Re: I said this would happen a year and half ago.. lol>>> Someone here is brain dead.
Re: I said this would happen a year and half ago.. lol>>> Someone here is brain dead.
its all about statistics.
People like you who like vista are so small a number that you can say you
are a statistical error
If MS didnt push vista on new computers almost no one would have it.
"Donald L McDaniel" <orthocross@invalid.invalid.com> wrote in message
news:qqh4141e60jmskd0qqr2resjok0p0e77hd@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:57:31 +0300, "vishhiita prime" <vee@shhhita.ch>
> wrote:
>
>>liking or disliking vista is not a matter of simple choice.
>>
>>Vista has nothing to do with taste. Its fundamentally so wrong that it
>>should have been banned.
>>
>>Its so bad that it would be like you saying some people like to eat crap
>>and
>>that's ok.
>>I would say a person eating crap has something very wrong with him and is
>>stupid.
>>
>>"Not Me" <cargod01@bresnan.net> wrote in message
>>news:36188F38-B039-4B5F-93A8-F5CA99EFDB0F@microsoft.com...
>>> Well, everyone has different tastes.
>>> That is why some people drive Volvos, Chevys, Cadillacs, Mercedes, Fords
>>> and even Kias.
>>> That doesn't make any of them stupid for liking something different that
>>> you or I do.
>>> I don't happen to LIKE Vista, but that doesn't make those that do
>>> stupid.
>>> To me Vista looks & feels like MS hired a bunch of laid off AOL
>>> programmers and gave them free rein with it; but some people like AOL
>>> too.
>>>
>>> Rather than getting new machines, I installed Linux on 30 assorted P2-P3
>>> machines that were running W98/ME, NT4, W2K.
>>> For what we use them for, they work fine.
>>> But I wouldn't want that setup on my personal PC.
>>> The other 200+ machines use XP Pro.
>>> I have no intention of getting the hardware necessary to run Vista
>>> anytime
>>> soon.
>>> The XP machines are stable & secure.
>>> What is the point of spending the time and money to get new hardware and
>>> retrain hundreds of users to get a marginal (at best) 'upgrade' to a new
>>> OS that requires at least double the hardware of the existing systems,
>>> but
>>> provides no needed functionality.
>
> THAT is the way to "reason" with men, "vashiita_prime".
>
> Making blanket statements like "Vista is the 'single most worst
> product (sic) microsoft has ever produced." is not "reasoning", it is
> "taking emotional potshots because of a lack of understanding of what
> you're writing about."
>
> But I will accept that you feel the way you do. And you have every
> right to feel that way about Vista for YOURSELF. But NOT for anyone
> else. They can (and do) speak for themselves, some better than
> others.
>
> Additionally, "vashiita prime", you don't speak for "the world". Since
> I am part of that "world", you certainly don't speak for me.
> Therefore, your statement that "the world doesn't want it" is
> obviously a lie (at worst), or a lack of knowledge about the matter
> (at best).
>
> Please, friend, take the time to educate yourself a little before
> writing to or speaking with your fellow-man.
>
>>>
>>> "vishhiita prime" <vee@shhhita.ch> wrote in message
>>> news:4810ff6a$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>>> I have seen many many many people say that they loved all microsoft
>>>> releases except Vista. Vista is the single most worst product microsoft
>>>> has ever made.
>>>> And this is something I agree with. I never complained about dos, win
>>>> 3.1, win95, win98, win2000, XP, windows2003. (Im leaving out windowsMe
>>>> because I didnt like it but I also didnt complain then).
>>>> In fact you could call me an MS fanboy before Vista!
>>>>
>>>> But vista??? Vista is the epitome of stupidity and CRAP!!!
>>>>
>>>> MS can take vista and shove it, the world doesnt want it, and whoever
>>>> likes it is stupid.
>
>
> Donald L McDaniel
> Please reply to the correct thread and article.
> ================================================