Re: batch file to change windows XP registry
Hi, Lanwench, Jeff,
I found the reason, after updated to version 6.0, the default setting of
Enable the printers on the RDC was unchecked, I just enable this from
Options-----Local sources----Printers, then it works fine.
Any how, thanks a lot for your help!
Enjoy ur good weekend!
Shermaine
"xiaomei" wrote:
> Hi, Lanwench, Jeff,
> Thanks for your time and valuable suggestion!
> May I know is there any Ms Windows update should be installed together with
> update to latest RDC client software?
> Because I update my XP SP2 machine RDC software from 5.1 to 6.0, but still
> can not see the printer on Terminal server, however another Vista machine
> which also running 6.0 RDC software can see the mapped printers. ( The same
> office printer)
>
> Or what is the difference between Vista and XP in terms of RDC parts.
> Many thanks again!
> Have a good weekend!
>
> Shermaine
>
>
>
> "xiaomei" wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> > Many thanks for all of you!
> >
> > Regards
> > Shermaine
> >
> > "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
> >
> > > Jeff Pitsch <Jeff@Jeffpitschconsulting.com> wrote:
> > > > Ah now that makes sense. I read it as the OP was saying no printers
> > > > at all can be mapped using WinXP which had me all confused.
> > >
> > > Ah, yes. I just remembered the registry thing because it used to drive me
> > > bonkers!
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
> > > >> xiaomei <xiaomei@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > >>> Hi, There,
> > > >>> In the old time, the network printer installed on the XP machine
> > > >>> could not be mapped on the Terminal server (TS), finally we got
> > > >>> document from Ms site told need change the client machine registry
> > > >>> to make it works, however, we have hundreds of client, it will be
> > > >>> very tedious and boring if we change one by one, is anyone have some
> > > >>> suggestion of bactch file scrip to change the registry, that will
> > > >>> save a lot of time.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks for any suggestion!
> > > >>> Shermaine
> > > >>
> > > >> If you're talking about KB 302361 (Printers That Use Ports That Do
> > > >> Not Begin With COM, LPT, or USB Are Not Redirected in a Remote
> > > >> Desktop or Terminal Services Session), I believe this registry
> > > >> change will be uneccessary if you upgrade everyone's RD client to
> > > >> the latest version.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >