Windows Vista WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

  • Thread starter Thread starter wheelman
  • Start date Start date
W

wheelman

Guest
we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release another.os..who
is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the bank..if
a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post on
here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the right.too
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

wheelman, A REAL IDIOT wrote:

....are you really as stupid as you appear to be?
Frank
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS


"wheelman" <wheelman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:91ED174E-EDC7-4733-8B0D-DC1A1239894B@microsoft.com...
> we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
> defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
> dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
> another.os..who
> is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
> powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the
> bank..if
> a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
> different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post
> on
> here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
> way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
> right.too

you are so full of crap you might as well run for President. If people
don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is that
ripping off people you idiot? I think you need to stop drinking.

Now go out and steal a car.
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS


"Frank" <fb@jr.kmo> wrote in message
news:OKvcuFbmIHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> wheelman, A REAL IDIOT wrote:
>
> ...are you really as stupid as you appear to be?
> Frank

I think he is "STUPIDER" than he appears to be. I think he uses Ubuntu
also. Poor sap
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

Sal M'Nella wrote:

> If people
> don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is that
> ripping off people you idiot?

Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

Frank wrote:

> ...are you really as stupid as you appear to be? Frank

That question mark should be a comma.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

"wheelman" <wheelman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:91ED174E-EDC7-4733-8B0D-DC1A1239894B@microsoft.com...
> we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
> defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
> dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
> another.os..who
> is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
> powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the
> bank..if
> a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
> different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post
> on
> here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
> way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
> right.too

Are you really this stupid ?

The potential release date for the next client OS after Vista (currently
referred to as Windows 7) is entirely in line with the well stated timelines
for Windows client OS release schedules.
No one is trying to"trash" Vista and release another OS.
What you and your fellow ....... seem to forget is that the exception to the
normal cycle was Windows Vista with a slightly longer development cycle.
Just look at the previous OS release dates and a later 2009 to 2010 release
for Windows "7" is completely acceptable and inline with plans. IN fact
you are getting your proverbial panties in a bunch only because Microsoft
are right back on track for a new client OS every 3 years (approx). ( You
may not remember that after Windows 2000 was release it was only a short
year and eight months to the arrival of Windows XP. I was around then ( and
long before that too) and remember all the nay sayers just like now whining
and bitching about Vista making all the same comments about XP.)
Face facts, as of right now Vista is already one and half years old since it
was released. Operating system development moves pretty fast maybe you
should get out of the slow lane.

Windows 1.0 - November 1985
Windows 2.0 - December 1987
Windows 3.0 - May 1990
Windows 3.1 - April 1992
Windows NT 3.1 - July 1993
Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994
Widnows NT 3.5 - September 1994
Windows NT 3.51 - May1995
Windows 95 - August 1995
Windows NT 4.0 - August 1996
Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
Windows 98 - June 1998
Windows 98SE- May 1999
Windows 2000- February 2000
Windows Me - July 2000
Windows XP - October 2001
Windows Server 2003 - April 2003
Windows XP 64-bit - 2003
Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs - July 2006
Windows Vista (Business Customers) - November 2006
Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January 2007


--

Mike Brannigan
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS


"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:5bQKj.6264$8Z4.2934@fe79.usenetserver.com...
> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>
>> If people
>> don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is that
>> ripping off people you idiot?
>
> Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
> computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?
>
Does not apply to me because I get my Software for free.
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

Sal M'Nella wrote:

> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
> message news:5bQKj.6264$8Z4.2934@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>>
>>> If people
>>> don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is that
>>> ripping off people you idiot?
>>
>> Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
>> computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?
>>
> Does not apply to me because I get my Software for free.

So you didn't know what you were talking about when you said that "If
people don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund."

Glad we got that straighten out!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

Mike Brannigan wrote:

> "wheelman" <wheelman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:91ED174E-EDC7-4733-8B0D-DC1A1239894B@microsoft.com...
>> we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
>> defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
>> dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
>> another.os..who
>> is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich
>> and powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to
>> the bank..if
>> a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
>> different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples
>> post on
>> here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
>> way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
>> right.too
>
> Are you really this stupid ?
>
> The potential release date for the next client OS after Vista (currently
> referred to as Windows 7) is entirely in line with the well stated
> timelines for Windows client OS release schedules. No one is trying
> to"trash" Vista and release another OS. What you and your fellow .......
> seem to forget is that the exception to the normal cycle was Windows
> Vista with a slightly longer development cycle. Just look at the
> previous OS release dates and a later 2009 to 2010 release for Windows
> "7" is completely acceptable and inline with plans. IN fact you are
> getting your proverbial panties in a bunch only because Microsoft are
> right back on track for a new client OS every 3 years (approx). ( You
> may not remember that after Windows 2000 was release it was only a short
> year and eight months to the arrival of Windows XP. I was around then (
> and long before that too) and remember all the nay sayers just like now
> whining and bitching about Vista making all the same comments about XP.)
> Face facts, as of right now Vista is already one and half years old
> since it was released. Operating system development moves pretty fast
> maybe you should get out of the slow lane.
>
> Windows 1.0 - November 1985
> Windows 2.0 - December 1987
> Windows 3.0 - May 1990
> Windows 3.1 - April 1992
> Windows NT 3.1 - July 1993
> Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994 Widnows NT 3.5 - September
> 1994
> Windows NT 3.51 - May1995
> Windows 95 - August 1995
> Windows NT 4.0 - August 1996
> Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
> Windows 98 - June 1998
> Windows 98SE- May 1999
> Windows 2000- February 2000
> Windows Me - July 2000
> Windows XP - October 2001
> Windows Server 2003 - April 2003
> Windows XP 64-bit - 2003
> Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs - July 2006 Windows Vista (Business
> Customers) - November 2006 Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January
> 2007

Now do that same timeline with only home-user OSs!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS



"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:5bQKj.6264$8Z4.2934@fe79.usenetserver.com...

> Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
> computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?

Then he should just return the computer as it's obvious he's too stupid to
own one.
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS


"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:VqQKj.6272$8Z4.4685@fe79.usenetserver.com...
> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>
>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
>> message news:5bQKj.6264$8Z4.2934@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>>> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>>>
>>>> If people
>>>> don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is that
>>>> ripping off people you idiot?
>>>
>>> Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
>>> computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?
>>>
>> Does not apply to me because I get my Software for free.
>
> So you didn't know what you were talking about when you said that "If
> people don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund."
>
> Glad we got that straighten out!

I wasn't thinking about OEM versions. If you have issues with the OEM
version call the vendor and they should (in theory) help with problems and
straighten them out.

Thank GOD you are here to set the record straight.
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS



"wheelman" <wheelman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:91ED174E-EDC7-4733-8B0D-DC1A1239894B@microsoft.com...
> we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
> defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
> dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
> another.os..who
> is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
> powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the
> bank..if
> a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
> different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post
> on
> here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
> way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
> right.too


Really?

So you go to a hospital, see folks in pain and suffering, and then assume
everyone is in pain and suffering the same way?
Vista 64 bit, working very well for me.



--
Don
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:lsQKj.6273$8Z4.3379@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>
> Now do that same timeline with only home-user OSs!
>

Windows 1.0 - November 1985
Windows 2.0 - December 1987
Windows 3.0 - May 1990
Windows 3.1 - April 1992
Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994
Windows 95 - August 1995
Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
Windows 98 - June 1998
Windows 98SE- May 1999
Windows Me - July 2000
Windows XP - October 2001
Windows XP SP2 - August 2004 (worthy of mention as it was a major update and
introduced lots of app compat issues for vendors to resolve due ot the
hightened securoity improvements back ported from the Server 2003 dev tree)
{Also don't forget there were special purpose Home OEM versions such as the
Media Center Edition 2003,2004,2005}
Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January 2007

As I said the only anomaly was the overly long Vista dev cycle - home users
were upgrading about every 2 years until the XP to Vista gap.
So again Jan 2007 to anytime 2009 would be fine for home users too.
--
Mike Brannigan

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:lsQKj.6273$8Z4.3379@fe79.usenetserver.com...
> Mike Brannigan wrote:
>
>> "wheelman" <wheelman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:91ED174E-EDC7-4733-8B0D-DC1A1239894B@microsoft.com...
>>> we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
>>> defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
>>> dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
>>> another.os..who
>>> is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich
>>> and powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to
>>> the bank..if
>>> a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
>>> different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples
>>> post on
>>> here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
>>> way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
>>> right.too
>>
>> Are you really this stupid ?
>>
>> The potential release date for the next client OS after Vista (currently
>> referred to as Windows 7) is entirely in line with the well stated
>> timelines for Windows client OS release schedules. No one is trying
>> to"trash" Vista and release another OS. What you and your fellow .......
>> seem to forget is that the exception to the normal cycle was Windows
>> Vista with a slightly longer development cycle. Just look at the
>> previous OS release dates and a later 2009 to 2010 release for Windows
>> "7" is completely acceptable and inline with plans. IN fact you are
>> getting your proverbial panties in a bunch only because Microsoft are
>> right back on track for a new client OS every 3 years (approx). ( You
>> may not remember that after Windows 2000 was release it was only a short
>> year and eight months to the arrival of Windows XP. I was around then (
>> and long before that too) and remember all the nay sayers just like now
>> whining and bitching about Vista making all the same comments about XP.)
>> Face facts, as of right now Vista is already one and half years old
>> since it was released. Operating system development moves pretty fast
>> maybe you should get out of the slow lane.
>>
>> Windows 1.0 - November 1985
>> Windows 2.0 - December 1987
>> Windows 3.0 - May 1990
>> Windows 3.1 - April 1992
>> Windows NT 3.1 - July 1993
>> Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994 Widnows NT 3.5 - September
>> 1994
>> Windows NT 3.51 - May1995
>> Windows 95 - August 1995
>> Windows NT 4.0 - August 1996
>> Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
>> Windows 98 - June 1998
>> Windows 98SE- May 1999
>> Windows 2000- February 2000
>> Windows Me - July 2000
>> Windows XP - October 2001
>> Windows Server 2003 - April 2003
>> Windows XP 64-bit - 2003
>> Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs - July 2006 Windows Vista (Business
>> Customers) - November 2006 Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January
>> 2007
>
> Now do that same timeline with only home-user OSs!
>
> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Former Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
>
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

Sal M'Nella wrote:

> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
> message news:VqQKj.6272$8Z4.4685@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>>
>>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
>>> message news:5bQKj.6264$8Z4.2934@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>>>> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If people
>>>>> don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is
>>>>> that ripping off people you idiot?
>>>>
>>>> Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
>>>> computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to
>>>> MS?
>>>>
>>> Does not apply to me because I get my Software for free.
>>
>> So you didn't know what you were talking about when you said that "If
>> people don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund."
>>
>> Glad we got that straighten out!
>
> I wasn't thinking

Obviously

> about OEM versions. If you have issues with the OEM
> version call the vendor and they should (in theory) help with problems
> and straighten them out.

I don't need to return my non-MS OS.

> Thank GOD you are here to set the record straight.

OK! God is great, isn't She?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

frank is dork extream winner of idiot of the year on vista.general

king of the apes (and im not talking about tarzan here)
King of the sheep....





"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ZbQKj.6265$8Z4.5646@fe79.usenetserver.com...
> Frank wrote:
>
>> ...are you really as stupid as you appear to be? Frank
>
> That question mark should be a comma.
>
> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Former Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
>
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS


"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:sJQKj.6276$8Z4.411@fe79.usenetserver.com...
> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>
>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
>> message news:VqQKj.6272$8Z4.4685@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>>> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>>>
>>>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
>>>> message news:5bQKj.6264$8Z4.2934@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>>>>> Sal M'Nella wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If people
>>>>>> don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is
>>>>>> that ripping off people you idiot?
>>>>>
>>>>> Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
>>>>> computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to
>>>>> MS?
>>>>>
>>>> Does not apply to me because I get my Software for free.
>>>
>>> So you didn't know what you were talking about when you said that "If
>>> people don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund."
>>>
>>> Glad we got that straighten out!
>>
>> I wasn't thinking
>
> Obviously
>
>> about OEM versions. If you have issues with the OEM
>> version call the vendor and they should (in theory) help with problems
>> and straighten them out.
>
> I don't need to return my non-MS OS.
>
>> Thank GOD you are here to set the record straight.
>
> OK! God is great, isn't She?
>

That is pretty funny. When sometalks about GOD, I say the same thing. I
refer to GOD as her.


> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Former Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
>
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

Re: WE KNOW WHO THE IDIOT IS

oh great moron wrote:

....why is it that you can't get your one little install of Vista to run
properly, huh?
Frank
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

Mike Brannigan wrote:

> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote in
> message news:lsQKj.6273$8Z4.3379@fe79.usenetserver.com...
>>
>> Now do that same timeline with only home-user OSs!
>>
>>
> Windows 1.0 - November 1985
> Windows 2.0 - December 1987
> Windows 3.0 - May 1990
> Windows 3.1 - April 1992
> Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994 Windows 95 - August 1995
> Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
> Windows 98 - June 1998
> Windows 98SE- May 1999
> Windows Me - July 2000
> Windows XP - October 2001
> Windows XP SP2 - August 2004 (worthy of mention as it was a major update
> and introduced lots of app compat issues for vendors to resolve due ot
> the hightened securoity improvements back ported from the Server 2003
> dev tree) {Also don't forget there were special purpose Home OEM
> versions such as the Media Center Edition 2003,2004,2005}
> Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January 2007
>
> As I said the only anomaly was the overly long Vista dev cycle - home
> users were upgrading about every 2 years until the XP to Vista gap. So
> again Jan 2007 to anytime 2009 would be fine for home users too.

Weren't you supposed to have plonked me? :)

But thanks. I think your timeline above is more relevant to this group,
though I would quibble over XP SP2, But a decent case could be made for
XP MCE 2005.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Re: WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:39:02 -0700, wheelman
<wheelman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
>defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
>dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release another.os..who
>is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
>powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the bank..if
>a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
>different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post on
>here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
>way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the right.too

And YOU are uniquely qualified to say this because....Just being a
normal everyday person spouting off at the pie hole? Go back to the
poker table or the wife and tell them! We now KNOW you are full of the
proverbial BS and by proving it are diminished in our eyes!
 
Back
Top