Re: TS CALs and dual core processors
OK, so both licenses are permanent ones, correct? Not one permanent
license and one temporary license?
Check what happened to these clients on the day the *second*
license was issued. One reason for this behaviour could be that the
locally stored license was deleted from the registry. This can
happen either deliberately, to solve a licensing problem, or as a
side effect of a fresh installation of the OS.
Note that expiration dates are random, 52-89 days after issueing,
so that doesn't tell anything about the cause of the duplicate
licenses.
_________________________________________________________
Vera Noest
MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
TS troubleshooting:
http://ts.veranoest.net
*----------- Please reply in newsgroup -------------*
=?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgUw==?= <DavidS@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
on 01 nov 2007:
> Domain controller is SBS 2k3
> TS servers are 2k3 Standard, licensing per device.
> Clients are XP Pro
>
> We have 25 Terminal Server Per Device CAL Tokens
>
> The duplicate instances are issued at different dates but have
> almost the same expiration date.
>
> Thank you for your input!
>
> "Vera Noest [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> What OS is your TS running?
>> And those 2 clients?
>> What is the licensing mode of the TS?
>> Which type of licenses have you purchased and installed on the
>> LS?
>>
>> Each client should only use a single TS CAL.
>> How exactly are these TS CALs listed in the TS Licensing
>> Manager? Description - Type - Issued - etc?
>> You can produce a report with the lsreport tool from the
>> Resource Kit.
>> _________________________________________________________
>> Vera Noest
>> MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
>> TS troubleshooting: http://ts.veranoest.net
>> *----------- Please reply in newsgroup -------------*
>>
>> =?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgUw==?= <DavidS@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> wrote on 01 nov 2007:
>>
>> > We recently ordered some new computers with dual core
>> > processors. I noticed on our TS Licensing server that these
>> > computers are using 2 CALs each. Is this by design because
>> > of the dual processors or should they only be using one CAL?