RE: /console switch does nothing since Vista SP1
Yes, I agree that it would have been better to either support both
the /console and the /admin flag, or pop-up a warning when the
/console flag is used, explaining that it has been changed to the
/admin flag.
_________________________________________________________
Vera Noest
MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
TS troubleshooting:
http://ts.veranoest.net
___ please respond in newsgroup, NOT by private email ___
=?Utf-8?B?c3VwZXJfZTkxNg==?=
<super_e916@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote on 04 jun 2008 in
microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:
> I can understand that this is not a change for the sake of
> change. However this is still poorly executed. MS should have
> made it more VISIBLE in XP SP3. I think the deployment of it
> was poorly communicated. If you google the console switch a lot
> of posts come up talking about this. Even after reading the
> white papers and other docs, the place I found the info I was
> looking for is in the Server 2008
> info...http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=947723
>
>
>
>
> "Vera Noest [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Not just for the sake of change.
>> Since the console session on Vista and Windows 2008 is not an
>> interactive session anymore, the /console flag to mstsc became
>> an inappropriate name.
>>
>> Here's more info:
>>
>> 947723 - Changes to remote administration in Windows Server
>> 2008 http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=947723
>>
>> _________________________________________________________
>> Vera Noest
>> MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
>> TS troubleshooting: http://ts.veranoest.net
>> ___ please respond in newsgroup, NOT by private email ___
>>
>> =?Utf-8?B?TWFyayBCYXJuZXMgKEphbyk=?=
>> <MarkBarnesJao@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote on 25 mar 2008
>> in microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:
>>
>> > Aha, a change for the sake of change.
>> >
>> > Cheers working now, just got 80 ish shortcuts now to update.