Re: Intel Official: Expect Less Privacy
> The Government claim such things as being to "Protect" you (or somebody)
> from some hypothetical enemy. You "Know" that you are not a criminal /
> thief / bad guy and you believe that the Government will only go after the
> bad guys, so it is easier just to do nothing about it. Fact is though that
> although "You" know you are not the bad guy, nobody else knows that, so
> you are just as much a suspect as anybody else. Thus to believe such
> legislation only affects bad guys (Pirates / terrorists / criminals etc)
> is a complete fallacy.
where does common sense enter into the equation?
want another common fallacy?
Privacy is about protection of my privacy 
Privacy are mostly about blindfolding the 'cops'
here is another nugget to THINK on
follow the liberal line of reasoning, NOBODY DO ANYTHING and wait for your
stuff to all go wrong while ..
at the same time yammer why all the other guys stuff is going wrong and then
make sure you are the first on your feet to demand an answer to "WHY DID'NT
SOMEONE DO SOMETHING?"
> Most of the proponents of the Iraq war (Which is supposedly to protect us
> from terrorists) are "Armchair Generals" who were never in any danger from
> terrorists anyway (Especially terrorists from Iraq) but it was much
> "Easier" to go along with it than to think about it
Speaking of armchair generals
how about those 'supposedly' against the war because its immoral .. heh
how about those 'supposedly' against the war because its illegal .. heh
How about the Democrat 'leadership' in congress .. the ultimate definition
of "ARMCHAIR"
> In reality the Government can't protect you from anything, but it makes
> their job of pretending to do so easier if the public simply complies...
oh, reality based are we? Of course a government can protect you .. that's
why there is a military ...
centers for disease control .. air traffic control regs .. et al.
What in your estimation would have been the outcome of WWII had there been
no government?
Sorry Charlie,
looks as if the more you THINK about it, the sillier you become
might want to stop pretending and start .... what? real THINKING
You seem to have grazed in the pasture of liberal zymology for quite awhile.
You might reTHINK that and THINK about why liberalism only constructs
SYMBOLS?
When the latest and greatest goes haywire? You're out only an ethereal
SYMBOL.
No biggie, just begin constructing the latest and greatest SYMBOL. No sweat
there.
Rich,