K
Kenneth
Guest
Howdy,
I run Win 2000 Pro SP4 on one of my systems, and had in it a
250 gig Western Digital disk that failed.
I replaced it with a 500 gig drive, but Windows can only see
127 gig on that disk.
Here are the things I am sure of:
The bios (the most recent available) sees the disk as 500
gig.
The registry has the appropriate 48-Bit LBA Support for
ATAPI Disk Drives. I have checked that both by simply
viewing the appropriate registry key, and also by running a
tool that looks in the registry to see if the key is set
correctly.
I have partitioned and formatted the disk.
I have tried to add another partition, but (beyond the 127
gigs) there is no extra space available for such a
modification. I made this attempt using the Western Digital
supplied tools, and also using Acronis Disk Director. The
results were the same.
Also, after too many calls to Western Digital Tech "Support"
I thought that the disk itself may be defective.
I replaced it with another, and the results are exactly the
same.
Might you have some suggestions about an appropriate next
step?
Sincere thanks,
--
Kenneth
If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
I run Win 2000 Pro SP4 on one of my systems, and had in it a
250 gig Western Digital disk that failed.
I replaced it with a 500 gig drive, but Windows can only see
127 gig on that disk.
Here are the things I am sure of:
The bios (the most recent available) sees the disk as 500
gig.
The registry has the appropriate 48-Bit LBA Support for
ATAPI Disk Drives. I have checked that both by simply
viewing the appropriate registry key, and also by running a
tool that looks in the registry to see if the key is set
correctly.
I have partitioned and formatted the disk.
I have tried to add another partition, but (beyond the 127
gigs) there is no extra space available for such a
modification. I made this attempt using the Western Digital
supplied tools, and also using Acronis Disk Director. The
results were the same.
Also, after too many calls to Western Digital Tech "Support"
I thought that the disk itself may be defective.
I replaced it with another, and the results are exactly the
same.
Might you have some suggestions about an appropriate next
step?
Sincere thanks,
--
Kenneth
If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."