pfmon for 64-bit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex
  • Start date Start date
A

Alex

Guest
Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is specified
Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit versions...
 
Re: pfmon for 64-bit

It's probably something that is not of any significant use
on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what
good will it do on a desktop?

Alex wrote:
> Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is specified
> Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit versions...
 
Re: pfmon for 64-bit

I want to use it on a server to investigate a pretty strange issue with
paging.

"Theo" wrote:

> It's probably something that is not of any significant use
> on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what
> good will it do on a desktop?
>
> Alex wrote:
> > Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is specified
> > Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit versions...
>
 
Re: pfmon for 64-bit

Generally speaking, if the program isn't making use of any driver-like code,
32bits should do the job. Being a monitoring piece, you could be lucky, I
think. At least as long as the server isn't Itanium based.


Tony. . .


"Alex" <Alex@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:379A46B9-1DC5-474E-A0F9-07703B0ACFB7@microsoft.com...
>I want to use it on a server to investigate a pretty strange issue with
> paging.
>
> "Theo" wrote:
>
>> It's probably something that is not of any significant use
>> on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what
>> good will it do on a desktop?
>>
>> Alex wrote:
>> > Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is
>> > specified
>> > Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit
>> > versions...
>>
 
Re: pfmon for 64-bit

It is Itanium based...

"Tony Sperling" wrote:

> Generally speaking, if the program isn't making use of any driver-like code,
> 32bits should do the job. Being a monitoring piece, you could be lucky, I
> think. At least as long as the server isn't Itanium based.
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Alex" <Alex@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:379A46B9-1DC5-474E-A0F9-07703B0ACFB7@microsoft.com...
> >I want to use it on a server to investigate a pretty strange issue with
> > paging.
> >
> > "Theo" wrote:
> >
> >> It's probably something that is not of any significant use
> >> on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what
> >> good will it do on a desktop?
> >>
> >> Alex wrote:
> >> > Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is
> >> > specified
> >> > Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit
> >> > versions...
> >>
>
>
>
 
Back
Top