Reply to thread

Re: Windows XP  - What you'll miss about Vista


Alias wrote:


> Dzomlija wrote:

>> -This post is an extract from article

>> "-'-http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/xpsp3_02.asp-'

>> (http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/xpsp3_02.asp)-" appearing on Paul

>> Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows.-

>>

>> _______________________________

>> Paul Thurrott's article basically covers the comparison between XP and

>> Vista quite nicely, and hopefully will give people a better

>> understanding of why Vista is better than XP - even if XP SP3 is

>> installed.

>> _______________________________

>>

>> Aside from obvious look and feel issues, the most striking thing about

>> downgrading from Windows Vista to XP is the sheer number of things that

>> need to be installed and configured in order to bring the older OS up to

>> speed with its more recent stablemate. Just some of these issues

>> include:

>>

>> *Hardware drivers.*

>> On three different systems, one a desktop and two portable devices, XP

>> required me to install a huge number of hardware drivers, most of which

>> had to be manually downloaded on other PCs because the XP-based PC

>> initially lacked networking facilities.

>>

>> *Out of date software applications.*

>> Even with the very latest version of XP, there are an alarming number

>> of out of date applications that must be removed and/or updated. I

>> removed MSN Explorer, Outlook Express, and Windows Messenger using Add

>> or Remove Programs. Then I manually updated Internet Explorer 6 to 7 and

>> Windows Media Player 9 to 11 by downloading the latest versions from

>> Windows Update and the Microsoft Download Center.

>>

>> *Missing applications. *

>> Windows XP does not include certain applications, like the

>> aforementioned IE 7 and WMP 11. But it's more than that. You have to

>> manually find, download, and install Windows Defender (or the

>> anti-spyware application of your choice), an application that (like IE 7

>> and WMP 11) is included in Vista by default. And like Vista, XP doesn't

>> ship with any form of anti-virus. So you'll have to find some kind of AV

>> solution on your own as well.

>>

>> *Microsoft Update. *

>> Windows XP ships with a lousy Web-based version of Windows Update,

>> which will not automatically provide updates for non-Windows products.

>> To gain this functionality, you have to manually install Microsoft

>> Update, a multi-step and time-consuming process. Once Microsoft Update

>> is installed, you can't get it to appear in the Start Menu's Most

>> Recently Used (MRU) list, no matter how frequently you use it. But the

>> old Windows Update appears in the Start Menu MRU, even when it's been

>> replaced.

>>

>> *Start Menu. *

>> XP's Start Menu, which relies on pop-out menus that never remember how

>> to stay sorted alphabetically, is demonstrably less useable than

>> Vista's. As you install more and more applications, the Start Menu grows

>> and grows, necessitating manual pruning and organization, a process that

>> isn't required on Vista. And don't get me started on the lack of Start

>> Menu Search.

>>

>> *Hidden applications.*

>> Tied to the lack of Start Menu Search, you simply have to know that

>> certain utilities exist in order to access them. Device Manager is a

>> typical example. To find it in XP, open the Start Menu, right-click My

>> Computer, choose Properties, and then go to Hardware tab. Obviously.

>>

>> *Desktop.*

>> Unlike with Vista, XP's desktop icons are too small ... or way too big,

>> assuming you can find the place in the UI where you can change their

>> size. Vista's more configurable desktop is easier on the eyes,

>> especially with the high-resolution screens of today.

>>

>> *ClearType.*

>> Microsoft's ClearType sub-pixel rendering system is not enabled by

>> default on Windows XP and must be manually enabled.

>>

>> *Windows Search.*

>> Windows XP's unbelievably annoying Search Companion, which for some

>> bizarre reason utilizes a cartoon dog, isn't just condecscending to

>> users, it's also lousy at what it does. To fix this and provide XP with

>> something approaching the power of Vista's Instant Search functionality,

>> you need to know about, find, and then manually download Windows Desktop

>> Search.

>>

>> *Networking. *

>> XP's networking functionality is laughably bad compared to Vista's,

>> which features simple, plain English auto-configuration capabilities

>> that utilize location concepts like Home, Work, and Public Location. In

>> XP, you have to enter the WPA network key TWICE to initially configure

>> wireless networking. There are repeated "Now connected" pop-up balloons:

>> Yeah, we get it, you're connected. And then there are those annoying

>> disconnected network adapter icons in the tray. You can't make them go

>> away unless you disable the connection(s) or connect them to something.

>>

>> *Power management. *

>> You have to enable the power management tray icon in Power Options on

>> portable machines. You also have to manually enable Hibernation,

>> regardless of the PC type. And then you have to hope that it works,

>> since power management is so much more dicey in XP than it is in Vista.

>> Good luck!

>>

>> *Backup. *

>> XP's backup utility dates back to the earliest days of NT and it shows.

>> Not surprisingly, Vista features a completely rewritten backup utility

>> that really works, and provides both image-based full PC backup and file

>> backup functionality. Oh, and Previous Versions, which lets you get at

>> older versions of documents and other data files. XP has none of that.

>>

>> *Taskbar. *

>> Seriously, make the Language toolbar go away. Why does it appear? Why

>> does it appear after I close it?

>>

>> *User interface. *

>> I'm not going to harp on XP's out of date user interface too much. But

>> I will point out that there is a decent XP UI available called Royale

>> that debuted in XP Media Center Edition 2005. It doesn't come with XP

>> Home or Pro by default, but you can download it from the Web. Why it's

>> not just included in XP is beyond me, but anyone stuck using XP should

>> search for it, download it, and install it.

>>

>> What makes this list even more daunting is that Windows XP, unlike

>> Vista, does not include any automatic degunking technology. Over time,

>> Windows XP simply gets slower and slower, and eventually you have to

>> reinstall from scratch to recover lost performance. That's not the case

>> with Windows Vista.

>>

>> *::Other features I missed from Windows Vista::*

>> Windows Vista's detractors like to spread the myth that Microsoft's

>> latest desktop OS doesn't offer enough unique new functionality when

>> compared to its predecessor, Windows XP. That's not true at all. In

>> addition to not suffering from most of the many issues listed above,

>> I've found my time using XP to be quite painful at times because I

>> missed, among other things, the following Vista features:

>>

>> *Windows Aero. *

>> Dismissed as eye candy, Vista's Aero user interface is nicer looking

>> than anything found on XP. It's also more functional: Aero's glass

>> effects and taskbar icon previews make it easier to find other windows

>> when you're multi-tasking. Subtle animations tell you where to look for

>> minimized windows. And live icons give you previews of document

>> contents. (One Aero feature I don't care for or use, however, is Flip

>> 3D). Possible solution: Download Royale at the very least or put up with

>> a potentially buggy UI replacement like WindowBlinds.

>>

>> *Start Menu Search. *

>> It doesn't get a lot of press, but this just may be one of Vista's best

>> and most important features. In my case, it affects my daily workflow in

>> ways that weren't appreciated until I downgraded to XP and immediately

>> missed its presense. Possible solution: Download a third party launcher

>> like Launchy or Enso Launcher

>>

>> *Windows Sidebar. *

>> I actually use Windows Sidebar regularly though I wish there were more

>> quality gadgets available. After initially promising to port Sidebar to

>> XP, Microsoft eventually gave up on the project. Possible solution:

>> Download a third party sidebar replacement like Google Desktop or Yahoo!

>> Widgets.

>>

>> *Breadcrumb bar. *

>> The new breadcrumb bar in Windows Vista's Explorer windows is a huge

>> improvement over the ancient address bars in XP and older Windows

>> versions. The big advance, however, isn't the simplification of the

>> location display, it's the ability to quickly jump around in the folder

>> hierarchy using the breadcrumb bar's node-based navigation scheme. As

>> with Start Menu Search, this is a feature you don't realize you use so

>> often until it's gone.

>>

>> *Disk Defrag. *

>> Windows XP does include a disk defragmentation utility, but it doesn't

>> run automatically in the background so you have to remember to run it

>> regularly.

>>

>> *ReadyBoost. *

>> A lot is made about how much better Windows XP runs on older hardware

>> than does Vista, but then why wouldn't it? A more important potential

>> market for Vista is those PCs that are less than two years old and on

>> the edge of meeting realistic Vista hardware requirements. For these

>> systems--with 1 to 2 GB of RAM and a pre-Core 2 Duo processor--Microsoft

>> has provided a truly useful performance feature called ReadyBoost that

>> makes all the difference in the world. Plug in a 512 MB to 2 GB USB

>> memory fob and suddenly that dog of a PC will run Vista just fine, thank

>> you very much.

>>

>> I know, I know. You're looking at this list and you're thinking big

>> deal. Remember, however, that this isn't a list of unique Vista

>> features--a list that would include such technologies as BitLocker,

>> Media Center, and Windows Calendar, among many others. This is a list of

>> things that impact me, as an individual, on a regular basis. A list that

>> should be combined with the list of issues from the previous section to

>> provide a wider overall picture of the real world day to day differences

>> between using each system. In this light, the advantages of Windows

>> Vista are very real. Very real indeed.

>>

>>

> Not very convincing, sorry. Who needs IE7 and Windows DRM Media 11? And 

> Defenseless? You *must* be kidding! At least the writer didn't complain 

> that UAC isn't included with XP. I wonder why ...

> Alias


Don't worry sheep-fukker...you'll never be able to afford or steal W7.

Best you stick with that POS toy os upyurbuttoo!

Frank


Back
Top