Re: user logging off
Anteaus <Anteaus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
>
>> But if this is a *server* based backup, backing up data on its own
>> bad self to a local backup medium, there ain't no issue.
>
> Ths main concern here is that smaller sites are increasingly using NAS
> devices for backup. Often they use tape too, but the NAS is a second
> insurance as non-enterprise-class tape drives are not all that
> reliable.
Agreed. If I can't get someone to swing for LTO (and frankly, even sometimes
if I could...) I tend to use multiple locally-attached USB drives, not NAS.
But the latter are fine for simple robocopy backup jobs, which I also like
to use. Still, one must review backup logs, at least periodically.
>
>>
>> Either of these is better than letting end users log into a server,
>> in my book.
>
> Agree. I would never allow this. Though I'm amazed at the number of
> places where they even have office software installed on servers, and
> use the thing as a surrogate desktop. Often ends in disaster when a
> user decides to start installing junk onto it.
Absolutely.
>
>> Eeeuw! I don't use auto login, anywhere. No way, no how.
>
> I do quite frequently, but the server is typically headless and set
> to lock the desktop as soon as it's booted. Plus, anyone who touches
> it... GRRRR. :-/
>
>> Got change for a quarter? ;-)
>
> Got a whole box of change I need to take to the bank. Just never get
> round to it.
There's at least one bank around here that lets you dump all your change
into a hopper, collect a ticket, and get bills in return - no charge. Of
course, there you are, walking down the street with a huge jar of pennies
and nickels beforehand, but you just have to be careful not to trip and
fall.