Re: Last Real Player
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:14:56 +0100, Tony Yarwood
<Tony.Yarwood@XXXfreeuk.com> wrote:
>Hi Guys
>
>On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:52:40 -0400, "glee" <glee29@spamindspring.com>
>wrote:
>
>>RealPlayer 10, perhaps?
>>
>>Real Legacy Software Archive - Real.com
>>http://tinyurl.com/66tffy
>
>Thanks for that, I tried 10.5 but no good.
>
>On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:21:43 -0500, letterman@invalid.com wrote:
>>
>>I dont know, but I want to warn you, Real Player can really screw up
>>Win95 and 98 (maybe other versions as well). RP has always been
known
>>to cause problems. A one time it had spyware in it too, but that was
>>during the Windows 3.x era. I believe they removed that. Just
>>thought I'd let you know. I wont install it. I see less and less RP
>>videos these days. Most are not Win Media Player, or Flash (SWF or
>>FLV). Both of those work much better.
>
>I am reluctant to install, I've been using Real Alternative for many
>years, but for some obscure reason in won't install properly on this
>m/c.
>
>Best regards
>
>Tony
I had the same problem with the alternative. I could not get it to
install properly ????
At one time I wanted it, but I see very little RP videos these days.
I much prefer the .FLV files. They work nicely, dont eat up a ton of
resources, and rarely skip on this slower PIII 1000mhz puter. That
seems to be the way video is heading and I have no complaints about it
at all. RP seems to be a dying format, with WMP being the second most
used, and I cant say too much bad about WMP either, except I will get
some skkpping if I have much else running at the same time.
--
Posted via
http://computerhelpforums.net Forum to USENET Gateway