M,I-5'Persecution haras sment at work

  • Thread starter Thread starter vififvivf@lycos.com
  • Start date Start date
V

vififvivf@lycos.com

Guest
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=. harassment at work -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Once I stopped. watching television and listening to the radio at the end of
1990, "they" had to find other ways of. committing abuses. So they took what
must be for them a tried and tested. route; they get at you by subversion of
those around you. Since they wouldn't be able to do that with my. family or
friends, that meant getting at people. in the workplace to be their
mouthpieces and do their dirty work. for them.

They. supplied my employers in Oxford with details from what was going on in
my private life, and what I and other people had said. at my home and
accommodation in. Oxford. So people at work repeated verbatim words which
had been said in. my home, and repeated what I'd been doing recently. Often
the most trivial things,. the ones from your domestic life, are the ones
which hurt most. One manager in particular. at Oxford continuously abused me
for ten months with verbal sexual abuse, swearing, and threats to. terminate
my employment. After. ten months I was forced to seek psychiatric help and
start taking medication, and was away from work. for two months. I spoke
later with a solicitor about. what had happened at that company; he advised
it was only. possible to take action if you had left the company as a result
of harassment, and such an action would have. to be started very soon after
leaving.

Over a year later the same. manager picked on another new worker, with even
more serious results;. that employee tried to commit suicide with an
overdose as a result of the ill-treatment, and was forced to. leave his job.
But he didn't. take action against the company, either. Abuse at work is
comparable to that elsewhere in that tangible evidence is difficult. to
produce, and the abusers will always have. their denials ready when
challenged. And even if a court accepts what you say. happened, it still
remains. to prove that abuse causes the type of breakdown I had at the end
of 1992. In a recent case. before a British court, a former member of the
Army brought a. case against others who had maltreated him ten years
previously. Although the court accepted. that abuse had occurred, it did not
agree. that depressive illness necessarily followed, and denied justice to
the. plaintiff.

4814
 
RE: M,I-5'Persecution haras sment at work

If you believe you are being persecuted by your employer ,under the
Employment Rights Act, you should resign and have your case represented
before an Employment Tribunal for Constructive Dismissal.
This should not cost you anything.Go to your Citizens Advice Bureau,DISCUSS
AND ASK THAT THEY TAKE ON YOUR CASE.

"vififvivf@lycos.com" wrote:

> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> -=. harassment at work -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> Once I stopped. watching television and listening to the radio at the end of
> 1990, "they" had to find other ways of. committing abuses. So they took what
> must be for them a tried and tested. route; they get at you by subversion of
> those around you. Since they wouldn't be able to do that with my. family or
> friends, that meant getting at people. in the workplace to be their
> mouthpieces and do their dirty work. for them.
>
> They. supplied my employers in Oxford with details from what was going on in
> my private life, and what I and other people had said. at my home and
> accommodation in. Oxford. So people at work repeated verbatim words which
> had been said in. my home, and repeated what I'd been doing recently. Often
> the most trivial things,. the ones from your domestic life, are the ones
> which hurt most. One manager in particular. at Oxford continuously abused me
> for ten months with verbal sexual abuse, swearing, and threats to. terminate
> my employment. After. ten months I was forced to seek psychiatric help and
> start taking medication, and was away from work. for two months. I spoke
> later with a solicitor about. what had happened at that company; he advised
> it was only. possible to take action if you had left the company as a result
> of harassment, and such an action would have. to be started very soon after
> leaving.
>
> Over a year later the same. manager picked on another new worker, with even
> more serious results;. that employee tried to commit suicide with an
> overdose as a result of the ill-treatment, and was forced to. leave his job.
> But he didn't. take action against the company, either. Abuse at work is
> comparable to that elsewhere in that tangible evidence is difficult. to
> produce, and the abusers will always have. their denials ready when
> challenged. And even if a court accepts what you say. happened, it still
> remains. to prove that abuse causes the type of breakdown I had at the end
> of 1992. In a recent case. before a British court, a former member of the
> Army brought a. case against others who had maltreated him ten years
> previously. Although the court accepted. that abuse had occurred, it did not
> agree. that depressive illness necessarily followed, and denied justice to
> the. plaintiff.
>
> 4814
>
>
 
Re: M,I-5'Persecution haras sment at work

"john coleman" <john coleman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C1E7D685-4DEE-4B15-9FD2-E9C2CCE299DA@microsoft.com...
> If you believe you are being persecuted by your employer ,under the
> Employment Rights Act, you should resign and have your case represented
> before an Employment Tribunal for Constructive Dismissal.
> This should not cost you anything.Go to your Citizens Advice
> Bureau,DISCUSS
> AND ASK THAT THEY TAKE ON YOUR CASE.
>
> "vififvivf@lycos.com" wrote:
>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> -=. harassment at work -=
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>
>> Once I stopped. watching television and listening to the radio at the end
>> of
>> 1990, "they" had to find other ways of. committing abuses. So they took
>> what
>> must be for them a tried and tested. route; they get at you by subversion
>> of
>> those around you. Since they wouldn't be able to do that with my. family
>> or
>> friends, that meant getting at people. in the workplace to be their
>> mouthpieces and do their dirty work. for them.
>>
>> They. supplied my employers in Oxford with details from what was going on
>> in
>> my private life, and what I and other people had said. at my home and
>> accommodation in. Oxford. So people at work repeated verbatim words which
>> had been said in. my home, and repeated what I'd been doing recently.
>> Often
>> the most trivial things,. the ones from your domestic life, are the ones
>> which hurt most. One manager in particular. at Oxford continuously abused
>> me
>> for ten months with verbal sexual abuse, swearing, and threats to.
>> terminate
>> my employment. After. ten months I was forced to seek psychiatric help
>> and
>> start taking medication, and was away from work. for two months. I spoke
>> later with a solicitor about. what had happened at that company; he
>> advised
>> it was only. possible to take action if you had left the company as a
>> result
>> of harassment, and such an action would have. to be started very soon
>> after
>> leaving.
>>
>> Over a year later the same. manager picked on another new worker, with
>> even
>> more serious results;. that employee tried to commit suicide with an
>> overdose as a result of the ill-treatment, and was forced to. leave his
>> job.
>> But he didn't. take action against the company, either. Abuse at work is
>> comparable to that elsewhere in that tangible evidence is difficult. to
>> produce, and the abusers will always have. their denials ready when
>> challenged. And even if a court accepts what you say. happened, it still
>> remains. to prove that abuse causes the type of breakdown I had at the
>> end
>> of 1992. In a recent case. before a British court, a former member of the
>> Army brought a. case against others who had maltreated him ten years
>> previously. Although the court accepted. that abuse had occurred, it did
>> not
>> agree. that depressive illness necessarily followed, and denied justice
>> to
>> the. plaintiff.
>>
>> 4814
>>
>>



He/she/it claims harassment yet has no problem harassing many newsgroups. A
stay in the Bangkok Hilton would not go amiss for whoever/whatever produces
this crap..

--
Mike Hall - MVP
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
 
Re: M,I-5'Persecution haras sment at work

Mike - doesn't anyone police this newsgroup? I would have thought this sort
of message would have been filtered as it is 'way off-topic. Not an attempt
to prevent the person from speaking out - there are many more relevant
forums available for this topic - not this newsgroup. My 2 cents worth
Pete

"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote in message
news:uVUTczTTIHA.280@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> "john coleman" <john coleman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:C1E7D685-4DEE-4B15-9FD2-E9C2CCE299DA@microsoft.com...
>> If you believe you are being persecuted by your employer ,under the
>> Employment Rights Act, you should resign and have your case represented
>> before an Employment Tribunal for Constructive Dismissal.
>> This should not cost you anything.Go to your Citizens Advice
>> Bureau,DISCUSS
>> AND ASK THAT THEY TAKE ON YOUR CASE.
>>
>> "vififvivf@lycos.com" wrote:
>>
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>> -=. harassment at work -=
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>>
>>> Once I stopped. watching television and listening to the radio at the
>>> end of
>>> 1990, "they" had to find other ways of. committing abuses. So they took
>>> what
>>> must be for them a tried and tested. route; they get at you by
>>> subversion of
>>> those around you. Since they wouldn't be able to do that with my. family
>>> or
>>> friends, that meant getting at people. in the workplace to be their
>>> mouthpieces and do their dirty work. for them.
>>>
>>> They. supplied my employers in Oxford with details from what was going
>>> on in
>>> my private life, and what I and other people had said. at my home and
>>> accommodation in. Oxford. So people at work repeated verbatim words
>>> which
>>> had been said in. my home, and repeated what I'd been doing recently.
>>> Often
>>> the most trivial things,. the ones from your domestic life, are the ones
>>> which hurt most. One manager in particular. at Oxford continuously
>>> abused me
>>> for ten months with verbal sexual abuse, swearing, and threats to.
>>> terminate
>>> my employment. After. ten months I was forced to seek psychiatric help
>>> and
>>> start taking medication, and was away from work. for two months. I spoke
>>> later with a solicitor about. what had happened at that company; he
>>> advised
>>> it was only. possible to take action if you had left the company as a
>>> result
>>> of harassment, and such an action would have. to be started very soon
>>> after
>>> leaving.
>>>
>>> Over a year later the same. manager picked on another new worker, with
>>> even
>>> more serious results;. that employee tried to commit suicide with an
>>> overdose as a result of the ill-treatment, and was forced to. leave his
>>> job.
>>> But he didn't. take action against the company, either. Abuse at work is
>>> comparable to that elsewhere in that tangible evidence is difficult. to
>>> produce, and the abusers will always have. their denials ready when
>>> challenged. And even if a court accepts what you say. happened, it still
>>> remains. to prove that abuse causes the type of breakdown I had at the
>>> end
>>> of 1992. In a recent case. before a British court, a former member of
>>> the
>>> Army brought a. case against others who had maltreated him ten years
>>> previously. Although the court accepted. that abuse had occurred, it did
>>> not
>>> agree. that depressive illness necessarily followed, and denied justice
>>> to
>>> the. plaintiff.
>>>
>>> 4814
>>>
>>>

>
>
> He/she/it claims harassment yet has no problem harassing many newsgroups.
> A stay in the Bangkok Hilton would not go amiss for whoever/whatever
> produces this crap..
>
> --
> Mike Hall - MVP
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
>
>
>
>
 
Re: M,I-5'Persecution haras sment at work

Whatever your thoughts on the original post, it might be best in the
interests of getting a clean deletion if everyone would avoid replying
(advice I did not follow, obviously) or avoid quoting any part of the
original.

Tom
MSMVP 1998-2007


"William Peterson" <wr.peterson@clearwire.net> wrote in message
news:%23E6XleWTIHA.4752@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Mike - doesn't anyone police this newsgroup? I would have thought this
> sort of message would have been filtered as it is 'way off-topic. Not an
> attempt to prevent the person from speaking out - there are many more
> relevant forums available for this topic - not this newsgroup. My 2 cents
> worth
> Pete
>
> "Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote in message
> news:uVUTczTTIHA.280@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> "john coleman" <john coleman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:C1E7D685-4DEE-4B15-9FD2-E9C2CCE299DA@microsoft.com...
>>> If you believe you are being persecuted by your employer ,under the
>>> Employment Rights Act, you should resign and have your case represented
>>> before an Employment Tribunal for Constructive Dismissal.
>>> This should not cost you anything.Go to your Citizens Advice
>>> Bureau,DISCUSS
>>> AND ASK THAT THEY TAKE ON YOUR CASE.


{Snip}


>>
>> He/she/it claims harassment yet has no problem harassing many newsgroups.
>> A stay in the Bangkok Hilton would not go amiss for whoever/whatever
>> produces this crap..
>>
>> --
>> Mike Hall - MVP
>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
>>
>>
>>
>>
 
Back
Top