Re: Best Registry Cleaner for vista
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:09:59 -0600, Bruce Chambers
<bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote:
>Adam Albright wrote:
>>
>>
>> I've been working with PC's for nearly 30 years and main frames before
>> that.
>
>
> That's awfully hard to believe, given your usual posting style is more
>reminiscent of a 14-year-old using the family computer when his parents
>are out.
I couldn't care less what the gang of regular fakers (you included)
post here. Time after time I've proved them either flat out wrong,
supplying incomplete or inaccurate information or deliberately biased
or misleading information or trying to pass off their opinions as
facts.
>But then, given the fact that PC's as we know them haven't
>existed for anywhere near 30 years yet (certainly no Windows PC with a
>registry), and that anything to do with main frames is completely
>irrelevant...., I'd have to conclude that your claims of experience are
>spurious, at best.
Obviously you don't know your history. PC's (personal computers)
arrived on the scene long before there ever a OS called Windows or a
company called Microsoft. Maybe next time taking ten seconds to do
some simple research on Google would prevent you from looking like a
fool.
http://www.old-computers.com/history/timeline.asp
http://www.intel.com/museum/archives/pctimeline.htm
> Do a Google search for registry cleaner reviews or perfoemance tests.
>You'll get hundreds of marketing links from people selling registry
>cleaners, or those sites that advertise them, but none from any
>independent laboratory that's actually tested them. Why is that?
Again you simply don't know what you're talking about, but you've
demonstrated that in the past. <wink>