Re: Wow - no Daylight Savings Time posts (!)
Dan wrote:
| Exactly. I cannot yet reccomend Vista to anyone and suggest users
| stick with XP until at least the first Vista Service Pack is
| released.
Yea. That's pretty nasty to get a BSOD over the time change! It worked
perfectly well for us in Win98-- or 98 Guy would have heard complaints
by now!
| I know if I posted this in a Vista newsgroup then many
| users would be up in arms about how great Vista is.
They have been V-irradiated into insensibility!
| It is great in
| terms of security but still lacks in backwards compatibility and
| general useability in terms of not having some email not working
| fully and certain websites do not want to cooperate with Vista fully.
I suppose the survivors may be happier with the next release, as you
suggested.
| My favorite operating system remains 98 Second Edition and XP after
| that and then Vista. I am looking forward to having my desktop up
| and running again soon, hopefully and then installing Ubuntu Linux on
| it. I also hope to try out Apple next year and see how well I like
| Mac OS 10.5, the new Leopard operating system compared to Windows and
| Linux.
(Seriously, you have done well to become familiar with all of those.)
| "PCR" wrote:
|
|> Dan wrote:
|> | I got a clock error on my Windows Vista Home Premium (32 bit)
|> | laptop that caused a Blue Screen of Death. I configured it so I
|> | would be able to see all the errors because that is the way I like
|> | it. Anyway, Microsoft Windows Vista searched for a solution and
|> | said I needed to update the BIOS so I updated the BIOS and the
|> | computer seems okay now. It seems a drastic fix for a time error.
|> | <grin>
|>
|> This had to do with the DST time change? I guess it wanted your
|> permission to adjust the BIOS clock-- which, you know, good old Win98
|> will just go ahead & do it!
|>
|> | "PCR" wrote:
|> |
|> |> Cymbal Man Freq. wrote:
|> |> | Windows ME machine went back 2 hours in the last month. Must've
|> |> | hit the original daylight point and hit the patch a week later.
|> |>
|> |> Once the patch is instituted, the old date no longer is in effect.
|> |> However, if that old date passed before the patch was instituted,
|> |> I guess a machine could revert twice. Otherwise, the more likely
|> |> cause of losing two hours would be two operating systems each
|> |> doing it one after the other in a dual boot system. I know I say
|> |> a warning about that somewhere recently-- but can quite locate
|> |> where!
|>
|> --
|> Thanks or Good Luck,
|> There may be humor in this post, and,
|> Naturally, you will not sue,
|> Should things get worse after this,
|> PCR
|>
pcrrcp@netzero.net
--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
Should things get worse after this,
PCR
pcrrcp@netzero.net