J
Jeff0803
Guest
Here is a sample code which have copy constructor.
class Point
{
private:
int x, y;
public:
Point(int x1, int y1) { x = x1; y = y1; }
// Copy constructor
Point(const Point &p2) { x = p2.x; y = p2.y; }
int getX() { return x; }
int getY() { return y; }
};
int main()
{
Point p1(10, 15); // Normal constructor is called here
Point p2 = p1; // Copy constructor is called here
// Let us access values assigned by constructors
cout << "p1.x = " << p1.getX() << ", p1.y = " << p1.getY();
cout << "\np2.x = " << p2.getX() << ", p2.y = " << p2.getY();
}
If run this code, the result is like following.
And without copy constructor of the Point class, the result is the same.
Then, why we need copy constructor in this case?
Continue reading...
class Point
{
private:
int x, y;
public:
Point(int x1, int y1) { x = x1; y = y1; }
// Copy constructor
Point(const Point &p2) { x = p2.x; y = p2.y; }
int getX() { return x; }
int getY() { return y; }
};
int main()
{
Point p1(10, 15); // Normal constructor is called here
Point p2 = p1; // Copy constructor is called here
// Let us access values assigned by constructors
cout << "p1.x = " << p1.getX() << ", p1.y = " << p1.getY();
cout << "\np2.x = " << p2.getX() << ", p2.y = " << p2.getY();
}
If run this code, the result is like following.
And without copy constructor of the Point class, the result is the same.
Then, why we need copy constructor in this case?
Continue reading...