Windows Vista When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Test User
  • Start date Start date
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?


So if someone has 4 gig of ram, are they more inclined to sell 2 gig and
run Vista 32, or use the 4 gig and run Vista64?


--
gizbug
 
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?

Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:44:36 -0500, gizbug
> <gizbug.2u7npz@no-mx.forums.net> wrote:
>
>> So if someone has 4 gig of ram, are they more inclined to sell 2 gig and
>> run Vista 32, or use the 4 gig and run Vista64?

>
>
>
> I can't tell what anybody's inclinations are. Depending on what apps
> you run, and *if* you can get 64-bit drivers for Vista, my guess is
> that from a performance standpoint, most people wouldn't see any
> difference between the two.
>



From what I've experienced Ken I think you guess right, if anything 64
is a bit slower but I put that down to possible driver development
issues that should improve. Unless you have apps that can use it there's
no advantage I can think of.
 
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:44:36 -0500, gizbug
<gizbug.2u7npz@no-mx.forums.net> wrote:

>
> So if someone has 4 gig of ram, are they more inclined to sell 2 gig and
> run Vista 32, or use the 4 gig and run Vista64?




I can't tell what anybody's inclinations are. Depending on what apps
you run, and *if* you can get 64-bit drivers for Vista, my guess is
that from a performance standpoint, most people wouldn't see any
difference between the two.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?

Charlie Tame <charlie@tames.net> wrote:

> Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
>> I can't tell what anybody's inclinations are. Depending on what
>> apps you run, and *if* you can get 64-bit drivers for Vista, my
>> guess is that from a performance standpoint, most people wouldn't
>> see any difference between the two.

>
> From what I've experienced Ken I think you guess right, if
> anything 64 is a bit slower but I put that down to possible driver
> development issues that should improve. Unless you have apps that
> can use it there's no advantage I can think of.


I can see one advantage, at least for me, 64 bit computing is coming
and 16 bit* computing is going, it's time to start making the change
slowly so it won't be so painful later when done all at once. The day
will come soon when major 64 bit software will be available such as MS
Office, etc. Gradually we'll start seeing 32 bit software becoming
unavailable and getting ready now isn't a bad idea.

*I really did mean 16 bit, not 32 bit, is going away. 32 bit OSs such
as XP support 16 bit installers and some DOS programs, 64 bit OSs will
not as most of us have already learned. When I started running Windows
XP Pro 64bit I found out to my surprise just how many 32 bit programs
and hardware drivers I had that relied on 16 bit installers... I've
been digging up replacements and workarounds ever since.






--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
 
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?


Doesn't a 64bit OS and a 64bit processor produce better results than a
32bit os and 64bit processor?


--
gizbug
 
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:05:08 -0500, gizbug
<gizbug.2ue970@no-mx.forums.net> wrote:

>
> Doesn't a 64bit OS and a 64bit processor produce better results than a
> 32bit os and 64bit processor?



No, not necessarily.

Unless you run 64-bit applications (of which there are so far very few
available), any performance difference in running a 64-bit operating
system will be so small as to be virtually unnoticeable.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?


Is 64bit firefox a lot faster than the 32bit version of the app?


--
gizbug
 
Re: When do you see Vista 64 being more main stream?

gizbug wrote:
> Is 64bit firefox a lot faster than the 32bit version of the app?
>
>



No, none at all.
 
Back
Top