ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

[Clear Windows]

My comment:
People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them, you
want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run into
millions of
pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people absolutely hate it!

Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1), SP3 Didn't Do it

ARTICLE:
Over a year after the general availability of Windows Vista (January 30,
2007), and a year and a half after the business launch of the latest Windows
client (November 30, 2006), the product has yet to receive the love
forecasted by Microsoft. While predicting nothing short of Wow experiences,
it is waking up following the availability of Windows Vista Service Pack 1
to the sound of silence where upgrades from Windows XP to Windows Vista
should have been. This realization seems difficult to sink in for the
Redmond company.

"During the conference call my team had on Friday, we were discussing the
upcoming content we are planning for the August-December timeframe. One of
my team members who shall remain nameless stated that most of the customers
he has talked to aren't upgrading existing Windows XP machines to Windows
Vista. Instead, they are just buying new machines with Windows Vista as the
old XP machines roll off the books and are re-purposed, or die," revealed
Keith Combs, Microsoft IT Pro Evangelist.

According to statistics provided by Microsoft, Windows Vista had sold in
excess of 140 million licenses by March 2008. Data published by Net
Applications give Vista a 14.57% share of the operating system market at the
end of April 2008. By comparison, Windows XP accounts for a share of 73.07%,
down from a high of 85.02% back in January 2007. With worldwide shipments of
PCs reaching over 250 million items the past year, it is clear that Vista's
growth comes largely from acquisitions of new machines rather than from
upgrades.

"None of the security, network, search, etc. improvements warrant an upgrade
of an existing machine, even with Aero glass turned off so that it performs
on par or better than Windows XP?" Combs asked rhetorically. But the real
question was "Is that accurate? Is that what you are doing?" with Combs
referring to the customers' failure to upgrade. The comments wrote in
response to Combs' post indicate that customers are steering clear of
Windows Vista, and sticking to what they already know, namely XP.

The reasons for doing this are multiple, and they are related to the now
year old problems of the operating system that caused a barrage of bad
publicity. Vista is avoided due to performance issues, compatibility
problems, but also the cost of the upgrade, although Microsoft has
continually touted that the operating system would deliver a lower TCO in
the end. However, the total cost of ownership does not generally include the
costs of the upgrade. But one thing is clear: none of the users mentioned
Service Pack 3 as the reason why the move to Vista was avoided. At the same
time, SP1 for Windows Vista also failed to catalyze a new wave of upgrades
to the latest Windows client.

"Are you running mixed environments of old and new machines with each OS? I
understand for small and small medium businesses that's unlikely, but what
about when you have several hundred PCs up? Are you buying new machines with
WinXP or flattening them and installing WinXP? What happens when we stop
selling Windows XP in a few weeks?" Combs asked.

 

[Bender]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

People "hear" that there are problems with Vista. And that is the problem.
Its no worse on old hardware than what occurred with any new version of
Windows.

I recall when a co-worker told me he would not buy Windows because he would
have to upgrade his memory to 4 MBytes (note: not GigaBytes but MegaBytes).
So he would stick with Dos.

Back then, an upgrade like that would have cost hundreds of dollars, and
that's not even adjusting for inflation.

Another aside, I was watching the 1994 Movie "Clear and Present Danger"
yesterday and noticed in one scene there is a machine inside a glass
enclosed cabinet in an office filled with computers. The machine has a
mechanical arm that retrieves data tapes. I recall reading about that
machine in a magazine when it was introduced and it was the equivalent of 1
TeraByte of tape storage.
I have a 'WD My Book' sitting on my shelf that has the same capacity, and a
few orders of magnitude cheaper.

Microsoft's historical success is largely due to thinking about future
computing hardware. And Vista matches that pattern.

 

[M.I.5?]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)


"Clear Windows" <carlferedeck@wizzmail.com> wrote in message
news:48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> My comment:
> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them, you
> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run into
> millions of
> pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people absolutely hate it!
>
> Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1), SP3 Didn't Do it
>
> ARTICLE:
> Over a year after the general availability of Windows Vista (January 30,
> 2007), and a year and a half after the business launch of the latest
> Windows client (November 30, 2006), the product has yet to receive the
> love forecasted by Microsoft. While predicting nothing short of Wow
> experiences, it is waking up following the availability of Windows Vista
> Service Pack 1 to the sound of silence where upgrades from Windows XP to
> Windows Vista should have been. This realization seems difficult to sink
> in for the Redmond company.
>
> "During the conference call my team had on Friday, we were discussing the
> upcoming content we are planning for the August-December timeframe. One of
> my team members who shall remain nameless stated that most of the
> customers he has talked to aren't upgrading existing Windows XP machines
> to Windows Vista. Instead, they are just buying new machines with Windows
> Vista as the old XP machines roll off the books and are re-purposed, or
> die," revealed Keith Combs, Microsoft IT Pro Evangelist.
>
> According to statistics provided by Microsoft, Windows Vista had sold in
> excess of 140 million licenses by March 2008. Data published by Net
> Applications give Vista a 14.57% share of the operating system market at
> the end of April 2008. By comparison, Windows XP accounts for a share of
> 73.07%, down from a high of 85.02% back in January 2007. With worldwide
> shipments of PCs reaching over 250 million items the past year, it is
> clear that Vista's growth comes largely from acquisitions of new machines
> rather than from upgrades.
>
> "None of the security, network, search, etc. improvements warrant an
> upgrade of an existing machine, even with Aero glass turned off so that it
> performs on par or better than Windows XP?" Combs asked rhetorically. But
> the real question was "Is that accurate? Is that what you are doing?" with
> Combs referring to the customers' failure to upgrade. The comments wrote
> in response to Combs' post indicate that customers are steering clear of
> Windows Vista, and sticking to what they already know, namely XP.
>
> The reasons for doing this are multiple, and they are related to the now
> year old problems of the operating system that caused a barrage of bad
> publicity. Vista is avoided due to performance issues, compatibility
> problems, but also the cost of the upgrade, although Microsoft has
> continually touted that the operating system would deliver a lower TCO in
> the end. However, the total cost of ownership does not generally include
> the costs of the upgrade. But one thing is clear: none of the users
> mentioned Service Pack 3 as the reason why the move to Vista was avoided.
> At the same time, SP1 for Windows Vista also failed to catalyze a new wave
> of upgrades to the latest Windows client.
>
> "Are you running mixed environments of old and new machines with each OS?
> I understand for small and small medium businesses that's unlikely, but
> what about when you have several hundred PCs up? Are you buying new
> machines with WinXP or flattening them and installing WinXP? What happens
> when we stop selling Windows XP in a few weeks?" Combs asked.
>

It's probably fair to say that a lot depends on your perceptions and
expectations. I know 2 people who speak very highly of Vista themselves and
can't really see what the fuss is about. As both are translators, their
power applications are internet, e-mail and word processing, all run on a
core 2 quad processor. As non of those are remotely demanding, it is
perhaps not unsurprising that Vista copes well. They both like the eye
candy, but freely admit that that they rarely use it.

On the other hand, a visit to the forums of a well known video editing
application shows considerable problems with user trying to edit and produce
high definition video. Of those having major problems, there are two common
factors which seem to prevent the editor working the way users expect, one
is running it on any PC with a lesser processor than a core 2 duo (or core 2
quad for the really demanding formats). The other is running it under
Vista, not because it shouldn't run under Vista, but because Vista hogs too
many resources and leaves too little free for the editor to do its stuff.

I have PCs that use both operating systems (Vista was preinstalled on my
laptop). I find it frustrating that once you discount the relatively
useless eye candy, Vista actually seems to have less functionality overall
than XP (not counting the software and hardware that doesn't work under
Vista - which only makes it worse). I know it includes extra functions like
DVD writing, but this could be added under XP using freeware third party
utilities.

I don't run heavy power applications on the laptop so if pushed I would
describe the Vista operating system as adequate, but I wouldn't mind
upgrading to XP, if only I could source motherboard chipset drivers.

 

[Fiddler]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

Anyone ever tell you that you have an attidude problem?
"Clear Windows" <carlferedeck@wizzmail.com> wrote in message
news:48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> My comment:
> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them, you
> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run into
> millions of
> pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people absolutely hate it!
>
> Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1), SP3 Didn't Do it
>
> ARTICLE:
> Over a year after the general availability of Windows Vista (January 30,
> 2007), and a year and a half after the business launch of the latest
> Windows client (November 30, 2006), the product has yet to receive the
> love forecasted by Microsoft. While predicting nothing short of Wow
> experiences, it is waking up following the availability of Windows Vista
> Service Pack 1 to the sound of silence where upgrades from Windows XP to
> Windows Vista should have been. This realization seems difficult to sink
> in for the Redmond company.
>
> "During the conference call my team had on Friday, we were discussing the
> upcoming content we are planning for the August-December timeframe. One of
> my team members who shall remain nameless stated that most of the
> customers he has talked to aren't upgrading existing Windows XP machines
> to Windows Vista. Instead, they are just buying new machines with Windows
> Vista as the old XP machines roll off the books and are re-purposed, or
> die," revealed Keith Combs, Microsoft IT Pro Evangelist.
>
> According to statistics provided by Microsoft, Windows Vista had sold in
> excess of 140 million licenses by March 2008. Data published by Net
> Applications give Vista a 14.57% share of the operating system market at
> the end of April 2008. By comparison, Windows XP accounts for a share of
> 73.07%, down from a high of 85.02% back in January 2007. With worldwide
> shipments of PCs reaching over 250 million items the past year, it is
> clear that Vista's growth comes largely from acquisitions of new machines
> rather than from upgrades.
>
> "None of the security, network, search, etc. improvements warrant an
> upgrade of an existing machine, even with Aero glass turned off so that it
> performs on par or better than Windows XP?" Combs asked rhetorically. But
> the real question was "Is that accurate? Is that what you are doing?" with
> Combs referring to the customers' failure to upgrade. The comments wrote
> in response to Combs' post indicate that customers are steering clear of
> Windows Vista, and sticking to what they already know, namely XP.
>
> The reasons for doing this are multiple, and they are related to the now
> year old problems of the operating system that caused a barrage of bad
> publicity. Vista is avoided due to performance issues, compatibility
> problems, but also the cost of the upgrade, although Microsoft has
> continually touted that the operating system would deliver a lower TCO in
> the end. However, the total cost of ownership does not generally include
> the costs of the upgrade. But one thing is clear: none of the users
> mentioned Service Pack 3 as the reason why the move to Vista was avoided.
> At the same time, SP1 for Windows Vista also failed to catalyze a new wave
> of upgrades to the latest Windows client.
>
> "Are you running mixed environments of old and new machines with each OS?
> I understand for small and small medium businesses that's unlikely, but
> what about when you have several hundred PCs up? Are you buying new
> machines with WinXP or flattening them and installing WinXP? What happens
> when we stop selling Windows XP in a few weeks?" Combs asked.
>
>
>

 

[Fiddler]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

MB"chipset"drivers are easy to get.

"M.I.5?" <no.one@no.where.NO_SPAM.co.uk> wrote in message
news:48329b19$1_1@glkas0286.greenlnk.net...
>
> "Clear Windows" <carlferedeck@wizzmail.com> wrote in message
> news:48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> My comment:
>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them, you
>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run into
>> millions of
>> pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people absolutely hate it!
>>
>> Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1), SP3 Didn't Do it
>>
>> ARTICLE:
>> Over a year after the general availability of Windows Vista (January 30,
>> 2007), and a year and a half after the business launch of the latest
>> Windows client (November 30, 2006), the product has yet to receive the
>> love forecasted by Microsoft. While predicting nothing short of Wow
>> experiences, it is waking up following the availability of Windows Vista
>> Service Pack 1 to the sound of silence where upgrades from Windows XP to
>> Windows Vista should have been. This realization seems difficult to sink
>> in for the Redmond company.
>>
>> "During the conference call my team had on Friday, we were discussing the
>> upcoming content we are planning for the August-December timeframe. One
>> of my team members who shall remain nameless stated that most of the
>> customers he has talked to aren't upgrading existing Windows XP machines
>> to Windows Vista. Instead, they are just buying new machines with Windows
>> Vista as the old XP machines roll off the books and are re-purposed, or
>> die," revealed Keith Combs, Microsoft IT Pro Evangelist.
>>
>> According to statistics provided by Microsoft, Windows Vista had sold in
>> excess of 140 million licenses by March 2008. Data published by Net
>> Applications give Vista a 14.57% share of the operating system market at
>> the end of April 2008. By comparison, Windows XP accounts for a share of
>> 73.07%, down from a high of 85.02% back in January 2007. With worldwide
>> shipments of PCs reaching over 250 million items the past year, it is
>> clear that Vista's growth comes largely from acquisitions of new machines
>> rather than from upgrades.
>>
>> "None of the security, network, search, etc. improvements warrant an
>> upgrade of an existing machine, even with Aero glass turned off so that
>> it performs on par or better than Windows XP?" Combs asked rhetorically.
>> But the real question was "Is that accurate? Is that what you are doing?"
>> with Combs referring to the customers' failure to upgrade. The comments
>> wrote in response to Combs' post indicate that customers are steering
>> clear of Windows Vista, and sticking to what they already know, namely
>> XP.
>>
>> The reasons for doing this are multiple, and they are related to the now
>> year old problems of the operating system that caused a barrage of bad
>> publicity. Vista is avoided due to performance issues, compatibility
>> problems, but also the cost of the upgrade, although Microsoft has
>> continually touted that the operating system would deliver a lower TCO in
>> the end. However, the total cost of ownership does not generally include
>> the costs of the upgrade. But one thing is clear: none of the users
>> mentioned Service Pack 3 as the reason why the move to Vista was avoided.
>> At the same time, SP1 for Windows Vista also failed to catalyze a new
>> wave of upgrades to the latest Windows client.
>>
>> "Are you running mixed environments of old and new machines with each OS?
>> I understand for small and small medium businesses that's unlikely, but
>> what about when you have several hundred PCs up? Are you buying new
>> machines with WinXP or flattening them and installing WinXP? What happens
>> when we stop selling Windows XP in a few weeks?" Combs asked.
>>
>
> It's probably fair to say that a lot depends on your perceptions and
> expectations. I know 2 people who speak very highly of Vista themselves
> and can't really see what the fuss is about. As both are translators,
> their power applications are internet, e-mail and word processing, all run
> on a core 2 quad processor. As non of those are remotely demanding, it is
> perhaps not unsurprising that Vista copes well. They both like the eye
> candy, but freely admit that that they rarely use it.
>
> On the other hand, a visit to the forums of a well known video editing
> application shows considerable problems with user trying to edit and
> produce high definition video. Of those having major problems, there are
> two common factors which seem to prevent the editor working the way users
> expect, one is running it on any PC with a lesser processor than a core 2
> duo (or core 2 quad for the really demanding formats). The other is
> running it under Vista, not because it shouldn't run under Vista, but
> because Vista hogs too many resources and leaves too little free for the
> editor to do its stuff.
>
> I have PCs that use both operating systems (Vista was preinstalled on my
> laptop). I find it frustrating that once you discount the relatively
> useless eye candy, Vista actually seems to have less functionality overall
> than XP (not counting the software and hardware that doesn't work under
> Vista - which only makes it worse). I know it includes extra functions
> like DVD writing, but this could be added under XP using freeware third
> party utilities.
>
> I don't run heavy power applications on the laptop so if pushed I would
> describe the Vista operating system as adequate, but I wouldn't mind
> upgrading to XP, if only I could source motherboard chipset drivers.
>
>
>

 

[Leythos]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
says...
> My comment:
> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them, you
> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run into
> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people absolutely
> hate it!
>

Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?

This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
run Vista or that have questions about Vista.

While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.

Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
more memory than I could under XP.

I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
normally do under XP.

People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
computers, it's their computer not yours.


--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

 

[xfile]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

> Microsoft's historical success is largely due to thinking about future
> computing hardware. And Vista matches that pattern.

Actually, that doesn't work anymore. Diminishing return from information
technology which has been discussed and shared by many insiders in the past
few years is the clear and present danger of the IT as a whole. Vista is
just being part of the big picture and it will be getting more and more
serious for both hardware and software unless there will be some truly
breakthrough applications to come out.

Not everyone is without sense when adopting new technologies or treating
computers as toys (I was like that 20 years ago). Many do believe IT is one
of the most important business tools and thus tie it to ROI.


"Bender" <imnotgivingmynametoa@machine.net> wrote in message
news:%23q4G9dluIHA.3792@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> People "hear" that there are problems with Vista. And that is the problem.
> Its no worse on old hardware than what occurred with any new version of
> Windows.
>
> I recall when a co-worker told me he would not buy Windows because he
> would have to upgrade his memory to 4 MBytes (note: not GigaBytes but
> MegaBytes).
> So he would stick with Dos.
>
> Back then, an upgrade like that would have cost hundreds of dollars, and
> that's not even adjusting for inflation.
>
> Another aside, I was watching the 1994 Movie "Clear and Present Danger"
> yesterday and noticed in one scene there is a machine inside a glass
> enclosed cabinet in an office filled with computers. The machine has a
> mechanical arm that retrieves data tapes. I recall reading about that
> machine in a magazine when it was introduced and it was the equivalent of
> 1 TeraByte of tape storage.
> I have a 'WD My Book' sitting on my shelf that has the same capacity, and
> a few orders of magnitude cheaper.
>
> Microsoft's historical success is largely due to thinking about future
> computing hardware. And Vista matches that pattern.

 

[Fiddler]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

Each to his(or her)own........
Whatever reasons people use or not use either Vista OR Windows is of their
choosing and that is that.
If anyone wants or needs proof(or not)of anything to do with Vista or XP
then it is up to them to go find it and not up to certain"loudmouths".
Comments like"People want proof that Vista is a pile of *** ***" and "I tell
them"are just that.
Comments(negative)and nothin more.
For myself nothing that others say or do make me decide what to buy, wear,
eat, drink, drive, use or say or what cpu and ram and OS to use or not use.
I make the choice for my reasons.
Others or"people"as the op stated also should be able to make the choice
also.
What others think or don't think about Vista has nothing whatsoever to do
with it all.
If "people"see someone drink a certain type drink or smoke a certain brand
cigar or whatever does not mean they have to do the same.
If Leythos thinks he or she or maybe it knows best and is the chosen voice
of the people then so what.........
Like I said, each to his her/their own.
IF Vista works for whoever or XP works for whoever then that is that.


"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
> says...
>> My comment:
>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them, you
>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run into
>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>> absolutely
>> hate it!
>>
>
> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>
> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>
> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>
> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
> more memory than I could under XP.
>
> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
> normally do under XP.
>
> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>
>
> --
> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>

 

[Clear Windows]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista

this newsgroup does not say
microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista

its microsoft.public.vista.general

that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I don't have
to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like the back of my
hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista would be like the back
of my hand)

Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join some
administrated forum....

So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating system
ever made...

I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!




"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
> says...
>> My comment:
>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them, you
>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run into
>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>> absolutely
>> hate it!
>>
>
> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>
> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>
> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>
> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
> more memory than I could under XP.
>
> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
> normally do under XP.
>
> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>
>
> --
> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

 

[Clear Windows]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

some people like doing very bad things, in fact they enjoy it, that does not
make it "ok" and just a matter of choice.
Some things are fundamentally WRONG AND BAD, and one of those things is
VISTA.

Its so horrible I would love to see it BANNED forever and taught at
programmer universities as a good example
of what a company can do BAD to DESTROY a successful product like XP.

I will be very happy to see vista die soon, when windows7 will come out...

it will be a very GOOD RIDDENs for vista...



"Fiddler" <j.boy@ridge.com> wrote in message
news:eTQYiRnuIHA.4492@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Each to his(or her)own........
> Whatever reasons people use or not use either Vista OR Windows is of their
> choosing and that is that.
> If anyone wants or needs proof(or not)of anything to do with Vista or XP
> then it is up to them to go find it and not up to certain"loudmouths".
> Comments like"People want proof that Vista is a pile of *** ***" and "I
> tell them"are just that.
> Comments(negative)and nothin more.
> For myself nothing that others say or do make me decide what to buy, wear,
> eat, drink, drive, use or say or what cpu and ram and OS to use or not
> use.
> I make the choice for my reasons.
> Others or"people"as the op stated also should be able to make the choice
> also.
> What others think or don't think about Vista has nothing whatsoever to do
> with it all.
> If "people"see someone drink a certain type drink or smoke a certain brand
> cigar or whatever does not mean they have to do the same.
> If Leythos thinks he or she or maybe it knows best and is the chosen voice
> of the people then so what.........
> Like I said, each to his her/their own.
> IF Vista works for whoever or XP works for whoever then that is that.
>
>
> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>> says...
>>> My comment:
>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them,
>>> you
>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>> into
>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>> absolutely
>>> hate it!
>>>
>>
>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>
>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>
>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>
>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>
>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>> normally do under XP.
>>
>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>>
>
>

 

[Fiddler]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

It also was posted in the XP GENERAL group
"Clear Windows" <carlferedeck@wizzmail.com> wrote in message
news:4832fddf$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista
>
> this newsgroup does not say
> microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista
>
> its microsoft.public.vista.general
>
> that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I don't
> have to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like the back
> of my hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista would be like
> the back of my hand)
>
> Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join some
> administrated forum....
>
> So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating system
> ever made...
>
> I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!
>
>
>
>
> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>> says...
>>> My comment:
>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them,
>>> you
>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>> into
>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>> absolutely
>>> hate it!
>>>
>>
>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>
>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>
>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>
>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>
>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>> normally do under XP.
>>
>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>

 

[Bob I]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

Sorry, you are wrong again.
Excerpt:
"These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."

http://www.microsoft.com/communities/conduct/default.mspx

Clear Windows wrote:

> WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista
>
> this newsgroup does not say
> microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista
>
> its microsoft.public.vista.general
>
> that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I don't
> have to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like the
> back of my hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista would
> be like the back of my hand)
>
> Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join
> some administrated forum....
>
> So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating
> system ever made...
>
> I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!
>
>
>
>
> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>
>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>> says...
>>
>>> My comment:
>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them,
>>> you
>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>> into
>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>> absolutely
>>> hate it!
>>>
>>
>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>
>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>
>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>
>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>
>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>> normally do under XP.
>>
>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>
>

 

[Bill Yanaire]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)


"Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OsGlnopuIHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Sorry, you are wrong again.
> Excerpt:
> "These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
> assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."

Clear Windows just wants to create trouble. The reason he is pissed is
because he can't figure out Vista. I think he needs something like Ubuntu.
One week with Ubuntu, he will be crawling back to Vista!

>
> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/conduct/default.mspx
>
> Clear Windows wrote:
>
>> WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista
>>
>> this newsgroup does not say
>> microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista
>>
>> its microsoft.public.vista.general
>>
>> that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I don't
>> have to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like the back
>> of my hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista would be like
>> the back of my hand)
>>
>> Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join
>> some administrated forum....
>>
>> So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating
>> system ever made...
>>
>> I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>>
>>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>>> says...
>>>
>>>> My comment:
>>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them,
>>>> you
>>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>>> into
>>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>>> absolutely
>>>> hate it!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>>
>>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>>
>>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>>
>>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>>
>>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>>> normally do under XP.
>>>
>>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>>
>>
>

 

[Alias]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

Bob I wrote:
> Sorry, you are wrong again.
> Excerpt:
> "These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
> assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/conduct/default.mspx

Considering that this is Usenet, not "communities", what you posted is
not relevant. I am posting from aioe.org, not msnews so I have no reason
or obligation to follow any of MS' silly rules.

Alias
>
> Clear Windows wrote:
>
>> WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista
>>
>> this newsgroup does not say
>> microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista
>>
>> its microsoft.public.vista.general
>>
>> that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I
>> don't have to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like
>> the back of my hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista
>> would be like the back of my hand)
>>
>> Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join
>> some administrated forum....
>>
>> So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating
>> system ever made...
>>
>> I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>>
>>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>>> says...
>>>
>>>> My comment:
>>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell
>>>> them, you
>>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>>> into
>>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>>> absolutely
>>>> hate it!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>>
>>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>>
>>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>>
>>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>>
>>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>>> normally do under XP.
>>>
>>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>>
>>
>

 

[Canuck57]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)


"Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message
news:eyjNQypuIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> "Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OsGlnopuIHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Sorry, you are wrong again.
>> Excerpt:
>> "These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
>> assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."
>
> Clear Windows just wants to create trouble. The reason he is pissed is
> because he can't figure out Vista. I think he needs something like
> Ubuntu.
> One week with Ubuntu, he will be crawling back to Vista!

Neither can Microsoft figure out why it is so slow.

Ooops, I forgot, MS knows best and we are all just troll users. LOL.

 

[Bob I]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)



Canuck57 wrote:

> "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message
> news:eyjNQypuIHA.4848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
>>"Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:OsGlnopuIHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>Sorry, you are wrong again.
>>>Excerpt:
>>>"These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
>>>assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."
>>
>>Clear Windows just wants to create trouble. The reason he is pissed is
>>because he can't figure out Vista. I think he needs something like
>>Ubuntu.
>>One week with Ubuntu, he will be crawling back to Vista!
>
>
> Neither can Microsoft figure out why it is so slow.
>
Oh really?
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2302499,00.asp

 

[Alias]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

Bill Yanaire wrote:
> "Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OsGlnopuIHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Sorry, you are wrong again.
>> Excerpt:
>> "These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
>> assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."
>
> Clear Windows just wants to create trouble. The reason he is pissed is
> because he can't figure out Vista. I think he needs something like Ubuntu.
> One week with Ubuntu, he will be crawling back to Vista!

LOL! I had two weeks with Vista, yuck, and two years so far with Ubuntu.
I guess you aren't very good at reading others' minds, are you?

Alias
>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/conduct/default.mspx
>>
>> Clear Windows wrote:
>>
>>> WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista
>>>
>>> this newsgroup does not say
>>> microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista
>>>
>>> its microsoft.public.vista.general
>>>
>>> that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I don't
>>> have to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like the back
>>> of my hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista would be like
>>> the back of my hand)
>>>
>>> Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join
>>> some administrated forum....
>>>
>>> So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating
>>> system ever made...
>>>
>>> I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>>> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>>>
>>>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>> My comment:
>>>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them,
>>>>> you
>>>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>>>> into
>>>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>>>> absolutely
>>>>> hate it!
>>>>>
>>>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>>>
>>>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>>>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>>>
>>>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>>>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>>>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>>>
>>>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>>>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>>>
>>>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>>>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>>>> normally do under XP.
>>>>
>>>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>>>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>>>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>>>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>>>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>>>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>>>
>
>

 

[Bill Yanaire]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)


"Alias" <iamalias@nukethisgmail.com> wrote in message
news:g0v0sh$9g8$1@aioe.org...
> Bob I wrote:
>> Sorry, you are wrong again.
>> Excerpt:
>> "These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
>> assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/conduct/default.mspx
>
> Considering that this is Usenet, not "communities", what you posted is not
> relevant. I am posting from aioe.org, not msnews so I have no reason or
> obligation to follow any of MS' silly rules.
>
> Alias

You also don't give a rats ass about what others think. It is all about
Alias 24/7.
No wonder why you cheat people out of their hard earned money. You were
probably banned from the USA and had to settle in Spain.


>>
>> Clear Windows wrote:
>>
>>> WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista
>>>
>>> this newsgroup does not say
>>> microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista
>>>
>>> its microsoft.public.vista.general
>>>
>>> that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I don't
>>> have to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like the
>>> back of my hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista would
>>> be like the back of my hand)
>>>
>>> Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join
>>> some administrated forum....
>>>
>>> So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating
>>> system ever made...
>>>
>>> I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>>> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>>>
>>>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>,
>>>> carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>>>> says...
>>>>
>>>>> My comment:
>>>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them,
>>>>> you
>>>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>>>> into
>>>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>>>> absolutely
>>>>> hate it!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>>>
>>>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>>>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>>>
>>>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>>>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>>>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>>>
>>>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>>>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>>>
>>>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>>>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>>>> normally do under XP.
>>>>
>>>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>>>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>>>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>>>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>>>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>>>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>>>
>>>
>>

 

[Alias]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

Bill Yanaire wrote:
> "Alias" <iamalias@nukethisgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:g0v0sh$9g8$1@aioe.org...
>> Bob I wrote:
>>> Sorry, you are wrong again.
>>> Excerpt:
>>> "These communities were created as a forum for providing peer-to-peer
>>> assistance related to using Microsoft products and services."
>>>
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/conduct/default.mspx
>> Considering that this is Usenet, not "communities", what you posted is not
>> relevant. I am posting from aioe.org, not msnews so I have no reason or
>> obligation to follow any of MS' silly rules.
>>
>> Alias
>
> You also don't give a rats ass about what others think.

False.

> It is all about
> Alias 24/7.

False.

> No wonder why you cheat people out of their hard earned money.

A lie.

> You were
> probably banned from the USA and had to settle in Spain.

Another lie.

Oops.

Alias
>
>
>>> Clear Windows wrote:
>>>
>>>> WRONG! this group is not about supporting people running Vista
>>>>
>>>> this newsgroup does not say
>>>> microsoft.public.provide-support-to-owners-of-vista
>>>>
>>>> its microsoft.public.vista.general
>>>>
>>>> that means I can come here and say vista is crap all I want and I don't
>>>> have to own vista (that I do own by the way, and know vista like the
>>>> back of my hand... well if my hand was dipped in poo, then vista would
>>>> be like the back of my hand)
>>>>
>>>> Nope sorry... if you want some group limited to vista fanboys go join
>>>> some administrated forum....
>>>>
>>>> So since I am free to say anything I want about the worst operating
>>>> system ever made...
>>>>
>>>> I SAY VISTA IS CRAP!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>>>> news:MPG.229c751290626137989805@adfree.usenet.com...
>>>>
>>>>> In article <48328e09$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>,
>>>>> carlferedeck@wizzmail.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> My comment:
>>>>>> People want proof that vista is a pile of poo poo... and I tell them,
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> want proof on a platter? Screw you! Do some surfing and you will run
>>>>>> into
>>>>>> millions of pages that state how bad Vista is and how much people
>>>>>> absolutely
>>>>>> hate it!
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why would anyone care if you think Vista is a pile of poo poo?
>>>>>
>>>>> This group is for supporting people that ARE running vista or what to
>>>>> run Vista or that have questions about Vista.
>>>>>
>>>>> While many people don't want to run vista, myself included, it's the
>>>>> next step and vendors will start building and pushing apps that require
>>>>> the resources of Vista, until that time we can still use XP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vista does have one nice benefit that we didn't get in XP, I can use
>>>>> more memory than I could under XP.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think vista is at least a little better security wise as I've not had
>>>>> any friends or relatives compromised while using Vista like they
>>>>> normally do under XP.
>>>>>
>>>>> People like to complain more than they like to praise, your post is a
>>>>> good example of that. Why do you care what people run on their
>>>>> computers, it's their computer not yours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> - Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
>>>>> - Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
>>>>> drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
>>>>> spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
>>>>
>
>

 

[PD43]

Re: ARTICLE: Users Not Upgrading XP to Vista (Even with SP1)

Bob I <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Sorry, you are wrong again.

You're feeding the troll