Re: I said this would happen a year and half ago.. lol>>> Someone here is brain dead.
Re: I said this would happen a year and half ago.. lol>>> Someone here is brain dead.
"vishhiita prime" <vee@shhhita.ch> wrote in message
news:48118ef5$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> liking or disliking vista is not a matter of simple choice.
>
> Vista has nothing to do with taste. Its fundamentally so wrong that it
> should have been banned.
And you know this HOW? You being born should have been banned, but yet YOU
are here spouting your retarded rhetoric.
> Its so bad that it would be like you saying some people like to eat crap
> and that's ok.
> I would say a person eating crap has something very wrong with him and is
> stupid.
You should know huh skippy?
--
Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting.
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
Undo the munge to reply by email
>
> "Not Me" <cargod01@bresnan.net> wrote in message
> news:36188F38-B039-4B5F-93A8-F5CA99EFDB0F@microsoft.com...
>> Well, everyone has different tastes.
>> That is why some people drive Volvos, Chevys, Cadillacs, Mercedes, Fords
>> and even Kias.
>> That doesn't make any of them stupid for liking something different that
>> you or I do.
>> I don't happen to LIKE Vista, but that doesn't make those that do stupid.
>> To me Vista looks & feels like MS hired a bunch of laid off AOL
>> programmers and gave them free rein with it; but some people like AOL
>> too.
>>
>> Rather than getting new machines, I installed Linux on 30 assorted P2-P3
>> machines that were running W98/ME, NT4, W2K.
>> For what we use them for, they work fine.
>> But I wouldn't want that setup on my personal PC.
>> The other 200+ machines use XP Pro.
>> I have no intention of getting the hardware necessary to run Vista
>> anytime soon.
>> The XP machines are stable & secure.
>> What is the point of spending the time and money to get new hardware and
>> retrain hundreds of users to get a marginal (at best) 'upgrade' to a new
>> OS that requires at least double the hardware of the existing systems,
>> but provides no needed functionality.
>>
>> "vishhiita prime" <vee@shhhita.ch> wrote in message
>> news:4810ff6a$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> I have seen many many many people say that they loved all microsoft
>>> releases except Vista. Vista is the single most worst product microsoft
>>> has ever made.
>>> And this is something I agree with. I never complained about dos, win
>>> 3.1, win95, win98, win2000, XP, windows2003. (Im leaving out windowsMe
>>> because I didnt like it but I also didnt complain then).
>>> In fact you could call me an MS fanboy before Vista!
>>>
>>> But vista??? Vista is the epitome of stupidity and CRAP!!!
>>>
>>> MS can take vista and shove it, the world doesnt want it, and whoever
>>> likes it is stupid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Donald L McDaniel" <orthocross@invalid.invalid.com> wrote in message
>>> news:kjo114172ji9vglunlkum7dstrqcusip61@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:19:51 GMT, kurttrail
>>>> <dontemailme@anywhereintheknownuniverse.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:%23$0fE0gpIHA.4672@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> An operating system is dead when no one is any longer using it. That
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> far from the case with Vista - though you may want it to be so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vista is "dead" with 130 million sold
>>>>>
>>>>>How many of those millions are actually represent VL customers that are
>>>>>still using XP, though they have the right to install Vista?
>>>>>
>>>>>> and 14% share!
>>>>>
>>>>>And what was XP's share a year and a quarter after its release?
>>>>>
>>>>>It was more like double that of Vista, if not more.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux with .6%
>>>>>> share has "momentum"!
>>>>>
>>>>>Can you cite that, because I know that number is old.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder what kind of drugs you have to take in order to believe such
>>>>>> drivel?
>>>>>
>>>>>You got to stop drinking the MicroFanboy Kool-Aid, that's all.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, how many were still roaring in these newsgroups about how
>>>> bad XP was, and how they swore by Win2k a year after XP's
>>>> introduction? How many still swear by Windows for Workgroups 3.22,
>>>> and complain about Windows 2.0?
>>>>
>>>> Complainers are nothing new with the introduction of a new OS,
>>>> "alias", and you know it.
>>>>
>>>> IN fact, we've both done our share of complaining about both XP and
>>>> Vista in the last few years. All of us do it. IN fact, it's our
>>>> right, just as complaining about the food or the drill-sargent's
>>>> stinky armpits are the perpetual rights of G.I.'s everywhere.
>>>>
>>>> I will remind you of the words of an old man: " 'Bad, Bad', says the
>>>> buyer, but when he walks away with his purchase, he boasts of the
>>>> great deal he got."
>>>>
>>>> Once we get started using an OS on a daily basis, all the warts start
>>>> looking like beauty marks instead. This is pretty-much true for ALL
>>>> OS's, and all people.
>>>>
>>>> It's just human nature to complain. WE won't ever stop, since we are
>>>> never truly pleased.
>>>>
>>>> Donald L McDaniel
>>>>
>>>> Donald L McDaniel
>>>> Please reply to the correct thread and article.
>>>> ================================================
>>>
>>>
>
>