Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim
  • Start date Start date
J

Jim

Guest
Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

I think you should be asking if its best to upgrade (?) to any of
the Vista flavors. I have had an association with Vista Ultimate
since it's release. The 64 bit system install was a real nightmare
until I finally did the unthinkable and got it to install. It
operates slightly slower than XP on my approved systems. The system
with the 32 bit OS is noticably slower that the 64 bit OS system.
The 64 bit system has consistently been slow in file transfers and
other functions. Also MS updates are looked upon with dread. Each
of the larger updates have resulted in totally unexpected problems.
SP1 was no exception. The systems is now more buggy than ever
before. There aren't as many problems with the 32 bit system. But
there are problems.

My system with XP still installed is running quite smothly. SP3
installation has caused no noticable problems. It's operation is
much crisper and faster than either Vista flavor. It is just a much
more enjoyable system to use.

If you have no real need for the 64 bit OS I would stay away from
it. If you want to play with A 64 bit OS, then try one of the Linux
distros.

I understand that MS will cease support of XP in the near future.
However, I am having a hard time with MS support of Vista and am not
sure that the software is supportable. I am also unsure that MS can
make the Vista software more efficient, more user supportable and
more user friendly either.

Basically, I and quite a few others have found Vista to be a dud.
MS reports of 100,000,000 licenses being sold makes one wonder. I
believe they reported that there were 90,000,000 licenses sold last
summer. An increase of 10,000,000 in the rest of the time makes one
wonder too. Carefully evaluate your needs before you jump on the
Vista bandwagon. I hate to say it; but, MS appears to be attempting
to force users into the flawed Vista product. They have already
stampeded the OEM market into line. Sure wish Apple would release
an OS that would operate on MS systems.


--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Final
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -
 
Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

On 19/05/2008 in message <CG4Yj.74449$FN2.63597@fe84.usenetserver.com> Jim
wrote:

>Sure wish Apple would release
>an OS that would operate on MS systems.


The latest OS X works on Intel systems, only those supplied by Apple
though. MSFT has a s/w monopoly and Apple a h/w monopoly.

--
Jeff Gaines
Damerham Hampshire UK
 
Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

MS will retire XP in April 2014 if that is what you mean by "cease
support... in the near future." Six years does not strike me as the near
future in the computing world.

"Jim" <neillm2001@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:CG4Yj.74449$FN2.63597@fe84.usenetserver.com...
>I think you should be asking if its best to upgrade (?) to any of
> the Vista flavors. I have had an association with Vista Ultimate
> since it's release. The 64 bit system install was a real nightmare
> until I finally did the unthinkable and got it to install. It
> operates slightly slower than XP on my approved systems. The system
> with the 32 bit OS is noticably slower that the 64 bit OS system.
> The 64 bit system has consistently been slow in file transfers and
> other functions. Also MS updates are looked upon with dread. Each
> of the larger updates have resulted in totally unexpected problems.
> SP1 was no exception. The systems is now more buggy than ever
> before. There aren't as many problems with the 32 bit system. But
> there are problems.
>
> My system with XP still installed is running quite smothly. SP3
> installation has caused no noticable problems. It's operation is
> much crisper and faster than either Vista flavor. It is just a much
> more enjoyable system to use.
>
> If you have no real need for the 64 bit OS I would stay away from
> it. If you want to play with A 64 bit OS, then try one of the Linux
> distros.
>
> I understand that MS will cease support of XP in the near future.
> However, I am having a hard time with MS support of Vista and am not
> sure that the software is supportable. I am also unsure that MS can
> make the Vista software more efficient, more user supportable and
> more user friendly either.
>
> Basically, I and quite a few others have found Vista to be a dud.
> MS reports of 100,000,000 licenses being sold makes one wonder. I
> believe they reported that there were 90,000,000 licenses sold last
> summer. An increase of 10,000,000 in the rest of the time makes one
> wonder too. Carefully evaluate your needs before you jump on the
> Vista bandwagon. I hate to say it; but, MS appears to be attempting
> to force users into the flawed Vista product. They have already
> stampeded the OEM market into line. Sure wish Apple would release
> an OS that would operate on MS systems.
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------- --- -- -
> Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Final
> Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
> ------------------- ----- ---- -- -
>
>
 
Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

Give Kubuntu 8.04 a try. I dual boot and it is much faster than Vista.
Vista 64 is slow even on the best available hardware. ( 4Gb Ram, Intel Duo).

"Jim" <neillm2001@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:CG4Yj.74449$FN2.63597@fe84.usenetserver.com...
>I think you should be asking if its best to upgrade (?) to any of
> the Vista flavors. I have had an association with Vista Ultimate
> since it's release. The 64 bit system install was a real nightmare
> until I finally did the unthinkable and got it to install. It
> operates slightly slower than XP on my approved systems. The system
> with the 32 bit OS is noticably slower that the 64 bit OS system.
> The 64 bit system has consistently been slow in file transfers and
> other functions. Also MS updates are looked upon with dread. Each
> of the larger updates have resulted in totally unexpected problems.
> SP1 was no exception. The systems is now more buggy than ever
> before. There aren't as many problems with the 32 bit system. But
> there are problems.
>
> My system with XP still installed is running quite smothly. SP3
> installation has caused no noticable problems. It's operation is
> much crisper and faster than either Vista flavor. It is just a much
> more enjoyable system to use.
>
> If you have no real need for the 64 bit OS I would stay away from
> it. If you want to play with A 64 bit OS, then try one of the Linux
> distros.
>
> I understand that MS will cease support of XP in the near future.
> However, I am having a hard time with MS support of Vista and am not
> sure that the software is supportable. I am also unsure that MS can
> make the Vista software more efficient, more user supportable and
> more user friendly either.
>
> Basically, I and quite a few others have found Vista to be a dud.
> MS reports of 100,000,000 licenses being sold makes one wonder. I
> believe they reported that there were 90,000,000 licenses sold last
> summer. An increase of 10,000,000 in the rest of the time makes one
> wonder too. Carefully evaluate your needs before you jump on the
> Vista bandwagon. I hate to say it; but, MS appears to be attempting
> to force users into the flawed Vista product. They have already
> stampeded the OEM market into line. Sure wish Apple would release
> an OS that would operate on MS systems.
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------- --- -- -
> Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Final
> Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
> ------------------- ----- ---- -- -
>
>
 
Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

Re: Yet another question about x86 & x64 Vista Upgrade

Not true at all. It is fast as lightening on my system (Q6600, 8GB).

"hvralpha" <hvralpha@intekom.co.za> wrote in message
news:Of1UyQduIHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Give Kubuntu 8.04 a try. I dual boot and it is much faster than Vista.
> Vista 64 is slow even on the best available hardware. ( 4Gb Ram, Intel
> Duo).
>
> "Jim" <neillm2001@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:CG4Yj.74449$FN2.63597@fe84.usenetserver.com...
>>I think you should be asking if its best to upgrade (?) to any of
>> the Vista flavors. I have had an association with Vista Ultimate
>> since it's release. The 64 bit system install was a real nightmare
>> until I finally did the unthinkable and got it to install. It
>> operates slightly slower than XP on my approved systems. The system
>> with the 32 bit OS is noticably slower that the 64 bit OS system.
>> The 64 bit system has consistently been slow in file transfers and
>> other functions. Also MS updates are looked upon with dread. Each
>> of the larger updates have resulted in totally unexpected problems.
>> SP1 was no exception. The systems is now more buggy than ever
>> before. There aren't as many problems with the 32 bit system. But
>> there are problems.
>>
>> My system with XP still installed is running quite smothly. SP3
>> installation has caused no noticable problems. It's operation is
>> much crisper and faster than either Vista flavor. It is just a much
>> more enjoyable system to use.
>>
>> If you have no real need for the 64 bit OS I would stay away from
>> it. If you want to play with A 64 bit OS, then try one of the Linux
>> distros.
>>
>> I understand that MS will cease support of XP in the near future.
>> However, I am having a hard time with MS support of Vista and am not
>> sure that the software is supportable. I am also unsure that MS can
>> make the Vista software more efficient, more user supportable and
>> more user friendly either.
>>
>> Basically, I and quite a few others have found Vista to be a dud.
>> MS reports of 100,000,000 licenses being sold makes one wonder. I
>> believe they reported that there were 90,000,000 licenses sold last
>> summer. An increase of 10,000,000 in the rest of the time makes one
>> wonder too. Carefully evaluate your needs before you jump on the
>> Vista bandwagon. I hate to say it; but, MS appears to be attempting
>> to force users into the flawed Vista product. They have already
>> stampeded the OEM market into line. Sure wish Apple would release
>> an OS that would operate on MS systems.
>>
>>
>> --
>> --------------------------------- --- -- -
>> Posted with NewsLeecher v3.9 Final
>> Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
>> ------------------- ----- ---- -- -
>>
>>

>
 
Back
Top