Windows Vista A Reason for the Alternative

  • Thread starter Thread starter measekite
  • Start date Start date
M

measekite

Guest
Although there is a lack of Linux ports for some Mac OS X and
Microsoft Windows programs in domains such as desktop publishing and
professional audio, applications roughly equivalent to those available
for Mac and Windows are available for Linux.

Most Linux distributions provide a program for browsing a list of
thousands of free software applications that have already been tested
and configured for a specific distribution.

Many free software titles that are popular on Windows, such as Pidgin,
Mozilla Firefox, Openoffice.org, and GIMP, are available for Linux. A
growing amount of proprietary desktop software is also supported under
Linux, examples being Adobe Flash Player, Acrobat Reader, Matlab, Nero
Burning ROM, Opera, Google Picasa, RealPlayer, and Skype. In the field
of animation and visual effects, most high end software, such as
AutoDesk Maya, Softimage XSI and Apple Shake, is available for Linux,
Windows and/or Mac OS X. CrossOver is a proprietary solution based on
the open source Wine project that supports running older Windows
versions of Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop versions through CS2.
Microsoft Office 2007 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 are known not to work.

Besides the free Windows compatibility layer Wine, most distributions
offer Dual boot and X86 virtualization for running both Linux and
Windows on the same computer.

Linux's open nature allows distributed teams to localize Linux
distributions for use in locales where localizing proprietary systems
would not be cost-effective. For example the Sinhalese language
version of the Knoppix distribution was available for a long time
before Microsoft Windows XP was translated to Sinhalese. In this case
the Lanka Linux User Group played a major part in developing the
localized system by combining the knowledge of university professors,
linguists, and local developers.

The performance of Linux on the desktop has been a controversial
topic, with at least one key Linux kernel developer, Con Kolivas,
accusing the Linux community of favouring performance on servers. He
quit Linux development because he was frustrated with this lack of
focus on the desktop, and then gave a 'tell all' interview on the
topic.

Wikipedia.org

See also: Linux gaming
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

measekite wrote:

-------------------------------

NO SPAMMING ALLOW!!!
Frank
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

Frank wrote:
> measekite wrote:
>
> -------------------------------
>
> NO SPAMMING ALLOW!!!
> Frank

Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say is
that every silver lining has a touch of gray.

Alias

http://www.ubuntu.com/
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

measekite wrote:
> Although there is a lack of Linux ports for some Mac OS X and
> Microsoft Windows programs in domains such as desktop publishing and
> professional audio, applications roughly equivalent to those available
> for Mac and Windows are available for Linux.
>
> Most Linux distributions provide a program for browsing a list of
> thousands of free software applications that have already been tested
> and configured for a specific distribution.
>
> Many free software titles that are popular on Windows, such as Pidgin,
> Mozilla Firefox, Openoffice.org, and GIMP, are available for Linux. A
> growing amount of proprietary desktop software is also supported under
> Linux, examples being Adobe Flash Player, Acrobat Reader, Matlab, Nero
> Burning ROM, Opera, Google Picasa, RealPlayer, and Skype. In the field
> of animation and visual effects, most high end software, such as
> AutoDesk Maya, Softimage XSI and Apple Shake, is available for Linux,
> Windows and/or Mac OS X. CrossOver is a proprietary solution based on
> the open source Wine project that supports running older Windows
> versions of Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop versions through CS2.
> Microsoft Office 2007 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 are known not to work.
>
> Besides the free Windows compatibility layer Wine, most distributions
> offer Dual boot and X86 virtualization for running both Linux and
> Windows on the same computer.
>
> Linux's open nature allows distributed teams to localize Linux
> distributions for use in locales where localizing proprietary systems
> would not be cost-effective. For example the Sinhalese language
> version of the Knoppix distribution was available for a long time
> before Microsoft Windows XP was translated to Sinhalese. In this case
> the Lanka Linux User Group played a major part in developing the
> localized system by combining the knowledge of university professors,
> linguists, and local developers.
>
> The performance of Linux on the desktop has been a controversial
> topic, with at least one key Linux kernel developer, Con Kolivas,
> accusing the Linux community of favouring performance on servers. He
> quit Linux development because he was frustrated with this lack of
> focus on the desktop, and then gave a 'tell all' interview on the
> topic.
>
> Wikipedia.org
>
> See also: Linux gaming

And http://www.ubuntu.com/

Alias
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative



Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> measekite wrote:
>>
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> NO SPAMMING ALLOW!!!
>> Frank
>
> Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say
> is that every silver lining has a touch of gray.
>
> Alias
>
> http://www.ubuntu.com/

See

hehehe...LOL! Baa the jerk read this and as you can see by the nutcase's
response above he is in total agreement with the following words for he
had nothing to dispute what it says. That is why he deleted it. He
knows it is true and factual.

Now nobody has ever read anything in Wikipedia.org that Frankie Crankie
hehehe...LOL! Baa.. ever wrote.

Take bets readers. The jerk will probably delete this and have one of
his stupid canned responses that he copies because he does not have the
balls to logically refute what is said below. Nor does he have the
intelligence.

Although there is a lack of Linux ports for some Mac OS X and
Microsoft Windows programs in domains such as desktop publishing and
professional audio, applications roughly equivalent to those available
for Mac and Windows are available for Linux.

Most Linux distributions provide a program for browsing a list of
thousands of free software applications that have already been tested
and configured for a specific distribution.

Many free software titles that are popular on Windows, such as Pidgin,
Mozilla Firefox, Openoffice.org, and GIMP, are available for Linux. A
growing amount of proprietary desktop software is also supported under
Linux, examples being Adobe Flash Player, Acrobat Reader, Matlab, Nero
Burning ROM, Opera, Google Picasa, RealPlayer, and Skype. In the field
of animation and visual effects, most high end software, such as
AutoDesk Maya, Softimage XSI and Apple Shake, is available for Linux,
Windows and/or Mac OS X. CrossOver is a proprietary solution based on
the open source Wine project that supports running older Windows
versions of Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop versions through CS2.
Microsoft Office 2007 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 are known not to work.

Besides the free Windows compatibility layer Wine, most distributions
offer Dual boot and X86 virtualization for running both Linux and
Windows on the same computer.

Linux's open nature allows distributed teams to localize Linux
distributions for use in locales where localizing proprietary systems
would not be cost-effective. For example the Sinhalese language
version of the Knoppix distribution was available for a long time
before Microsoft Windows XP was translated to Sinhalese. In this case
the Lanka Linux User Group played a major part in developing the
localized system by combining the knowledge of university professors,
linguists, and local developers.

The performance of Linux on the desktop has been a controversial
topic, with at least one key Linux kernel developer, Con Kolivas,
accusing the Linux community of favouring performance on servers. He
quit Linux development because he was frustrated with this lack of
focus on the desktop, and then gave a 'tell all' interview on the
topic.

Wikipedia.org

See also: Linux gaming
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

Frank wrote:
>
> NO SPAMMING ALLOWED!
> Frank

Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say is
that every silver lining has a touch of gray. Oh, and you don't decide
what's allowed and wasn't isn't here. In fact you aren't in charge of
*anything* here, including your own mind.

Alias

http://www.ubuntu.com/
 
meashershithead aka, inkystinky the idiot moron loser...LOL!

meashershithead aka, inkystinky the idiot moron loser...LOL!

measekite wrote:

>>
>>> That's me, meashershithead...with a monkey on my back...
>
>
>
> I am famous! I am the jerk who is the Missing Link!


---------------------------------------------------

Yeah we all who you are inkystinky.
For those of you who don't know, read all about this loser using the
below link.

http://groups.google.com/groups/pro...ADEx8x8Ar5cT9MycNaTjCAv8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg

Frank
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative



"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:lL87k.16436$co7.11256@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Although there is a lack of Linux ports for some Mac OS X and
> Microsoft Windows programs in domains such as desktop publishing and
> professional audio, applications roughly equivalent to those available
> for Mac and Windows are available for Linux.
>
> Most Linux distributions provide a program for browsing a list of
> thousands of free software applications that have already been tested
> and configured for a specific distribution.

Don't forget that all the good OSS works on windows too, so you can keep
windows to run the games and other stuff that doesn't run on linux and run
the OSS if you have windows.
>
> Many free software titles that are popular on Windows, such as Pidgin,
> Mozilla Firefox, Openoffice.org, and GIMP, are available for Linux.

Yes they are available for windows so no need to switch to linux if you want
to run them.

> A
> growing amount of proprietary desktop software is also supported under
> Linux, examples being Adobe Flash Player, Acrobat Reader, Matlab, Nero
> Burning ROM, Opera, Google Picasa, RealPlayer, and Skype. In the field
> of animation and visual effects, most high end software, such as
> AutoDesk Maya, Softimage XSI and Apple Shake, is available for Linux,
> Windows and/or Mac OS X. CrossOver is a proprietary solution based on
> the open source Wine project that supports running older Windows
> versions of Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop versions through CS2.
> Microsoft Office 2007 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 are known not to work.

Also a lot of those programs don't work on 64 bit linux.
And without support for DRM you can't use many download services like the
BBC iPlayer or Sky anytime.
Ask alias as he couldn't protect his downloadable forms from being changed
on linux even though he felt he needed to.
Amusing how someone so against DRM actually thinks he needs the capabilities
of DRM.
"Listen to what I say not what I do" springs to mind.
>
> Besides the free Windows compatibility layer Wine, most distributions
> offer Dual boot and X86 virtualization for running both Linux and
> Windows on the same computer.

Why?
You can run the OSS on windows.

>
> Linux's open nature allows distributed teams to localize Linux
> distributions for use in locales where localizing proprietary systems
> would not be cost-effective. For example the Sinhalese language
> version of the Knoppix distribution was available for a long time
> before Microsoft Windows XP was translated to Sinhalese. In this case
> the Lanka Linux User Group played a major part in developing the
> localized system by combining the knowledge of university professors,
> linguists, and local developers.

Why would the average user care?
They just want to use their computer, the one that is currently working in
most cases.

>
> The performance of Linux on the desktop has been a controversial
> topic, with at least one key Linux kernel developer, Con Kolivas,
> accusing the Linux community of favouring performance on servers. He
> quit Linux development because he was frustrated with this lack of
> focus on the desktop, and then gave a 'tell all' interview on the
> topic.

Most people don't care as long as their games work OK, which they probably
don't on linux.

linux may be a viable choice for systems integrators and home builders but
its a bit pointless as a replacement for windows already on a machine as
they would be here.

>
> Wikipedia.org
>
> See also: Linux gaming
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
> news:lL87k.16436$co7.11256@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> Although there is a lack of Linux ports for some Mac OS X and
>> Microsoft Windows programs in domains such as desktop publishing and
>> professional audio, applications roughly equivalent to those available
>> for Mac and Windows are available for Linux.
>>
>> Most Linux distributions provide a program for browsing a list of
>> thousands of free software applications that have already been tested
>> and configured for a specific distribution.
>
> Don't forget that all the good OSS works on windows too, so you can keep
> windows to run the games and other stuff that doesn't run on linux and
> run the OSS if you have windows.
>>
>> Many free software titles that are popular on Windows, such as Pidgin,
>> Mozilla Firefox, Openoffice.org, and GIMP, are available for Linux.
>
> Yes they are available for windows so no need to switch to linux if you
> want to run them.
>
>> A
>> growing amount of proprietary desktop software is also supported under
>> Linux, examples being Adobe Flash Player, Acrobat Reader, Matlab, Nero
>> Burning ROM, Opera, Google Picasa, RealPlayer, and Skype. In the field
>> of animation and visual effects, most high end software, such as
>> AutoDesk Maya, Softimage XSI and Apple Shake, is available for Linux,
>> Windows and/or Mac OS X. CrossOver is a proprietary solution based on
>> the open source Wine project that supports running older Windows
>> versions of Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop versions through CS2.
>> Microsoft Office 2007 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 are known not to work.
>
> Also a lot of those programs don't work on 64 bit linux.
> And without support for DRM you can't use many download services like
> the BBC iPlayer or Sky anytime.
> Ask alias as he couldn't protect his downloadable forms from being
> changed on linux even though he felt he needed to.
> Amusing how someone so against DRM actually thinks he needs the
> capabilities of DRM.
> "Listen to what I say not what I do" springs to mind.
>>
>> Besides the free Windows compatibility layer Wine, most distributions
>> offer Dual boot and X86 virtualization for running both Linux and
>> Windows on the same computer.
>
> Why?
> You can run the OSS on windows.
>
>>
>> Linux's open nature allows distributed teams to localize Linux
>> distributions for use in locales where localizing proprietary systems
>> would not be cost-effective. For example the Sinhalese language
>> version of the Knoppix distribution was available for a long time
>> before Microsoft Windows XP was translated to Sinhalese. In this case
>> the Lanka Linux User Group played a major part in developing the
>> localized system by combining the knowledge of university professors,
>> linguists, and local developers.
>
> Why would the average user care?
> They just want to use their computer, the one that is currently working
> in most cases.
>
>>
>> The performance of Linux on the desktop has been a controversial
>> topic, with at least one key Linux kernel developer, Con Kolivas,
>> accusing the Linux community of favouring performance on servers. He
>> quit Linux development because he was frustrated with this lack of
>> focus on the desktop, and then gave a 'tell all' interview on the
>> topic.
>
> Most people don't care as long as their games work OK, which they
> probably don't on linux.
>
> linux may be a viable choice for systems integrators and home builders
> but its a bit pointless as a replacement for windows already on a
> machine as they would be here.
>
>>
>> Wikipedia.org
>>
>> See also: Linux gaming
>

Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say is
that every silver lining has a touch of gray.

Alias

http://www.ubuntu.com/
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

Alias wrote:

> Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say is
> that every silver lining has a touch of gray.
>
> Alias
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/
---------------------------------------
Get lost you lying linux troll!
Frank
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say
>> is that every silver lining has a touch of gray.
>>
>> Alias
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/
> ---------------------------------------
> Get lost you lying linux troll!
> Frank

Snort for us, Frank.

Alias
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative



dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
> news:lL87k.16436$co7.11256@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> Although there is a lack of Linux ports for some Mac OS X and
>> Microsoft Windows programs in domains such as desktop publishing and
>> professional audio, applications roughly equivalent to those available
>> for Mac and Windows are available for Linux.
>>
>> Most Linux distributions provide a program for browsing a list of
>> thousands of free software applications that have already been tested
>> and configured for a specific distribution.
>
> Don't forget that all the good OSS works on windows too, so you can
> keep windows to run the games and other stuff that doesn't run on
> linux and run the OSS if you have windows.

That is why I have a dual boot. Infrequently I used it if I need
Photoshop (most of the time Gimp does the job) Visual Studio and SQL
Server but for all of the rest of my personal use I stick with Ubuntu.
>>
>> Many free software titles that are popular on Windows, such as Pidgin,
>> Mozilla Firefox, Openoffice.org, and GIMP, are available for Linux.
>
> Yes they are available for windows so no need to switch to linux if
> you want to run them.
The 2.2 version of Gimp ran and printed great. But Gimp 2.4 has issues
printing with Windows and is not really usuable for printing. I have
not tested Gimp 2.4/5 on Linux for printing.
>
>> A
>> growing amount of proprietary desktop software is also supported under
>> Linux, examples being Adobe Flash Player, Acrobat Reader, Matlab, Nero
>> Burning ROM, Opera, Google Picasa, RealPlayer, and Skype. In the field
>> of animation and visual effects, most high end software, such as
>> AutoDesk Maya, Softimage XSI and Apple Shake, is available for Linux,
>> Windows and/or Mac OS X. CrossOver is a proprietary solution based on
>> the open source Wine project that supports running older Windows
>> versions of Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop versions through CS2.
>> Microsoft Office 2007 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 are known not to work.
>
> Also a lot of those programs don't work on 64 bit linux.
> And without support for DRM you can't use many download services like
> the BBC iPlayer or Sky anytime.
> Ask alias as he couldn't protect his downloadable forms from being
> changed on linux even though he felt he needed to.
> Amusing how someone so against DRM actually thinks he needs the
> capabilities of DRM.
> "Listen to what I say not what I do" springs to mind.
>>
>> Besides the free Windows compatibility layer Wine, most distributions
>> offer Dual boot and X86 virtualization for running both Linux and
>> Windows on the same computer.
>
> Why?
> You can run the OSS on windows.
>
>>
>> Linux's open nature allows distributed teams to localize Linux
>> distributions for use in locales where localizing proprietary systems
>> would not be cost-effective. For example the Sinhalese language
>> version of the Knoppix distribution was available for a long time
>> before Microsoft Windows XP was translated to Sinhalese. In this case
>> the Lanka Linux User Group played a major part in developing the
>> localized system by combining the knowledge of university professors,
>> linguists, and local developers.
>
> Why would the average user care?
> They just want to use their computer, the one that is currently
> working in most cases.
I just read a report by Microsoft that about 20% of the computers
running Windows have some kind of virus, trojan or some adware program
running on their computer and the user does not even know. They think
their machine is working the way it should.
>
>>
>> The performance of Linux on the desktop has been a controversial
>> topic, with at least one key Linux kernel developer, Con Kolivas,
>> accusing the Linux community of favouring performance on servers. He
>> quit Linux development because he was frustrated with this lack of
>> focus on the desktop, and then gave a 'tell all' interview on the
>> topic.
>
> Most people don't care as long as their games work OK, which they
> probably don't on linux.
>
> linux may be a viable choice for systems integrators and home builders
> but its a bit pointless as a replacement for windows already on a
> machine as they would be here.
>
>>
>> Wikipedia.org
>>
>> See also: Linux gaming
>
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative



Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>>
>> NO SPAMMING ALLOWED!
>> Frank
>
> Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say
> is that every silver lining has a touch of gray. Oh, and you don't
> decide what's allowed and wasn't isn't here. In fact you aren't in
> charge of *anything* here, including your own mind.
>
> Alias
Ah ha ha ha. But I cannot believe you said that. You really think he
has a mind that he is not in charge of. He has no mind. He is not even
in charge of his bottom. You know he cleans that like a cat. Did you
ever see a cat in action?

Now tell me yu believe that.
>
> http://www.ubuntu.com/
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative



Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry to see that you feel that way and the only thing I have to say
>>> is that every silver lining has a touch of gray.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>>
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/
>> ---------------------------------------
>> Get lost you lying linux troll!
>> Frank
>
> Snort for us, Frank.
>
> Alias
Oh Yeah... A drunkin oinker
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative



"measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
news:XFc7k.9086$jI5.292@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com...
>
>
> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>> "measekite" <inkystinky@oem.com> wrote in message
>> news:lL87k.16436$co7.11256@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>> Although there is a lack of Linux ports for some Mac OS X and
>>> Microsoft Windows programs in domains such as desktop publishing and
>>> professional audio, applications roughly equivalent to those available
>>> for Mac and Windows are available for Linux.
>>>
>>> Most Linux distributions provide a program for browsing a list of
>>> thousands of free software applications that have already been tested
>>> and configured for a specific distribution.
>>
>> Don't forget that all the good OSS works on windows too, so you can keep
>> windows to run the games and other stuff that doesn't run on linux and
>> run the OSS if you have windows.
>
> That is why I have a dual boot. Infrequently I used it if I need
> Photoshop (most of the time Gimp does the job) Visual Studio and SQL
> Server but for all of the rest of my personal use I stick with Ubuntu.

That's your choice, there is little advantage to running OSS on linux to
running OSS on windows, if any.
I use OSS when I want to but I don't have to reboot into linux to do it.

>>>
>>> Many free software titles that are popular on Windows, such as Pidgin,
>>> Mozilla Firefox, Openoffice.org, and GIMP, are available for Linux.
>>
>> Yes they are available for windows so no need to switch to linux if you
>> want to run them.
> The 2.2 version of Gimp ran and printed great. But Gimp 2.4 has issues
> printing with Windows and is not really usuable for printing. I have not
> tested Gimp 2.4/5 on Linux for printing.

I have no problems with gimp ATM.

>>
>>> A
>>> growing amount of proprietary desktop software is also supported under
>>> Linux, examples being Adobe Flash Player, Acrobat Reader, Matlab, Nero
>>> Burning ROM, Opera, Google Picasa, RealPlayer, and Skype. In the field
>>> of animation and visual effects, most high end software, such as
>>> AutoDesk Maya, Softimage XSI and Apple Shake, is available for Linux,
>>> Windows and/or Mac OS X. CrossOver is a proprietary solution based on
>>> the open source Wine project that supports running older Windows
>>> versions of Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop versions through CS2.
>>> Microsoft Office 2007 and Adobe Photoshop CS3 are known not to work.
>>
>> Also a lot of those programs don't work on 64 bit linux.
>> And without support for DRM you can't use many download services like the
>> BBC iPlayer or Sky anytime.
>> Ask alias as he couldn't protect his downloadable forms from being
>> changed on linux even though he felt he needed to.
>> Amusing how someone so against DRM actually thinks he needs the
>> capabilities of DRM.
>> "Listen to what I say not what I do" springs to mind.
>>>
>>> Besides the free Windows compatibility layer Wine, most distributions
>>> offer Dual boot and X86 virtualization for running both Linux and
>>> Windows on the same computer.
>>
>> Why?
>> You can run the OSS on windows.
>>
>>>
>>> Linux's open nature allows distributed teams to localize Linux
>>> distributions for use in locales where localizing proprietary systems
>>> would not be cost-effective. For example the Sinhalese language
>>> version of the Knoppix distribution was available for a long time
>>> before Microsoft Windows XP was translated to Sinhalese. In this case
>>> the Lanka Linux User Group played a major part in developing the
>>> localized system by combining the knowledge of university professors,
>>> linguists, and local developers.
>>
>> Why would the average user care?
>> They just want to use their computer, the one that is currently working
>> in most cases.
> I just read a report by Microsoft that about 20% of the computers running
> Windows have some kind of virus, trojan or some adware program running on
> their computer and the user does not even know. They think their machine
> is working the way it should.

That is the users, the same users would probably install malware on linux
boxes.
In fact uneducated users that think linux is safe are probably more
vulnerable than a windows user.
They don't bother with safe hex as they think they don't need to.
Alias is an example of such a user, he still thinks that patching a
vulnerability means he was safe before he applied the patch.
He never checks his machine properly and he doesn't have any decent anti
malware software to run like windows users do.
I bet you never check your box either.

>>
>>>
>>> The performance of Linux on the desktop has been a controversial
>>> topic, with at least one key Linux kernel developer, Con Kolivas,
>>> accusing the Linux community of favouring performance on servers. He
>>> quit Linux development because he was frustrated with this lack of
>>> focus on the desktop, and then gave a 'tell all' interview on the
>>> topic.
>>
>> Most people don't care as long as their games work OK, which they
>> probably don't on linux.
>>
>> linux may be a viable choice for systems integrators and home builders
>> but its a bit pointless as a replacement for windows already on a machine
>> as they would be here.
>>
>>>
>>> Wikipedia.org
>>>
>>> See also: Linux gaming
>>
 
Re: A Reason for the Alternative

Alias wrote:

I am a total fool so don't pay attention to anything I post!
It's all GARBAGE!
 

Similar threads

C
What Is AppImage? Benefits, Drawbacks, and Getting Started
Replies
0
Views
71
Christopher Tozzi
C
B
How to Install Ubuntu on Windows Services for Linux
Replies
0
Views
70
Brien Posey
B
G
where to get a product for server 2012 r2
Replies
1
Views
272
RSchwarz
RSchwarz
D
Lenovo Chromebook Flex 3i review: A likeable but flawed Chromebook
Replies
0
Views
91
David Steele
D
N
Windows 10 Can I use a VHDK to run Windows 10 from a USB?
Replies
0
Views
147
NetHunter321
N
Back
Top