Re: Strange share rights problems
Re: Strange share rights problems
Hello MarcusB,
Do not share the root drive, create a folder under the root, in your case
X, and share this folder, then start with confidential.
X drive
-----MyFolderstructure as Share
-----Administrators = F
-----SYSTEM = F
-----Authenticated users = F
-----------------Confidential
-----------------Administrators = F
-----------------SYSTEM = F
-----------------Staff = R&E
-----------------Managers = F
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!!
http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
> The parent folder is disk "X:"
> THere is in Security:
> Administrators: FULL Control
> Everyone :READ & Execute
> SYSTEM : FULL Control
> CREATOR OWNER
> USERS : READ
> The problematic folder is the folder under drive X and is called
> "confident"
>
> THere is in Security:
> Administrators: FULL Control
> Everyone :READ & Execute
> SYSTEM : FULL Control
> CREATOR OWNER
> USERS : READ
> STAFF: READ
> Managers: FULL Control
> Share is:
> Everyone: Full Control
> Users who belongs to the STAFF belongs also to Domain Users.
>
> STAFF and Managers are Universal groups in the domain.
>
> To make sharing easier we gave "Everyone" Full rights and we wanted to
> manage rioghts by NTFS but it is not working like it should. Shares
> rights wins?
>
> Can you help now?
>
> /Marcus
>
> JohnB wrote:
>
>> It is difficult, if not impossible, to help you further if you don't
>> answer the follow-up questions that you get here. Myself and AllenM
>> asked about parent folders and inherited permissions. If you answer
>> those questions we could probably help you further.
>>
>> "MarcusB" <marcusb@llunet.se> wrote in message
>> news:Oje8TqtrIHA.4492@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>
>>> Under share permisions "everyone" have Full Control, change and read
>>> permissions.
>>>
>>> "Staff" group have in Security permission only read.
>>>
>>> Thus staff should only have read permission and it have in the
>>> Security.
>>> Which permision: Security or Share take over?
>>> In my case it seems that Share permissions take over. How is it? It
>>> should
>>> be that NTFS permission take over not oposit. Most restrictiv is it
>>> not
>>> like that?
>>> /Marcus
>>>
>>> AllenM wrote:
>>>
>>>> You really need to be more specific and provide more details such
>>>> as the folder structure and most importantly the NTFS permissions
>>>> on the parent folder as well as the sub folder. Are you sure there
>>>> are no duplicate memberships for both Managers/Staff?
>>>>
>>>> "MarcusB" <marcusb@llunet.se> wrote in message
>>>> news:uMFox3rrIHA.4492@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>
>>>>> We got very strange right problems on our server.
>>>>> We have Common shares and we have enabled all rights for everyone
>>>>> on the
>>>>> the share. Than we are giving proper security rights to groups.
>>>>> Managers groups have write and read rights but Staff group have
>>>>> only
>>>>> read rights.
>>>>> When the staff login than can also write to the share. Why? What
>>>>> happen?
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>