DirectX

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnsuth@nospam.com.au
  • Start date Start date
J

johnsuth@nospam.com.au

Guest
In Win XP Pro x64 SP2 dxdiag.exe 64bit wrongly reports the CPU as AMD64, while
32 bit correctly reports Intel.

System Information reports the CPU correctly.

I downloaded directx_jun2008_redist.exe, expanded it and ran dxsetup.exe. It
seemed to go through an install process and I rebooted.

However dxdiag.exe reports no change to dx file dates and the CPU information is
still wrong.

This matters because all the 64 bit display drivers that don't work are placed
by the NVIDIA installer in c:\NVIDIA\Win2KAMD64\xxx. I want to be sure I am
installing drivers for Intel CPU, not AMD.

What should I do next?
 
Re: DirectX

The AMD64 report is correct. It does not mean it thinks you have a cpu made
by AMD. It just means that ALL 64bit cpus that support the x86 instruction
set as well as the 64bit extensions are in the class "AMD64." Even Intel's
EMT64 cpus. Since the AMD64 cpus were the first cpus in this class to reach
the market, the class is named for them. The x86 class was named for the
Intel 8086, the first cpu in that class.

System info is reporting the specific make and model cpu and graphics
adaptor.

<johnsuth@nospam.com.au> wrote in message
news:c1.2c.3B8pwD$0OX@PC1.BIGPOND.COM...
>
> In Win XP Pro x64 SP2 dxdiag.exe 64bit wrongly reports the CPU as AMD64,
> while
> 32 bit correctly reports Intel.
>
> System Information reports the CPU correctly.
>
> I downloaded directx_jun2008_redist.exe, expanded it and ran dxsetup.exe.
> It
> seemed to go through an install process and I rebooted.
>
> However dxdiag.exe reports no change to dx file dates and the CPU
> information is
> still wrong.
>
> This matters because all the 64 bit display drivers that don't work are
> placed
> by the NVIDIA installer in c:\NVIDIA\Win2KAMD64\xxx. I want to be sure I
> am
> installing drivers for Intel CPU, not AMD.
>
> What should I do next?
>
>
>
 
Re: DirectX

In message <c1.2c.3B8pwD$0OX@PC1.BIGPOND.COM> johnsuth@nospam.com.au
wrote:

>
>In Win XP Pro x64 SP2 dxdiag.exe 64bit wrongly reports the CPU as AMD64, while
>32 bit correctly reports Intel.
>
>System Information reports the CPU correctly.
>
>I downloaded directx_jun2008_redist.exe, expanded it and ran dxsetup.exe. It
>seemed to go through an install process and I rebooted.
>
>However dxdiag.exe reports no change to dx file dates and the CPU information is
>still wrong.
>
>This matters because all the 64 bit display drivers that don't work are placed
>by the NVIDIA installer in c:\NVIDIA\Win2KAMD64\xxx. I want to be sure I am
>installing drivers for Intel CPU, not AMD.

In short, this is correct. Originally known as x86-64, AMD renamed the
architecture to AMD64. Intel called theirs EM64T at one point. These
all mean the same thing.

This is different from Intel's Itanium (IA-64) architecture which was a
redesign rather then an augmentation of the traditional x86
architecture.

In short, all is well here.
 
Back
Top