Re: Spybot Crashes
Jim wrote:
| I updated to that version 1.5 ~ when it was recommended and ran it
| once and uninstalled it. If I use SpyBot again I will reinstall v.1.4
| only. The new v.1.5 requires way to much system resources for
| win98/95 even though they say it is ok... Is it really any better
| than the v.1.4 which worked like a charm on win98?
Uhuh. I just took the download of SpybotSD152.exe (v.1.5.2)-- which is
9,772,720 bytes huge! Have you seen Terhune's suggestion on that...?...
.......Quote Terhune's suggestion.........
Spybot S&D (do not install Tea-Timer, SDHelper or Immunization. Just use
for
static scanning on some schedule like weekly or monthly.
http://www.safer-networking.org/
.......EOQ............................................
Did you install those extras to come to your assessment-- or did you
find v.1.5.2 kills resources even just running it statically?
| "S1L1Y1" <s1l1y1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
| news:OHcaA3YyIHA.5620@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
|> Version 1.5.2.20
|> "Jim" <invalid@example.invalid> wrote in message
|> news:ejQ3N53xIHA.4704@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
|> > Which version of SpyBot S&D?
|> >
|> > "Nigel Stapley" <unet@judgemental.plus.com> wrote in message
|> > news:LIidnea1w7hX2KPVnZ2dnUVZ8sPinZ2d@posted.plusnet...
|> > > S1L1Y1 wrote:
|> > > > It Worked. Thank You. What was the problem?
|> > >
|> > > I seem to recall that Spybot claim it's an issue with the way 98
|> > > handles memory. I'm not convinced.
|> > >
|> > > Glad it worked.
|> > >
|> > >
|> > > --
|> > > Regards
|> > >
|> > > Nigel Stapley
|> > >
|> > >
www.thejudge.me.uk
|> > >
|> > > <reply-to will bounce>
--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
Should things get worse after this,
PCR
pcrrcp@netzero.net