Re: Putting Win98se on a P4 2600mhz
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:38:00 -0800, Paradoxdb3
<Paradoxdb3@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Hey, 98 Guy...
>
>So everything runs beautifully with a CPU clock speed over 2.2 GHz? Does
>that make the flash movies (like on You-Tube) play smoothly? What
>suggestions would you have to make them run very smoothly? I have a 355MHz
>processor and watching those flash movies is worse than watching paint dry!
>
Thanks to all that responded. I'm looking forward to the speed when I
get this new system put together.
Oh, yes, 2.6ghz or 2600mhz
What I find odd, is that this 1ghz computer never made anything faster
than my 266mhz. But that 266 was overclocked and it was always
extremely fast. It lasted 8 years, and I never had reason to upgrade.
This IBM bios has no way to overclock. In some ways, it's actually a
tad slower than the old 266, and I got 3 times the ram.
>"98 Guy" wrote:
>
>> alvinamorey@notmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > I just bought a mobo and cpu for an AMD 2600ghz. I know win98
>> > was never intended to run on such a fast computer. Will it
>> > run ok?
>>
>> At least once every 6 months, the above question is asked here.
>>
>> And invariably someone responds incorrectly with this:
>>
>> Paradoxdb3 wrote:
>>
>> > Apparently there's timing issues with a CPU of that speed and
>> > Windows 98.
>>
>> Windows 95 and the first edition of Windows 98 (aka "Gold" or FE) have
>> a problem in the file NDIS.VXD that causes issues when the CPU is
>> faster than 2.1 ghz.
>>
>> Windows 98 SE (second edition) does not have this problem.
>>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/312108
>>
>> The fastest CPU I've had running win-98 on so far is a Celeron-D 3.46
>> ghz. When I get a good heatsink for that CPU I will overclock it to
>> 4.5 (or higher) ghz.
>>