Re: Microsoft Sets Up Digital Manners Police
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eW9o8Z51IHA.5512@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
| I think:
|
| => The fact that MS has patented the technology does not mean it's being
| used anywhere yet and people like you are being excessively alarmist;
Excuse me,, did I write the article... I don't think so...
|
| => It's a stretch to compare this technology to DRM;
|
| "You walk into a movie theater, the movie theater sets your mobile phone
to
| vibrate for you."
|
| => Excellent! Wish it would disable the ability to make calls while in the
| theater, too (bonus points for stuffing a sock in chatty people's mouths);
Oh me too. and the dirtier the sock the better... but this is the plus
side, the other side is that numerous people DO use their cells to copy
stage productions and other to their home computers. IT IS ILLEGAL, but is
turning off the ringer the intent or is it more likely to disable cell
phones entirely. {which I would support, kill the technology all together]
|
| "You stroll into a museum, the museum disables the flash on your camera or
| disables your camera altogether."
|
| => Excellent! Protects copyrights and fragile artwork;
|
| "You get too close to the ****pit, any wireless device at risk of
| interfering is shut off."
|
| => Excellent! Have it disable any wireless device altogether unless
| passengers are embarking or disembarking, and it'll be even better. Hope
| they use it in all forms of public tranportation, too.
| --
| ~PA Bear
|
www.KillAllTheLawyers.mvp
|
So the above is the up side, but there are ALWAYS two sides to any coin.
The writer(s) attempted to address the potentials that could be associated
with other uses. Blanking out all cell phones with cameras could be
extremely misused by enforcement agencies. Hacking the control systems
software could leave entire houses, buildings, or cities at the mercy of the
hacker or other criminals.
Let's say you have your home controlled, using these controls and software,
someone hacks the system while you and your family are in the home, say at
night.
There is no automatic call to the security agency because its part of the
networked control system and has been disabled.
There's no phone system, because that was tied in as well.
There's no cell phones because your cells were tied in via their IDs.
No lights, they were controlled by the system.
Your electronic locks are disabled.
Your video security cameras and devices have also been disabled.
Your cars are disabled as they were tied in also.
Your hand gun or other you bought for protection has an electronically
"safety" which has also been locked/disabled so it can't be used.
Now explain WHY you think this is good technology.. oh wait, you were
likely beaten into coma or killed during this crime. So was the rest of your
family... guess your opinion is now non-existant, as you no longer exist.
To ignore the other potential uses while keying on those "things you want"
because they annoy you, would seem to be another instance of placing a
bullseye on your forehead, handing out sledge hammers, publicly posting your
"full responsibility statement' in which you and your attorneys obsolve any
others of responsibility, and asking people to hit the bullseye to prove
your invincable. I would bet your not.
|
|
| MEB wrote:
| > Hmm, seems Microsoft may not be content with the present DRM technology,
| > seems intent on extending device control.
| >
| > Whatcha tink???
| >
| >
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/06/13/microsoft-sets-up-digital-manners-police
|
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
--
_________