Is Thumbs.db file necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PAT (Paul)
  • Start date Start date
P

PAT (Paul)

Guest
If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this Thumbs.db file.
Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one picture file there is almost 1
GB in the Thumbs.db file.

--
cogito ergo sum
 
Re: Is Thumbs.db file necessary?

Thumbs.db contains the previews used by Windows Explorer when you use
thumbnail view. There's no reason why you shouldn't delete these files
when you have finished using thumbnail view but this could slow down the
display of thumbnails when you next visit a folder with thumbnail view as
the thumbnails have to be regenerated.

Windows XP has the option "Do not cache thumbnails" at Folder Options |
View which avoids the problem you are seeing however Win Me's version of
Windows Explorer hadn't advanced that far and therefore has no similar
setting.
--
Mike Maltby
mike.maltby@gmail.com


PAT (Paul) <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this
> Thumbs.db file. Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one
> picture file there is almost 1 GB in the Thumbs.db file.
 
Re: Is Thumbs.db file necessary?

Mike. Thanks for your fast reply. Been away last 6 months and behind news.
I see that Ad-Aware SE is no longer available in the freee V. What is a
good replacement - would SuperAntiVirus do? is there others. Glad to see
this group again.
Paul
--
cogito ergo sum


"Mike M" wrote:

> Thumbs.db contains the previews used by Windows Explorer when you use
> thumbnail view. There's no reason why you shouldn't delete these files
> when you have finished using thumbnail view but this could slow down the
> display of thumbnails when you next visit a folder with thumbnail view as
> the thumbnails have to be regenerated.
>
> Windows XP has the option "Do not cache thumbnails" at Folder Options |
> View which avoids the problem you are seeing however Win Me's version of
> Windows Explorer hadn't advanced that far and therefore has no similar
> setting.
> --
> Mike Maltby
> mike.maltby@gmail.com
>
>
> PAT (Paul) <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this
> > Thumbs.db file. Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one
> > picture file there is almost 1 GB in the Thumbs.db file.
>
>
 
Re: Is Thumbs.db file necessary?

A decent one which runs on WinME and works very well is the free version of
SuperAntiSpyware, I have that running on my WinME machine. I don't know the
one you mentioned and that sounds like an Anti-Virus program not a spyware
removal one, I think also there's still Spybot but I've never used that but
think it's OK for WinME.
Joan

--
Joan Archer
http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
http://lachsoft.com/photogallery

"PAT (Paul)" <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0261AF20-BF55-46B4-B2FD-460FEBBAEB04@microsoft.com...
> Mike. Thanks for your fast reply. Been away last 6 months and behind
> news.
> I see that Ad-Aware SE is no longer available in the freee V. What is a
> good replacement - would SuperAntiVirus do? is there others. Glad to
> see
> this group again.
> Paul
> --
> cogito ergo sum
>
>
> "Mike M" wrote:
>
>> Thumbs.db contains the previews used by Windows Explorer when you use
>> thumbnail view. There's no reason why you shouldn't delete these files
>> when you have finished using thumbnail view but this could slow down the
>> display of thumbnails when you next visit a folder with thumbnail view as
>> the thumbnails have to be regenerated.
>>
>> Windows XP has the option "Do not cache thumbnails" at Folder Options |
>> View which avoids the problem you are seeing however Win Me's version of
>> Windows Explorer hadn't advanced that far and therefore has no similar
>> setting.
>> --
>> Mike Maltby
>> mike.maltby@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> PAT (Paul) <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> > If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this
>> > Thumbs.db file. Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one
>> > picture file there is almost 1 GB in the Thumbs.db file.
>>
>>
 
Re: Is Thumbs.db file necessary?

Another that either Heirloom or Mart recommended was Spyware Terminator. I
have been using it for a while now and it appears to be good. Certainly runs
fast!!

Dan
"Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:u1iIksLxIHA.1980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>A decent one which runs on WinME and works very well is the free version of
>SuperAntiSpyware, I have that running on my WinME machine. I don't know the
>one you mentioned and that sounds like an Anti-Virus program not a spyware
>removal one, I think also there's still Spybot but I've never used that but
>think it's OK for WinME.
> Joan
>
> --
> Joan Archer
> http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
> http://lachsoft.com/photogallery
>
> "PAT (Paul)" <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0261AF20-BF55-46B4-B2FD-460FEBBAEB04@microsoft.com...
>> Mike. Thanks for your fast reply. Been away last 6 months and behind
>> news.
>> I see that Ad-Aware SE is no longer available in the freee V. What is a
>> good replacement - would SuperAntiVirus do? is there others. Glad to
>> see
>> this group again.
>> Paul
>> --
>> cogito ergo sum
>>
>>
>> "Mike M" wrote:
>>
>>> Thumbs.db contains the previews used by Windows Explorer when you use
>>> thumbnail view. There's no reason why you shouldn't delete these files
>>> when you have finished using thumbnail view but this could slow down the
>>> display of thumbnails when you next visit a folder with thumbnail view
>>> as
>>> the thumbnails have to be regenerated.
>>>
>>> Windows XP has the option "Do not cache thumbnails" at Folder Options |
>>> View which avoids the problem you are seeing however Win Me's version of
>>> Windows Explorer hadn't advanced that far and therefore has no similar
>>> setting.
>>> --
>>> Mike Maltby
>>> mike.maltby@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> PAT (Paul) <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this
>>> > Thumbs.db file. Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one
>>> > picture file there is almost 1 GB in the Thumbs.db file.
>>>
>>>
 
Re: Is Thumbs.db file necessary?

Not me Dan, I've never used it. Although if HL (and you!) recommended it,
then I'm sure that's good enough for all. HL usually recommends well.

I (still) use AVG 7.5 for A-V on my WinMe boxes - and they were still
auto-updating (well they did again today!) with the latest defs.

Regarding Ad-Aware, I stopped using it even before it was updated to v2008
on both my WinMe and XP boxes. Got a little bit disillusioned with it and
tended not to run it unless I managed to remember to - which wasn't very
often.

I use AVG 8 Free now on my XP boxes, which includes a (sort of)
anti-spyware/adware scanner which appears to find the stuff that A-A used to
do (and more!). BUT the jury is still out here with AVG 8 - it certainly
now fits into the 'bloatware' category and IMHO, is somewhat (quite a bit!)
slower than AVG 7.5.

Maybe it's more thorough? Hmm..

Mart


"Dapper Dan" <dapperdan@home.com> wrote in message
news:uT3MA7LxIHA.2384@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Another that either Heirloom or Mart recommended was Spyware Terminator. I
> have been using it for a while now and it appears to be good. Certainly
> runs fast!!
>
> Dan
> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:u1iIksLxIHA.1980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>A decent one which runs on WinME and works very well is the free version
>>of SuperAntiSpyware, I have that running on my WinME machine. I don't know
>>the one you mentioned and that sounds like an Anti-Virus program not a
>>spyware removal one, I think also there's still Spybot but I've never used
>>that but think it's OK for WinME.
>> Joan
>>
>> --
>> Joan Archer
>> http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
>> http://lachsoft.com/photogallery
>>
>> "PAT (Paul)" <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:0261AF20-BF55-46B4-B2FD-460FEBBAEB04@microsoft.com...
>>> Mike. Thanks for your fast reply. Been away last 6 months and behind
>>> news.
>>> I see that Ad-Aware SE is no longer available in the freee V. What is
>>> a
>>> good replacement - would SuperAntiVirus do? is there others. Glad to
>>> see
>>> this group again.
>>> Paul
>>> --
>>> cogito ergo sum
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mike M" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thumbs.db contains the previews used by Windows Explorer when you use
>>>> thumbnail view. There's no reason why you shouldn't delete these files
>>>> when you have finished using thumbnail view but this could slow down
>>>> the
>>>> display of thumbnails when you next visit a folder with thumbnail view
>>>> as
>>>> the thumbnails have to be regenerated.
>>>>
>>>> Windows XP has the option "Do not cache thumbnails" at Folder Options |
>>>> View which avoids the problem you are seeing however Win Me's version
>>>> of
>>>> Windows Explorer hadn't advanced that far and therefore has no similar
>>>> setting.
>>>> --
>>>> Mike Maltby
>>>> mike.maltby@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PAT (Paul) <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this
>>>> > Thumbs.db file. Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one
>>>> > picture file there is almost 1 GB in the Thumbs.db file.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
 
Re: Is Thumbs.db file necessary?

AVG 7.5 is the one on my WinME as well Mart and it did the update today.
That one doesn't get turned on much now though and if it turns out that AVG
stops updating the 7.5 version I may very well go with Avast instead.

I took Ad-Aware off of the WinME machine and my XP I didn't want to bother
with the hassle of trying to get the SE version to update on there and on my
XP the 2007 version was a pain in the rear when it came to update the defs
the amount of times it came up with the message that it had an error and
needed to close after trying to get the new def files to install was a joke.
I didn't need the hassle especially as if it found anything it would only be
a couple of tracking cookies.

I put the free version of SuperAntiSpyware on WinME and the paid Pro version
on my XP and I'm more than happy with the results and performance.
Joan

--
Joan Archer
http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
http://lachsoft.com/photogallery

"Mart" <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:uLSjjcMxIHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Not me Dan, I've never used it. Although if HL (and you!) recommended it,
> then I'm sure that's good enough for all. HL usually recommends well.
>
> I (still) use AVG 7.5 for A-V on my WinMe boxes - and they were still
> auto-updating (well they did again today!) with the latest defs.
>
> Regarding Ad-Aware, I stopped using it even before it was updated to v2008
> on both my WinMe and XP boxes. Got a little bit disillusioned with it and
> tended not to run it unless I managed to remember to - which wasn't very
> often.
>
> I use AVG 8 Free now on my XP boxes, which includes a (sort of)
> anti-spyware/adware scanner which appears to find the stuff that A-A used
> to do (and more!). BUT the jury is still out here with AVG 8 - it
> certainly now fits into the 'bloatware' category and IMHO, is somewhat
> (quite a bit!) slower than AVG 7.5.
>
> Maybe it's more thorough? Hmm..
>
> Mart
>
>
> "Dapper Dan" <dapperdan@home.com> wrote in message
> news:uT3MA7LxIHA.2384@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Another that either Heirloom or Mart recommended was Spyware Terminator.
>> I have been using it for a while now and it appears to be good. Certainly
>> runs fast!!
>>
>> Dan
>> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:u1iIksLxIHA.1980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>A decent one which runs on WinME and works very well is the free version
>>>of SuperAntiSpyware, I have that running on my WinME machine. I don't
>>>know the one you mentioned and that sounds like an Anti-Virus program not
>>>a spyware removal one, I think also there's still Spybot but I've never
>>>used that but think it's OK for WinME.
>>> Joan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joan Archer
>>> http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
>>> http://lachsoft.com/photogallery
>>>
>>> "PAT (Paul)" <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:0261AF20-BF55-46B4-B2FD-460FEBBAEB04@microsoft.com...
>>>> Mike. Thanks for your fast reply. Been away last 6 months and behind
>>>> news.
>>>> I see that Ad-Aware SE is no longer available in the freee V. What is
>>>> a
>>>> good replacement - would SuperAntiVirus do? is there others. Glad
>>>> to see
>>>> this group again.
>>>> Paul
>>>> --
>>>> cogito ergo sum
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mike M" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thumbs.db contains the previews used by Windows Explorer when you use
>>>>> thumbnail view. There's no reason why you shouldn't delete these
>>>>> files
>>>>> when you have finished using thumbnail view but this could slow down
>>>>> the
>>>>> display of thumbnails when you next visit a folder with thumbnail view
>>>>> as
>>>>> the thumbnails have to be regenerated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Windows XP has the option "Do not cache thumbnails" at Folder Options
>>>>> |
>>>>> View which avoids the problem you are seeing however Win Me's version
>>>>> of
>>>>> Windows Explorer hadn't advanced that far and therefore has no similar
>>>>> setting.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mike Maltby
>>>>> mike.maltby@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> PAT (Paul) <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this
>>>>> > Thumbs.db file. Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one
>>>>> > picture file there is almost 1 GB in the Thumbs.db file.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
 
Re: Is Thumbs.db file necessary?


"Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:u1iIksLxIHA.1980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> A decent one which runs on WinME and works very well is the free version
of
> SuperAntiSpyware, I have that running on my WinME machine. I don't know
the
> one you mentioned and that sounds like an Anti-Virus program not a spyware
> removal one, I think also there's still Spybot but I've never used that
but
> think it's OK for WinME.

It surely is, Joan, I can vouch for that. <H>.

> Joan
>
> --
> Joan Archer
> http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
> http://lachsoft.com/photogallery
>
> "PAT (Paul)" <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0261AF20-BF55-46B4-B2FD-460FEBBAEB04@microsoft.com...
> > Mike. Thanks for your fast reply. Been away last 6 months and behind
> > news.
> > I see that Ad-Aware SE is no longer available in the freee V. What is
a
> > good replacement - would SuperAntiVirus do? is there others. Glad to
> > see
> > this group again.
> > Paul
> > --
> > cogito ergo sum
> >
> >
> > "Mike M" wrote:
> >
> >> Thumbs.db contains the previews used by Windows Explorer when you use
> >> thumbnail view. There's no reason why you shouldn't delete these files
> >> when you have finished using thumbnail view but this could slow down
the
> >> display of thumbnails when you next visit a folder with thumbnail view
as
> >> the thumbnails have to be regenerated.
> >>
> >> Windows XP has the option "Do not cache thumbnails" at Folder Options |
> >> View which avoids the problem you are seeing however Win Me's version
of
> >> Windows Explorer hadn't advanced that far and therefore has no similar
> >> setting.
> >> --
> >> Mike Maltby
> >> mike.maltby@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >> PAT (Paul) <PATPaul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > If I download even one or two pics, or hundreds, I get this
> >> > Thumbs.db file. Is there a way to get rid of this file? In one
> >> > picture file there is almost 1 GB in the Thumbs.db file.
> >>
> >>
 

Similar threads

B
Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
Replies
0
Views
62
Bhuta-Bhavya-Bhavat-Prabh
B
Z
Windows 7 Robocopy from NTFS to non-NTFS File System
Replies
0
Views
171
Zak Lyles
Z
C
How to write to a text file using Fable?
Replies
0
Views
465
cschristine
C
J
no "open file/project" dialog in VS2010 RTM ?
Replies
0
Views
236
jojo665
J
K
IE11 on server 2012 always wants to download XML, we need to show XML in IE
Replies
0
Views
262
Korazy
K
Back
Top