Ad-Aware 2007

[oops!!]

Updates available today.

Zee

 

[jeanette]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

you win.....!

J

"oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Updates available today.
>
> Zee
>
>

 

[Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do the
Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for
definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently have
91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
up-to-date

"jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> you win.....!
>
> J
>
> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Updates available today.
>>
>> Zee
>>
>>
>
>

 

[Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

No confirmation........don't think I am getting it......guess the server is
weighed down.
Heirloom, old and so am I

"jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> you win.....!
>
> J
>
> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Updates available today.
>>
>> Zee
>>
>>
>
>

 

[oops!!]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007


Yuppie!!!
)



"jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> you win.....!
>
> J
>
> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Updates available today.
>>
>> Zee
>>
>>
>
>

 

[richard]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

Heirloom wrote:
> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do the
> Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for
> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently have
> 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
> up-to-date
>
> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> you win.....!
>>
>> J
>>
>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> Updates available today.
>>>
>>> Zee
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
richard

 

[oops!!]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007


True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.

Oh well, there goes the coat.


Zee





"richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Heirloom wrote:
>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do
>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for
>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently
>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
>> up-to-date
>>
>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> you win.....!
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> Updates available today.
>>>>
>>>> Zee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
> richard

 

[richard]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

oops!! wrote:
> True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.
>
> Oh well, there goes the coat.
>
>
> Zee

Ah, heck. At least take the buttons.
richard

>
>
>
>
>
> "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
> news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Heirloom wrote:
>>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do
>>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for
>>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently
>>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
>>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
>>> up-to-date
>>>
>>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
>>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> you win.....!
>>>>
>>>> J
>>>>
>>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Updates available today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Zee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
>> richard
>
>

 

[Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that
sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, but,
that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or
not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.
Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,
anyway.
(I know, that is little insurance)


"oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.
>
> Oh well, there goes the coat.
>
>
> Zee
>
>
>
>
>
> "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
> news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Heirloom wrote:
>>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do
>>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for
>>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently
>>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
>>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
>>> up-to-date
>>>
>>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
>>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> you win.....!
>>>>
>>>> J
>>>>
>>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Updates available today.
>>>>>
>>>>> Zee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
>> richard
>
>

 

[Rocky T Squirrel]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

Heirloom,
My update shows the following.
SE1R186 06.08.2007
files 1389441
total 4705296
sig.. 4662587
ref.. 42197
sig.. tot.. 119159
CSI fing.. 8912
CSI data 567343

not sure if that my box or the update.. )
it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection
speed..
RTS

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that
> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,
but,
> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or
> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.
> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,
> anyway.
> (I know, that is little insurance)
>
>
> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >
> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.
> >
> > Oh well, there goes the coat.
> >
> >
> > Zee
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >> Heirloom wrote:
> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I
do
> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking
for
> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I
currently
> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
> >>> up-to-date
> >>>
> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >>>> you win.....!
> >>>>
> >>>> J
> >>>>
> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> >>>>> Updates available today.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Zee
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
> >> richard
> >
> >
>
>

 

[oops!!]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

Again, this is funny...

I think we are talking same number of signatures, different version numbers.

My home system updated to 0014.0000, could we be talking revised versions???

No, 2 updates on the same day, see here:

http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/

Zee


"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that
> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,
> but, that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current,
> or not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.
> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,
> anyway.
> (I know, that is little insurance)
>
>
> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>
>> True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.
>>
>> Oh well, there goes the coat.
>>
>>
>> Zee
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
>> news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Heirloom wrote:
>>>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I
>>>> do the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking
>>>> for definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I
>>>> currently have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
>>>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
>>>> up-to-date
>>>>
>>>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>> you win.....!
>>>>>
>>>>> J
>>>>>
>>>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Updates available today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Zee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
>>> richard
>>
>>
>
>

 

[Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your
response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some difference
in those.
Heirloom, old and I think it's right


"Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net...
> Heirloom,
> My update shows the following.
> SE1R186 06.08.2007
> files 1389441
> total 4705296
> sig.. 4662587
> ref.. 42197
> sig.. tot.. 119159
> CSI fing.. 8912
> CSI data 567343
>
> not sure if that my box or the update.. )
> it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection
> speed..
> RTS
>
> "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
> news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that
>> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,
> but,
>> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or
>> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.
>> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,
>> anyway.
>> (I know, that is little insurance)
>>
>>
>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.
>> >
>> > Oh well, there goes the coat.
>> >
>> >
>> > Zee
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
>> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> >> Heirloom wrote:
>> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I
> do
>> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking
> for
>> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I
> currently
>> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
>> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is
>> >>> up-to-date
>> >>>
>> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
>> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> >>>> you win.....!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> J
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> >>>>> Updates available today.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Zee
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
>> >> richard
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

 

[webster72n]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007


Thanks for both, "oops!!".
All's well at this castel (for 'castle'). <H>.

"oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Updates available today.
>
> Zee
>
>

 

[Rocky T Squirrel]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

Heirloom,
Yep the SE, I'm also still runing the ME OS and I've heard that SE is
best for that..
CU
RTS

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
news:u1iOhbi2HHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your
> response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some
difference
> in those.
> Heirloom, old and I think it's right
>
>
> "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net...
> > Heirloom,
> > My update shows the following.
> > SE1R186 06.08.2007
> > files 1389441
> > total 4705296
> > sig.. 4662587
> > ref.. 42197
> > sig.. tot.. 119159
> > CSI fing.. 8912
> > CSI data 567343
> >
> > not sure if that my box or the update.. )
> > it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection
> > speed..
> > RTS
> >
> > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
> > news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> >> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that
> >> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,
> > but,
> >> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current,
or
> >> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.
> >> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I
shouldn't,
> >> anyway.
> >> (I know, that is little insurance)
> >>
> >>
> >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >> >
> >> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I
missed.
> >> >
> >> > Oh well, there goes the coat.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Zee
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >> >> Heirloom wrote:
> >> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update.
I
> > do
> >> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second
"Looking
> > for
> >> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I
> > currently
> >> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
> >> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine
is
> >> >>> up-to-date
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
> >> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >> >>>> you win.....!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> J
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> >> >>>>> Updates available today.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Zee
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
> >> >> richard
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

 

[Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

Rocky, I believe that to be correct. There is a new update out today for
the 2007 (and maybe SE), but, it is only for Ad-Watch which the free
versions do not have. Take care, my friend.......
Heirloom, old and sure is hot today

"Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message
newsPOdnXsPrrxAEybbnZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@vci.net...
> Heirloom,
> Yep the SE, I'm also still runing the ME OS and I've heard that SE is
> best for that..
> CU
> RTS
>
> "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
> news:u1iOhbi2HHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your
>> response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some
> difference
>> in those.
>> Heirloom, old and I think it's right
>>
>>
>> "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net...
>> > Heirloom,
>> > My update shows the following.
>> > SE1R186 06.08.2007
>> > files 1389441
>> > total 4705296
>> > sig.. 4662587
>> > ref.. 42197
>> > sig.. tot.. 119159
>> > CSI fing.. 8912
>> > CSI data 567343
>> >
>> > not sure if that my box or the update.. )
>> > it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection
>> > speed..
>> > RTS
>> >
>> > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message
>> > news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> >> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you,
>> >> that
>> >> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,
>> > but,
>> >> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current,
> or
>> >> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.
>> >> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I
> shouldn't,
>> >> anyway.
>> >> (I know, that is little insurance)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> >> >
>> >> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I
> missed.
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh well, there goes the coat.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Zee
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message
>> >> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> >> >> Heirloom wrote:
>> >> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update.
> I
>> > do
>> >> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second
> "Looking
>> > for
>> >> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I
>> > currently
>> >> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??
>> >> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine
> is
>> >> >>> up-to-date
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> >> >>>> you win.....!
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> J
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> >> >>>>> Updates available today.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Zee
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.
>> >> >> richard
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>