Trojan.Delf.BZ

[HickorySpam]

Anyone know anything about it? trojan.delf.bz
My AV didn't pick it up but a free spyware program did.

 

[Malke]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

HickorySpam wrote:
> Anyone know anything about it? trojan.delf.bz
> My AV didn't pick it up but a free spyware program did.
>
>

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=trojan.delf.bz&btnG=Google+Search

What "free spyware program"?

Make sure the "free spyware program" isn't a rogue:

http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-spyware.htm

General malware removal:

http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware


Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User

 

[cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:14:55 -0700, Malke wrote:
>HickorySpam wrote:

>General malware removal:
>
>http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware

What's up with David Lipman's Multi-AV tool? Seems to be nearly
impossible to find. I see it's been tweaked for Vista (suggesting
it's not abandonware) yet the only download link I can find is in a
German page that requires personal info to access the download.

Reading privacy policies is hard at the best of times, and my German
isn't up to the challenge ;-)

I ask, because I want to couple this to Bart as a quick-and-easy mOS
for end-users to use, covering the same need as the Malware Removal
Starter Kit addresses in Vista using WinPE 2.0 here:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/guidance/disasterrecovery/malware/default.mspx

The process of building a WinPE CDR isn't as easy as Bart PE Builder,
plus 900M of WAIK is more of an obstacle to dial-up users than 3.5M of
Bart PE Builder, and Bart may suit XP users better for now.

Oh wait, I see the Multi-AV download worked!

>---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
On the 'net, *everyone* can hear you scream
>---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -

 

[pcbutts1]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

Dave put it up on a German site because they don't honor DCMA complaints
from the USA. His other site was shutdown when a complaint was filed by the
real author of a tool he was using. Contrary to what you all believe he
stole it and got caught. BTW that German site is full of spam and pop ups
and to send people there for crappy software is just wrong. Use something
else. Before any of you start up with lies my site is still up, never been
down. 4 DCMA complaints has been fraudulently been filed against me and I
won them all because what's mine is mine and I proved it.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)" <cquirkenews@nospam.mvps.org> wrote in
message news:qsaub31futo0p6esn07purqv9aisma01o0@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:14:55 -0700, Malke wrote:
>>HickorySpam wrote:
>
>>General malware removal:
>>
>>http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware
>
> What's up with David Lipman's Multi-AV tool? Seems to be nearly
> impossible to find. I see it's been tweaked for Vista (suggesting
> it's not abandonware) yet the only download link I can find is in a
> German page that requires personal info to access the download.
>
> Reading privacy policies is hard at the best of times, and my German
> isn't up to the challenge ;-)
>
> I ask, because I want to couple this to Bart as a quick-and-easy mOS
> for end-users to use, covering the same need as the Malware Removal
> Starter Kit addresses in Vista using WinPE 2.0 here:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/guidance/disasterrecovery/malware/default.mspx
>
> The process of building a WinPE CDR isn't as easy as Bart PE Builder,
> plus 900M of WAIK is more of an obstacle to dial-up users than 3.5M of
> Bart PE Builder, and Bart may suit XP users better for now.
>
> Oh wait, I see the Multi-AV download worked!
>
>>---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
> On the 'net, *everyone* can hear you scream
>>---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -

 

[---Fitz---]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

Still a class act.

Sickness snipped.

>"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
>news:f9oh90$lon$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> You forgot this one

 

[BoaterDave]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

How can anyone visiting here for the first time have *any* idea that they
could receive good ........ or bad .......... advice?

I thought at first that the TechNet Communities must be monitored by
Microsoft staff and therefore be relatively safe. I'm still not sure about
that. Having come here (for ease of use, on someone's advice) it appears
that *no* such protection applies and that it really is a 'free-for-all' and
is, quite likely, a dangerous place to visit.

This may not have always been so - and I do wish to stress that I HAVE
received some excellent and helpful advice, much of which has enabled me to
help myself more and better understand my PC and its' software. I have also
learnt a great deal about 'malware' and how to deal with it.

PCButts1 - some while ago now - explained to me how effective it is to run
HiJackThis and then copy and paste a specific entry directly into Google.
Here's an example - O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Adobe Reader Speed Launcher]
"C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 8.0\Reader\Reader_sl.exe"

Try it for yourself. I got 66,800 responses which can be reviewed at
leisure. <g>

What I have NOT found is other people who are trying to find out who
*perpetrates* the 'malware' in the first place - no-one seems to care. I do!

So, in spite of comments like yours, 'Fitz', and also having been
'warned-off'' having contact with PCButts1 by Kerry Brown and David H
Lipman, I'm grateful for PCB's help. Perhaps he's one of the good guys after
all, but only experience here will tell. I'm glad I'm not a Newbie any more!

BD

***************************************************************************
---Fitz---" <---fitz---@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:46bfedc4$0$16557$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Still a class act.
>
> Sickness snipped.
>
>>"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
>>news:f9oh90$lon$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> You forgot this one
>

 

[---Fitz---]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

If you're comfortable with advice from pcbutts1 then, by all means, you
should take it.

"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:en4Loib3HHA.5984@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> How can anyone visiting here for the first time have *any* idea that they
> could receive good ........ or bad .......... advice?
>
> I thought at first that the TechNet Communities must be monitored by
> Microsoft staff and therefore be relatively safe. I'm still not sure about
> that. Having come here (for ease of use, on someone's advice) it appears
> that *no* such protection applies and that it really is a 'free-for-all'
> and is, quite likely, a dangerous place to visit.
>
> This may not have always been so - and I do wish to stress that I HAVE
> received some excellent and helpful advice, much of which has enabled me
> to help myself more and better understand my PC and its' software. I have
> also learnt a great deal about 'malware' and how to deal with it.
>
> PCButts1 - some while ago now - explained to me how effective it is to run
> HiJackThis and then copy and paste a specific entry directly into Google.
> Here's an example - O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Adobe Reader Speed Launcher]
> "C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 8.0\Reader\Reader_sl.exe"
>
> Try it for yourself. I got 66,800 responses which can be reviewed at
> leisure. <g>
>
> What I have NOT found is other people who are trying to find out who
> *perpetrates* the 'malware' in the first place - no-one seems to care. I
> do!
>
> So, in spite of comments like yours, 'Fitz', and also having been
> 'warned-off'' having contact with PCButts1 by Kerry Brown and David H
> Lipman, I'm grateful for PCB's help. Perhaps he's one of the good guys
> after all, but only experience here will tell. I'm glad I'm not a Newbie
> any more!
>
> BD
>
> ***************************************************************************
> ---Fitz---" <---fitz---@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:46bfedc4$0$16557$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Still a class act.
>>
>> Sickness snipped.
>>
>>>"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
>>>news:f9oh90$lon$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>> You forgot this one
>>
>
>

 

[Dustin Cook]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

"BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:en4Loib3HHA.5984@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:

> How can anyone visiting here for the first time have *any* idea that
> they could receive good ........ or bad .......... advice?

By lurking and reading threads. Typically if someone is offering bad
advice, several individuals will chime in and explain why.

> I thought at first that the TechNet Communities must be monitored by
> Microsoft staff and therefore be relatively safe. I'm still not sure
> about that. Having come here (for ease of use, on someone's advice) it
> appears that *no* such protection applies and that it really is a
> 'free-for-all' and is, quite likely, a dangerous place to visit.

The internet in general is a dangerous place, same as anything else. It's
where you go that decides the amount of danger your exposed to.

> This may not have always been so - and I do wish to stress that I HAVE
> received some excellent and helpful advice, much of which has enabled
> me to help myself more and better understand my PC and its' software.
> I have also learnt a great deal about 'malware' and how to deal with
> it.

MalWare is an annoying problem, glad you've learned some about it.

> PCButts1 - some while ago now - explained to me how effective it is to
> run HiJackThis and then copy and paste a specific entry directly into
> Google. Here's an example - O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Adobe Reader Speed
> Launcher] "C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 8.0\Reader\Reader_sl.exe"

I don't mean to discredit anyone when I say this, but what you did is
hardly new. Google.com provides a very nice text based search engine.
You can find many things depending on what you enter.

> What I have NOT found is other people who are trying to find out who
> *perpetrates* the 'malware' in the first place - no-one seems to care.
> I do!

You haven't looked very hard then. There are people and organizations
which do follow the trends with malware, indicating who's behind it and
what the likely reasons are.

> So, in spite of comments like yours, 'Fitz', and also having been
> 'warned-off'' having contact with PCButts1 by Kerry Brown and David H
> Lipman, I'm grateful for PCB's help. Perhaps he's one of the good guys
> after all, but only experience here will tell. I'm glad I'm not a
> Newbie any more!

I'm not going to try and warn you off, as I don't feel I need to do so.
What I will suggest instead is that you read some information which can
be found on google.com concerning pcbutts. You can makeup your own mind.
Which I suggest you do, before posting support of someone in the future.
You were warned off for a reason, not an alterior motive.

 

[BoaterDave]

Re: Trojan.Delf.BZ

Thank you for taking the time and trouble to post your views, Dustin. I will
act on your comments.

Must get around to using another newsgroup reader too!

David

*********************************************
"Dustin Cook" <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9992EC99EC868HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121...
> "BoaterDave" <BoaterDave@nospam.invalid> wrote in
> news:en4Loib3HHA.5984@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:
>
>> How can anyone visiting here for the first time have *any* idea that
>> they could receive good ........ or bad .......... advice?
>
> By lurking and reading threads. Typically if someone is offering bad
> advice, several individuals will chime in and explain why.
>
>> I thought at first that the TechNet Communities must be monitored by
>> Microsoft staff and therefore be relatively safe. I'm still not sure
>> about that. Having come here (for ease of use, on someone's advice) it
>> appears that *no* such protection applies and that it really is a
>> 'free-for-all' and is, quite likely, a dangerous place to visit.
>
> The internet in general is a dangerous place, same as anything else. It's
> where you go that decides the amount of danger your exposed to.
>
>> This may not have always been so - and I do wish to stress that I HAVE
>> received some excellent and helpful advice, much of which has enabled
>> me to help myself more and better understand my PC and its' software.
>> I have also learnt a great deal about 'malware' and how to deal with
>> it.
>
> MalWare is an annoying problem, glad you've learned some about it.
>
>> PCButts1 - some while ago now - explained to me how effective it is to
>> run HiJackThis and then copy and paste a specific entry directly into
>> Google. Here's an example - O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Adobe Reader Speed
>> Launcher] "C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 8.0\Reader\Reader_sl.exe"
>
> I don't mean to discredit anyone when I say this, but what you did is
> hardly new. Google.com provides a very nice text based search engine.
> You can find many things depending on what you enter.
>
>> What I have NOT found is other people who are trying to find out who
>> *perpetrates* the 'malware' in the first place - no-one seems to care.
>> I do!
>
> You haven't looked very hard then. There are people and organizations
> which do follow the trends with malware, indicating who's behind it and
> what the likely reasons are.
>
>> So, in spite of comments like yours, 'Fitz', and also having been
>> 'warned-off'' having contact with PCButts1 by Kerry Brown and David H
>> Lipman, I'm grateful for PCB's help. Perhaps he's one of the good guys
>> after all, but only experience here will tell. I'm glad I'm not a
>> Newbie any more!
>
> I'm not going to try and warn you off, as I don't feel I need to do so.
> What I will suggest instead is that you read some information which can
> be found on google.com concerning pcbutts. You can makeup your own mind.
> Which I suggest you do, before posting support of someone in the future.
> You were warned off for a reason, not an alterior motive.