Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new (also posted in server.setup)
Not sure which was the best group, so posting to both.
Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new
harddrive, it goes through the inital setup fine. It then gets into windows
and runs the server setup where i use the default options (its a 2 NIC
system with 1 NIC disabled to start with) I install everything and it goes
through happily installing exchange etc. It gets to server tools and says
that its installing IE6.0 and sits there. Ive left it for about 3 hours and
all that happens is that the setup.exe is using around 1gb of ram. From the
bottom installtion progress bar i would say its about 80% through the server
setup.
Im a bit stumped as to what this could be - any ideas would be great.
Re: Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new (also posted in server.setup)
Re: Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new (also posted in server.setup)
Hello Adrian,
There is still a better group for SBS, because a lot is different from "normal"
server:
microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
> Not sure which was the best group, so posting to both.
>
> Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new
> harddrive, it goes through the inital setup fine. It then gets into
> windows and runs the server setup where i use the default options (its
> a 2 NIC system with 1 NIC disabled to start with) I install
> everything and it goes through happily installing exchange etc. It
> gets to server tools and says that its installing IE6.0 and sits
> there. Ive left it for about 3 hours and all that happens is that the
> setup.exe is using around 1gb of ram. From the bottom installtion
> progress bar i would say its about 80% through the server setup.
>
> Im a bit stumped as to what this could be - any ideas would be great.
>
Re: Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new (also posted in server.setup)
Re: Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new (also posted in server.setup)
Thanks, i dont like cross-positng, but ill stick it there as well
"Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:ff16fb66a29048caaa44543c0df3@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Hello Adrian,
>
> There is still a better group for SBS, because a lot is different from
> "normal" server:
> microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> confers no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>> Not sure which was the best group, so posting to both.
>>
>> Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new
>> harddrive, it goes through the inital setup fine. It then gets into
>> windows and runs the server setup where i use the default options (its
>> a 2 NIC system with 1 NIC disabled to start with) I install
>> everything and it goes through happily installing exchange etc. It
>> gets to server tools and says that its installing IE6.0 and sits
>> there. Ive left it for about 3 hours and all that happens is that the
>> setup.exe is using around 1gb of ram. From the bottom installtion
>> progress bar i would say its about 80% through the server setup.
>>
>> Im a bit stumped as to what this could be - any ideas would be great.
>>
>
>
Re: Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new (also posted in server.setup)
Re: Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a new (also posted in server.setup)
Hello Adrian,
Crossposting is fine, because if you add all groups to one posting you can
any answer posted to the different groups. So i think you mean multiposting,
where you have to switch between all groups.
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
> Thanks, i dont like cross-positng, but ill stick it there as well
>
> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message
> news:ff16fb66a29048caaa44543c0df3@msnews.microsoft.com...
>
>> Hello Adrian,
>>
>> There is still a better group for SBS, because a lot is different
>> from
>> "normal" server:
>> microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>> Best regards
>>
>> Meinolf Weber
>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
>> confers no rights.
>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>>> Not sure which was the best group, so posting to both.
>>>
>>> Ive just tried reinstalling an sbs2003 server from scratch onto a
>>> new harddrive, it goes through the inital setup fine. It then gets
>>> into windows and runs the server setup where i use the default
>>> options (its a 2 NIC system with 1 NIC disabled to start with) I
>>> install everything and it goes through happily installing exchange
>>> etc. It gets to server tools and says that its installing IE6.0 and
>>> sits there. Ive left it for about 3 hours and all that happens is
>>> that the setup.exe is using around 1gb of ram. From the bottom
>>> installtion progress bar i would say its about 80% through the
>>> server setup.
>>>
>>> Im a bit stumped as to what this could be - any ideas would be
>>> great.
>>>
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.