Re: Intel Official: Expect Less Privacy
> You have no concept of the word reality at all, you only think / pretend
> you do. You probably need a break from Limbaugh, because you constantly
> confuse the words "Liberal" and "Logical".
Well ... If you say so ...Sounds like you have a frim grasp on reality there
> So tell me, how is your fuhrer Bush going to protect the nation from
> earthquakes, or how about hurricanes, you still living in a trailer and
> loving it obviously - or maybe the folks in New Orleans were a bit too
> "Liberal" and deserved what they got eh?
you've got a cornacopia overflowing with sterotypes there .. such bounty
New Orleans got what the democrat state of Louisana gave them ...
The city of New Orleans got what the democrat city government prepared them
for ...
blaming the weather on your political foes is reaching for straws .. isn't
it?
> The reality is that no Government or anybody else can guarantee your
> safety, but they can pretty much guarantee your vote by fooling you into
> thinking they can, and it obviously works on a great many people of which
> you are an almost perfect example.
here comes reality again .. now why is it liberals try to remove any and
all vestiages of risk from 'society'?
with every more intrusive laws .. what are they trying to guarantee? .. then
why gun control?
and .. who? fooled you into thinking the way you do?
You sure seem to know a lot about me how did you come by this ? .. heh
> Typically you equate privacy with criminal activity, you stated so clearly
> enough, you are typical of the idiots who believe they have nothing to be
> concerned about when Governments become more and more intrusive.
heh .. if you say so .. oh brother ...
liberals intrude into our lives ... no smoking .. no guns .. more taxes ..
more government ... and to do what with?
make laws that do what? 
you have a wonderful way of arguing in a circle and sneaking up on your self
and becoming your own worst enemy
kinda neat, hard keepting track of all your fibs .. isn't it?
Rich