M
Moshe Goldfarb
Guest
Re: a system crash at least once a week ..
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
> "Doug Mentohl" <doug_mentohl@linuxmail.org> wrote in message
> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-4a34cdf8ac0e@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and expensive to
>> collaborate with clients effectively because a majority of its
>> customers work in a Microsoft-based IT environment"
>>
>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data with
>> clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in moving to a
>> Microsoft-based platform"
>>
>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without having
>> someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain folder.
>> There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on the Linux
>> server."
>>
>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with the
>> volume of message traffic being generated by the growing company, and
>> mobile users could not access email and customer data easily when they
>> were travelling or working offsite"
>>
>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>
>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital Engineering
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/casestudies/capitalengineering.mspx
>>
>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>
>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>> Engineering
>
>
> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature versions of
> linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well known fact that most
> linux machines grind to a halt within days or sometimes hours because of
> memory leaks in the kernel.
Not to mention inept administration.
Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
Please............
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
> "Doug Mentohl" <doug_mentohl@linuxmail.org> wrote in message
> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-4a34cdf8ac0e@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and expensive to
>> collaborate with clients effectively because a majority of its
>> customers work in a Microsoft-based IT environment"
>>
>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data with
>> clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in moving to a
>> Microsoft-based platform"
>>
>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without having
>> someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain folder.
>> There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on the Linux
>> server."
>>
>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with the
>> volume of message traffic being generated by the growing company, and
>> mobile users could not access email and customer data easily when they
>> were travelling or working offsite"
>>
>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>
>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital Engineering
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/casestudies/capitalengineering.mspx
>>
>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>
>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>> Engineering
>
>
> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature versions of
> linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well known fact that most
> linux machines grind to a halt within days or sometimes hours because of
> memory leaks in the kernel.
Not to mention inept administration.
Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
Please............
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/