How to format large drive fat32?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zootal
  • Start date Start date
Z

Zootal

Guest
I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western Digital
make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't recognize sata
drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.

So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really BAD
choice for a large drive.

XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
anything will create a FAT drive that large.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the don't
send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
> partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western Digital
> make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't recognize sata
> drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.
>
> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

oh, and you could create a FAT drive from the command line. I don't have a
copy of XP x64 running here right now (all on Vista64 or Server 2k8 64), but
the diskpart utility should create the partition (and in Vista/Server 2k8
will do formatting as well), but then you'll need to use the command line
format utility which will let you specify FAT32.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the don't
send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
> partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western Digital
> make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't recognize sata
> drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.
>
> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

Because I double boot to Win98 on all of my boxes. And if I have to, I can
boot from an old dos boot disk, and still access my drives. Lately, I've
been loading Linux instead of Win98, and when I get round to getting rid of
Win98 on all of my boxes, then I'll consider moving on from fat32.

"Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
news:74828A1E-2BD8-4558-A5AA-4D196FAE4092@microsoft.com...
> Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really BAD
> choice for a large drive.
>
> XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
> anything will create a FAT drive that large.
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
>
> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
> news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
>> partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western
>> Digital make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't
>> recognize sata drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.
>>
>> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>>
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

Just be aware that Windows 98 no longer gets any security updates. I would
not run it on any box connected to the Internet. Seriously.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the don't
send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
news:ulE8RIiNIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Because I double boot to Win98 on all of my boxes. And if I have to, I can
> boot from an old dos boot disk, and still access my drives. Lately, I've
> been loading Linux instead of Win98, and when I get round to getting rid
> of Win98 on all of my boxes, then I'll consider moving on from fat32.
>
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
> news:74828A1E-2BD8-4558-A5AA-4D196FAE4092@microsoft.com...
>> Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really
>> BAD choice for a large drive.
>>
>> XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
>> anything will create a FAT drive that large.
>>
>> --
>> Charlie.
>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>
>>
>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>> news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
>>> partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western
>>> Digital make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't
>>> recognize sata drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.
>>>
>>> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>>>
>>
>
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

OK. I suppose you have your preferences; however, my first impression of the
idea is that you are either very eccentric or totally insane.

See
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2006/07/WindowsConfidential/

However, they are your boxes. Have you considered using MS VirtualPC 2007 or
Virtual Server 2005 or VMWare Workstation to run Win98 in a virtual machine
on XP? Granted, other "rescue methods" are necessary to get HD read access
if the OS fails to boot.

Tom
MSMVP 1998-2007


"Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the don't
send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
news:ulE8RIiNIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Because I double boot to Win98 on all of my boxes. And if I have to, I can
> boot from an old dos boot disk, and still access my drives. Lately, I've
> been loading Linux instead of Win98, and when I get round to getting rid
> of Win98 on all of my boxes, then I'll consider moving on from fat32.
>
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
> news:74828A1E-2BD8-4558-A5AA-4D196FAE4092@microsoft.com...
>> Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really
>> BAD choice for a large drive.
>>
>> XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
>> anything will create a FAT drive that large.
>>
>> --
>> Charlie.
>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>
>>
>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>> news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
>>> partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western
>>> Digital make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't
>>> recognize sata drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.
>>>
>>> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>>>
>>
>
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

As far as I know, there are no SATA drivers for Windows 98, so even if you
could format the drive FAT32 your Windows 98 installations would not be able
to use it.



"Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the don't
send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
news:ulE8RIiNIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Because I double boot to Win98 on all of my boxes. And if I have to, I can
> boot from an old dos boot disk, and still access my drives. Lately, I've
> been loading Linux instead of Win98, and when I get round to getting rid
> of Win98 on all of my boxes, then I'll consider moving on from fat32.
>
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
> news:74828A1E-2BD8-4558-A5AA-4D196FAE4092@microsoft.com...
>> Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really
>> BAD choice for a large drive.
>>
>> XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
>> anything will create a FAT drive that large.
>>
>> --
>> Charlie.
>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>
>>
>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>> news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
>>> partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western
>>> Digital make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't
>>> recognize sata drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.
>>>
>>> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>>>
>>
>
>
 
RE: How to format large drive fat32?

Zootal,
This is the tool you are looking for:
CompuApps SwissKnife V3.22
http://www.compuapps.com/Download/swissknife/swissknife.htm
It will allow you to format jumbo size partitions in FAT32.
I had to use it once for formatting the 160 GB IDE HD included in my LAN
disk Conceptronic case.
Carlos

"Zootal" wrote:

> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large fat32
> partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that Western Digital
> make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool doesn't recognize sata
> drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I need fat32.
>
> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>
>
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

Carlos wrote:
> Zootal,
> This is the tool you are looking for:
> CompuApps SwissKnife V3.22

I've tried that tool. Its internal calculator breaks on disks larger
than 500GB
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

Eccentric, sure, totally insane? No, only partially nutso. I do things my
way if I think it gets the job done with the least amount of pain. I don't
have to adopt policies that make management happy, I don't have to satisfy
some comittee that this helps maximize the shareholders wealth, and I don't
need permission from IT :-)

In the past, dual booting to Win98 got the job done with the least amount of
pain. I can't use a virtual machine because one of the things I do is boot
to another OS and backup/restore my XP partition. When I install the OS and
get it setup the way I want and patched to the current SP, I then boot to
another OS and make a copy of the entire boot partion.

Then, when I do something stupid, or Windows does something stupid, I simply
boot to another OS, and selectively restore the files. In the real world
they call this re-imaging, only technically I don't use an image, I just use
discreetly copied files. I've done it like this for many years, and I've
restored my xP and Win2000 installs several times - saving me the pain of
having to reinstall windows.

Looks like Win98 is finally out the door, as Win98 won't install on my
current box - it's a AMD Phenom quad core with 2GB ram, and Win98 chokes for
some reason. So I stuck Slackware 12 on it and I'm using that in place of
win98.

"Tom Ferguson" <tom.newsgroups@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e6ewx0jNIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> OK. I suppose you have your preferences; however, my first impression of
> the idea is that you are either very eccentric or totally insane.
>
> See
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2006/07/WindowsConfidential/
>
> However, they are your boxes. Have you considered using MS VirtualPC 2007
> or Virtual Server 2005 or VMWare Workstation to run Win98 in a virtual
> machine on XP? Granted, other "rescue methods" are necessary to get HD
> read access if the OS fails to boot.
>
> Tom
> MSMVP 1998-2007
>
>
> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
> news:ulE8RIiNIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Because I double boot to Win98 on all of my boxes. And if I have to, I
>> can boot from an old dos boot disk, and still access my drives. Lately,
>> I've been loading Linux instead of Win98, and when I get round to getting
>> rid of Win98 on all of my boxes, then I'll consider moving on from fat32.
>>
>> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
>> news:74828A1E-2BD8-4558-A5AA-4D196FAE4092@microsoft.com...
>>> Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really
>>> BAD choice for a large drive.
>>>
>>> XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
>>> anything will create a FAT drive that large.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Charlie.
>>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>>
>>>
>>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>>> news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large
>>>> fat32 partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that
>>>> Western Digital make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool
>>>> doesn't recognize sata drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I
>>>> need fat32.
>>>>
>>>> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

OK. I totally get it. Ever since Windows 3.x, I used to use a way of setting
up multi-booting systems that involved a FAT system volume. However Windows
XP came along and made the method sub-optimum for XP on large drives.
Vista's boot loader simply totally blew it out of the water. Now I set up XP
and Vista 'on metal', dual booting, with earlier systems in virtual
machines. I suits my requirements-I don't use 9x systems much now. But, by
what you say, your requirements do vary.

I am not familiar with Slackware 12. Thanks for the mention. I'll have a
look out of curiosity, if nothing else. who knows...

As you were!
Carry on.

Tom
MSMVP 1998-2007

"Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the don't
send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
news:OIJaM7sNIHA.5224@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Eccentric, sure, totally insane? No, only partially nutso. I do things my
> way if I think it gets the job done with the least amount of pain. I don't
> have to adopt policies that make management happy, I don't have to satisfy
> some comittee that this helps maximize the shareholders wealth, and I
> don't need permission from IT :-)
>
> In the past, dual booting to Win98 got the job done with the least amount
> of pain. I can't use a virtual machine because one of the things I do is
> boot to another OS and backup/restore my XP partition. When I install the
> OS and get it setup the way I want and patched to the current SP, I then
> boot to another OS and make a copy of the entire boot partion.
>
> Then, when I do something stupid, or Windows does something stupid, I
> simply boot to another OS, and selectively restore the files. In the real
> world they call this re-imaging, only technically I don't use an image, I
> just use discreetly copied files. I've done it like this for many years,
> and I've restored my xP and Win2000 installs several times - saving me the
> pain of having to reinstall windows.
>
> Looks like Win98 is finally out the door, as Win98 won't install on my
> current box - it's a AMD Phenom quad core with 2GB ram, and Win98 chokes
> for some reason. So I stuck Slackware 12 on it and I'm using that in place
> of win98.
>
> "Tom Ferguson" <tom.newsgroups@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e6ewx0jNIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> OK. I suppose you have your preferences; however, my first impression of
>> the idea is that you are either very eccentric or totally insane.
>>
>> See
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2006/07/WindowsConfidential/
>>
>> However, they are your boxes. Have you considered using MS VirtualPC 2007
>> or Virtual Server 2005 or VMWare Workstation to run Win98 in a virtual
>> machine on XP? Granted, other "rescue methods" are necessary to get HD
>> read access if the OS fails to boot.
>>
>> Tom
>> MSMVP 1998-2007
>>
>>
>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>> news:ulE8RIiNIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Because I double boot to Win98 on all of my boxes. And if I have to, I
>>> can boot from an old dos boot disk, and still access my drives. Lately,
>>> I've been loading Linux instead of Win98, and when I get round to
>>> getting rid of Win98 on all of my boxes, then I'll consider moving on
>>> from fat32.
>>>
>>> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in
>>> message news:74828A1E-2BD8-4558-A5AA-4D196FAE4092@microsoft.com...
>>>> Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really
>>>> BAD choice for a large drive.
>>>>
>>>> XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
>>>> anything will create a FAT drive that large.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Charlie.
>>>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>>>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>>>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>>>> news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large
>>>>> fat32 partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that
>>>>> Western Digital make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool
>>>>> doesn't recognize sata drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I
>>>>> need fat32.
>>>>>
>>>>> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

On Dec 5, 3:09 am, "Tom Ferguson" <tom.newsgro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK. I totally get it. Ever since Windows 3.x, I used to use a way of setting
> up multi-booting systems that involved a FAT system volume. However Windows
> XP came along and made the method sub-optimum for XP on large drives.
> Vista's boot loader simply totally blew it out of the water. Now I set up XP
> and Vista 'on metal', dual booting, with earlier systems in virtual
> machines. I suits my requirements-I don't use 9x systems much now. But, by
> what you say, your requirements do vary.
>
> I am not familiar with Slackware 12. Thanks for the mention. I'll have a
> look out of curiosity, if nothing else. who knows...
>

Slackware is another Linux variant. Unlike Redhat and others that are
trying to be more like Windows, Slackware is trying to be more like
Unix, and is not for the faint of heart. If hunting down drivers and
compiling your own kernel are tasks that don't scare you, then by all
means give it a shot. I've been running it for about 3 or 4 years now.
On my laptop, the only reason I boot to Windows is when I need to use
visual studio. Other then that, I only use Linux.

Another thought that occurred to me was to simply install a second
copy of XP on a different partition. That way I can boot to the other
to do maintenance on the primary partition. I stuck a 750GB drive in
the box (woohoo!) so disk space is no longer a premium :)
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

You might want to consider something like Acronis TrueImage. I've found it
quite satisfactory. I'm also using Windows Home Server to do this, but they
don't support XP x64. (Vista 64 is coming "soon", whatever that means.)

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel


"Ook" <zootal@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5d01c6eb-5619-4ae8-9088-a60c72917224@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 5, 3:09 am, "Tom Ferguson" <tom.newsgro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK. I totally get it. Ever since Windows 3.x, I used to use a way of
>> setting
>> up multi-booting systems that involved a FAT system volume. However
>> Windows
>> XP came along and made the method sub-optimum for XP on large drives.
>> Vista's boot loader simply totally blew it out of the water. Now I set up
>> XP
>> and Vista 'on metal', dual booting, with earlier systems in virtual
>> machines. I suits my requirements-I don't use 9x systems much now. But,
>> by
>> what you say, your requirements do vary.
>>
>> I am not familiar with Slackware 12. Thanks for the mention. I'll have a
>> look out of curiosity, if nothing else. who knows...
>>
>
> Slackware is another Linux variant. Unlike Redhat and others that are
> trying to be more like Windows, Slackware is trying to be more like
> Unix, and is not for the faint of heart. If hunting down drivers and
> compiling your own kernel are tasks that don't scare you, then by all
> means give it a shot. I've been running it for about 3 or 4 years now.
> On my laptop, the only reason I boot to Windows is when I need to use
> visual studio. Other then that, I only use Linux.
>
> Another thought that occurred to me was to simply install a second
> copy of XP on a different partition. That way I can boot to the other
> to do maintenance on the primary partition. I stuck a 750GB drive in
> the box (woohoo!) so disk space is no longer a premium :)
 
Re: How to format large drive fat32?

Slackware is fine, no debate but if you're only curious for the odd rescue
operation maybe:

http://www.sysresccd.org/Main_Page

will fit? I don't know, but I think it is Slackware based - or, is it
Knoppix?

By the looks of it, System Rescue CD has damn near anything anyone would
ever need, for any rescue-task!

For a pure Windows-based setup, I think Charlie has a point - Acronis seems
to serve quite a bit more than the minimum requirements!


Tony. . .


"Tom Ferguson" <tom.newsgroups@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23OZNC9yNIHA.5524@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> OK. I totally get it. Ever since Windows 3.x, I used to use a way of
> setting up multi-booting systems that involved a FAT system volume.
> However Windows XP came along and made the method sub-optimum for XP on
> large drives. Vista's boot loader simply totally blew it out of the water.
> Now I set up XP and Vista 'on metal', dual booting, with earlier systems
> in virtual machines. I suits my requirements-I don't use 9x systems much
> now. But, by what you say, your requirements do vary.
>
> I am not familiar with Slackware 12. Thanks for the mention. I'll have a
> look out of curiosity, if nothing else. who knows...
>
> As you were!
> Carry on.
>
> Tom
> MSMVP 1998-2007
>
> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
> news:OIJaM7sNIHA.5224@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Eccentric, sure, totally insane? No, only partially nutso. I do things my
>> way if I think it gets the job done with the least amount of pain. I
>> don't have to adopt policies that make management happy, I don't have to
>> satisfy some comittee that this helps maximize the shareholders wealth,
>> and I don't need permission from IT :-)
>>
>> In the past, dual booting to Win98 got the job done with the least amount
>> of pain. I can't use a virtual machine because one of the things I do is
>> boot to another OS and backup/restore my XP partition. When I install the
>> OS and get it setup the way I want and patched to the current SP, I then
>> boot to another OS and make a copy of the entire boot partion.
>>
>> Then, when I do something stupid, or Windows does something stupid, I
>> simply boot to another OS, and selectively restore the files. In the real
>> world they call this re-imaging, only technically I don't use an image, I
>> just use discreetly copied files. I've done it like this for many years,
>> and I've restored my xP and Win2000 installs several times - saving me
>> the pain of having to reinstall windows.
>>
>> Looks like Win98 is finally out the door, as Win98 won't install on my
>> current box - it's a AMD Phenom quad core with 2GB ram, and Win98 chokes
>> for some reason. So I stuck Slackware 12 on it and I'm using that in
>> place of win98.
>>
>> "Tom Ferguson" <tom.newsgroups@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:e6ewx0jNIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> OK. I suppose you have your preferences; however, my first impression of
>>> the idea is that you are either very eccentric or totally insane.
>>>
>>> See
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2006/07/WindowsConfidential/
>>>
>>> However, they are your boxes. Have you considered using MS VirtualPC
>>> 2007 or Virtual Server 2005 or VMWare Workstation to run Win98 in a
>>> virtual machine on XP? Granted, other "rescue methods" are necessary to
>>> get HD read access if the OS fails to boot.
>>>
>>> Tom
>>> MSMVP 1998-2007
>>>
>>>
>>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>>> news:ulE8RIiNIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> Because I double boot to Win98 on all of my boxes. And if I have to, I
>>>> can boot from an old dos boot disk, and still access my drives. Lately,
>>>> I've been loading Linux instead of Win98, and when I get round to
>>>> getting rid of Win98 on all of my boxes, then I'll consider moving on
>>>> from fat32.
>>>>
>>>> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in
>>>> message news:74828A1E-2BD8-4558-A5AA-4D196FAE4092@microsoft.com...
>>>>> Why in the world would you even WANT FAT32? Seriously, that's a really
>>>>> BAD choice for a large drive.
>>>>>
>>>>> XP x64 doesn't support creating FAT32 hard drives. And I don't think
>>>>> anything will create a FAT drive that large.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Charlie.
>>>>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>>>>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Zootal" <Don't send me any freaking spam at zootal dot com remove the
>>>>> don't send me any freaking spam> wrote in message
>>>>> news:%23J2hInhNIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> I'm running XP 64bit. I have a WD 750GB sata drive. I want a large
>>>>>> fat32 partition on it, about 650GB. The windows based tools that
>>>>>> Western Digital make don't run under XP64, and the dos based tool
>>>>>> doesn't recognize sata drives. XP will only format it as ntfs, but I
>>>>>> need fat32.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So - how can I create a 650GB fat32 partition on this drive?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
 
Back
Top