothing to lose to be honest!
I'll let you know how that goes. It's a pain though, I'll have to reinstall;
Visual Studio 2005
Visual Studio 2008
SQL Server 2005
etc. etc.

Cheers,
Jamie

"Tony Sperling mail.dk>" wrote:

> Giving this a quick search, I found someone who solved (for the moment?)
> this exact issue by re-installing.
>
> My own contribution - if you upgraded the BIOS, did you look for upgraded
> system drivers as well?
>
> Try disconnecting everything you don't need for booting - especially USB
> stuff.
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:4B09A34E-1B5D-4989-A4FD-A63B4E46CF6D@microsoft.com...
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> > Recently put together a machine;
> > E6700 Quad Core CPU
> > Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> > 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> > ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> > etc.
> >
> > I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs
> > and
> > reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> > 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> > allocated time interval'
> > Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> > So, for example;
> >
> > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> > or
> > 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
> >
> > I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> > motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
> > graphics
> > drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs.
> > The
> > machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
> > tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in
> > Safe
> > Mode.
> > Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
> > but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently
> > any
> > other game will not cause the machine to crash.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jamie
>
>
>
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

Another bizarre piece of information.

If I use the Intel CPU Identification Utility, it tells me that the CPU is
overclocked.
I don't understand how this can be the case though. It's a normal Intel
boxed CPU. I haven't overclocked it or anything. I'm using the default
motherboard settings, and when I look at the overclocking areas of the BIOS,
they are all set to the normal speed the CPU is supposed to be running at.
But it's saying the following

System Expected Speed: 2.66GHz
System Reported Core 1: 2.71GHz
System Reported Core 2: 2.71GHz
System Reported Core 3: 2.71GHz
System Reported Core 4: 2.71GHz

System Bus Expected: 1066MHz
System Bus Reported Core 1: 1087MHz
System Bus Reported Core 2: 1087MHz
System Bus Reported Core 3: 1087MHz
System Bus Reported Core 4: 1087MHz


So for some reason the CPU is running faster than it's supposed to....
bizarre....

"Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> Recently put together a machine;
> E6700 Quad Core CPU
> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> etc.
>
> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs and
> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> allocated time interval'
> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> So, for example;
>
> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> or
> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>
> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest graphics
> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs. The
> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in Safe
> Mode.
> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently any
> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Jamie
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Jamie:
That's a mere 2% overclocking and shouldn't be a problem.
Maybe your BIOS setup has options for Automatic Overclocking via some
nickname.
ASUS uses "NOS" for those tasks.
See if you have it and if it can be disabled. Check your motherboard manual.
One last shot.
Insufficient power supply wattage may be causing your posted issues!!

Carlos


"Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:

> Another bizarre piece of information.
>
> If I use the Intel CPU Identification Utility, it tells me that the CPU is
> overclocked.
> I don't understand how this can be the case though. It's a normal Intel
> boxed CPU. I haven't overclocked it or anything. I'm using the default
> motherboard settings, and when I look at the overclocking areas of the BIOS,
> they are all set to the normal speed the CPU is supposed to be running at.
> But it's saying the following
>
> System Expected Speed: 2.66GHz
> System Reported Core 1: 2.71GHz
> System Reported Core 2: 2.71GHz
> System Reported Core 3: 2.71GHz
> System Reported Core 4: 2.71GHz
>
> System Bus Expected: 1066MHz
> System Bus Reported Core 1: 1087MHz
> System Bus Reported Core 2: 1087MHz
> System Bus Reported Core 3: 1087MHz
> System Bus Reported Core 4: 1087MHz
>
>
> So for some reason the CPU is running faster than it's supposed to....
> bizarre....
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> > Recently put together a machine;
> > E6700 Quad Core CPU
> > Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> > 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> > ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> > etc.
> >
> > I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs and
> > reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> > 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> > allocated time interval'
> > Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> > So, for example;
> >
> > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> > or
> > 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
> >
> > I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> > motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest graphics
> > drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs. The
> > machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
> > tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in Safe
> > Mode.
> > Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
> > but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently any
> > other game will not cause the machine to crash.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jamie
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Hi Carlos,

When I underclock the CPU it seems to stay on for longer and World of
Warcraft can run for some time.

I thought it was power originally, so replaced by 450W PSU with a 700W PSU.
That did not have any effect :/

"Carlos" wrote:

> Jamie:
> That's a mere 2% overclocking and shouldn't be a problem.
> Maybe your BIOS setup has options for Automatic Overclocking via some
> nickname.
> ASUS uses "NOS" for those tasks.
> See if you have it and if it can be disabled. Check your motherboard manual.
> One last shot.
> Insufficient power supply wattage may be causing your posted issues!!
>
> Carlos
>
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>
> > Another bizarre piece of information.
> >
> > If I use the Intel CPU Identification Utility, it tells me that the CPU is
> > overclocked.
> > I don't understand how this can be the case though. It's a normal Intel
> > boxed CPU. I haven't overclocked it or anything. I'm using the default
> > motherboard settings, and when I look at the overclocking areas of the BIOS,
> > they are all set to the normal speed the CPU is supposed to be running at.
> > But it's saying the following
> >
> > System Expected Speed: 2.66GHz
> > System Reported Core 1: 2.71GHz
> > System Reported Core 2: 2.71GHz
> > System Reported Core 3: 2.71GHz
> > System Reported Core 4: 2.71GHz
> >
> > System Bus Expected: 1066MHz
> > System Bus Reported Core 1: 1087MHz
> > System Bus Reported Core 2: 1087MHz
> > System Bus Reported Core 3: 1087MHz
> > System Bus Reported Core 4: 1087MHz
> >
> >
> > So for some reason the CPU is running faster than it's supposed to....
> > bizarre....
> >
> > "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> > > Recently put together a machine;
> > > E6700 Quad Core CPU
> > > Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> > > 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> > > ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs and
> > > reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> > > 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> > > allocated time interval'
> > > Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> > > So, for example;
> > >
> > > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> > > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> > > or
> > > 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
> > >
> > > I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> > > motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest graphics
> > > drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs. The
> > > machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
> > > tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in Safe
> > > Mode.
> > > Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
> > > but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently any
> > > other game will not cause the machine to crash.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jamie
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Jamie --
It really sounds like you've tried most things we've all come up with.
I'm beginning to suspect some subtle problem with the board or the CPU. If
it's a newly built system, you should have some recourse with your vendor. I
might try for a system board swap to a different mfg & model. Most will want
you to do a few tests you've already done, and then do the deal if you
approach them right. I would avoid going back to the same abit board.

Another, low time cost, non-invasive test is to try running with only 1
GB of RAM and/or change around which slots are being used.

I once had a world of problems with an Asus board, and AMD Athlon64 CPU.
No matter what we tried, it had problems. We swapped out for another board,
same model, and it STILL had problems. And yet, I have an identical board
here, running with that same BIOS version and same speed/stepping CPU and
it's been running like a champ for nearly 3 years. We finally got the
problem one to work by changing to an abit board. sometimes it's just the
combination of things that causes the problem. Changing out the board
model/mfg should eliminate that as a possibility.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:97851DA8-7AE4-49AC-8B8F-86473B45D48F@microsoft.com...
> Hi Carlos,
>
> When I underclock the CPU it seems to stay on for longer and World of
> Warcraft can run for some time.
>
> I thought it was power originally, so replaced by 450W PSU with a 700W
> PSU.
> That did not have any effect :/
>
> "Carlos" wrote:
>
>> Jamie:
>> That's a mere 2% overclocking and shouldn't be a problem.
>> Maybe your BIOS setup has options for Automatic Overclocking via some
>> nickname.
>> ASUS uses "NOS" for those tasks.
>> See if you have it and if it can be disabled. Check your motherboard
>> manual.
>> One last shot.
>> Insufficient power supply wattage may be causing your posted issues!!
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>>
>> > Another bizarre piece of information.
>> >
>> > If I use the Intel CPU Identification Utility, it tells me that the CPU
>> > is
>> > overclocked.
>> > I don't understand how this can be the case though. It's a normal Intel
>> > boxed CPU. I haven't overclocked it or anything. I'm using the default
>> > motherboard settings, and when I look at the overclocking areas of the
>> > BIOS,
>> > they are all set to the normal speed the CPU is supposed to be running
>> > at.
>> > But it's saying the following
>> >
>> > System Expected Speed: 2.66GHz
>> > System Reported Core 1: 2.71GHz
>> > System Reported Core 2: 2.71GHz
>> > System Reported Core 3: 2.71GHz
>> > System Reported Core 4: 2.71GHz
>> >
>> > System Bus Expected: 1066MHz
>> > System Bus Reported Core 1: 1087MHz
>> > System Bus Reported Core 2: 1087MHz
>> > System Bus Reported Core 3: 1087MHz
>> > System Bus Reported Core 4: 1087MHz
>> >
>> >
>> > So for some reason the CPU is running faster than it's supposed to....
>> > bizarre....
>> >
>> > "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Guys,
>> > >
>> > > Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
>> > > Recently put together a machine;
>> > > E6700 Quad Core CPU
>> > > Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
>> > > 2GB of PC8500 RAM
>> > > ATI Radeon X1800 XL
>> > > etc.
>> > >
>> > > I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random
>> > > BSODs and
>> > > reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
>> > > 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within
>> > > the
>> > > allocated time interval'
>> > > Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's
>> > > 0x0101
>> > > So, for example;
>> > >
>> > > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
>> > > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
>> > > or
>> > > 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>> > >
>> > > I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated
>> > > the
>> > > motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
>> > > graphics
>> > > drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista
>> > > installs. The
>> > > machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran
>> > > the
>> > > tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running
>> > > in Safe
>> > > Mode.
>> > > Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very
>> > > quickly -
>> > > but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening
>> > > apparently any
>> > > other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>> > >
>> > > Any thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Jamie
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

These are good points. Like Carlos says, a few percent OC isn't going to be
a problem, but if it is doing that behind your back I would suspect a faulty
voltage regulator, overvoltage could overclock your CPU but it could also
make other things start acting funny on the motherboard.

Even if you were living next door to the powerstation, your PSU should keep
that in check, if it is of good quality.


Tony. . .


"Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
news:A61DE5C2-D5ED-40A0-8859-2B5AC05AB747@microsoft.com...
> Jamie --
> It really sounds like you've tried most things we've all come up with.
> I'm beginning to suspect some subtle problem with the board or the CPU. If
> it's a newly built system, you should have some recourse with your vendor.
> I might try for a system board swap to a different mfg & model. Most will
> want you to do a few tests you've already done, and then do the deal if
> you approach them right. I would avoid going back to the same abit board.
>
> Another, low time cost, non-invasive test is to try running with only 1
> GB of RAM and/or change around which slots are being used.
>
> I once had a world of problems with an Asus board, and AMD Athlon64
> CPU. No matter what we tried, it had problems. We swapped out for another
> board, same model, and it STILL had problems. And yet, I have an identical
> board here, running with that same BIOS version and same speed/stepping
> CPU and it's been running like a champ for nearly 3 years. We finally got
> the problem one to work by changing to an abit board. sometimes it's just
> the combination of things that causes the problem. Changing out the board
> model/mfg should eliminate that as a possibility.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> in message news:97851DA8-7AE4-49AC-8B8F-86473B45D48F@microsoft.com...
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> When I underclock the CPU it seems to stay on for longer and World of
>> Warcraft can run for some time.
>>
>> I thought it was power originally, so replaced by 450W PSU with a 700W
>> PSU.
>> That did not have any effect :/
>>
>> "Carlos" wrote:
>>
>>> Jamie:
>>> That's a mere 2% overclocking and shouldn't be a problem.
>>> Maybe your BIOS setup has options for Automatic Overclocking via some
>>> nickname.
>>> ASUS uses "NOS" for those tasks.
>>> See if you have it and if it can be disabled. Check your motherboard
>>> manual.
>>> One last shot.
>>> Insufficient power supply wattage may be causing your posted issues!!
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>>>
>>> > Another bizarre piece of information.
>>> >
>>> > If I use the Intel CPU Identification Utility, it tells me that the
>>> > CPU is
>>> > overclocked.
>>> > I don't understand how this can be the case though. It's a normal
>>> > Intel
>>> > boxed CPU. I haven't overclocked it or anything. I'm using the default
>>> > motherboard settings, and when I look at the overclocking areas of the
>>> > BIOS,
>>> > they are all set to the normal speed the CPU is supposed to be running
>>> > at.
>>> > But it's saying the following
>>> >
>>> > System Expected Speed: 2.66GHz
>>> > System Reported Core 1: 2.71GHz
>>> > System Reported Core 2: 2.71GHz
>>> > System Reported Core 3: 2.71GHz
>>> > System Reported Core 4: 2.71GHz
>>> >
>>> > System Bus Expected: 1066MHz
>>> > System Bus Reported Core 1: 1087MHz
>>> > System Bus Reported Core 2: 1087MHz
>>> > System Bus Reported Core 3: 1087MHz
>>> > System Bus Reported Core 4: 1087MHz
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > So for some reason the CPU is running faster than it's supposed to....
>>> > bizarre....
>>> >
>>> > "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Guys,
>>> > >
>>> > > Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
>>> > > Recently put together a machine;
>>> > > E6700 Quad Core CPU
>>> > > Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
>>> > > 2GB of PC8500 RAM
>>> > > ATI Radeon X1800 XL
>>> > > etc.
>>> > >
>>> > > I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random
>>> > > BSODs and
>>> > > reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
>>> > > 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within
>>> > > the
>>> > > allocated time interval'
>>> > > Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's
>>> > > 0x0101
>>> > > So, for example;
>>> > >
>>> > > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
>>> > > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
>>> > > or
>>> > > 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>>> > >
>>> > > I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated
>>> > > the
>>> > > motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
>>> > > graphics
>>> > > drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista
>>> > > installs. The
>>> > > machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows
>>> > > ran the
>>> > > tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while
>>> > > running in Safe
>>> > > Mode.
>>> > > Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very
>>> > > quickly -
>>> > > but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening
>>> > > apparently any
>>> > > other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>>> > >
>>> > > Any thoughts?
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Jamie
>
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

Okay interesting update.

I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I would assume
it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:

BOINC & SETI@Home
Windows Updates

The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are cpu
intensive.
The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.

I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all applications,
services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and work back
from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all the
updates and see if that has any effect.

If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe mode...
Urgh :D

"Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> Recently put together a machine;
> E6700 Quad Core CPU
> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> etc.
>
> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs and
> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> allocated time interval'
> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> So, for example;
>
> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> or
> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>
> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest graphics
> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs. The
> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in Safe
> Mode.
> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently any
> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Jamie
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Slight update;
The machine is behaving itself.

With all the updates removed, and SETI@Home running; the machine rebooted.
With all the updates removed, and SETI@Home suspended; the machine is
behaving itself.



"Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:

> Okay interesting update.
>
> I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
> Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I would assume
> it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:
>
> BOINC & SETI@Home
> Windows Updates
>
> The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
> I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are cpu
> intensive.
> The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.
>
> I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all applications,
> services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and work back
> from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
> So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all the
> updates and see if that has any effect.
>
> If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe mode...
> Urgh :D
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> > Recently put together a machine;
> > E6700 Quad Core CPU
> > Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> > 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> > ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> > etc.
> >
> > I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs and
> > reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> > 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> > allocated time interval'
> > Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> > So, for example;
> >
> > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> > 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> > or
> > 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
> >
> > I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> > motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest graphics
> > drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs. The
> > machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
> > tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in Safe
> > Mode.
> > Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
> > but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently any
> > other game will not cause the machine to crash.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jamie
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

For my self, I'm thinking - even if you do find a Service (worse, a set of
Services) that resolves the issue, it may still be a Hardware problem (I
think it is) and it may not tell you which one it is, or what to look for
next?

Charlie's suggestion to amputate the root of the tree will not tell you
which twig on the tree was sick - but it will have the twig removed!

I would try, as I said, removing all devices that you don't need for
booting, this will have a large number of the services being inactive and if
it doesn't help, it's a new motherboard. If it does help, you can reconnect
the devices one at a time and watch what heppens.

The more time you spend on stabbing at darkness - the less you'll probably
end up knowing, because the possibilities will be multiplying as you go.


Tony. . .


"Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:0F7C4429-13A6-4A7E-AA85-5ECA98A9B6DA@microsoft.com...
> Okay interesting update.
>
> I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
> Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I would
> assume
> it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:
>
> BOINC & SETI@Home
> Windows Updates
>
> The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
> I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are cpu
> intensive.
> The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.
>
> I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all applications,
> services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and work
> back
> from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
> So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all the
> updates and see if that has any effect.
>
> If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe
> mode...
> Urgh :D
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
>> Recently put together a machine;
>> E6700 Quad Core CPU
>> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
>> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
>> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
>> etc.
>>
>> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs
>> and
>> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
>> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
>> allocated time interval'
>> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
>> So, for example;
>>
>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
>> or
>> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>>
>> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
>> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
>> graphics
>> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs.
>> The
>> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran the
>> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in
>> Safe
>> Mode.
>> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very quickly -
>> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening apparently
>> any
>> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jamie
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

Or, remove SETI@Home and leave it off.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Tony Sperling mail.dk>" <tony.sperling@db<REMOVE> wrote in message
news:O9hwqWKFIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> For my self, I'm thinking - even if you do find a Service (worse, a set of
> Services) that resolves the issue, it may still be a Hardware problem (I
> think it is) and it may not tell you which one it is, or what to look for
> next?
>
> Charlie's suggestion to amputate the root of the tree will not tell you
> which twig on the tree was sick - but it will have the twig removed!
>
> I would try, as I said, removing all devices that you don't need for
> booting, this will have a large number of the services being inactive and
> if it doesn't help, it's a new motherboard. If it does help, you can
> reconnect the devices one at a time and watch what heppens.
>
> The more time you spend on stabbing at darkness - the less you'll probably
> end up knowing, because the possibilities will be multiplying as you go.
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> in message news:0F7C4429-13A6-4A7E-AA85-5ECA98A9B6DA@microsoft.com...
>> Okay interesting update.
>>
>> I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
>> Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I would
>> assume
>> it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:
>>
>> BOINC & SETI@Home
>> Windows Updates
>>
>> The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
>> I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are cpu
>> intensive.
>> The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.
>>
>> I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all applications,
>> services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and work
>> back
>> from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
>> So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all the
>> updates and see if that has any effect.
>>
>> If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe
>> mode...
>> Urgh :D
>>
>> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
>>> Recently put together a machine;
>>> E6700 Quad Core CPU
>>> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
>>> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
>>> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs
>>> and
>>> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
>>> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
>>> allocated time interval'
>>> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
>>> So, for example;
>>>
>>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
>>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
>>> or
>>> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>>>
>>> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
>>> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
>>> graphics
>>> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs.
>>> The
>>> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran
>>> the
>>> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in
>>> Safe
>>> Mode.
>>> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very
>>> quickly -
>>> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening
>>> apparently any
>>> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jamie
>
>
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Okay, update;

The machine has been running quite well all day. It's rebooted all of maybe
2 or 4 times during the course of the day, and that's with WoW running the
whole time.
It's also with SETI@Home uninstalled.

Then, about half an hour ago it started blue-screening & rebooting again.
I cannot get into WoW for more than about 10 seconds without it restarting.

Coincidentally, my girlfriend had just come home, but I don't think that's
causing it ;)

"Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:

> Or, remove SETI@Home and leave it off.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
>
> "Tony Sperling mail.dk>" <tony.sperling@db<REMOVE> wrote in message
> news:O9hwqWKFIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> > For my self, I'm thinking - even if you do find a Service (worse, a set of
> > Services) that resolves the issue, it may still be a Hardware problem (I
> > think it is) and it may not tell you which one it is, or what to look for
> > next?
> >
> > Charlie's suggestion to amputate the root of the tree will not tell you
> > which twig on the tree was sick - but it will have the twig removed!
> >
> > I would try, as I said, removing all devices that you don't need for
> > booting, this will have a large number of the services being inactive and
> > if it doesn't help, it's a new motherboard. If it does help, you can
> > reconnect the devices one at a time and watch what heppens.
> >
> > The more time you spend on stabbing at darkness - the less you'll probably
> > end up knowing, because the possibilities will be multiplying as you go.
> >
> >
> > Tony. . .
> >
> >
> > "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> > in message news:0F7C4429-13A6-4A7E-AA85-5ECA98A9B6DA@microsoft.com...
> >> Okay interesting update.
> >>
> >> I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
> >> Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I would
> >> assume
> >> it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:
> >>
> >> BOINC & SETI@Home
> >> Windows Updates
> >>
> >> The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
> >> I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are cpu
> >> intensive.
> >> The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.
> >>
> >> I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all applications,
> >> services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and work
> >> back
> >> from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
> >> So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all the
> >> updates and see if that has any effect.
> >>
> >> If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe
> >> mode...
> >> Urgh :D
> >>
> >> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Guys,
> >>>
> >>> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> >>> Recently put together a machine;
> >>> E6700 Quad Core CPU
> >>> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> >>> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> >>> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> >>> etc.
> >>>
> >>> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random BSODs
> >>> and
> >>> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> >>> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the
> >>> allocated time interval'
> >>> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's 0x0101
> >>> So, for example;
> >>>
> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> >>> or
> >>> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
> >>>
> >>> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated the
> >>> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
> >>> graphics
> >>> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista installs.
> >>> The
> >>> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran
> >>> the
> >>> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running in
> >>> Safe
> >>> Mode.
> >>> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very
> >>> quickly -
> >>> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening
> >>> apparently any
> >>> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Jamie
> >
> >
>
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

You have a hardware problem. It's probably temperature related. (SETI makes
it worse, since it makes the machine work harder, thus causing things to
overheat sooner. )

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:F2EB6FC3-2D30-45C5-B281-BD774E5B4015@microsoft.com...
> Okay, update;
>
> The machine has been running quite well all day. It's rebooted all of
> maybe
> 2 or 4 times during the course of the day, and that's with WoW running the
> whole time.
> It's also with SETI@Home uninstalled.
>
> Then, about half an hour ago it started blue-screening & rebooting again.
> I cannot get into WoW for more than about 10 seconds without it
> restarting.
>
> Coincidentally, my girlfriend had just come home, but I don't think that's
> causing it ;)
>
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
>
>> Or, remove SETI@Home and leave it off.
>>
>> --
>> Charlie.
>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>
>>
>> "Tony Sperling mail.dk>" <tony.sperling@db<REMOVE> wrote in message
>> news:O9hwqWKFIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> > For my self, I'm thinking - even if you do find a Service (worse, a set
>> > of
>> > Services) that resolves the issue, it may still be a Hardware problem
>> > (I
>> > think it is) and it may not tell you which one it is, or what to look
>> > for
>> > next?
>> >
>> > Charlie's suggestion to amputate the root of the tree will not tell you
>> > which twig on the tree was sick - but it will have the twig removed!
>> >
>> > I would try, as I said, removing all devices that you don't need for
>> > booting, this will have a large number of the services being inactive
>> > and
>> > if it doesn't help, it's a new motherboard. If it does help, you can
>> > reconnect the devices one at a time and watch what heppens.
>> >
>> > The more time you spend on stabbing at darkness - the less you'll
>> > probably
>> > end up knowing, because the possibilities will be multiplying as you
>> > go.
>> >
>> >
>> > Tony. . .
>> >
>> >
>> > "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> > wrote
>> > in message news:0F7C4429-13A6-4A7E-AA85-5ECA98A9B6DA@microsoft.com...
>> >> Okay interesting update.
>> >>
>> >> I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
>> >> Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I would
>> >> assume
>> >> it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:
>> >>
>> >> BOINC & SETI@Home
>> >> Windows Updates
>> >>
>> >> The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
>> >> I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are cpu
>> >> intensive.
>> >> The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.
>> >>
>> >> I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all applications,
>> >> services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and
>> >> work
>> >> back
>> >> from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
>> >> So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all
>> >> the
>> >> updates and see if that has any effect.
>> >>
>> >> If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe
>> >> mode...
>> >> Urgh :D
>> >>
>> >> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Guys,
>> >>>
>> >>> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
>> >>> Recently put together a machine;
>> >>> E6700 Quad Core CPU
>> >>> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
>> >>> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
>> >>> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
>> >>> etc.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random
>> >>> BSODs
>> >>> and
>> >>> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
>> >>> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within
>> >>> the
>> >>> allocated time interval'
>> >>> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's
>> >>> 0x0101
>> >>> So, for example;
>> >>>
>> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
>> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
>> >>> or
>> >>> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>> >>>
>> >>> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated
>> >>> the
>> >>> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
>> >>> graphics
>> >>> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista
>> >>> installs.
>> >>> The
>> >>> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran
>> >>> the
>> >>> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running
>> >>> in
>> >>> Safe
>> >>> Mode.
>> >>> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very
>> >>> quickly -
>> >>> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening
>> >>> apparently any
>> >>> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Jamie
>> >
>> >
>>
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Well I thought I had ruled that out.

The cooling in the machine seems adequate. The board ships with a utility to
monitor the CPU temperate (and other system zones).
It has a high warning level of 75C, and even when SETI has been running full
whack for some time the CPU only goes to about 62-65C

"Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:

> You have a hardware problem. It's probably temperature related. (SETI makes
> it worse, since it makes the machine work harder, thus causing things to
> overheat sooner. )
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
>
> "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:F2EB6FC3-2D30-45C5-B281-BD774E5B4015@microsoft.com...
> > Okay, update;
> >
> > The machine has been running quite well all day. It's rebooted all of
> > maybe
> > 2 or 4 times during the course of the day, and that's with WoW running the
> > whole time.
> > It's also with SETI@Home uninstalled.
> >
> > Then, about half an hour ago it started blue-screening & rebooting again.
> > I cannot get into WoW for more than about 10 seconds without it
> > restarting.
> >
> > Coincidentally, my girlfriend had just come home, but I don't think that's
> > causing it ;)
> >
> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
> >
> >> Or, remove SETI@Home and leave it off.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Charlie.
> >> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
> >>
> >>
> >> "Tony Sperling mail.dk>" <tony.sperling@db<REMOVE> wrote in message
> >> news:O9hwqWKFIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> >> > For my self, I'm thinking - even if you do find a Service (worse, a set
> >> > of
> >> > Services) that resolves the issue, it may still be a Hardware problem
> >> > (I
> >> > think it is) and it may not tell you which one it is, or what to look
> >> > for
> >> > next?
> >> >
> >> > Charlie's suggestion to amputate the root of the tree will not tell you
> >> > which twig on the tree was sick - but it will have the twig removed!
> >> >
> >> > I would try, as I said, removing all devices that you don't need for
> >> > booting, this will have a large number of the services being inactive
> >> > and
> >> > if it doesn't help, it's a new motherboard. If it does help, you can
> >> > reconnect the devices one at a time and watch what heppens.
> >> >
> >> > The more time you spend on stabbing at darkness - the less you'll
> >> > probably
> >> > end up knowing, because the possibilities will be multiplying as you
> >> > go.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Tony. . .
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com>
> >> > wrote
> >> > in message news:0F7C4429-13A6-4A7E-AA85-5ECA98A9B6DA@microsoft.com...
> >> >> Okay interesting update.
> >> >>
> >> >> I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
> >> >> Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I would
> >> >> assume
> >> >> it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:
> >> >>
> >> >> BOINC & SETI@Home
> >> >> Windows Updates
> >> >>
> >> >> The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
> >> >> I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are cpu
> >> >> intensive.
> >> >> The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.
> >> >>
> >> >> I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all applications,
> >> >> services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and
> >> >> work
> >> >> back
> >> >> from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
> >> >> So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all
> >> >> the
> >> >> updates and see if that has any effect.
> >> >>
> >> >> If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe
> >> >> mode...
> >> >> Urgh :D
> >> >>
> >> >> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi Guys,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
> >> >>> Recently put together a machine;
> >> >>> E6700 Quad Core CPU
> >> >>> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
> >> >>> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
> >> >>> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
> >> >>> etc.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random
> >> >>> BSODs
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
> >> >>> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> allocated time interval'
> >> >>> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's
> >> >>> 0x0101
> >> >>> So, for example;
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
> >> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
> >> >>> or
> >> >>> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have updated
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the latest
> >> >>> graphics
> >> >>> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista
> >> >>> installs.
> >> >>> The
> >> >>> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows ran
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while running
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> Safe
> >> >>> Mode.
> >> >>> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very
> >> >>> quickly -
> >> >>> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening
> >> >>> apparently any
> >> >>> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Any thoughts?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>> Jamie
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

If you have a temperature related problem, it is a weak component that is
displaying the problem at a lower temperature than you'd expect. When the
machine is cold, or idling (with no SETI), it behaves. Mostly. When it's
warm (and SETI will definitely warm it up), it has problems. There are
myriad things it could be. But we've already suggested several possible
hardware related troubleshooting steps.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:BAC4AFF5-01F0-44D9-BE68-819E0354D101@microsoft.com...
> Well I thought I had ruled that out.
>
> The cooling in the machine seems adequate. The board ships with a utility
> to
> monitor the CPU temperate (and other system zones).
> It has a high warning level of 75C, and even when SETI has been running
> full
> whack for some time the CPU only goes to about 62-65C
>
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
>
>> You have a hardware problem. It's probably temperature related. (SETI
>> makes
>> it worse, since it makes the machine work harder, thus causing things to
>> overheat sooner. )
>>
>> --
>> Charlie.
>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>
>>
>> "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
>> in
>> message news:F2EB6FC3-2D30-45C5-B281-BD774E5B4015@microsoft.com...
>> > Okay, update;
>> >
>> > The machine has been running quite well all day. It's rebooted all of
>> > maybe
>> > 2 or 4 times during the course of the day, and that's with WoW running
>> > the
>> > whole time.
>> > It's also with SETI@Home uninstalled.
>> >
>> > Then, about half an hour ago it started blue-screening & rebooting
>> > again.
>> > I cannot get into WoW for more than about 10 seconds without it
>> > restarting.
>> >
>> > Coincidentally, my girlfriend had just come home, but I don't think
>> > that's
>> > causing it ;)
>> >
>> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Or, remove SETI@Home and leave it off.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Charlie.
>> >> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> >> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Tony Sperling mail.dk>" <tony.sperling@db<REMOVE> wrote in message
>> >> news:O9hwqWKFIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> >> > For my self, I'm thinking - even if you do find a Service (worse, a
>> >> > set
>> >> > of
>> >> > Services) that resolves the issue, it may still be a Hardware
>> >> > problem
>> >> > (I
>> >> > think it is) and it may not tell you which one it is, or what to
>> >> > look
>> >> > for
>> >> > next?
>> >> >
>> >> > Charlie's suggestion to amputate the root of the tree will not tell
>> >> > you
>> >> > which twig on the tree was sick - but it will have the twig removed!
>> >> >
>> >> > I would try, as I said, removing all devices that you don't need for
>> >> > booting, this will have a large number of the services being
>> >> > inactive
>> >> > and
>> >> > if it doesn't help, it's a new motherboard. If it does help, you can
>> >> > reconnect the devices one at a time and watch what heppens.
>> >> >
>> >> > The more time you spend on stabbing at darkness - the less you'll
>> >> > probably
>> >> > end up knowing, because the possibilities will be multiplying as you
>> >> > go.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Tony. . .
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "Jamie Plenderleith" <JamiePlenderleith@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> >> > wrote
>> >> > in message
>> >> > news:0F7C4429-13A6-4A7E-AA85-5ECA98A9B6DA@microsoft.com...
>> >> >> Okay interesting update.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I reinstalled Windows on the machine, and it installed just fine.
>> >> >> Windows was running for quite some time - to the point where I
>> >> >> would
>> >> >> assume
>> >> >> it is now stable. The only items I installed this time:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BOINC & SETI@Home
>> >> >> Windows Updates
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The machine is now rebooting & blue-screening as before.
>> >> >> I don't believe it could be boinc/seti@home, even though these are
>> >> >> cpu
>> >> >> intensive.
>> >> >> The machine seems okay in Safe Mode.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I cannot easily (that I know of) generate a list of all
>> >> >> applications,
>> >> >> services & device drivers that are *not* started in Safe Mode, and
>> >> >> work
>> >> >> back
>> >> >> from that to find the one that's causing trouble.
>> >> >> So I'm going to do the only troubleshooting I can do and remove all
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> updates and see if that has any effect.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If it doesn't then I'll try to figure out what's not loaded in safe
>> >> >> mode...
>> >> >> Urgh :D
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Jamie Plenderleith" wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Hi Guys,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Am an experienced system builder, and former software dev MVP.
>> >> >>> Recently put together a machine;
>> >> >>> E6700 Quad Core CPU
>> >> >>> Abit AW9D-Max Motherboard
>> >> >>> 2GB of PC8500 RAM
>> >> >>> ATI Radeon X1800 XL
>> >> >>> etc.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I have installed Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit. I am getting random
>> >> >>> BSODs
>> >> >>> and
>> >> >>> reboots. I'm getting a comination of stop codes. Usually it's
>> >> >>> 'A Clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor
>> >> >>> within
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> allocated time interval'
>> >> >>> Sometimes it's 0x0A IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, but usually it's
>> >> >>> 0x0101
>> >> >>> So, for example;
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...03
>> >> >>> 0x00000101, 0x000...030, 0x000...0, 0xFF..., 0x000...02
>> >> >>> or
>> >> >>> 0x0000000A, 0x000...030, 0x000...C, 0x000...01, 0xFF....
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I have swapped out the memory with known good memory. I have
>> >> >>> updated
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> motherboard BIOS to its latest version. I have tried both the
>> >> >>> latest
>> >> >>> graphics
>> >> >>> drivers from ATI and the default Microsoft drivers that Vista
>> >> >>> installs.
>> >> >>> The
>> >> >>> machine is not overheating. The built-in memory tester in windows
>> >> >>> ran
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> tests without issue. The machine seems to behave itself while
>> >> >>> running
>> >> >>> in
>> >> >>> Safe
>> >> >>> Mode.
>> >> >>> Loading the game 'World of Warcraft' can cause it to crash very
>> >> >>> quickly -
>> >> >>> but sometimes I can get a few minutes out of the game. Opening
>> >> >>> apparently any
>> >> >>> other game will not cause the machine to crash.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Regards,
>> >> >>> Jamie
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

Update;

Got an email back from Abit customer support. They had asked about the
voltage I set the memory to, and I said that I didn't - that I was just using
the defaults the BIOS shipped with.
They instructed me to look at the RAM specifications and set that voltage in
the BIOS.

As it happens, the BIOS was defaulting to about 1.75V supply for the RAM,
and the RAM is supposed to take 2.2V. I manually set this to 2.2V.


The machine has blue-screened once so far. This might be conincidence, as I
was still installing drivers etc. etc.
I left memtest86 from the Ubuntu 7.10 running and it finished 3 full passes
without any errors. (Having said that, I had left memtest running when the
machine was undersupplying voltage to the memory, and it still didn't fail -
go figure :/)


The machine seems to be behaving itself a lot more now. SETI@Home has been
running for quite a while now, and nothing's crashed. I'm installing updates
as we speak.


Something odd though. If I run memtest86, then restart the machine, the
dvd-rom drive (IDE Primary Master) is knocked off. It doesn't even seem to be
supplied with power, so the POST hangs.
To get it to behave again I have to turn off the PSU, let the system power
down completely, and then it'll behave.


Anyway. So far so good. I'm not going to say it's definitely fixed yet, but
I'm hopeful!
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

I spoke too soon.
About 2 minutes after posting that it was behaving, it blue screened with
the scondary processor problem (0x101)

Hrmz.
 
Re: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within

Oh, well - things are lighting up then.

This proves (and I wish I could remember who coined these memorable words):

". . .that it is no more difficult to build and maintain a personal computer
than it is to assemble a nuclear power supply from wristwatch parts, in
total darkness, using only your teeth"!


Tony. . .
 
RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

RE: A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor wi

Another update;

The nth reinstallation of Vista did not succeed. Same issues. Even when
using msconfig and only loading the bare essentials.

I tried installed Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon 64bit. That is also
restarting/crashing the machine. This would lead me to believe it's hardware
related.


Machine crashes with older or brand new PSU.
I'm using the same graphics card from before I put in this motherboard, so
it's known to be good.
I've tried swapping out the RAM, and it still crashes.
Memtest86 runs without crashing and without failing.

So it must be motherboard or cpu... unless anyone else has any thoughts?
 

Similar threads

J
Windows Vista A clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within
Replies
4
Views
246
Not Even Me
N
S
Windows Vista Clock Interrupt Problem
Replies
1
Views
111
Musky Man
M
Back
Top