Windows Vista Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gene Jones
  • Start date Start date
Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:40:58 +0000, Kier wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:35:56 -0700, Gene Jones wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:16:38 -0500, 7 wrote:
>>> >> if you haven't bought into Linux yet.
>>> >
>>> > Rather sounds like multilevel marketing.
>>>
>>> Coupled with a religious cult.

>>
>> and horrendous software. linux is for kids.

>
> How so? Are you talking about Sugar, the OLPC interface? That's certainly
> *designed* for kids. Linux as a whole is meant for adults with minds of
> their own.


And what happens when these kids get into the real world someday and start
looking for jobs or applying to college?

Are they going to list "I know Sugar" on their applications?
That will go about as far as listing Open Office.

You Linux freaks just don't get it do you?
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

In article <O2OJkNTYIHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>,
"Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

> "Mitch" <mitch@hawaii.rr> wrote in message
> news:270120081159504056%mitch@hawaii.rr...
> >
> > I can't believe anyone would talk about the Asus low-end laptop as a
> > comparison to regular laptop considerations.

>
> Heh, I'd say the same about this Macbook Air.


No doubt.

Then again, you've lately been saying quite a bit that doesn't map to
reality all that well.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

Mitch wrote:

> In article <eWFVdcOYIHA.748@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, Synapse Syndrome
> <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can just imagine the type of totally obnoxiously devoted Apple gimps
>> that
>> I'm going to see posing with those this summer. I'll stick with the
>> totally functional and useful Thinkpad X-Series.

>
> Are you saying that Apple doesn't make the same thing?


No, they don't

> Or are you saying that Apple's hardware isn't serious enough for real
> users?


Depends on the definition of "real user". Usually, no, it isn't serious
enough. "Serious" hardware is competitive. Apple hardware isn't

> Or are you suggesting that people only buy Apple to look good, or for
> that stupid 'religion' comment from years ago?


Yes. Although religous nutjobs would feel insulted being compared to apple
users

>
> All of that is junk not worthy even of you.


Well, he should have perhaps made it clearer that apple stuff is highpriced
junk

> And the Air is still usable, practical, and decent, as long as the user
> buys knowing the limitations.


Well, it certainly isn't even good enough to be properly landfill
--
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:59:50 -1000, Mitch wrote:

> In article <86nu65x4ot.ln2@supertux.my.domain>, Jerry McBride
> <jmcbride@mail-on.us> wrote:
>
>> For the price of one mac air... I could buy three eePC's... and have Linux
>> pre-installed....
>>
>> Is the Air Linux compatible?

>
> I don't know of any Mac ever made that was not compatible with Linux.
> Now, it's compatible with even Windows.
>
> I can't believe anyone would talk about the Asus low-end laptop as a
> comparison to regular laptop considerations. Come on, a 7 inch screen?


It's their only defense.
The entire thing is laughable.

One Linux loony is claiming he can buy 3 Asus units for the cost of one Mac
unit.
Yea, sure he can.
And I can buy 10,000 marbles for the same price.

He will still be stuck with the limitations of that device, only he will
now have 3 of them.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:28:13 -0600, Synapse Syndrome wrote
(in article <OwC#CrRYIHA.748@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>):

> "Lefty Bigfoot" <nunya@busyness.info> wrote in message
> news:0001HW.C3C231B001AD3676F01846D8@news.verizon.net...
>>
>>> Daniel, don't be stupid, the MacBook is about twice the size, weight and
>>> about the same speed. The MacBook Air is easily the thinnest, most
>>> powerful laptop in the world, and will be for several years to come.

>>
>> Unless you want firewire.
>>
>> Unless you want multiple USB ports.
>>
>> Unless you want more memory capacity.
>>
>> Unless you want more storage capacity.
>>
>> Unless you want ExpressCard/34.
>>
>> Unless you want multiple batteries to quick change on a long
>> flight or elsewhere.

>
>
> It's male jewellery for posing ponces.


I can see how it's useful for someone that is on the road
constantly and doesn't need a luggable workstation. If all they
need is lightweight basic computing, it seems like a decent
choice. If you need to do heavy duty work on it, it's a boat
anchor.

> Sort of like the guys you see around with iPhones. Dicks.


Jealousy is so ugly. I don't have an iPhone myself, having no
need for one, but I don't have any silly notions about ownership
of one implying any stereotypes for the owners.

--
Lefty
All of God's creatures have a place..........
..........right next to the potatoes and gravy.
See also: http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:44:22 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:59:50 -1000, Mitch wrote:
>
>> In article <86nu65x4ot.ln2@supertux.my.domain>, Jerry McBride
>> <jmcbride@mail-on.us> wrote:
>>
>>> For the price of one mac air... I could buy three eePC's... and have
>>> Linux pre-installed....
>>>
>>> Is the Air Linux compatible?

>>
>> I don't know of any Mac ever made that was not compatible with Linux.
>> Now, it's compatible with even Windows.
>>
>> I can't believe anyone would talk about the Asus low-end laptop as a
>> comparison to regular laptop considerations. Come on, a 7 inch screen?

>
> It's their only defense. The entire thing is laughable.
>
> One Linux loony is claiming he can buy 3 Asus units for the cost of one Mac
> unit. Yea, sure he can. And I can buy 10,000 marbles for the same price.
>
> He will still be stuck with the limitations of that device, only he will
> now have 3 of them.


And you will have all the marbles.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:30:42 -0500, Tim Murray wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:44:22 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:59:50 -1000, Mitch wrote:
>>
>>> In article <86nu65x4ot.ln2@supertux.my.domain>, Jerry McBride
>>> <jmcbride@mail-on.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the price of one mac air... I could buy three eePC's... and have
>>>> Linux pre-installed....
>>>>
>>>> Is the Air Linux compatible?
>>>
>>> I don't know of any Mac ever made that was not compatible with Linux.
>>> Now, it's compatible with even Windows.
>>>
>>> I can't believe anyone would talk about the Asus low-end laptop as a
>>> comparison to regular laptop considerations. Come on, a 7 inch screen?

>>
>> It's their only defense. The entire thing is laughable.
>>
>> One Linux loony is claiming he can buy 3 Asus units for the cost of one Mac
>> unit. Yea, sure he can. And I can buy 10,000 marbles for the same price.
>>
>> He will still be stuck with the limitations of that device, only he will
>> now have 3 of them.

>
> And you will have all the marbles.


Which is more than most Linvocates can claim!
 
REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

REPOST. Sent a few hours ago, but the microsoft newsserver filters posts
containing
swearing, even though I cannot find any swearing in my post.

"Gene Jones" <jasin@janus.com> wrote in message
news:jasin-ED8CF1.13560127012008@mpls-nnrp-05.inet.qwest.net...
>
> macs run more software than any computer made, don't forget that.


What are you talking about? How can any Mac advocate argue with a Windows
user and talk about the amount of software they have available? Is this
just some dumb reference for Macs being able to run Unix programs, and the
Intel hardware to run Windows apps by running Windows itself? When you are
talking about the amount of native software, nothing comes close to Windows,
and Macs cannot even run most of Macintosh software natively anymore, with
all the processor (Motorola > PowerPC > Intel) and OS changes (MacOS > OSX)
you keep having.

> plus the macbook air is quite a bit more feature rich than the x-series.


LOL. Compromise is what happens when you design an ultra-compact, and to
get the Macbook Air that thin, for posing fanboys, there have been far more
compromises than ever!

What is your definition of 'feature rich'? So what are these better
features you were talking about exactly? I can only see a higher
resolution, as the screen is quite a lot bigger.

The main feature of this Macbook Air is its thinness, and there are a lot
of common features missing in it. It is compromised!

My Thinkpads have more than one measly USB port. They have Firewire. How
could an Apple not even have Firewire??

They have high speed 7200rpm 2.5 hard drives. This Macbook Air has 4200rpm
1.8" drive like those used in iPods. Do you realise that? Thinkpad X4x
series had 1.8" drives, and they moved back to 2.5" for the X6x, as 4200rpm
drives are 'performance dogs' (quote from the Thinkpad division). I think
you will find that this is going to be the biggest criticism of this laptop
when it comes out. It's going to be s-l-o-w. SSD's are very very
expensive, but you'd have to get one of those if you want better performance
as you cannot even get 5400rpm drives in 1.8" size, let alone 7200rpm.

And this thread was started on the basis that it uses a processor especially
made for Apple. This new small form factor was apparently planned for
Penryn all along, according to the AnandTech link posted. It's just Apple
wanted the smaller size on the older Merom core, that has been out for ages.
And by the way, it took ages for Apple to move from the Core Duo to the Core
2 Duo once it came out. I think we can expect to see Windows/Linux PCs with
Penryn chips long before we see them in Apples, and Penryn is a major
advance in processor technology.

I'm not against Macs for any reason, but some of their fans are knob.heads
and this Macbook Air is just a toy, made for iPosers. Have you
pre-ordered one already then?

ss.
 
Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:40:58 +0000, Kier wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:35:56 -0700, Gene Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:16:38 -0500, 7 wrote:
>>>>>> if you haven't bought into Linux yet.
>>>>> Rather sounds like multilevel marketing.
>>>> Coupled with a religious cult.
>>> and horrendous software. linux is for kids.

>> How so? Are you talking about Sugar, the OLPC interface? That's certainly
>> *designed* for kids. Linux as a whole is meant for adults with minds of
>> their own.

>
> And what happens when these kids get into the real world someday and start
> looking for jobs or applying to college?


My kid, who is in University, dual boots XP with Office and Linux with
Open Office and knows both.

Alias
 
Re: REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

Re: REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

"Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

> > macs run more software than any computer made, don't forget that.

>
> What are you talking about? How can any Mac advocate argue with a Windows
> user and talk about the amount of software they have available? Is this
> just some dumb reference for Macs being able to run Unix programs, and the
> Intel hardware to run Windows apps by running Windows itself? When you are
> talking about the amount of native software, nothing comes close to Windows,
> and Macs cannot even run most of Macintosh software natively anymore, with
> all the processor (Motorola > PowerPC > Intel) and OS changes (MacOS > OSX)
> you keep having.


Most Macs can run all software, only the Intel versions can't run the
few remaining Classic apps. There are tons more OSX software than
classic so it really doesn't matter.

> > plus the macbook air is quite a bit more feature rich than the x-series.

>
> LOL. Compromise is what happens when you design an ultra-compact, and to
> get the Macbook Air that thin, for posing fanboys, there have been far more
> compromises than ever!
>
> What is your definition of 'feature rich'? So what are these better
> features you were talking about exactly? I can only see a higher
> resolution, as the screen is quite a lot bigger.


It's the thinnest laptop with the largest screen, has a FULL keyboard,
the keys light up when the ambient light level gets dark, it has no
unneeded ports, thus battery life is longer than any laptop of it's size
and power. has LED backlit screen, keeps its value better than any other
laptop, runs OSX, etc, etc.

> The main feature of this Macbook Air is its thinness, and there are a lot
> of common features missing in it. It is compromised!


No, you are thinking of "Legacy" ports. Do you really need an ethernet
port nowadays? nope! an optical drive? nope! those are all 1980's ports
that Apple made standard, now they are taking them away just like they
did to the floppy which they brought the world in 1977. Trust me, every
laptop in 10 years will work just like the MacBook Air, you are just
trying to prop up a dying platform (window/linux)

> My Thinkpads have more than one measly USB port. They have Firewire. How
> could an Apple not even have Firewire??


And could you please explain why you would ever need a USB port?
Everything is wireless now (in the modern Apple world) but yes, if you
still live in the (old legacy Windows world) you can't understand what
I'm saying.

what is this?

http://www.apple.com/timecapsule/wireless.html

what is this?

http://www.apple.com/airportextreme/

what is this?

http://www.apple.com/appletv/specs.html

you don't need firewire with "wireless migration", gosh, you sure don't
know what is going on in the modern computer world!

http://www.apple.com/macbookair/wireless.html

> They have high speed 7200rpm 2.5 hard drives. This Macbook Air has 4200rpm
> 1.8" drive like those used in iPods. Do you realise that? Thinkpad X4x
> series had 1.8" drives, and they moved back to 2.5" for the X6x, as 4200rpm
> drives are 'performance dogs' (quote from the Thinkpad division). I think
> you will find that this is going to be the biggest criticism of this laptop
> when it comes out. It's going to be s-l-o-w. SSD's are very very
> expensive, but you'd have to get one of those if you want better performance
> as you cannot even get 5400rpm drives in 1.8" size, let alone 7200rpm.


so you admit you don't understand how OSX works? programs load into RAM,
they don't load off the hard drive but what? maybe once a month? Do you
even use a Mac? Sounds like not.

Yes, when SSD's come down in price it won't matter anyway. So wait a
year if you aren't ready to join the modern world.

> And this thread was started on the basis that it uses a processor especially
> made for Apple. This new small form factor was apparently planned for
> Penryn all along, according to the AnandTech link posted. It's just Apple
> wanted the smaller size on the older Merom core, that has been out for ages.
> And by the way, it took ages for Apple to move from the Core Duo to the Core
> 2 Duo once it came out. I think we can expect to see Windows/Linux PCs with
> Penryn chips long before we see them in Apples, and Penryn is a major
> advance in processor technology.


Yes, but Apple was able to help Intel Engineers to get to the small chip
size. And when you feel the bottom of the of the MacBook Air, you'll be
shocked at how cool running it is. Apple and Intel did it again.

> I'm not against Macs for any reason, but some of their fans are knob.heads
> and this Macbook Air is just a toy, made for iPosers. Have you
> pre-ordered one already then?


I'm not a fan of Apple, I just like quality products, you don't and I
don't hold that against you. Sure, I've actually have 6 on order.

How about you?

-
 
Re: REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

Re: REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

Gene Jones wrote:
> "Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:
>
>>> macs run more software than any computer made, don't forget that.

>> What are you talking about? How can any Mac advocate argue with a Windows
>> user and talk about the amount of software they have available? Is this
>> just some dumb reference for Macs being able to run Unix programs, and the
>> Intel hardware to run Windows apps by running Windows itself? When you are
>> talking about the amount of native software, nothing comes close to Windows,
>> and Macs cannot even run most of Macintosh software natively anymore, with
>> all the processor (Motorola > PowerPC > Intel) and OS changes (MacOS > OSX)
>> you keep having.

>
> Most Macs can run all software, only the Intel versions can't run the
> few remaining Classic apps. There are tons more OSX software than
> classic so it really doesn't matter.
>
>>> plus the macbook air is quite a bit more feature rich than the x-series.

>> LOL. Compromise is what happens when you design an ultra-compact, and to
>> get the Macbook Air that thin, for posing fanboys, there have been far more
>> compromises than ever!
>>
>> What is your definition of 'feature rich'? So what are these better
>> features you were talking about exactly? I can only see a higher
>> resolution, as the screen is quite a lot bigger.

>
> It's the thinnest laptop with the largest screen, has a FULL keyboard,
> the keys light up when the ambient light level gets dark, it has no
> unneeded ports, thus battery life is longer than any laptop of it's size
> and power. has LED backlit screen, keeps its value better than any other
> laptop, runs OSX, etc, etc.
>
>> The main feature of this Macbook Air is its thinness, and there are a lot
>> of common features missing in it. It is compromised!

>
> No, you are thinking of "Legacy" ports. Do you really need an ethernet
> port nowadays? nope! an optical drive? nope! those are all 1980's ports
> that Apple made standard, now they are taking them away just like they
> did to the floppy which they brought the world in 1977. Trust me, every
> laptop in 10 years will work just like the MacBook Air, you are just
> trying to prop up a dying platform (window/linux)
>
>> My Thinkpads have more than one measly USB port. They have Firewire. How
>> could an Apple not even have Firewire??

>
> And could you please explain why you would ever need a USB port?
> Everything is wireless now (in the modern Apple world) but yes, if you
> still live in the (old legacy Windows world) you can't understand what
> I'm saying.
>
> what is this?
>
> http://www.apple.com/timecapsule/wireless.html
>
> what is this?
>
> http://www.apple.com/airportextreme/
>
> what is this?
>
> http://www.apple.com/appletv/specs.html
>
> you don't need firewire with "wireless migration", gosh, you sure don't
> know what is going on in the modern computer world!
>
> http://www.apple.com/macbookair/wireless.html
>
>> They have high speed 7200rpm 2.5 hard drives. This Macbook Air has 4200rpm
>> 1.8" drive like those used in iPods. Do you realise that? Thinkpad X4x
>> series had 1.8" drives, and they moved back to 2.5" for the X6x, as 4200rpm
>> drives are 'performance dogs' (quote from the Thinkpad division). I think
>> you will find that this is going to be the biggest criticism of this laptop
>> when it comes out. It's going to be s-l-o-w. SSD's are very very
>> expensive, but you'd have to get one of those if you want better performance
>> as you cannot even get 5400rpm drives in 1.8" size, let alone 7200rpm.

>
> so you admit you don't understand how OSX works? programs load into RAM,
> they don't load off the hard drive but what? maybe once a month? Do you
> even use a Mac? Sounds like not.
>
> Yes, when SSD's come down in price it won't matter anyway. So wait a
> year if you aren't ready to join the modern world.
>
>> And this thread was started on the basis that it uses a processor especially
>> made for Apple. This new small form factor was apparently planned for
>> Penryn all along, according to the AnandTech link posted. It's just Apple
>> wanted the smaller size on the older Merom core, that has been out for ages.
>> And by the way, it took ages for Apple to move from the Core Duo to the Core
>> 2 Duo once it came out. I think we can expect to see Windows/Linux PCs with
>> Penryn chips long before we see them in Apples, and Penryn is a major
>> advance in processor technology.

>
> Yes, but Apple was able to help Intel Engineers to get to the small chip
> size. And when you feel the bottom of the of the MacBook Air, you'll be
> shocked at how cool running it is. Apple and Intel did it again.
>
>> I'm not against Macs for any reason, but some of their fans are knob.heads
>> and this Macbook Air is just a toy, made for iPosers. Have you
>> pre-ordered one already then?

>
> I'm not a fan of Apple, I just like quality products, you don't and I
> don't hold that against you. Sure, I've actually have 6 on order.
>
> How about you?
>
> -


The Mac Air is nice, I admit. I just watched the video. I wouldn't mind
having one :-) The wireless features are really cool. I would connect a
DVI TFT Monitor to it, though. 13" ain't much and I don't travel much
and when I do, it is without *any* computers.

Alias
 
Re: REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

Re: REPOST: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

In article <uKIviEUYIHA.4172@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>,
"Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMgomez404.elitemail.org> wrote:

> REPOST. Sent a few hours ago, but the microsoft newsserver filters posts
> containing
> swearing, even though I cannot find any swearing in my post.
>
> "Gene Jones" <jasin@janus.com> wrote in message
> news:jasin-ED8CF1.13560127012008@mpls-nnrp-05.inet.qwest.net...
> >
> > macs run more software than any computer made, don't forget that.

>
> What are you talking about? How can any Mac advocate argue with a Windows
> user and talk about the amount of software they have available?


It's easy. Mac's start off loaded with software. Everything from a
full blown set of developer tools to an SQL database to a full featured
text editor (will spell checking), dictionary, thesaurus plus all the
unix goodies (grep, bash etc). These all run under a robust UI with
integrated system services and a plethora of GUI functionality all
accessible through one button on the mouse.

All Tier 1 Mac OS X apps run natively, these include apps used daily by
professionals as well as science apps, games for kids, just pick a
category. We can also run Tier 1 Linux/UNIX/OSS whatever apps: MySql,
Gimp to name a couple, on the same system. If we need to, if we
absolutely have to, if our lives depend on running that oddball windows
app we can do that too. One system, thousands of apps many of which are
designed for different systems.

The ability to run software is why I bought this machine several years
ago. Forget it dude, you windows guys are so far out of your league you
don't even know it.

<snip>

--
SD

"This post was proof read by Mac OS X Leopard
running on a G4 933 with a little more than 700
things of ram. :)"
 
Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

In article <bfragkvkf71u$.1ovndmv1owc3c$.dlg@40tude.net>, Moshe
Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:28:55 -0500, Tim Murray wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:26:24 -0500, 7 wrote:
> >> Appil Corporation Fraudulent Asstroturfer Gene Jones wrote on behalf of
> >> Appil Corporation:
> >>
> >>> A
> >>
> >> Stick to AMD 64 bit CPUs and PCs running Linux. Its a lot faster than appil
> >> crap.
> >>
> >> See for yourself the coolest desktops running Linux
> >> www.youtube.com search for beryl and compiz
> >>
> >> All free with source code unlike appil crap
> >> http://www.livecdlist.com
> >> http://www.distrowatch.com
> >>

> >
> > Wow. You really put forth a compelling argument.

>
> As you have discovered, ' 7 ' isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer.
> Most of COLA, both sides, have more or less agreed that he is mentally
> retarded.


He must be. He still doesn't understand that showing a couple screen
shots of Beryl is _not_ advocating Linux, and certainly not a specific
product recommendation.
Of course, his poor-attitude spelling and extreme exaggerations do the
same. I would swear if a product he didn't use had 1 percent less
performance, he'd call it crap. Heck, if it had ten percent better
performance, he'd call it crap as long as it wasn't what he used.
 
Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

In article <G72nj.83968$c_1.80981@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
<website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote:

> > Wow. You really put forth a compelling argument.

>
> You got to remember these arguments are addressed towards appil retardees
> conning the public out of money and better technology.



How are Mac users conning the public out of money?
How are Mac users causing any slower adoption of tech?

Isn't this a complaint directed better at nearly ANY other company?
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

Synapse Syndrome wrote:
> "Gene Jones" <jasin@janus.com> wrote in message
> news:jasin-D12641.20475726012008@mpls-nnrp-05.inet.qwest.net...
>> As we all know Intel has always been desperate to have Apple as a
>> customer. Apple was just too demanding in the past for Intel to measure
>> up, but now Intel has learned to work at the level of Apple and has
>> again built a chip exactly to Apple's specifications.
>>
>> The MacBook Air is the first to have this fast, super low temp chip.
>> Apple correctly says it's the world's thinnest Laptop, but they don't
>> mention it's also the world's coolest running.
>>
>> A good read:
>>
>> You may have wondered how it is possible that the MacBook Air is getting
>> a new Intel microprocessor - a processor that is so new that it has not
>> been available for any other product. We actually have seen other
>> examples of Apple being treated as a very special customer by Intel,
>> such as the exclusive availability of the 3.0 GHz quad-core Xeon last
>> year.
>>
>> A little investigation reveals that Intel actually did develop a
>> processor for Apple and its MacBook Air. And, if you are aware of the
>> background story, this special Apple chip makes a whole lot of sense for
>> both Apple and Intel.
>>
>> http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/35789/118/
>>
>> you can learn more about the most powerful laptop for its size in the
>> world here:
>>
>> COOL!
>>
>> http://www.apple.com/macbookair/guidedtour/
>> http://www.apple.com/macbookair/

>
>
> I can just imagine the type of totally obnoxiously devoted Apple gimps that
> I'm going to see posing with those this summer. I'll stick with the totally
> functional and useful Thinkpad X-Series.
>
> ss.
>
>


Agreed. I love Thinkpad xseries too. I have an x41. :)

--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -
Submit your nomination at the link below:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

View nominations already submitted:
http://htmlgear.tripod.com/guest/control.guest?u=protectfreedom&i=1&a=view

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on
free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the
creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer
rights in the digital age are not frivolous."
- Maura Corbett
 
Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

Re: Once again, AMD builds better CPU for Linux

Kier <vallon@tiscali.co.uk> writes:

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:35:56 -0700, Gene Jones wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:16:38 -0500, 7 wrote:
>>> >> if you haven't bought into Linux yet.
>>> >
>>> > Rather sounds like multilevel marketing.
>>>
>>> Coupled with a religious cult.

>>
>> and horrendous software. linux is for kids.

>
> How so? Are you talking about Sugar, the OLPC interface? That's certainly
> *designed* for kids. Linux as a whole is meant for adults with minds of
> their own.


Poor Kier. Always counteraction with no "action". Come on Kier. Instead
of getting your panties in a wad, do some real advocacy.

What SW do YOU use that is better on Linux than on XP?

OSS that is.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:13:28 -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
>> Is the Air Linux compatible?

>
> Who cares?
> Only an idiot or a super geek would remove a fine operating system like OSX
> and install a kludge like Linux.


No. The core kernel and the architecture is excellent.

The apps generally let it down.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

"Hadron" <hadronquark@googlemail.com> stated in post
fnjlbe$kqr$5@registered.motzarella.org on 1/27/08 9:23 PM:

> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:13:28 -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
>>> Is the Air Linux compatible?

>>
>> Who cares?
>> Only an idiot or a super geek would remove a fine operating system like OSX
>> and install a kludge like Linux.

>
> No. The core kernel and the architecture is excellent.
>
> The apps generally let it down.



Which apps have let you down? What were you doing with them?


--
One who makes no mistakes, never makes anything.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

"The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy'"
<none@none.not> wrote in message news:fnjknv$ee2$2@aioe.org...
>>
>> I can just imagine the type of totally obnoxiously devoted Apple gimps
>> that I'm going to see posing with those this summer. I'll stick with the
>> totally functional and useful Thinkpad X-Series.
>>

>
> Agreed. I love Thinkpad xseries too. I have an x41. :)



I have an X31 and an X40. I have been planning to get a X61 or X61s, but
now I think I'll wait for a Penryn powered X62 (or is it going to be a new
design, X70?).

ss.
 
Re: Once again, Intel builds a CPU just for Apple

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:23:07 -0600, Hadron wrote
(in article <fnjlbe$kqr$5@registered.motzarella.org>):

> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:13:28 -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
>>> Is the Air Linux compatible?

>>
>> Who cares?
>> Only an idiot or a super geek would remove a fine operating system like OSX
>> and install a kludge like Linux.

>
> No. The core kernel and the architecture is excellent.
>
> The apps generally let it down.


The Fickle Finger of Fate points at glib.





--
Lefty
All of God's creatures have a place..........
..........right next to the potatoes and gravy.
See also: http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif
 
Back
Top